Ada Lovelace

back to index

description: English mathematician, work on Analytical Engine

99 results

The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood

by James Gleick  · 1 Mar 2011  · 855pp  · 178,507 words

a scientific report, “Notions sur la machine analytique,”♦ to introduce Babbage’s plan to a broader community of European philosophers. As soon as this reached Ada Lovelace, she began translating it into English, correcting errors on the basis of her own knowledge. She did that on her own, without telling either Menabrea

could verify a proof step by step, by following the rules, without understanding it. Calling this quality mechanical invoked the dreams of Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace, machines grinding through numbers, and numbers standing for anything at all. Amid the doomed culture of 1930 Vienna, listening to his new friends debate the

machines think? was a question with a relatively brief and slightly odd tradition—odd because machines were so adamantly physical in themselves. Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace lay near the beginning of this tradition, though they were all but forgotten, and now the trail led to Alan Turing, who did something really

an industrious and diligent clerk, well supplied with scratch paper, tirelessly following his instructions,”♦ as the mathematician and logician Herbert Enderton remarked years later. Like Ada Lovelace, Turing was a programmer, looking inward to the step-by-step logic of his own mind. He imagined himself as a computer. He distilled mental

: William Morrow, 1994), 183. 4. TO THROW THE POWERS OF THOUGHT INTO WHEEL-WORK ♦ The original writings of Charles Babbage and, to a lesser extent, Ada Lovelace are increasingly accessible. The comprehensive, thousand-dollar, eleven-volume edition, The Works of Charles Babbage, edited by Martin Campbell-Kelly, was published in 1989. Online

, 4 July 1843, in Betty Alexandra Toole, Ada, the Enchantress of Numbers, 145. ♦ “ANY PROCESS WHICH ALTERS THE MUTUAL RELATION”: Note A (by the translator, Ada Lovelace) to L. F. Menabrea, “Sketch of the Analytical Engine Invented by Charles Babbage,” in Charles Babbage and His Calculating Engines, 247. ♦ “THE ANALYTICAL ENGINE DOES

Bath, 12 September 1888, in Charles Babbage and His Calculating Engines, 331. ♦ “WE EASILY PERCEIVE THAT SINCE EVERY SUCCESSIVE FUNCTION”: Note D (by the translator, Ada Lovelace) to L. F. Menabrea, “Sketch of the Analytical Engine Invented by Charles Babbage.” ♦ “THAT BRAIN OF MINE”: Ada to Babbage, 5 July 1843, in Betty

Alexandra Toole, Ada, the Enchantress of Numbers, 147. ♦ “HOW MULTIFARIOUS AND HOW MUTUALLY COMPLICATED”: Note D (by the translator, Ada Lovelace) to L. F. Menabrea, “Sketch of the Analytical Engine Invented by Charles Babbage.” ♦ “I AM IN MUCH DISMAY”: Ada to Babbage, 13 July 1843, in

Rage Inside the Machine: The Prejudice of Algorithms, and How to Stop the Internet Making Bigots of Us All

by Robert Elliott Smith  · 26 Jun 2019  · 370pp  · 107,983 words

who gave us the first probability distribution), which would have run correctly if the machine had ever been built. It is for this contribution that Ada Lovelace is often described as the world’s first computer programmer; however, that description fails to capture the real novelty and insight of her contribution. While

the imaginings of her forebears and contemporaries, becoming the first person to really see where computing was headed. Unlike Mary Edwards, and even Mary Wollstonecraft, Ada Lovelace had every social advantage. She was a rich aristocrat by birth and marriage who had both fortune and fame. She was not denied an education

spheres, even among contemporary scientists who were sure to have known her. One of those scientists was, of course, Charles Darwin who likely knew of Ada Lovelace’s abilities, perhaps even her formal contributions. It’s possible that they may have met as they both attended Babbage’s popular soirees, but it

would have been while Ada was more famous than he as well as being significantly superior to him socially. Ada Lovelace died of uterine cancer on 27 November 1852. Almost exactly seven years later Darwin rose to become the most famous scientist in history with the

any thinking ‘requiring deep thought, reason, or imagination’. These observations were made despite of the manifest evidence to the contrary of women like Mary Wollstonecraft, Ada Lovelace and Caroline Kennard, along with other contemporary female scientists of note, who Darwin’s corresponded with, thanked for their contributions to his work and encouraged

argue that the most important contribution of Babbage’s Engines was getting people to think seriously about the range of things that computing could do. Ada Lovelace was one of the first people to speculate about computers manipulating not just numbers, but symbols, and how similar such manipulations could be to human

