23andMe

back to index

description: biotechnology company

101 results

Mine!: How the Hidden Rules of Ownership Control Our Lives

by Michael A. Heller and James Salzman  · 2 Mar 2021  · 332pp  · 100,245 words

a dozen saliva samples as part of her story-writing research. For an article on her ethnic heritage, she mailed spit to Ancestry.com and 23andMe; for insight into her athletic ability, diet, and sleep patterns, she sent a sample to Helix; for a genetically tailored beauty regime, she uploaded her

DNA, the commercial value of gene databases grows exponentially. Medical data licensing has become a multibillion-dollar business. GlaxoSmithKline paid 23andMe $300 million to access data for targeted drug development. 23andMe went one step further, developing an anti-inflammatory drug based on its data. The company already has over 9 million individual

sports plays. Perhaps a no-ownership world creates more value than the rules that lawmakers would likely impose. But who benefits from this value? For 23andMe and its industry cohort, no-ownership would be fine: the companies do not need law to reward their labor. Nor do they rely on shaming

charge for the information. As databases scale up, they can become exponentially more valuable. The key is to grow the database fast. This is why 23andMe decodes your heritage for just $99: your genetic information is raw material for the real product, its database. To preserve the Wild West regime, the

industry has been working to fend off ownership regulation. In a savvy move, companies like 23andMe decided not to fight Brown and others like her. Gene companies have learned the lessons of Napster and music streaming, of HBO and password sharing

secrecy is hard to pierce; and social media tweets don’t inflict much shame. One industry strategy is to foster the illusion of individual ownership. 23andMe realized it was better off disclaiming ownership in Brown’s data. The company did not want to provoke Brown to feel her self-ownership was

they swab and swipe. When Brown tried to retrieve the spit samples she had mailed in, the companies readily agreed…in principle. In practice, though, 23andMe told Brown the procedures needed to delete physical samples were “not currently available.” And Ancestry.com told her no one had ever asked to have

’s mine because it’s attached to something mine (see Chapter 4). If you want data deleted, fine—in principle. In practice, though, Brown reports, “23andMe may tell you that you can delete your data, but in reality, the law says you can’t.” Scrubbing data is impossible in part because

lot. More than 80 percent of Ancestry.com customers check the box, letting the company sell or share their data. According to 23andMe, “The average customer who chooses to let 23andMe share their data for research contributes to more than 230 studies on topics including asthma, lupus, and Parkinson’s disease.” And

are substantially absent from these databases—and by extension, from medical research and discoveries that might benefit them. If the baseline ownership rule were that 23andMe paid people for data, instead of the reverse, perhaps we would see more diverse contributors and more inclusive drug development. But if our goal is

one of these start-ups. Twenty days of data from a fitness tracker is worth two of Barry’s shares, valued at 14 cents; a 23andMe–style test earns you $3.50 in shares; your whole genome nets you $21. People cash in if the start-up shares do well—thus

reversing the cash flow from the 23andMe model. But the stock ownership model has downsides, too. It’s meaningfully available only to the handful of sophisticated consumers who search it out, prefer

stock to cheap testing, and deliberately opt in to this ownership relationship. Most people keep on mailing in 23andMe and Ancestry.com kits, clicking “I consent,” and getting no direct compensation (though there may be some indirect compensation if it costs companies more to

such that everyone who contributes genetic data—not just the savviest—owns a small share in medical discoveries derived from their genetic data. Companies like 23andMe could still offer cash today in exchange for a future ownership share, but the opt-out transaction would have to be deliberate and transparent, not

tweaking ownership to steer us this way or that—whether it’s to ensure rabid fans for Duke basketball, scoop up our genetic code for 23andMe, or encourage safer and more sustainable crabbing on the Bering Sea. Remember the Knee Defender story that opened this book? In the time it took

June 5, 2020. These terms change without notice—and that’s part of our point. “The average customer who”: Erin Brodwin, “DNA-testing Companies Like 23andMe Sell Your Genetic Data to Drugmakers and Other Silicon Valley Startups,” Business Insider, August 3, 2018. “You can’t go to them later”: Molly Wood

She Has Her Mother's Laugh

by Carl Zimmer  · 29 May 2018

Kunta Kinte in the original version, now served as an executive producer. To promote the new version of Roots, Burton took a DNA test from 23andMe, along with Malachi Kirby, the actor playing Kinte in the remake. “I’ve always felt there was a piece of me missing,” Burton said in

a lot more complicated than I had expected. I could not simply spit into a tube and mail it off to a company like 23andMe. In 2007, 23andMe began providing reports on DNA directly to consumers. For $999, they would identify the variants at half a million sites in a person’s

a profound leap from conventional genetic tests. They had to be approved by the FDA and ordered by doctors. Now 23andMe was delivering information straight to customers. In 2013, the FDA told 23andMe to stop selling unvalidated tests or face the consequences. In response, the company cut back their reports to ancestry

evidence for Neanderthal interbreeding, genetic genealogy was a thriving industry. It was ready to seize such a sensational finding and make the most of it. 23andMe quickly put together a test that they claimed could tell customers just how much of their genome was Neanderthal. When I told people about my

eagerly let me know about their percentage. The more Neanderthal DNA they carried, the happier they sounded. Judging from comments that customers have left on 23andMe’s website, Neanderthal pride is a common thing. “I am very proud of my 2.8% Neanderthal DNA,” someone named Gayle wrote in 2011. “Neanderthals

were happy to see all the enthusiasm over their research, but they also didn’t like the pretzels into which it was getting stretched. The 23andMe test, for example, was based only on the 2010 rough draft of the Neanderthal genome. Only later did Pääbo and his colleagues discover that a

or minus only 0.08 percent. When the Neanderthal researchers published their analysis, they went out of their way to take a swipe at the 23andMe test. For the most part, the researchers said, the test only delivered “statistical noise.” Even if some people actually did have twice as much Neanderthal

genomes for several years at Cold Spring Harbor. He was intrigued by the request, admitting that he had never been a big fan of the 23andMe Neanderthal test. “They just give you a number,” he said. “They don’t tell you where you’re Neanderthal.” I arranged for Siepel to get

Deficiency.” National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, working paper 19233. http://www.nber.org/papers/w19233. “Find Your Inner Neanderthal.” 2011. 23andMe blog, December 15. https://blog.23andme.com/ancestry/find-your-inner-neanderthal/ (accessed July 25, 2017). Finger, Stanley, and Shawn E. Christ. 2004. “Pearl S. Buck and Phenylketonuria

27: R1177-R1192. Rogers, Lois. 1998. “Baby Created from Two Mothers Raises Hopes for Childless.” Sunday Times, June 14. “Roots Revisited.” 2016. 23andMe blog, May 30. https://blog.23andme.com/ancestry/roots-revisited/ (accessed August 3, 2017). Rose, Steven. 1972. “Environmental Effects on Brain and Behaviour.” In Race, Culture and Intelligence. Edited

