"watch time" YouTube

back to index

74 results

Like, Comment, Subscribe: Inside YouTube's Chaotic Rise to World Domination

by Mark Bergen  · 5 Sep 2022  · 642pp  · 141,888 words

one goal above others. * * * • • • Cristos Goodrow had sent his email right as YouTube’s leaders convened. For maximum attention, he sent it to all of them and gave it a compelling subject line: “Watch time, and only watch time.” Goodrow came to YouTube after two decades programming software for companies across Silicon Valley and for Google

gridlock and lack of clear marching orders. In his prognosis he proposed rewiring YouTube’s machines to favor just one outcome: how long people stayed with videos. “All other things being equal, our goal is to increase watch time,” he wrote in the email. Goodrow liked to debate this idea with fellow

rising nemesis, Facebook, flourished not just by racking up accounts but by keeping people engaged. TV certainly did. So YouTube would keep people engaged by promoting videos that racked up the most watch time. Will it make the boat go faster? Then do it! Now they just needed a big, hairy, audacious goal

?” he asked. “When could we reasonably do that?” * * * • • • Mehrotra announced the new OKR the following year at YouTube’s annual leadership summit in Los Angeles: YouTube would work to get one billion hours of watch time every day within four years. “Look, I know what you’re all thinking,” Mehrotra began. Impossible. Once trained

unit plotted trajectories on a chart, which they called their “Break the Internet Graph.” Goodrow’s coders began rewiring YouTube’s search and recommendation system to promote videos that generated the best watch time, not the most views. Only videos that made their boat go faster. One team was not so enthusiastic. Bing

email in early 2012 from Mehrotra inviting him to a room in San Bruno nicknamed the product den. Before setting its audacious goal, YouTube wanted to test prioritizing watch time in its algorithm. Inside the den, Chen was told he had five days to prepare an explanation of the planned change for creators

“Your algorithm has a bug.” O’Brien was responsible for YouTube’s search product and neatly fit Google’s product manager mold—a fast talker with software know-how and better people skills than coders. Once YouTube switched its system to favor watch time, some staff were not prepared for the immediate upheaval it

the clip, which had been selected to run ads, nearly halved. It didn’t help that no one had updated the“analytics” web dashboard for YouTubers to show “watch time” as a figure. They saw “views” and saw those views plummeting but had no idea why. The company had to convince

the redesign that drove viewers away from hitmakers like him. Months later, when YouTube moved to favor watch time, that trend worsened. Penna’s management company, Big Frame, tracked stats for several YouTubers and watched them all drop practically overnight. YouTube’s blog post introducing the switch had less than helpful advice: How can you

be this now.” Really? How do you know? No one really did. But in a few months, the main lever became clear: only watch time. When he began on YouTube, Wong carefully studied the science of virality, testing the right ingredients. Now its formula felt painfully simple. “Okay,” he realized. “We’re just

Disneyland, and Wong saw swarms of attendees all start to hold cameras at arm’s length, pointed back at themselves. * * * • • • No YouTube genre benefited from the switch to favor watch time more than “Let’s Play.” That was the name given to footage of video gamers filming themselves playing popular or deeply bizarre

had raised $1.5 million in venture capital. But many of Maker’s channels had scripted, costly productions, and YouTube’s ad intake didn’t always cover expenses. Once YouTube switched to watch time, the economic tilt became impossible to ignore. Gamers filmed themselves playing and talking. Maybe they edited a bit, added some

teed up one video after another. After the Google meeting the Jhos saw even more traffic on their site. YouTube let them into its ads program. A year later YouTube switched to prioritize watch time, and very quickly Mother Goose Club got company. It began with BluCollection, an anonymous account that only posted videos

for the eyes”—colorful, sugary, craved. But plenty of videos were educational and healthy, too, YouTube thought. (It surely had more of those than TV did, if you added the hours up.) Delicious videos certainly improved watch time, although some staff expressed concern that this type of viewing could be fleeting. After gorging

broccoli”). Some drafted broccoli OKRs. The Torso division, which managed its ever-sprawling creator class, drew plans to get 30 percent of watch time from Nutritious videos. Coders working on YouTube search and ads all discussed the effort. Then, in a fateful twist, these discussions petered out. No company-wide objectives and key