-fi tale Frankenstein could be described very precisely as a tragic version of the hero’s journey. And, in the same way, the story of Ada Lovelace would make a fine Hollywood hero’s journey with Ada as Luke Skywalker, Charles Babbage as Obi-Wan Kenobi and Byron’s Romantic image as

to create the definitive map of the world: ‘wise men contemplate the world, knowing full well that they are contemplating themselves’. I believe that since Ada Lovelace, calling herself an ‘Analyst & Metaphysician’, first contemplated whether computers could do anything creative, AI has done more than any other field of study to explore

Lake Geneva, with his personal physician, John Polidori. Byron was fleeing his abandoned wife, Annabella, and his new-born daughter, Ada (who would later become Ada Lovelace), and was just beginning his lifelong and self-inflicted exile from England. All four of them were true romantics, believers in free love and personal

In Our Own Image: Savior or Destroyer? The History and Future of Artificial Intelligence

by George Zarkadakis  · 7 Mar 2016  · 405pp  · 117,219 words

, would later influence two of the most important heroes in the history of Artificial Intelligence, the English mathematician Charles Babbage and Lord Byron’s daughter Ada Lovelace. These two would go on to invent the first general-purpose computer and write the first computer program respectively. But the achievements of Babbage and

. However, in 1842 the Italian mathematician and military engineer Luigi Menabrea (1809–1896) wrote a description of the machine in French. One year later Countess Ada Lovelace, the daughter of Lord Byron, translated the description into English. Included in her translation was the first computer program ever written, which makes

Ada Lovelace the inventor of software. Ada Lovelace (1815–1852) was the only legitimate child of Lord Byron. A month after she was born, her father abandoned her and her mother, and

her mathematical acumen and used to call her the ‘Enchantress of Numbers’. By annotating her translation of Menabrea’s description of the Analytical Engine,10 Ada Lovelace gave us one of the most significant documents in the history of computing. Impressed with the potential of her friend’s design, she wrote: ‘Mr

could calculate the sequence of the Bernoulli numbers.11 This algorithm is considered to be the first software program ever written. The Analytical Engine and Ada Lovelace’s ‘first program’ have been subjects of fascination for historians and fiction writers alike. How would the world be today if the British Treasury had

the electronic relay that allows electrical automation and switching. 1842: Charles Babbage lectures at the University of Turin, where he describes the Analytical Engine. 1843: Ada Lovelace writes the first computer program. 1847: George Boole invents symbolic and binary logic. 1876: Alexander Graham Bell invents the telephone. 1879: Thomas Edison invents the

The Innovators: How a Group of Inventors, Hackers, Geniuses and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution

by Walter Isaacson  · 6 Oct 2014  · 720pp  · 197,129 words

wife thus became Ada, Countess of Lovelace. She is therefore properly referred to as Ada or Lady Lovelace, though she is now commonly known as Ada Lovelace. That Christmas of 1835, Ada received from her mother the family’s life-size portrait of her father. Painted by Thomas Phillips, it showed Lord

. Babbage named this proposed machine the Analytical Engine. He was one hundred years ahead of his time. The Analytical Engine was the product of what Ada Lovelace, in her essay on imagination, had called “the Combining Faculty.” Babbage had combined innovations that had cropped up in other fields, a trick of many

fund it. Try as he might, Babbage could generate little notice in either the popular press or scientific journals. But he did find one believer. Ada Lovelace fully appreciated the concept of a general-purpose machine. More important, she envisioned an attribute that might make it truly amazing: it could potentially process

the Translator” that ended up totaling 19,136 words, more than twice the length of Menabrea’s original article. Signed “A.A.L.,” for Augusta Ada Lovelace, her “Notes” became more famous than the article and were destined to make her an iconic figure in the history of computing.35 As she

description for the generation of Bernoulli numbers was the first computer program ever to be published. And the initials at the end were those of Ada Lovelace. There was one other significant concept that she introduced in her “Notes,” which harked back to the Frankenstein story produced by Mary Shelley after that

more exciting idea that derived from it: such machines could process not only numbers but anything that could be notated in symbols. Over the years, Ada Lovelace has been celebrated as a feminist icon and a computer pioneer. For example, the U.S. Defense Department named its high-level object-oriented programming