, 360–65 Tsuji, Frederick, 406 Tucker, William, 299 tumors, 274, 353–54, 392–400, 472. See also cancers Turkheimer, Eric, 310–11 Turnbull, Doug, 517 23andMe, 180, 182, 240–42 twins and chimerism, 380–82, 384 and CRISPR research, 497 and effects of meiosis on heredity, 151–52 and ethical issues

The Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine Is in Your Hands

by Eric Topol  · 6 Jan 2015  · 588pp  · 131,025 words

JEFFERSON “It used to be that patients learned about their health only from their doctor. Thanks to mobile health gadgets, apps and services such as 23andMe’s, that is changing.” —The Economist2 Angelina Jolie was used to leading big screen, big action roles, from swashbuckling archaeologist Lara Croft to being

us. She did something to prevent disease, and that’s exactly what we want people thinking about.”33 We’re going to drill down on 23andMe, whose mission is to democratize genetic information. This was the first direct-to-consumer genomics company; it was founded in 2006 and launched in November

million from Google, Johnson & Johnson, the Russian billionaire Yuri Milner, and several venture capital firms. In November 2013, the FDA sent a stern letter to 23andMe, which included the following: As part of our interactions with you, including more than 14 face-to-face and teleconference meetings, hundreds of e-mail

an increasing list of indications, show that you plan to expand the PGS’s uses and consumer base without obtaining marketing authorization from FDA. Therefore, 23andMe must immediately discontinue marketing the PGS until such time as it receives FDA marketing authorization for the device. . . . Failure to take adequate corrective action

FDA notification was intense, not as extensive or global as the Jolie disclosure, but highly charged and polarized.2,35–77* Some felt that 23andMe was reckless and arrogant and had overstepped their bounds, while others felt this endangered the democratization of health information. Or as a cofounder of

on his or her own to interpret such complicated and highly nuanced data,” and that a health care professional should ideally be involved.63 However, 23andMe’s website says, “You should not assume that any information we may be able to provide to you, whether now or as genetic research advances

highway stripes provide information, they don’t drive the car. The FDA is demanding sole right to steer the car. Beyond paternalism, the FDA-vs.-23andMe flap brings out another critical and unresolved matter—validity of the genomic results. Validity can be divided into two categories—technical and clinical. As far

as technical, the genotyping for 23andMe is done by state-of-the-art equipment in a clinical laboratory known as the National Genetics Institute, a wholly owned subsidiary of LabCorp. In

a replication experiment of 23andMe data performed in 2010, of six hundred thousand genotypes there were only eighty-five that were errors—that is a rate of 0.01 percent

as any academic genomics research laboratory. So the question about the accuracy of the genotyping is pretty easy to put aside. Further, in February 2013, 23andMe scientists published, in a well-regarded, peer-reviewed, open-access journal, PeerJ, their results of the individuals who had tested positive for their BRCA tests

to the three mutations prevalent in Ashkenazi Jews.80 There are hundreds of mutations in the BRCA1|2 genes that may be associated with cancer—23andMe only tests for a few of the common ones via what is known as array genotyping, not sequencing. The array method assesses particular bases

the Illumina OmniExpress Plus biochip, which is the same as is used by academic researchers around the world.68 Of 114,627 customers in the 23andMe database at the time, 204 (130 males and 74 females) tested positive for one of the three BRCA mutations. Of those who were Ashkenazi

through their saliva genotyping. They handled this information quite well, without undue anxiety, sharing it with relatives and identifying additional carriers. Furthermore, controls (from the 23andMe database) of 31 Ashkenazi Jews matched for age and sex, but who were not BRCA mutation carriers, did not forego cancer screening, acknowledging that the

23andMe testing is quite limited. Only 1 of the 63 participants reported a negative impact and said, “I would not do it again.”44 But the

clinical validity of 23andMe’s reports is quite a different matter. Each customer gets hundreds of thousands of DNA sequence variants assessed for over 250 medical conditions and traits

type of earwax or whether you are likely to sneeze when you look directly at the sun (this gene variant was discovered and reported by 23andMe from review of their database). But most are for common diseases like heart attack, diabetes, and various cancers, or for DNA interactions with medications.

Richard Epstein, the noted law professor at New York University, has pointed out, “The FDA should have to show by clear and convincing evidence that 23andMe leads to dangerous results that the FDA claims by surveying customers of the firm.”68,81 Thus far, with over seven hundred thousand customers, there

Our group at Scripps published a New England Journal of Medicine study of over three thousand individuals who had a similar consumer genomics assessment to 23andMe’s and found no evidence of psychological harm or sustained anxiety.83 One in 4 participants decided to share their genomic information with their doctor

. More recently, Eric Green and colleagues at Harvard studied 1,057 consumers who had a 23andMe test or one from another company. This study confirmed both any lack of adverse effects and the proportion of individuals who shared their data with

physician.84 But absence from harm is a far cry from benefit. Some have therefore called this “recreational genetics.” I like to think of 23andMe as a starter kit of genomic data, as it is just the beginning of how we will understand human DNA sequence data in the future

a clinical laboratory. It’s just the beginning of where consumer genomics can and will get to over time when our knowledge base is enhanced. 23andMe was initially positioned as providing genomics education and research for consumers when it was commercially launched in 2007. But in August 2013, having put two

showed individuals next to a graph of their genomic profile saying things like, “I might have an increased risk of heart disease.”62,85 That 23andMe was “going medical” was also evident in their campaign “Know more about your health!,” including new website content with such anecdotes of people getting

an unexpected diagnosis that “changed their lives forever.” Further, 23andMe started selling their saliva kits and Personal Genome Service via Amazon for the first time. The marketing was not well received by the FDA. The

campaign. Ironically, the cover and feature article of the November 2013 issue (which was published in October, well in advance of the FDA letter to 23andMe) of Fast Company called out Anne Wojcicki as “The Most Daring CEO in America” and asked, “Why Are Doctors, Insurers and Privacy Wonks Having

a Heart Attack?”33 It should have included the FDA! In response to the FDA’s shutdown of 23andMe’s marketing, there were two public efforts of online petitions, TechFreedom at change.org and We the People at whitehouse.gov, asking the Obama administration

The other was not, when the “We the People” petition included the following: “we demand that we maintain access to genomics testing services like 23andMe,” and “the price of over-regulation is lengthy delays in potentially life-saving medical innovations.”38 The latter claim is clearly off base, since

Wall Street Journal had a strong response, titled “The FDA and Thee,” crying foul, that the FDA had overstepped its bounds: “The agency is declaring 23andMe’s service an ‘adulterated’ product under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act of 1938, in one more case of twentieth-century law undermining medical