movies, a foil to Apple’s iTunes. Rubin’s coders also controlled YouTube’s app on Android phones. Several directors at YouTube felt that it should run Google’s music service instead—music videos, after the watch-time transition, were exploding—and that YouTube should control its own app. They pushed Kamangar, who usually avoided

to practice, fail and laugh at yourself,” a fashion observer explained in The New York Times the year Nilsen debuted. After the watch-time transition, beauty gurus shot up in YouTube’s charts. Nilsen could post ten- or fifteen-minute-long videos with relatively little editing. She expanded beyond makeup tips and skin

the concept certainly did. More viewers moved from one recommended clip to the next, bringing in more watch time and, just as critically, more data. At San Bruno, YouTube staff rarely watched videos, but they watched video data constantly. In particular they paid attention to the seesaw of data on ads and viewership

told his coders he was willing to take a 1 percent drop in watch time for a 2 percent increase in ads, but nothing more. Engineers ran tests for Dallas, tweaking experiences for certain viewers without telling them. At YouTube Stats, a meeting Mehrotra held every Friday, they presented the befuddling results:

the machines found a way to show more ads and improve watch time. “How can it possibly be positive on both?” Mehrotra asked. “No idea,” an

met with Google’s networking staff, which invited her to do so: they were freaked out about the strain YouTube’s hefty watch-time goal was placing on company servers and wanted to curb the plans to relieve stress on bandwidth. There’s no evidence anyone warned her about

2005, mixing regular lefty jabs at the press and politicians with clickable tabloid fare. Uygur saw few conservative shock jocks on YouTube, until around the watch-time transition, when they “started popping up all over the place.” Many popped up with videos mocking Uygur’s show or his name; tagging footage with “

careful not to overuse ugly slurs or call for outright violence, the kind of invective YouTube removed. If the Brain network was set to maximize watch time, which it was, those sorts of videos might perform very well. YouTube had begun to filter videos promoting Islamist terror, restricting certain clips by age or deleting

produce twenty videos a week across her channels, a new kind of juggling. And then YouTube’s second generation and all the demanding social apps arrived. Kay adapted to YouTube’s watch-time change, uploading gaming and makeup videos. At YouTube events she learned that her fans were mostly teenage girls. Kay, then in her

, the company converted a 40,000-square-foot airplane hangar into a state-of-the-art production studio for select creators called YouTube Space. But YouTube’s algorithm still wanted the opposite. It desired watch time and daily views; videos that delivered that were usually made cheap. But they rose to the top. One

tracked videos about particular world or historical events. The French engineer intentionally noted how such a thing could improve YouTube watch time. Chaslot won praise for it from peers but couldn’t find any interested YouTube managers, and he soon received a negative performance review (a “ding”). Google let him go. He had more

the channels that uncritically cheered Trump, such as Alex Jones, under the guise of commentary or punditry. Bundled together, they had more watch time than legitimate news outlets on YouTube. This is a crisis, the staffer pleaded. If YouTube brass agreed, they didn’t say so. But a certifiable crisis came soon enough, and

using these surveys and thumbs next to videos to gauge satisfaction. To fix its quality crisis years before, YouTube had switched its gears from views to watch time, but that didn’t cut it anymore. (YouTube never specified the precise equation for its ranking system to outsiders.) When videos suggested the earth was flat

popular but what kind of videos were made. Also, when the company wanted to, it went in and turned the dials. Consider Minecraft. After the watch-time transition, YouTube’s audience clearly loved Minecraft, heaving the niche game into the mainstream. At one point, in May 2015, fourteen slots on

. (Wikipedia, after Wojcicki spoke, said it had not been informed of this plan.) Wojcicki also introduced a term she had begun using frequently at YouTube. Its algorithms favored watch time, daily viewers, and satisfaction, but they had added a fourth metric. “We’re starting to build in that concept of responsibility,” she told

website she documented this corporate crackdown, which she viewed as retaliation for her outspoken challenge to the meat industry. She posted three screenshots of her YouTube dashboard, showing watch time, views, and subscribers on her videos and how they kept falling. One post listed 307,658 minutes of

watch time and 366,591 views. “Your estimated revenue,” the YouTube dashboard read, “$0.10.” This she circled in red pixels. “There is no equal growth opportunity on YouTube,” her website blared in bright, frantic text. “Your channel will grow if

their videos and use an overall pool of ad money instead, doling out checks based on engagement—the likes, comments, and watch time videos got. This felt fairer and more sustainable. YouTube briefed a few creators on its ambitious plan. In March, Wojcicki presented it to her staff, telling them, “Please don’t