using a finite table of instructions. So could the logarithm of 7, or the square root of 2, or the sequence of Bernoulli numbers that Ada Lovelace had helped produce an algorithm for, or any other number or series, no matter how challenging to compute, as long as its calculation was defined

the instructions of any other machine and carry out whatever task that machine could do. In essence, it embodied the dream of Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace for a completely general-purpose universal machine. A different and less beautiful solution to the Entscheidungsproblem, with the clunkier name “untyped lambda calculus,” had been

that, it was more advanced than the machines built by Atanasoff, Zuse, Aiken, and Stibitz. Using what was called conditional branching (a capability described by Ada Lovelace a century earlier), it could hop around in a program based on its interim results, and it could repeat blocks of code, known as subroutines

were conceived, at least initially, with a specific task in mind, such as solving equations or deciphering codes. A real computer, like that envisioned by Ada Lovelace and then Alan Turing, should be able to perform, seamlessly and quickly, any logical operation. This required machines whose operations were determined not just by

computers focused primarily on the hardware. But the women who became involved during World War II saw early on the importance of programming, just as Ada Lovelace had. They developed ways to code the instructions that told the hardware what operations to perform. In this software lay the magic formulas that could

portion of Babbage’s Difference Engine that Aiken had mounted in his office, and Hopper began with an epigraph from Babbage. She understood, as had Ada Lovelace, that Babbage’s Analytical Engine had a special quality, one that she and Aiken believed would distinguish the Harvard Mark I from other computers of

, and clear. With their strong partnership, Hopper and Aiken became the modern counterparts, a century later, of Lovelace and Babbage. The more she learned about Ada Lovelace, the more Hopper identified with her. “She wrote the first loop,” Hopper said. “I will never forget. None of us ever will.”9 Hopper’s

Mark I contained subroutines for sine x, log10 x, and 10x, each called for by a single operational code.”17 It was a concept that Ada Lovelace had originally described in her “Notes” on the Analytical Engine. Hopper collected a growing library of these subroutines. She also developed, while programming the Mark

was especially good at devising the fundamentals of computer programming, which was still an ill-defined craft that had advanced little in the century since Ada Lovelace wrote down the steps for getting the Analytical Engine to generate Bernoulli numbers. Creating an elegant instruction set, he realized, involved both rigorous logic and

happen he did not explain, but it and millions of other such ramifications did in fact eventually transpire. Later Jennings complained, in the tradition of Ada Lovelace, that many of the newspaper reports overstated what ENIAC could do by calling it a “giant brain” and implying that it could think. “The ENIAC

the early 1970s. CAN MACHINES THINK? As he thought about the development of stored-program computers, Alan Turing turned his attention to the assertion that Ada Lovelace had made a century earlier, in her final “Note” on Babbage’s Analytical Engine: that machines could not really think. If a machine could modify

new gambits and refine its strategy with every new win or loss. This approach, if successful, would represent a fundamental leap that would have dazzled Ada Lovelace: machines would be able to do more than merely follow the specific instructions given them by humans; they could learn from experience and refine their

confer a soul upon a machine if He so desired. The most interesting objection, especially for our narrative, is the one that Turing attributed to Ada Lovelace. “The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything,” she wrote in 1843. “It can do whatever we know how to order it to

a real speaker of Chinese. Nevertheless, he would not have understood a single response that he made, nor would he have exhibited any intentionality. In Ada Lovelace’s words, he would have no pretensions whatever to originate anything but instead would merely do whatever actions he was ordered to perform. Similarly, the

does his thinking with symbolized concepts (whether in the form of the English language, pictographs, formal logic, or mathematics) should be able to benefit significantly.” Ada Lovelace would have been thrilled. Engelbart’s treatise appeared the same month that Licklider, who had explored the same concepts two years earlier in his “Man

the Dynabook, titled “A Personal Computer for Children of All Ages,” that was partly a product proposal but mostly a manifesto. He began by quoting Ada Lovelace’s seminal insight about how computers could be used for creative tasks: “The Analytical Engine weaves algebraical patterns just as the Jacquard loom weaves flowers

song. The members of the Homebrew Club had found a computer they could take home and make do all sorts of beautiful things, including, as Ada Lovelace had predicted, rendering music. Dompier published his musical program in the next issue of the People’s Computer Company, which led to a historically noteworthy

made with a mesh of associative trails running through them, ready to be dropped into the memex and there amplified.” It also harkened back to Ada Lovelace, who asserted that machines would be able to do almost anything, except think on their own. Wikipedia was not about building a machine that could