’s insistence that the information pass through a doctor or genetic counselor first. The final indication that the FDA was preparing for the takedown on 23andMe came just two days prior, on November 20, 2013, when the FDA announced its approval of the first DNA sequencing technology, the so-called

doctor. With the right information and support, patients will be able to participate alongside their doctors in making more informed decisions.” Despite these actions against 23andMe and others, there are many glaring inconsistencies in how the FDA treats consumer genomics. Myriad Genetics, for example, has never had FDA approval or clearance

allowed on the market before it has been approved.94,95 As Michael Eisen, a University of California, Berkeley, geneticist, who is an advisor to 23andMe, nicely summarized, “Genetic tests are simply not—at least not yet—medical devices in any meaningful sense of the word. They are closer to family

history than to an accurate diagnostic.”96 While 23andMe agreed to stop selling its PGS, it still will provide the raw genomic data to consumers, and there are free software tools that can

of time before such genomic information is free-flowing to the public. OK, maybe not free, but certainly flowing. Big Consumer Genomic Data Before leaving 23andMe, there is one other big thing to note—its ambitious strategy to build a database with the DNA data from twenty-five million customers and

pharmaceutical firms and marketers might know more about your body than you know yourself.”98 This is not true. When you become a customer of 23andMe, you are asked to opt in to their research and 90 percent of people do that—with the assurance that you will be kept

a drug company. Addressing both concerns is critical, because the promise of massive medicine information resources is so great. This issue is much bigger than 23andMe, and I will discuss it fully in two dedicated chapters later in the book. The Supreme Court and Genomic Medicine The BRCA genes that were

15 and for Tay-Sachs 1 in 27.5 Prospective parents can be readily screened for important carrier conditions via a variety of commercial tests; 23andMe screens for fifty conditions; Counsyl tests for over one hundred. Both these companies use array chips that only pick up the mutations that have been

Not only would data come from physicians but also it would be pouring in from patients themselves, from direct-to-consumer testing companies (such as 23andMe), patient advocate foundations, online health communities (such as PatientsLikeMe), and the large number of clinical trials that are perpetually being conducted without taking full advantage

public talk about genomics, the first question that I invariably get is related to the privacy issue. Currently the largest genomic data set resides at 23andMe. The company’s mission is to create “the world’s large, secure, private database of genotypic and phenotypic information that can be used for

1. A. Jolie, “My Medical Choice,” New York Times, May 14, 2013, http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/14/opinion/my-medical-choice.html. 2. “23andMe and the FDA: A Regulator Brings a Genetic Company to a Halt,” The Economist, November 30, 2013, http://www.economist.com/news/business/21590941-regulator

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/27/health/in-israel-a-push-to-screen-for-cancer-gene-leaves-many-conflicted.html. 33. E. Murphy, “Inside 23andMe Founder Anne Wojcicki’s $99 DNA Revolution,” Fast Company, October 14, 2013: http://www.fastcompany.com/3018598/for-99-this-ceo-can-tell-you-what

-might-kill-you-inside-23andme-founder-anne-wojcickis-dna-r. 34. FDA, “Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations: Warning Letter to Ann Wojcicki,” November 22, 2013, http://www.fda.

’t Mean Anything in the Long Run,” Slate, November 25, 2013, http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2013/11/25/fda_letter_to_23andme_won_t_mean_anything_in_the_long_run.html. 41. R. Khan and D. Mittelman, “Rumors of the Death of Consumer Genomics Are Greatly Exaggerated

Just a Bump in the Road, One Genetics-Testing Investor Says,” Wall Street Journal, December 16, 2013, http://blogs.wsj.com/venturecapital/2013/12/16/23andme-flap-with-fda-just-a-bump-in-the-road-one-genetics-testing-investor-says/tab/print/. 45. H. Greely, “The FDA Drops an Anvil

. 51. J. K. Wagner, “The Sky Is Falling for Personal Genomics! Oh, Nevermind. It’s Just a Cease & Desist Letter from the FDA to 23andMe,” Genomics Law Report, December 3, 2013, http://www.genomicslawreport.com/index.php/2013/12/03/the-sky-is-falling-for-personal-genomics-oh-nevermind-its

-just-a-cease-desist-letter-from-the-fda-to-23andme/. 52. “Doing the Genomic Revolution Right,” Huffington Post, December 20, 2013, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tricia-page/doing-the-genomic-revolution-right_b_4480887.

truth/. 70. M. Allison, “Direct-to-Consumer Genomics Reinvents Itself,” Nature Biotechnology 30, no. 11 (2012): 1027–1029. 71. G. J. Annas and S. Elias, “23andMe and the FDA,” New England Journal of Medicine 370 (2014): 985–988. 72. M. White, “The FDA is Not Anti-Genetics,” Pacific Standard, January 17

G. Marchant, “The FDA Could Set Personal Genetics Rights Back Decades,” Slate, November 26, 2013, http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2013/11/_23andme_fda_letter_premarket_approval_requirement_could_kill_at_home_genetic.html. 80. U. Francke et al., “Dealing with the Unexpected: Consumer Responses to Direct-Access

2011): 524–534. 84. R. C. Green and N. A. Farahany, “The FDA Is Overcautious on Consumer Genomics,” Nature 505 (2014): 2. 85. R. Leuty, “23andMe’s Andy Page Gets Disruptive with the Masses,” San Francisco Business Times, October 22, 2013, http://www.bizjournals.com/sanfrancisco/blog/biotech/2013/10

Neuron Culture, December 2, 2013, http://daviddobbs.net/smoothpebbles/is-the-national-cancer-institute-telling-me-to-remove-my-breasts/. 96. M. Eisen, “FDA vs. 23andMe: How Do We Want Genetic Testing to Be Regulated?,” it is NOT junk, November 26, 2013, http://www.michaeleisen.org/blog/?p=1480. 97. “The

/article/report-healthcare-cybersecurity-legislation-not-enough. 90. L. Miller, “The Google of Spit,” New York Magazine, April 22, 2014, http://nymag.com/news/features/23andme-2014-4/. 91. Y. Erlich and A. Narayanan, “Routes for Breaching and Protecting Genetic Privacy,” Nature Reviews Genetics 15 (2014): 409–421. 92. K.