. Nearly a decade after tilting its system toward longer videos, YouTube was now paying for shorter ones. Of course, the main algorithmic metric for Shorts, like that for all of YouTube, remained watch time. Most signs indicated that TikTok did chip away at YouTube’s dominance. A 2021 report revealed that for the first time

2020, 388 and quality content, 175 responsibility metric, 328 screeners’ role in training, 320 and skeptics of YouTube, 223 skin-detection by, 255–56 titles of content chosen for, 172 watch time favored in, 156–60 and YouTube Kids app, 238, 244–45 Allen & Company (investment bank), 49 Alphabet, 257 alt-right, 263, 269

viewers, 252, 254 emphasis on growth of, 91 and initiative to recruit female viewers, 369 and length of viewing sessions, 252 (see also watch time of audience) loyalty to YouTube, 394 number of videos watched daily, 49, 140 satisfaction ratings of, 296–97 See also engagement of users Auletta, Ken, 97 authoritative sources

of, 323–24 video responses between, 39 volume of uploaded material, 6, 49, 140, 215–16, 389 and watch time of users, 157, 158–60 and Wojcicki, 261, 373 women’s experience as, 303 and YouTube Creator Summit, 250–51, 253, 262, 289–90 See also partner program; payment and income of creators

employees, 317–20, 327, 349 diversity hiring in, 301 as parents, 174 and perks at YouTube offices, 148 poached from Yahoo, 52 and Wojcicki, 211–13 engagement of users emphasis placed on, 154, 158–59 (see also watch time of audience) and machine learning applied to advertising, 191 payments based on (Moneyball proposal

, 388 neural networks in, 233–35 as new feature, 23 Reinforce program behind, 298 and right-wing content, 223, 224, 227 and watch time, 154, 155 See also algorithms of YouTube re-creation aesthetic, 27 Reddit, 218, 270 Redstone, Sumner, 60, 62, 76, 253–54 refugees, 264 Reinforce program, 298 related videos sidebar

and word of funded channels, 133 Walmart, 286 war crimes, archives of, 296 Warner, Mark, 341 Warren, Elizabeth, 365 watch time of audience and billion-hours goal of YouTube, 228, 270 and COVID-19, 376 and “Delicious”/ “Nutritious” content, 174 and engagement-based payments, 337 and machine learning, 191–92, 233 of pro

Blank Space: A Cultural History of the Twenty-First Century

by W. David Marx  · 18 Nov 2025  · 642pp  · 142,332 words

ultimately the success of its hosts, Facebook and YouTube. These platforms, not individual websites, had become the backbone of the internet, reshaping the logic of cultural creation. After brief experiments in elite curation, platforms embraced a laissez-faire approach, prioritizing user numbers and “watch time” over quality content. The twentieth-century content industry

The Dream of Europe: Travels in the Twenty-First Century

by Geert Mak  · 27 Oct 2021  · 722pp  · 223,701 words

were followed keenly – in that sense, the continent was far more united than in 1999. But the scenes in the Commons gradually became impossible to watch. Time and again the British premier was chased around the arena like a wounded bull, to laughter and jeers, speared from all sides till she bled

Walled Culture: How Big Content Uses Technology and the Law to Lock Down Culture and Keep Creators Poor

by Glyn Moody  · 26 Sep 2022  · 295pp  · 66,912 words

YouTube’s chief business officer, Robert Kyncl, told a conference: ‘We are roughly neck-and-neck with Netflix on revenue, actually we are slightly larger and growing faster.’597 Kyncl also revealed that video represents 25% of YouTube ‘watch time’, 50% is YouTube creators and 25% is music

Leadership by Algorithm: Who Leads and Who Follows in the AI Era?