. Anyone could share with people anywhere and, as the Victorian-era almanac promised, enquire within upon everything. CHAPTER TWELVE ADA FOREVER LADY LOVELACE’S OBJECTION Ada Lovelace would have been pleased. To the extent that we are permitted to surmise the thoughts of someone who’s been dead for more than 150

never devise any inventions more beautiful, nor more simple, nor more to the purpose than Nature does.” There is, however, yet another possibility, one that Ada Lovelace would like, which is based on the half century of computer development in the tradition of Vannevar Bush, J. C. R. Licklider, and Doug Engelbart

. HUMAN-COMPUTER SYMBIOSIS: “WATSON, COME HERE” “The Analytical Engine has no pretensions whatever to originate anything,” Ada Lovelace declared. “It can do whatever we know how to order it to perform.” In her mind, machines would not replace humans but instead become their

the 1890 census. “The second generation involved programmable machines that used the von Neumann architecture. You had to tell them what to do.” Beginning with Ada Lovelace, people wrote algorithms that instructed these computers, step by step, how to perform tasks. “Because of the proliferation of data,” Rometty adds, “there is no

computer at Harvard, he was inspired by a fragment of Charles Babbage’s Difference Engine that he found, and he made his crew members read Ada Lovelace’s “Notes.” The most productive teams were those that brought together people with a wide array of specialties. Bell Labs was a classic example. In

. They are what we make of them. ADA’S LASTING LESSON: POETICAL SCIENCE That leads to a final lesson, one that takes us back to Ada Lovelace. As she pointed out, in our symbiosis with machines we humans have brought one crucial element to the partnership: creativity. The history of the digital

are able to link beauty to engineering, humanity to technology, and poetry to processors. In other words, it will come from the spiritual heirs of Ada Lovelace, creators who can flourish where the arts intersect with the sciences and who have a rebellious sense of wonder that opens them to the beauty

: my father, Irwin (an electrical engineer); my brother, Lee (a computer consultant); and my daughter, Betsy (a tech writer, who first turned me on to Ada Lovelace). Most of all, I am grateful to my wife, Cathy, the wisest reader and most loving person I’ve ever known. NOTES INTRODUCTION 1. Henry

(Morrow, 1963); James Gleick, The Information (Pantheon, 2011), chapter 4. Unless otherwise noted, quotes from Ada’s letters rely on the Toole transcriptions. Writers about Ada Lovelace range from canonizers to debunkers. The most sympathetic books are those by Toole, Woolley, and Baum; the most scholarly and balanced is Stein’s. For

a debunking of Ada Lovelace, see Bruce Collier, “The Little Engines That Could’ve,” PhD dissertation, Harvard, 1970, http://robroy.dyndns.info/collier/. He writes, “She was a manic depressive

cover for the first time, the MIT-trained do-it-yourself entrepreneur Limor Fried, whose moniker “ladyada” and company name Adafruit Industries were homages to Ada Lovelace. 31. To listen to Dompier’s Altair play “Fool on the Hill,” go to http://startup.nmnaturalhistory.org/gallery/story.php?ii=46. 32. After

Tools for Thought: The History and Future of Mind-Expanding Technology

by Howard Rheingold  · 14 May 2000  · 352pp  · 120,202 words

his life: 'He spoke as if he hated mankind in general, Englishmen in particular, and the English Government and Organ Grinders most of all.'" While Ada Lovelace has been unofficially known to the inner circles of programmers since the 1950s, when card-punched batch-processing was not altogether different from Ada's

of driving so recklessly that he demolished automobiles at regular intervals, always managing to emerge miraculously unscathed. Despite his apparently charmed existence, von Neumann, like Ada Lovelace and Alan Turing, died relatively young. Lovelace died of cancer at thirty-six, Turing of cyanide at forty-two, and von Neumann of cancer at

less unusual than the software patriarchs who preceded them. Eccentrics and prodigies of both the blissful and agonized varieties dominated the early history of computation. Ada Lovelace, George Boole, John von Neumann, Alan Turing, and Presper Eckert were all in their early twenties or younger when they did their most important work