Hello World: Being Human in the Age of Algorithms

by Hannah Fry  · 17 Sep 2018  · 296pp  · 78,631 words

current trend for genetic testing. For the bargain price of £149, you can send off a saliva sample to the genomics and bio­technology company 23andMe in exchange for a report of your ­genetic traits, including answers to questions such as: What kind of earwax do you have? Do you have

its potential to advance our understanding of the human genome. Academics, pharmaceutical companies and non-profits around the world are queuing up to partner with 23andMe to hunt for patterns in their data – both with and without the help of algorithms – in the hope of answering big questions that affect all

treat Parkinson’s? The dataset is also valuable in a much more literal sense. Although the research being done offers an immense benefit to society, 23andMe isn’t doing this out of the goodness of its heart. If you give it your consent (and 80 per cent of customers do), it

research partners for a tidy profit.56 The money earned isn’t a happy bonus for the company; it’s actually their business plan. One 23andMe board member told Fast Company: ‘The long game here is not to make money selling kits, although the kits are essential to get the base

getting a genetic test any time soon. And yet (thankfully for society) millions of ­people are voluntarily giving up their data. At the last count 23andMe has more than 2 million genotyped customers,62 while ­MyHeritage, ­Ancestry.com – even the National Geographic Genographic ­project – have millions more. So perhaps this is

Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 14, 1885, pp. 205–21. 53. ‘Taste’, https://permalinks.23andme.com/pdf/samplereport_traits.pdf. 54. ‘Sneezing on summer solstice?’, 23andMeBlog, 20 June 2012, https://blog.23andme.com/health-traits/sneezing-on-summer-solstice/. 55. ‘Find out what your DNA says about your health

, traits and ancestry’, 23andMe, https://www.23andme.com/en-gb/dna-health-ancestry/. 56. Kristen v. Brown, ‘23andMe is selling your data but not how you think

’, Gizmodo, 14 April 2017, https://gizmodo.com/23andme-is-selling-your-data-but-not-how-you-think-1794340474. 57

. Michael Grothaus, ‘How23andMe is monetizing your DNA’, Fast Company, 15 Jan. 2015, https://www.fastcompany.com/3040356/what-23andme-is-doing-with-all-that-dna. 58. Rob Stein, ‘Found on the Web, with DNA: a boy’s father’, Washington Post, 13 Nov. 2005, http

.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23329047. 61. Currently, genetic tests for Huntington’s disease are not available from any commercial DNA testing kits. 62. Matthew Herper, ‘23andMe rides again: FDA clears genetic tests to predict disease risk’, Forbes, 6 April 2017, https://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper/2017/04/06

/23andme-rides-again-fda-clears-genetic-tests-to-predict-disease-risk/#302aea624fdc. Cars 1. DARPA, Grand Challenge 2004: Final Report (Arlington, VA: Defence Advanced Research Projects

to locate particular terms in the text. Endnotes in the index are denoted by an ‘n’ after the page number e.g. ‘ambiguous images 211n13’ 23andMe 108–9 profit 109 promises of anonymity 109 sale of data 109 volume of customers 110 52Metro 177 abnormalities 84, 87, 95 acute kidney injuries

The Industries of the Future

by Alec Ross  · 2 Feb 2016  · 364pp  · 99,897 words

anxiety or anxiety out of proportion to the risk.” Vogelstein and Diaz’s concerns were brought to the surface recently by the genomic testing company 23andMe. Founded by Anne Wojcicki at age 32 in 2006, the company provides ancestry-related genetic reports and uninterpreted raw genetic data for its clients. You

spit in a tube, send it to 23andMe’s lab, and for $99 they send you back your genetic information. It’s not a full sequencing of your genome, but a snapshot of

researchers know the most about, like genes that indicate a risk for Parkinson’s or how a person might react to certain blood thinners. Wojcicki, 23andMe’s CEO, also happens to be Silicon Valley royalty: she married Google cofounder Sergey Brin; her father chaired the Stanford physics department; and her mother

at Palo Alto High who rented out the family’s garage to graduate students Brin and Larry Page to incubate Google. It was through a 23andMe test that Brin learned he had a genetic mutation that increased his risk of getting Parkinson’s to somewhere between 30 and 75 percent, compared

then, he drinks green tea and exercises a lot, two activities linked with reducing the risk of Parkinson’s. But while it worked for Brin, 23andMe’s version of sequencing is a much simpler version of what Lukas Wartman underwent. Wartman had both his cancer and his full genome sequenced. The

difference here is important. Whereas the full sequencing of a tumor is intensive and extensive, and even more so to have an entire genome sequenced, 23andMe is neither. It’s a much smaller analysis of some genes that have been linked to common diseases. Wojcicki’s

23andMe is just one company offering do-it-yourself genomic tests, but all of them have faced criticism, specifically around their wildly variable genetic feedback. One

the potential to cause both false worry and false reassurance. This problem hasn’t been lost on the FDA. In late 2013, it demanded that 23andMe stop marketing its product as “health-related genetic tests” because the company didn’t have regulatory approval to make those claims. The FDA’s public

letter to 23andMe said the FDA was “concerned about the public health consequences of inaccurate results.” Since the FDA came down on them, Wojcicki and her company have

comprehensive product offering. At this time we do not know which health reports might be available or when they might be available.” Though Diaz dismisses 23andMe as “a gimmick” due to its limitations, the company has developed a valuable asset in the form of the genetic material from its 900,000

pivoted its business model in a way that may ultimately produce both commercial and scientific victories. Through a partnership with the Michael J. Fox Foundation, 23andMe built what they called the Parkinson’s Research Community with genetic material from more than 12,000 Parkinson’s patients. This quantity of data is

valuable to pharmaceutical companies developing precision medications and led to a $60 million deal for 23andMe with Genentech. As people continue to pay $99 to 23andMe for ancestor information, they will be building a database that 23andMe can commercialize for drugmakers. Another set of concerns about the rise of medicines rooted in

://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/29/technology/29google.html. the company provides ancestry-related: “How It Works,” 23andMe, https://www.23andme.com/howitworks/. It’s not a full sequencing: “About the 23andMe Personal Genome Service,” 23andMe, https://customercare.23andme.com/entries/22591668. Since then, he drinks green tea: Elizabeth Murphy, “Do You Want to Know

What Will Kill You?” Salon, October 25, 2013, http://www.salon.com/2013/10/25/inside_23andme_founder_anne_wojcickis_99_dna_revolution_newscred/. all of them have faced: Kira Peikoff, “I Had My DNA Picture Taken, with Varying Results,” New York

.com/2013/12/31/science/i-had-my-dna-picture-taken-with-varying-results.html?src=recg. In late 2013, it demanded: Chris O’Brien, “23andMe Suspends Health-Related Genetic Tests after FDA Warning,” Los Angeles Times, December 6, 2013, http://articles.latimes.com/2013/dec/06/business/la-fi-tn

-23andme-suspends-tests-fda-20131205. The FDA’s public letter: “23andMe, Inc. 11/22/13,” FDA: Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigation Warning Letters, November 22, 2013, http://www.fda.gov

/iceci/enforcementactions/warningletters/2013/ucm376296.htm; Scott Hensley, “23andMe Bows to FDA’s Demands, Drops Health Claims,” National Public Radio, December 6, 2013, http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2013/12/06/249231236

/23andme-bows-to-fdas-demands-drops-health-claims. Now their tests promise only: Ibid. At this time we do not: “How It Works.” Through a partnership: “