by David de Cremer  · 25 May 2020  · 241pp  · 70,307 words

/customer-service-trends.html 34 Hoffman, P. (1986). ‘The Unity of Descartes’ Man,’ The Philosophical Review 95, 339-369. 35 Google Duplex (2018). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D5VN 56jQMWM Chapter 2: The Leadership Challenge in the Algorithm Age The machine age arrived a long time ago, but today’s

example of how utilitarian companies really employ their algorithms is the discussion surrounding how the YouTube algorithm makes recommendations to viewers. The metric that YouTube uses to decide on their recommendations for you as a customer (i.e. watch time) is not aimed at helping customers to get what they want, but rather to

Don't Be Evil: How Big Tech Betrayed Its Founding Principles--And All of US

by Rana Foroohar  · 5 Nov 2019  · 380pp  · 109,724 words

(often correctly) that this was what would keep them coming back and watching more—thus allowing YouTube to make more money from the advertising sold against that content. But because the subtler algorithms resulted in lower “watch time” than the original ones, the project was dropped. Chaslot was gutted; he believed that these

-popping content that pays off in shorter—albeit more immediately profitable—bursts. But the powers that be disagreed. Their mentality, according to Chaslot, was that “watch time was an easy metric, and that if users want racist content, ‘well, what can you do?’ ” This was a culture in which the metrics were

undermining the fabric of democracy.3 A spokesperson at YouTube, which doesn’t contradict the basic facts of Chaslot’s account, told me in 2018 that the company’s recommendation system has “changed substantially over time” and now includes other metrics beyond watch time, including consumer surveys and the number of shares and

‘Cult of Travis,’ ” Financial Times, March 9, 2017. 2. Video of Kalanick arguing with an Uber driver over fares can be accessed here: https://www.youtube.com/​watch?v=gTEDYCkNqns. 3. Katy Steinmetz and Matt Vella, “Uber Fail: Upheaval at the World’s Most Valuable Startup Is a Wake-Up Call

System Error: Where Big Tech Went Wrong and How We Can Reboot

by Rob Reich, Mehran Sahami and Jeremy M. Weinstein  · 6 Sep 2021

, “the true scarce commodity is increasingly human attention.” When users spend more of their valuable time watching YouTube videos, they must perforce be happier with those videos. It’s a virtuous circle: More satisfied viewership (watch time) begets more advertising, which incentivizes more content creators, which draws more viewership. Our true currency wasn

’t views or clicks—it was watch time. The logic was undeniable. YouTube needed a new core metric. To argue for this new metric, he

wrote an email to the YouTube executive team arguing that “Watch time, and only watch time” should be the objective to improve at YouTube. In essence, he equated watch time with user happiness: if a person

lawn, or even smoking—make us happy or contribute to our well-being. Yet the focus on watch time ultimately became the basis of one of YouTube’s most significant objectives: to reach 1 billion hours of watch time per day by 2016—a goal it ultimately surpassed. To be fair, Goodrow notes that in

pursuing its goal, YouTube did sometimes take actions that had a negative impact on watch time if the company believed that the action was in the user’s interest: “For example, we made it a policy to stop

recommending click-baity videos.” But he followed up by saying “We never did anything without measuring impact on watch time.” Left out seem to be questions such as whether it’s really healthy for children (or adults, for that matter) to watch an endless stream

of videos; whether conspiracy theory videos by flat-earthers should be recommended with the same gusto as more benign videos; or what the race for watch time could do to the ecosystem of content producers—who are paid by advertisers when their videos are watched—who might create more outrageous videos in

order to have their content be the centerpiece of the user’s coveted watch time. Doerr himself acknowledged that management systems such as OKRs can have their faults, writing, “Like any management system, OKRs may be executed well or badly

difficult to factor it into the metric being optimized. It’s easier to just assume that watching more videos must be making users happier. Measuring watch time is straightforward; determining whether users are actually happier, more factually informed, or politically radicalized, is not. OKRs are just a more recent manifestation of the

her article a decade later, she could easily have included more examples from the tech world, such as whether an extreme focus on increasing video watch time may have left little room for considering the political, social, and health impacts of millions of people being glued to their screens. Of course organizations

slide”: Ibid., 7. “the marriage of Google”: Ibid., 11. “I think it’s worked out”: Ibid., xi. “As Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella”: Ibid., 161. “Watch time, and only watch time”: Ibid. “For example, we made it”: Ibid., 164. “Like any management system”: Ibid., 9. “Goals Gone Wild”: Lisa D. Ordóñez et al., “Goals Gone