12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next

by Jeanette Winterson  · 15 Mar 2021  · 256pp  · 73,068 words

WHERE WE MIGHT GO NEXT JEANETTE WINTERSON Grove Press New York Copyright © 2021 by Jeanette Winterson Jacket details: woman © Michael Nelson/Trevillion Images; portrait of Ada Lovelace by Alfred Chalon © Science Museum/SSPL; frame © Getty Images All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by

, computers weren’t powerful enough to do what McCarthy, Minsky and Turing knew they would be able to do. And before those men, there was Ada Lovelace, the early-19th century genius who inspired Alan Turing to devise the Turing Test – when we can no longer tell the difference between AI and

How We Got Here. A Few Lessons From History. Love(Lace) Actually At the beginning of the future were two young women: Mary Shelley and Ada Lovelace. Mary was born in 1797. Ada was born in 1815. Each of these young women tore their way into history in the early years of

Zone mansplaining is still alive and well on the web. More accurately, and more importantly, there is now Ada Lovelace Day, celebrated on the second Tuesday of October. In the UK we have the Ada Lovelace Institute (founded 2018), an independent body whose mission is to ensure that data use and AI technology work

soul, but he was interested in whether or not a computer could originate (as well as learn) independently of human input. Turing took issue with Ada Lovelace on this matter – though again we have to remember that he took issue 110 years after her statement that a computer could not originate anything

might decide, or AI might decide, that it doesn’t matter. * * * Mary Shelley may be closer to the world that is to come than either Ada Lovelace or Alan Turing. A new kind of life-form may not need to be like a human at all (the cute helper bot or the

chess. Machines that could talk to you. Think with you. And one day, perhaps, think beyond you. Turing was ahead of his time, just as Ada Lovelace was ahead of hers. Arrested for gross indecency in 1952, Turing didn’t live to see, or to work on, the astonishing breakthroughs of the

degrees. Between 1921 and 1948 the men awarding these semi-degrees called them BA tit. (Thanks, guys.) * * * Women like Philippa Fawcett were seen as flukes. Ada Lovelace, the world’s first computer programmer, was seen as a fluke. Here’s Gustave Le Bon, medic and polymath, and author of the 1895 bestseller

nominated by two existing fellows (who are probably men). It’s not hard to do the gender-maths here. We are only recently learning about Ada Lovelace, Grace Hopper, Katherine Johnson, Margaret Hamilton, Stephanie Shirley, the women at Bletchley Park. Listening to the ahistorical, fact-free-free-speech ‘heroes’ telling us that

, intelligent people who are not working in the field. What do you make of ‘disambiguation’? ‘Participatory mechanisms’? ‘Rapid online deliberation’? Now see below from the Ada Lovelace Institute: Privacy-enhancing technologies (PETs) are increasingly being advocated as a means to help ensure regulatory compliance and the protection of commercially confidential information more

mature market offerings and others still undergoing significant development. I am not being mean to Ada-wonks – and I am a flag-waver for the Ada Lovelace Institute – but their written content is torture. And they are far from being the only language-manglers. This is typical stuff. It really matters that

Literary Theory for Robots: How Computers Learned to Write

by Dennis Yi Tenen  · 6 Feb 2024  · 169pp  · 41,887 words

inscription. History tells us that computers compute not only in the mathematical sense but universally. The number was incidental to the symbol. In the 1840s, Ada Lovelace, daughter of Lord Byron and one of the first “programmers” in the modern sense, imagined an engine that could manipulate any symbolic information whatsoever (not

problem. And was likely using the first computer ever to bet on horses. The conventional story has Charles Babbage, another Royal Society member, together with Ada Lovelace originating the concept of a digital programmable computer sometime in the 1820s. Things were a bit more complicated, however. The Analytical Engine, as Babbage called

to high-­minded topics like war and justice. Neither Aristotle nor Babbage tolerated an epistemic mess, obsessively compelled to make lists, even in passing. Young Ada Lovelace, a daughter of nobility, visited Babbage’s fashionable salons alongside other illustrious visitors like Charles Darwin, Michael Faraday, and Charles Dickens. She was introduced for

Transactions of the Royal Society of London 116, no. 1/3 (1826): 250–­65. 57 Whatever the arrangement of objects in: L. F. Menabrea and Ada Lovelace (1842), “Sketch of the Analytical Engine Invented by Charles Babbage Esq.” in Scientific Memoirs, Selected from the Transactions of Foreign Academics of Science and Learned