Michael J. Fox, Our Big-Time Hero,” 23andMe, April 27, 2012, http://blog.23andme.com/news/inside-23andme/michael-j-fox-our-big-time-hero/; Matthew Herper, “Surprise! With $60 Million Genentech Deal, 23andMe Has a Business Plan,” Forbes, January 6, 2015, http://www.forbes.com/sites/matthewherper

/2015/01/06/surprise-with-60-million-genentech-deal-23andme-has-a-business-plan/. Its signature product, Genophen, sequences: “Our Model,” Genophen: How It Works, http://www.genophen.com/consumers/how-it-works/our-model;

, 118 Goldberg, Ken, 27, 33, 35 Goldman Sachs, 113 Goldsmith, Stephen, 197 Goloskokov, Konstantin, 141 Goma, Congo, 83–85, 89 Good2Go, 176, 180–81 Google: 23andMe and, 57–58 acquisitions, 25 Berman, Dror and, 191–92 Car Project, 28–31, 134 China and, 219 coded markets and, 94 cryptocurrencies and, 118

War and, 145 coded money and, 88–97 future of coded trust, 117–20 innovation and, 248 technology and, 74, 98–99 Turkle, Sherry, 18 23andMe, 57–59 Twitter, 78–80, 126–27, 201, 218 Tyle, Sheel, 85, 241–44, 246 Tyle, Sujay, 241–42, 246 Uber, 30–31, 92–96

, 119 Wells Fargo, 168 Wells, H. G., 1, 196 West Bank, 81–82 WhatsApp, 212–13 Wieseltier, Leon, 181 Wojcicki, Anne, 57–58. See also 23andMe Women’s Digital League, 201–2 women’s equality, 227–28 World Bank, 71, 112, 219, 226, 237 World Economic Forum, 178, 229–30 World

Reset

by Ronald J. Deibert  · 14 Aug 2020

, because of their own actions, is constantly encountering their children? A rash of unintended consequences surrounds DNA data, such as that collected by companies like 23andMe and Ancestry.com — a market that is exploding in popularity as genetic testing technology advances and curious customers want to know more about their lineage

, genetic testing services such as these have higher- and lower-level functions, including selling data they collect on their customers to third parties. For example, 23andMe and Airbnb have partnered to offer customers “heritage vacations” based on their genetic results.64 Large pharmaceutical companies could use genetic data to target users

genetic markers with tailored advertisements for their drugs. That’s no doubt why, in 2018, the pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline acquired a $300 million stake in 23andMe.65 Another obvious potential third-party client is law enforcement agencies, which can use genetic information to locate perpetrators of crimes (however those may be

of digital safety for children and young people in developing nations. Berkman Center Research Publication, (2010-7), 10-36. 23andMe and Airbnb have partnered: Valle, G. D. (2019, May 22). Airbnb is partnering with 23andMe to send people on “heritage” vacations. Retrieved from https://www.vox.com/2019/5/22/18635829/airbnb

-23andme-heritage-vacations-partnership GlaxoSmithKline acquired: Brodwin, E. (2018, July 25). DNA-testing company 23andMe has signed a $300 million deal with a drug giant. Here’s how to delete your data if that freaks you

out. Retrieved from https://www.businessinsider.com/dna-testing-delete-your-data-23andme-ancestry-2018-7 Those who share their genetic fingerprints: Resnick, B. (2018, October 15). How your third cousin’s Ancestry DNA test could jeopardize your

social media use, 110–111, 269, 303 Trump, Donald, Jr., 88 Trump, Melania, 110 tsmc Co., 227 Tubaigy, Salah Muhammed, 137 Turkmenistan, 150–151, 192 23andMe, 71–72 Twitter, 2, 28, 48, 107, 111 activism on, 138, 139, 142, 156–157 data retrieval from, 183, 189–190 false information on, 84

Super Founders: What Data Reveals About Billion-Dollar Startups

by Ali Tamaseb  · 14 Sep 2021  · 251pp  · 80,831 words

sizable number of billion-dollar startup founders worked in venture capital rather than in corporations. Anne Wojcicki, the founder of the consumer genetics-testing company 23andMe, worked as an analyst for Passport Capital. Katrina Lake was an associate at Leader Ventures before starting Stitch Fix, a clothing retailer. David Vélez was

neither of the cases increased the likelihood of becoming a billion-dollar company. For some billion-dollar startups, creating the market offers clear advantages. Take 23andMe. Before the consumer genetic-testing company was launched, most people would raise their eyebrows at the invitation to mail a tube of their saliva to

predisposition to certain ailments. In other words, there was no market for consumer genetic testing. The founders of 23andMe—Anne Wojcicki, Linda Avey, and Paul Cusenza—had to create one. The company 23andMe was one of the first to offer autosomal genetics testing for ancestry applications using saliva, and it took years

for sales to ramp up beyond the early adopters. Initially, the tests were expensive—23andMe charged $999 for each test back in 2008. Only a very small population of affluent individuals could afford the tests, so the founders of

23andMe threw “spit parties” at high-end gatherings, like the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, in an attempt to win influential customers. As the volumes

make cheaper computers opened up personal computing and gave birth to companies like Microsoft, the reduction in costs of DNA sequencing made possible companies like 23andMe. Now, over ten million people have taken the test—and plenty of other consumer genetics companies have sprung up as competitors. Consumer demand and market

size are not factors to be taken for granted, however, especially when a new market and a new demand type are being created. While 23andMe had a strong growth rate for years, the company was struggling with direct-to-consumer demand growth at the time of writing this book, as

the early adopters of the technology dried up. Time will tell whether 23andMe will be able to use its wealth of clinical data and partnerships with pharmaceutical companies to create a generational company, or whether it will lose

very few companies pursued both simultaneously at the time of founding, and they are the exception. Some, like 23andMe, started selling to consumers but later built partnerships with other corporations (pharmaceutical companies in 23andMe’s case), pursuing a B2B channel as well. In my dataset, I placed the companies that sell to