Waal, Frans de, 92 Wales, Jimmy, 195 Walker, Darren, 180 Wall Street Journal, 42–43 Warren, Elizabeth, 181, 256 washing machines and laundry, 157–58 watch time metric, 34 Watchdog.net, xxiii Weapons of Math Destruction (O’Neil), 98 Weinberg, Gabriel, 135–36 Weinstein, Jeremy, xv–xvi, 72 Weld, William, 130 Western

Off the Edge: Flat Earthers, Conspiracy Culture, and Why People Will Believe Anything

by Kelly Weill  · 22 Feb 2022

that time, YouTube veered away from recommending videos based on their relevance to someone’s previous viewing habits and started recommending videos that viewers were likely to spend more time watching. “It’s not trying to optimize for relevance,” Chaslot told me. “It’s trying to optimize for watch time, or at

was working there.” Which videos kept people on the website the longest? “Extreme videos are extremely good for watch time,” he said. The bizarre, the fringe, and the impossible lured in the most viewers. So YouTube’s recommendation algorithm, at least before a major overhaul in 2019, prioritized the strange. The recommendations often

No Filter: The Inside Story of Instagram

by Sarah Frier  · 13 Apr 2020  · 484pp  · 114,613 words

win. The effect had already played out in other parts of the internet, where user-generated content reigns. On YouTube, the site’s algorithm gradually started to reward creators according to watch time, thinking that a longer time spent on a video meant it was engaging enough to be displayed higher in searches

The Future Is Faster Than You Think: How Converging Technologies Are Transforming Business, Industries, and Our Lives

by Peter H. Diamandis and Steven Kotler  · 28 Jan 2020  · 501pp  · 114,888 words

, 2018). 2010 speech at NYU law school: “The Virtues of Virtual Reality: How Immersive Technology Can Reduce Bias,” April 26, 2019 (video). See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vXxfkkINq8M. In 2016, when Nintendo’s Pokemon GO was downloaded almost a billion times: Lauren Musni, “Pokémon GO Surpasses the 1 Billion

,” 9To5Google, May 6, 2019. the soft-spoken Google CEO Sundar Pichai may have stolen back the crown: “Keynote (Google I/O ’18).” See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ogfYd705cRs. According to a recent Zendesk study: “The Impact of Customer Service on Customer Lifetime Value 2013.” See: https://www.zendesk.com

.cc.gatech.edu/~riedl/pubs/guzdial-fdg15.pdf. See also: “Artificial Intelligence System for Crowdsourcing Interactive Fiction” (video), September 1, 2016. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=1&v=znqw17aOrCs. From Passive to Active Video games with user-generated gameplay content: “Category: Video Games with User-Generated Gameplay Content,” Wikipedia. See

Kurzweil: Ray Kurzweil, author interview, 2018. See also this conversation between Peter and Ray where they discuss the concept of longevity escape velocity: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=2&v=SaOfLtoaKqw. Aubrey de Grey: Kira Peikoff, “Anti-Aging Pioneer Aubrey de Grey: ‘People in Middle Age Now Have a Fair Chance

The Non-Tinfoil Guide to EMFs

by Nicolas Pineault  · 6 Dec 2017

The Chaos Machine: The Inside Story of How Social Media Rewired Our Minds and Our World

by Max Fisher  · 5 Sep 2022  · 439pp  · 131,081 words

The Ones We've Been Waiting For: How a New Generation of Leaders Will Transform America

by Charlotte Alter  · 18 Feb 2020  · 504pp  · 129,087 words

Rigged: How the Media, Big Tech, and the Democrats Seized Our Elections

by Mollie Hemingway  · 11 Oct 2021  · 595pp  · 143,394 words

The Future of Money: How the Digital Revolution Is Transforming Currencies and Finance

by Eswar S. Prasad  · 27 Sep 2021  · 661pp  · 185,701 words

Cognitive Surplus: Creativity and Generosity in a Connected Age

by Clay Shirky  · 9 Jun 2010  · 236pp  · 66,081 words

Men Who Hate Women: From Incels to Pickup Artists, the Truth About Extreme Misogyny and How It Affects Us All