Coders: The Making of a New Tribe and the Remaking of the World

by Clive Thompson  · 26 Mar 2019  · 499pp  · 144,278 words

field where things went backward, and women were actually chased away. Why? It’s often noted that the first computer programmer ever was a woman: Ada Lovelace. As a young mathematician in Victorian England, she met Charles Babbage, the inventor who was trying to create an Analytical Engine. The Engine was a

: My description of Lovelace’s life and work draws from James Essinger, Ada’s Algorithm: How Lord Byron’s Daughter Ada Lovelace Launched the Digital Age (New York: Melville House, 2014); Betsy Morais, “Ada Lovelace, the First Tech Visionary,” New Yorker, October 15, 2013, accessed August 18, 2018, https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements

/ada-lovelace-the-first-tech-visionary; Amy Jollymore, “Ada Lovelace, An Indirect and Reciprocal Influence,” Forbes, October 15, 2013, accessed August 18, 2018, https://www

.forbes.com/sites/oreillymedia/2013/10/15/ada-lovelace-an-indirect-and-reciprocal-influence; Valerie Aurora, “Deleting Ada Lovelace from the History of Computing,” Ada Initiative

, August 24, 2013, accessed August 18, 2018, https://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/ada-lovelace-the-first-tech-visionary; Amy Jollymore, “Ada Lovelace, An Indirect and Reciprocal Influence,” Forbes, October 15

, 2013, accessed August 18, 2018, https://www.forbes.com/sites/oreillymedia/2013/10/15/ada-lovelace-an-indirect-and-reciprocal-influence; Valerie Aurora, “Deleting Ada Lovelace from the History of Computing,” Ada Initiative, August 24, 2013, accessed August 18, 2018, https://adainitiative.org/2013/08/24/deleting

-ada-lovelace-from-the-history-of-computing. it contained a bug: Eugene Eric Kim and Betty Alexandra Toole, “Ada and the First Computer,” Scientific American, May 1999,

Broad Band: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the Internet

by Claire L. Evans  · 6 Mar 2018  · 371pp  · 93,570 words

, a hundred times, by teenage girls at their desks in the heart of their kingdoms, on machines beyond your wildest imagination. KILOGIRLS By her insistence, Ada Lovelace was buried next to her father in a small church near his ancestral estate of Newstead Abbey. Her coffin, finished in soft violet velvet, bore

designed a general-purpose computer—think of the difference between Charles Babbage’s one-note Difference Engine and the speculative Analytical Engine, which so entranced Ada Lovelace. It could perform an essentially limitless number of computational functions, as long as new programs for it were written. In its time at the Moore

or otherwise. Many of Grace’s female peers worked tirelessly to develop and standardize programming strategies that would transform the early computer industry, just as Ada Lovelace had made the mental leap from hardware to software a century before. But although the Difference Engine was never finished and the Analytical Engine was

blood workers, the bodies which composed them were female.” With our twenty-first-century brains, we all have a shot at being as clever as Ada Lovelace, the Harvard computers, or a wartime ballistics calculator at Penn. But there’s only so far we can reach before we hit the ultimate threshold

and faxed it to tech magazines and feminist artists around the world, proclaiming the dawn of a new age: a century and a half after Ada Lovelace first scratched a computer program onto paper, it was time for women to become the virus, the signal, and the pulse of the network. When

around them. It was an evocative vision of women’s bodily connection to networked computing, a connection that emerged before the technology itself, beginning with Ada Lovelace and the countless uncounted female computers—a lineage Plant traces in her book, much as I have in mine. Sadie Plant and VNS Matrix are

step is to learn all the strategies of triumph and survival we can from our forebears, and I hope this book has unearthed a few: Ada Lovelace’s refusal of propriety, Grace Hopper’s forward-thinking tenacity, and the support the women of Resource One gave one another. Jake Feinler’s clarity

How We Got to Now: Six Innovations That Made the Modern World

by Steven Johnson  · 28 Sep 2014  · 243pp  · 65,374 words

was a wretch, and that such a rebellious, unconventional lifestyle could only end in ruin. And so, at the still young age of twenty-five, Ada Lovelace found herself at a crossroads, confronting two very different ways of being an adult in the world. She could resign herself to the settled path

of society propelled her toward it. And yet, like it or not, she was still Byron’s daughter. A conventional life seemed increasingly unthinkable. But Ada Lovelace found a way around the impasse she had confronted in her mid-twenties. In collaboration with another brilliant Victorian who was equally ahead of his

able to imagine the idea of “writing” sound waves because he had borrowed metaphors from stenography and printing and anatomical studies of the human ear. Ada Lovelace could see the aesthetic possibilities of Babbage’s Analytical Engine because her life had been lived at a unique collision point between advanced math and