100 Plus: How the Coming Age of Longevity Will Change Everything, From Careers and Relationships to Family And

by Sonia Arrison  · 22 Aug 2011  · 381pp  · 78,467 words

$1,000 genome (or less) is in sight. Indeed, a partial DNA scan can already be had for only $199 at consumer genomics companies like 23andMe, and that company is using its data sets to attempt to link certain diseases to specific genes, important work on the way toward individually tailored

silk stockings, to the rich paying $20 in 1915 for a three-minute phone call from New York to San Francisco. Indeed, when genomics firm 23andMe (founded in 2006) first offered its DNA tests, the price was $1,000 for less information than is now available today at the $199 price

fringe conference, think again. The headliner for the event was venture capitalist (VC) Ester Dyson, who sits on the board of directors for genomics company 23andMe and is a former chairman of the illustrious Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, the agency governing the Internet address system. Hedge fund manager

a well-known aging expert and one of Larry Ellison’s award recipients.68 Sergey Brin is spreading the meme in a more personal way. 23andMe is a genomics company that was cofounded by Brin’s biologist wife, Anne Wojcicki, and has gone a long way toward popularizing the idea of

to cure disease. One high-profile party took place during New York City’s Fashion Week. Company staffers recounted the event on their blog, saying, “23andMe managed to lure a few hundred people away from the catwalks Tuesday night to consider the beauty that lies within—DNA. Our Fashion Week spit

about his predisposition, Brin has reportedly contributed some $50 million to the cause, which is in addition to the $3.9 million Google invested in 23andMe after Brin made an initial loan of $2.6 million.71 It is worth pointing out here that Brin is not a wealthy man who

–163. 45 Comments on Andrew Hessel’s Web page, http://openwetware.org/wiki/Andrew_Hessel (last accessed July 9, 2010). 46 The $199 price for 23andMe’s service requires a $5 per month subscription to the company’s personal genome service. This is far less expensive than the $1,000 the

, June 26–27, 2007, www.nlm.nih.gov/ep/trainingconf2007agenda.html#22. 69 Matt C, “23andMe Struts Its Stuff in NYC During Fashion Week,” The Spittoon, September 11, 2008, http://spittoon.23andme.com/2008/09/11/23andme-struts-its-stuff-in-nyc-during-fashion-week/. 70 Andrew Pollack, “Google Co-founder Backs Vast

Parkinson’s Study,” New York Times, March 11, 2009, www.nytimes.com/2009/03/12/business/12gene.html?_r=1. 71 Leena Rao, “While 23andMe Raises $11 Million, Mohr Davidow Sells Stake to Invest in Rival,” TechCrunch, May 4, 2009, http://techcrunch.com/2009/05/04/while-23 andme-raises

, The (Gladwell) Tissue engineering Tobacco Topel, Robert Trachea(fig.) Training Transcendence Transhumanism Transistors Trauma repair Treder, Mike True Blood (HBO series) Truth Tuberculosis Turkey Turtles 23andMe company Twilight movie series Uncertainty United Nations United Religious Initiative (URI) United States, life expectancy in Urban Tribes (Watters) URI. See United Religious Initiative U

Masters of Scale: Surprising Truths From the World's Most Successful Entrepreneurs

by Reid Hoffman, June Cohen and Deron Triff  · 14 Oct 2021  · 309pp  · 96,168 words

needed to establish trust with an old-school industry that viewed him as a threat, Anne Wojcicki, founder of the DNA testing and analysis company 23andMe, faced even more formidable hurdles as she launched her business. She had to take on both the entrenched healthcare establishment and the U.S. government

, people would say, ‘Wouldn’t my doctor pay for that? Why am I paying for it? What would I do with the results?’ ” As the 23andMe founders grappled with the problem of reaching consumers, Anne’s marketing team suggested a messaging pivot. Instead of emphasizing a health-information angle

, 23andMe began playing up the joys of discovering and sharing your ancestry. Bingo—customers warmed to the idea of getting closer to their roots. And if

learned about my health risks from DNA testing—what should I do?” Doctors were used to being the gatekeepers of that type of information. So 23andMe began an ongoing effort to convince physicians that it was a good thing for patients to be proactively asking more questions about their health. But

the biggest challenge for 23andMe was dealing with state and federal regulators. One particularly challenging gatekeeper was the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Anne and her team had been

meeting with the FDA since early days, but because 23andMe was a first-of-its-kind company, government regulators didn’t know how to classify it. (Note to readers: Occasionally, being a first-in-field

, the FDA classified genetic tests as “medical devices,” requiring federal approval. Later, a new team of FDA regulators sent a cease-and-desist letter to 23andMe, claiming it was offering medical advice and was thus a “healthcare product.” Anne was frustrated: “It was the first time in my experience where the

committed to doing that.’ ” Anne’s response: “I’m not going anywhere. What else do I have to do? I’m committed.” Anne and her 23andMe team decided to slow down the rollout of new products. Usually this is the last thing a founder should do. But in

23andMe’s case, no one else was going to swoop in and grab market share—the FDA was a hard barrier that someone would need to

through. Anne decided it would be her. Although working with the FDA would prove slow and sometimes painful, it would build the trust that allowed 23andMe to grow in the long term. “Our work with the FDA changed our company a lot,” says Anne. “Our engineers, the way we develop, the

the FDA that the product is accurate, which is something that we always felt confident in.” The company also had to convince the FDA that 23andMe was providing consumers with enough information to fully understand their DNA test results, so they hired a dedicated regulation consultant to help guide them through

this long process. It has taken years to work through the issues with the FDA—and it’s still ongoing. But in the meantime, 23andMe has steadily built its consumer base, while helping the FDA to understand the value and benefits of enabling more people to do genetic testing. “There

investors. Payal Kadakia of ClassPass built her business around the vision of helping people become more active and find their fitness passion. Anne Wojcicki of 23andMe started her genetic testing business with the goal of empowering people to gain more control of their healthcare information. And Charles Best launched DonorsChoose with

The Science and Technology of Growing Young: An Insider's Guide to the Breakthroughs That Will Dramatically Extend Our Lifespan . . . And What You Can Do Right Now

by Sergey Young  · 23 Aug 2021  · 326pp  · 88,968 words

number of affordable genetic testing services on the market can identify your genetic predisposition to disease using nothing more than a swab of your saliva. 23andMe and other consumer products, for instance, offer genotyping (which examines about ~0.02 percent of DNA to find mutations that may contribute to various health

health, which is changing how medicine is practiced. Following the $2.5 billion blockbuster market reception of the direct-to-consumer (DTC) genetic testing company 23andMe, diagnostic services that focus on “omes” are exploding. Mind you, this technology still has a long way to go before it can be reliably, widely

-consumer diagnostic companies, retain the right to sell your anonymized data to pharmaceutical makers, research institutions, insurance companies, and others. In early 2020, for example, 23andMe entered into a licensing agreement with Spanish pharma company Almirall to develop a drug from customer data.29 There are even totally legal ways to

. What about the direct-to-consumer (DTC) diagnostic tests that we met in the pages of this book? DTC early insight into your health, like 23andMe, Nebula Genomics, DNAFit, Chronomics, Viome, and Thryve, offer convenient, low-cost ways to study your genes, epigenome, and gut flora. Is it really worth it

April 8, 2019, https://www.cnbc.com/2019/04/08/apple-could-top-300-billion-in-sales-from-health-care-morgan-stanley.html. 29Jessica Hamzelou, “23andMe has sold the rights to develop a drug based on its users’ DNA,” New Scientist, last modified January 10, 2020, https://www.newscientist.com/article