by Laura Bates  · 2 Sep 2020  · 364pp  · 119,398 words

Move Fast and Break Things: How Facebook, Google, and Amazon Cornered Culture and Undermined Democracy

by Jonathan Taplin  · 17 Apr 2017  · 222pp  · 70,132 words

The People vs Tech: How the Internet Is Killing Democracy (And How We Save It)

by Jamie Bartlett  · 4 Apr 2018  · 170pp  · 49,193 words

Blitzscaling: The Lightning-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Companies

by Reid Hoffman and Chris Yeh  · 14 Apr 2018  · 286pp  · 87,401 words

Apocalypse Never: Why Environmental Alarmism Hurts Us All

by Michael Shellenberger  · 28 Jun 2020

Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art

by James Nestor  · 25 May 2020  · 365pp  · 96,573 words

Who’s Raising the Kids?: Big Tech, Big Business, and the Lives of Children

by Susan Linn  · 12 Sep 2022  · 415pp  · 102,982 words

The Cryptopians: Idealism, Greed, Lies, and the Making of the First Big Cryptocurrency Craze

by Laura Shin  · 22 Feb 2022  · 506pp  · 151,753 words

Four Battlegrounds

by Paul Scharre  · 18 Jan 2023

Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity

by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson  · 15 May 2023  · 619pp  · 177,548 words

Bezonomics: How Amazon Is Changing Our Lives and What the World's Best Companies Are Learning From It

by Brian Dumaine  · 11 May 2020  · 411pp  · 98,128 words

Crushing It!: How Great Entrepreneurs Build Their Business and Influence—and How You Can, Too

by Gary Vaynerchuk  · 30 Jan 2018

Measure What Matters: How Google, Bono, and the Gates Foundation Rock the World With OKRs

by John Doerr  · 23 Apr 2018  · 280pp  · 71,268 words

Upstream: The Quest to Solve Problems Before They Happen

by Dan Heath  · 3 Mar 2020

Frenemies: The Epic Disruption of the Ad Business

by Ken Auletta  · 4 Jun 2018  · 379pp  · 109,223 words

The People vs. Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It

by Yascha Mounk  · 15 Feb 2018  · 497pp  · 123,778 words

Samsung Rising: The Inside Story of the South Korean Giant That Set Out to Beat Apple and Conquer Tech

by Geoffrey Cain  · 15 Mar 2020  · 540pp  · 119,731 words

New Laws of Robotics: Defending Human Expertise in the Age of AI

by Frank Pasquale  · 14 May 2020  · 1,172pp  · 114,305 words

Fancy Bear Goes Phishing: The Dark History of the Information Age, in Five Extraordinary Hacks

by Scott J. Shapiro  · 523pp  · 154,042 words

The Twittering Machine

by Richard Seymour  · 20 Aug 2019  · 297pp  · 83,651 words

Culture Warlords: My Journey Into the Dark Web of White Supremacy

by Talia Lavin  · 14 Jul 2020  · 231pp  · 71,299 words

We Are Bellingcat: Global Crime, Online Sleuths, and the Bold Future of News

by Eliot Higgins  · 2 Mar 2021  · 277pp  · 70,506 words

The Smart Wife: Why Siri, Alexa, and Other Smart Home Devices Need a Feminist Reboot

by Yolande Strengers and Jenny Kennedy  · 14 Apr 2020

The Lonely Century: How Isolation Imperils Our Future

by Noreena Hertz  · 13 May 2020  · 506pp  · 133,134 words

The Rise of the Network Society

by Manuel Castells  · 31 Aug 1996  · 843pp  · 223,858 words

Merchants of Truth: The Business of News and the Fight for Facts

by Jill Abramson  · 5 Feb 2019  · 788pp  · 223,004 words

Modern Monopolies: What It Takes to Dominate the 21st Century Economy

by Alex Moazed and Nicholas L. Johnson  · 30 May 2016  · 324pp  · 89,875 words

Utopia Is Creepy: And Other Provocations

by Nicholas Carr  · 5 Sep 2016  · 391pp  · 105,382 words

The Key Man: The True Story of How the Global Elite Was Duped by a Capitalist Fairy Tale

by Simon Clark and Will Louch  · 14 Jul 2021  · 403pp  · 105,550 words

Algospeak: How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language

by Adam Aleksic  · 15 Jul 2025  · 278pp  · 71,701 words

Cult of the Dead Cow: How the Original Hacking Supergroup Might Just Save the World