/2229828-23andme-has-sold-the-rights-to-develop-a-drug-based-on-its-users-dna/. 30Gregory Barber and Megan Molteni, “Google Is Slurping Up Health Data—and

Tel Aviv University telemedicine telexistence Telexistence, Inc. telomerase telomeres Tesla Theranos 3D bioprinting Thryve tissue regeneration Topol, Eric Total Artificial Heart transcriptome Transmedics Traveso, Giovanni 23andMe U UC San Francisco UK Biobank University of Maryland University of Rochester V vaccines Vanderbilt University Venter, Craig Verburgh, Kris Verdin, Eric Vetter, David Joseph

Singularity Rising: Surviving and Thriving in a Smarter, Richer, and More Dangerous World

by James D. Miller  · 14 Jun 2012  · 377pp  · 97,144 words

Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?

by Bill McKibben  · 15 Apr 2019

Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives

by Michael Specter  · 14 Apr 2009  · 281pp  · 79,958 words

The Mutant Project: Inside the Global Race to Genetically Modify Humans

by Eben Kirksey  · 10 Nov 2020  · 599pp  · 98,564 words

Exponential: How Accelerating Technology Is Leaving Us Behind and What to Do About It

by Azeem Azhar  · 6 Sep 2021  · 447pp  · 111,991 words

Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World

by Bruce Schneier  · 2 Mar 2015  · 598pp  · 134,339 words

Who We Are and How We Got Here: Ancient DNA and the New Science of the Human Past

by David Reich  · 22 Mar 2018  · 372pp  · 110,208 words

Dirty Genes: A Breakthrough Program to Treat the Root Cause of Illness and Optimize Your Health

by Ben Lynch Nd.  · 30 Jan 2018  · 438pp  · 103,983 words

The Messy Middle: Finding Your Way Through the Hardest and Most Crucial Part of Any Bold Venture

by Scott Belsky  · 1 Oct 2018  · 425pp  · 112,220 words

A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived

by Adam Rutherford  · 7 Sep 2016

An Optimist's Tour of the Future

by Mark Stevenson  · 4 Dec 2010  · 379pp  · 108,129 words

Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think

by Viktor Mayer-Schonberger and Kenneth Cukier  · 5 Mar 2013  · 304pp  · 82,395 words

Click Here to Kill Everybody: Security and Survival in a Hyper-Connected World

by Bruce Schneier  · 3 Sep 2018  · 448pp  · 117,325 words

Like, Comment, Subscribe: Inside YouTube's Chaotic Rise to World Domination

by Mark Bergen  · 5 Sep 2022  · 642pp  · 141,888 words

Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World

by Christopher Steiner  · 29 Aug 2012  · 317pp  · 84,400 words

Soonish: Ten Emerging Technologies That'll Improve And/or Ruin Everything

by Kelly Weinersmith and Zach Weinersmith  · 16 Oct 2017  · 398pp  · 105,032 words

Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy

by Melanie Swan  · 22 Jan 2014  · 271pp  · 52,814 words

Live Work Work Work Die: A Journey Into the Savage Heart of Silicon Valley

by Corey Pein  · 23 Apr 2018  · 282pp  · 81,873 words

The 4-Hour Body: An Uncommon Guide to Rapid Fat-Loss, Incredible Sex, and Becoming Superhuman

by Timothy Ferriss  · 1 Dec 2010  · 836pp  · 158,284 words

What Would Google Do?

by Jeff Jarvis  · 15 Feb 2009  · 299pp  · 91,839 words

The Sullivanians: Sex, Psychotherapy, and the Wild Life of an American Commune

by Alexander Stille  · 19 Jun 2023  · 436pp  · 148,809 words

Facing Reality: Two Truths About Race in America

by Charles Murray  · 14 Jun 2021  · 147pp  · 42,682 words

50 Future Ideas You Really Need to Know

by Richard Watson  · 5 Nov 2013  · 219pp  · 63,495 words

Merchants of Truth: The Business of News and the Fight for Facts

by Jill Abramson  · 5 Feb 2019  · 788pp  · 223,004 words

Uncharted: How to Map the Future

by Margaret Heffernan  · 20 Feb 2020  · 335pp  · 97,468 words

The Norm Chronicles

by Michael Blastland  · 14 Oct 2013

Googled: The End of the World as We Know It

by Ken Auletta  · 1 Jan 2009  · 532pp  · 139,706 words

Homo Deus: A Brief History of Tomorrow

by Yuval Noah Harari  · 1 Mar 2015  · 479pp  · 144,453 words

Going Dark: The Secret Social Lives of Extremists

by Julia Ebner  · 20 Feb 2020  · 309pp  · 79,414 words

The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality

by Kathryn Paige Harden  · 20 Sep 2021  · 375pp  · 102,166 words

This Is for Everyone: The Captivating Memoir From the Inventor of the World Wide Web

by Tim Berners-Lee  · 8 Sep 2025  · 347pp  · 100,038 words

Decoding the World: A Roadmap for the Questioner

by Po Bronson  · 14 Jul 2020  · 320pp  · 95,629 words

Brotopia: Breaking Up the Boys' Club of Silicon Valley

by Emily Chang  · 6 Feb 2018  · 334pp  · 104,382 words

On the Future: Prospects for Humanity

by Martin J. Rees  · 14 Oct 2018  · 193pp  · 51,445 words

Big Data and the Welfare State: How the Information Revolution Threatens Social Solidarity

by Torben Iversen and Philipp Rehm  · 18 May 2022

The Driver in the Driverless Car: How Our Technology Choices Will Create the Future

by Vivek Wadhwa and Alex Salkever  · 2 Apr 2017  · 181pp  · 52,147 words

The Power Law: Venture Capital and the Making of the New Future

by Sebastian Mallaby  · 1 Feb 2022  · 935pp  · 197,338 words

Terms of Service: Social Media and the Price of Constant Connection

by Jacob Silverman  · 17 Mar 2015  · 527pp  · 147,690 words

Money: Vintage Minis

by Yuval Noah Harari  · 5 Apr 2018  · 97pp  · 31,550 words

Sprint: How to Solve Big Problems and Test New Ideas in Just Five Days

by Jake Knapp, John Zeratsky and Braden Kowitz  · 8 Mar 2016  · 233pp  · 58,561 words

Immortality, Inc.

by Chip Walter  · 7 Jan 2020  · 232pp  · 72,483 words

The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts

by Richard Susskind and Daniel Susskind  · 24 Aug 2015  · 742pp  · 137,937 words

Dark Laboratory: On Columbus, the Caribbean, and the Origins of the Climate Crisis

by Tao Leigh. Goffe  · 14 Mar 2025  · 441pp  · 122,013 words

A Map of Future Ruins: On Borders and Belonging

by Lauren Markham  · 13 Feb 2024  · 234pp  · 74,626 words

Mood Machine: The Rise of Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist

by Liz Pelly  · 7 Jan 2025  · 293pp  · 104,461 words

The AI-First Company

by Ash Fontana  · 4 May 2021  · 296pp  · 66,815 words

Eat People: And Other Unapologetic Rules for Game-Changing Entrepreneurs

by Andy Kessler  · 1 Feb 2011  · 272pp  · 64,626 words

The Ethical Algorithm: The Science of Socially Aware Algorithm Design

by Michael Kearns and Aaron Roth  · 3 Oct 2019

Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup's Quest to End Privacy as We Know It

by Kashmir Hill  · 19 Sep 2023  · 487pp  · 124,008 words

The Great Experiment: Why Diverse Democracies Fall Apart and How They Can Endure

by Yascha Mounk  · 19 Apr 2022  · 442pp  · 112,155 words

The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century's Greatest Dilemma

by Mustafa Suleyman  · 4 Sep 2023  · 444pp  · 117,770 words

In the Plex: How Google Thinks, Works, and Shapes Our Lives

by Steven Levy  · 12 Apr 2011  · 666pp  · 181,495 words

The Future of the Brain: Essays by the World's Leading Neuroscientists

by Gary Marcus and Jeremy Freeman  · 1 Nov 2014  · 336pp  · 93,672 words

The Human Age: The World Shaped by Us

by Diane Ackerman  · 9 Sep 2014  · 380pp  · 104,841 words

Tribe of Mentors: Short Life Advice From the Best in the World

by Timothy Ferriss  · 14 Jun 2017  · 579pp  · 183,063 words

Capitalism Without Capital: The Rise of the Intangible Economy

by Jonathan Haskel and Stian Westlake  · 7 Nov 2017  · 346pp  · 89,180 words

Editing Humanity: The CRISPR Revolution and the New Era of Genome Editing

by Kevin Davies  · 5 Oct 2020  · 741pp  · 164,057 words

Deep Medicine: How Artificial Intelligence Can Make Healthcare Human Again

by Eric Topol  · 1 Jan 2019  · 424pp  · 114,905 words

Fix Your Gut: The Definitive Guide to Digestive Disorders

by John Brisson  · 12 Apr 2014

The Costs of Connection: How Data Is Colonizing Human Life and Appropriating It for Capitalism

by Nick Couldry and Ulises A. Mejias  · 19 Aug 2019  · 458pp  · 116,832 words

The Pattern Seekers: How Autism Drives Human Invention

by Simon Baron-Cohen  · 14 Aug 2020

Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health

by H. Gilbert Welch, Lisa M. Schwartz and Steven Woloshin  · 18 Jan 2011  · 302pp  · 92,546 words

The Equality Machine: Harnessing Digital Technology for a Brighter, More Inclusive Future

by Orly Lobel  · 17 Oct 2022  · 370pp  · 112,809 words

Morning After the Revolution: Dispatches From the Wrong Side of History

by Nellie Bowles  · 13 May 2024  · 207pp  · 62,397 words

Life After Google: The Fall of Big Data and the Rise of the Blockchain Economy

by George Gilder  · 16 Jul 2018  · 332pp  · 93,672 words

The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race

by Walter Isaacson  · 9 Mar 2021  · 700pp  · 160,604 words

Beautiful Data: The Stories Behind Elegant Data Solutions

by Toby Segaran and Jeff Hammerbacher  · 1 Jul 2009

Big Business: A Love Letter to an American Anti-Hero

by Tyler Cowen  · 8 Apr 2019  · 297pp  · 84,009 words

The Transhumanist Reader

by Max More and Natasha Vita-More  · 4 Mar 2013  · 798pp  · 240,182 words

Final Jeopardy: Man vs. Machine and the Quest to Know Everything

by Stephen Baker  · 17 Feb 2011  · 238pp  · 77,730 words

Technical Blogging: Turn Your Expertise Into a Remarkable Online Presence

by Antonio Cangiano  · 15 Mar 2012  · 315pp  · 85,791 words

The Nocturnal Brain: Nightmares, Neuroscience, and the Secret World of Sleep

by Dr. Guy Leschziner  · 22 Jul 2019  · 307pp  · 102,477 words

The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks

by Rebecca Skloot  · 2 Feb 2010  · 370pp  · 114,741 words

A Short History of Humanity: How Migration Made Us Who We Are

by Johannes Krause and Thomas Trappe  · 8 Apr 2021  · 218pp  · 62,621 words

Gene Eating: The Science of Obesity and the Truth About Dieting

by Giles Yeo  · 3 Jun 2019  · 351pp  · 112,079 words

100 Years of Identity Crisis: Culture War Over Socialisation

by Frank Furedi  · 6 Sep 2021  · 535pp  · 103,761 words

100 Things We've Lost to the Internet

by Pamela Paul  · 14 Oct 2021  · 194pp  · 54,355 words

The Dying Citizen: How Progressive Elites, Tribalism, and Globalization Are Destroying the Idea of America

by Victor Davis Hanson  · 15 Nov 2021  · 458pp  · 132,912 words

How to Fix the Future: Staying Human in the Digital Age

by Andrew Keen  · 1 Mar 2018  · 308pp  · 85,880 words

Everything's Trash, but It's Okay

by Phoebe Robinson  · 15 Oct 2018  · 257pp  · 90,857 words

Data for the Public Good

by Alex Howard  · 21 Feb 2012  · 25pp  · 5,789 words

Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper Than Yours (And What to Do About It)

by Salim Ismail and Yuri van Geest  · 17 Oct 2014  · 292pp  · 85,151 words

Future Crimes: Everything Is Connected, Everyone Is Vulnerable and What We Can Do About It

by Marc Goodman  · 24 Feb 2015  · 677pp  · 206,548 words

Data-Ism: The Revolution Transforming Decision Making, Consumer Behavior, and Almost Everything Else

by Steve Lohr  · 10 Mar 2015  · 239pp  · 70,206 words

This Will Make You Smarter: 150 New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking

by John Brockman  · 14 Feb 2012  · 416pp  · 106,582 words

Augmented: Life in the Smart Lane

by Brett King  · 5 May 2016  · 385pp  · 111,113 words

Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class

by Charles Murray  · 28 Jan 2020  · 741pp  · 199,502 words

Surveillance Valley: The Rise of the Military-Digital Complex

by Yasha Levine  · 6 Feb 2018  · 474pp  · 130,575 words

The Rational Optimist: How Prosperity Evolves

by Matt Ridley  · 17 May 2010  · 462pp  · 150,129 words

Raw Data Is an Oxymoron

by Lisa Gitelman  · 25 Jan 2013

Life on the Rocks: Building a Future for Coral Reefs

by Juli Berwald  · 4 Apr 2022  · 495pp  · 114,451 words