by Joseph Menn  · 3 Jun 2019  · 302pp  · 85,877 words

Tools and Weapons: The Promise and the Peril of the Digital Age

by Brad Smith and Carol Ann Browne  · 9 Sep 2019  · 482pp  · 121,173 words

This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race

by Nicole Perlroth  · 9 Feb 2021  · 651pp  · 186,130 words

Amazon: How the World’s Most Relentless Retailer Will Continue to Revolutionize Commerce

by Natalie Berg and Miya Knights  · 28 Jan 2019  · 404pp  · 95,163 words

We Are the Nerds: The Birth and Tumultuous Life of Reddit, the Internet's Culture Laboratory

by Christine Lagorio-Chafkin  · 1 Oct 2018

The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure

by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt  · 14 Jun 2018  · 531pp  · 125,069 words

Antisemitism: Here and Now

by Deborah E. Lipstadt  · 29 Jan 2019  · 276pp  · 71,950 words

Machine Learning Design Patterns: Solutions to Common Challenges in Data Preparation, Model Building, and MLOps

by Valliappa Lakshmanan, Sara Robinson and Michael Munn  · 31 Oct 2020

The Space Barons: Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, and the Quest to Colonize the Cosmos

by Christian Davenport  · 20 Mar 2018  · 390pp  · 108,171 words

Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst

by Robert M. Sapolsky  · 1 May 2017  · 1,261pp  · 294,715 words

The Rise and Fall of American Growth: The U.S. Standard of Living Since the Civil War (The Princeton Economic History of the Western World)

by Robert J. Gordon  · 12 Jan 2016  · 1,104pp  · 302,176 words

Transport for Humans: Are We Nearly There Yet?

by Pete Dyson and Rory Sutherland  · 15 Jan 2021  · 342pp  · 72,927 words

Shape: The Hidden Geometry of Information, Biology, Strategy, Democracy, and Everything Else

by Jordan Ellenberg  · 14 May 2021  · 665pp  · 159,350 words

Hiding in Plain Sight: The Invention of Donald Trump and the Erosion of America

by Sarah Kendzior  · 6 Apr 2020

Grand Transitions: How the Modern World Was Made

by Vaclav Smil  · 2 Mar 2021  · 1,324pp  · 159,290 words

Nomads: The Wanderers Who Shaped Our World

by Anthony Sattin  · 25 May 2022  · 412pp  · 121,164 words

Survival of the Friendliest: Understanding Our Origins and Rediscovering Our Common Humanity

by Brian Hare and Vanessa Woods  · 13 Jul 2020

The Story of Crossrail

by Christian Wolmar  · 5 Sep 2018  · 292pp  · 85,381 words

Radiant Rest

by Tracee Stanley  · 9 Mar 2021

I, Partridge: We Need to Talk About Alan

by Steve Coogan  · 1 Sep 2011

Gnomon

by Nick Harkaway  · 18 Oct 2017  · 778pp  · 239,744 words

The Fourth Revolution: The Global Race to Reinvent the State

by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge  · 14 May 2014  · 372pp  · 92,477 words

Strong Towns: A Bottom-Up Revolution to Rebuild American Prosperity

by Charles L. Marohn, Jr.  · 24 Sep 2019  · 242pp  · 71,943 words

The Psychology of Money: Timeless Lessons on Wealth, Greed, and Happiness

by Morgan Housel  · 7 Sep 2020  · 209pp  · 53,175 words

Our 50-State Border Crisis: How the Mexican Border Fuels the Drug Epidemic Across America

by Howard G. Buffett  · 2 Apr 2018  · 350pp  · 109,521 words

The Highly Sensitive Person: How to Thrive When the World Overwhelms You

by Elaine N. Aron  · 1 Dec 2013  · 323pp  · 94,683 words

On the Clock: What Low-Wage Work Did to Me and How It Drives America Insane

by Emily Guendelsberger  · 15 Jul 2019  · 382pp  · 114,537 words

Don't Trust, Don't Fear, Don't Beg: The Extraordinary Story of the Arctic 30

by Ben Stewart  · 4 May 2015  · 347pp  · 94,701 words