The Internet Is Not What You Think It Is: A History, a Philosophy, a Warning

by Justin E. H. Smith  · 22 Mar 2022  · 198pp  · 59,351 words

The Creativity Code: How AI Is Learning to Write, Paint and Think

by Marcus Du Sautoy  · 7 Mar 2019  · 337pp  · 103,522 words

The Future Is Faster Than You Think: How Converging Technologies Are Transforming Business, Industries, and Our Lives

by Peter H. Diamandis and Steven Kotler  · 28 Jan 2020  · 501pp  · 114,888 words

When Einstein Walked With Gödel: Excursions to the Edge of Thought

by Jim Holt  · 14 May 2018  · 436pp  · 127,642 words

Computer: A History of the Information Machine

by Martin Campbell-Kelly and Nathan Ensmenger  · 29 Jul 2013  · 528pp  · 146,459 words

Turing's Vision: The Birth of Computer Science

by Chris Bernhardt  · 12 May 2016  · 210pp  · 62,771 words

Thinking Machines: The Inside Story of Artificial Intelligence and Our Race to Build the Future

by Luke Dormehl  · 10 Aug 2016  · 252pp  · 74,167 words

How to Fix the Future: Staying Human in the Digital Age

by Andrew Keen  · 1 Mar 2018  · 308pp  · 85,880 words

Protocol: how control exists after decentralization

by Alexander R. Galloway  · 1 Apr 2004  · 287pp  · 86,919 words

The TypeScript Workshop: A Practical Guide to Confident, Effective TypeScript Programming

by Ben Grynhaus, Jordan Hudgens, Rayon Hunte, Matthew Thomas Morgan and Wekoslav Stefanovski  · 28 Jul 2021  · 739pp  · 174,990 words

Journey to Crossrail

by Stephen Halliday  · 124pp  · 38,034 words

Prediction Machines: The Simple Economics of Artificial Intelligence

by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb  · 16 Apr 2018  · 345pp  · 75,660 words

Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control

by Stuart Russell  · 7 Oct 2019  · 416pp  · 112,268 words

The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence

by Ray Kurzweil  · 31 Dec 1998  · 696pp  · 143,736 words

Automate This: How Algorithms Came to Rule Our World

by Christopher Steiner  · 29 Aug 2012  · 317pp  · 84,400 words

The Big Nine: How the Tech Titans and Their Thinking Machines Could Warp Humanity

by Amy Webb  · 5 Mar 2019  · 340pp  · 97,723 words

Darwin Among the Machines

by George Dyson  · 28 Mar 2012  · 463pp  · 118,936 words

Empire of the Sum: The Rise and Reign of the Pocket Calculator

by Keith Houston  · 22 Aug 2023  · 405pp  · 105,395 words

Filterworld: How Algorithms Flattened Culture

by Kyle Chayka  · 15 Jan 2024  · 321pp  · 105,480 words

Nine Algorithms That Changed the Future: The Ingenious Ideas That Drive Today's Computers

by John MacCormick and Chris Bishop  · 27 Dec 2011  · 250pp  · 73,574 words

The Long History of the Future: Why Tomorrow's Technology Still Isn't Here

by Nicole Kobie  · 3 Jul 2024  · 348pp  · 119,358 words

Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach

by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig  · 14 Jul 2019  · 2,466pp  · 668,761 words

Paper: A World History

by Mark Kurlansky  · 3 Apr 2016  · 485pp  · 126,597 words

The Most Human Human: What Talking With Computers Teaches Us About What It Means to Be Alive

by Brian Christian  · 1 Mar 2011  · 370pp  · 94,968 words

Ways of Being: Beyond Human Intelligence

by James Bridle  · 6 Apr 2022  · 502pp  · 132,062 words

Blood in the Machine: The Origins of the Rebellion Against Big Tech

by Brian Merchant  · 25 Sep 2023  · 524pp  · 154,652 words

Why Information Grows: The Evolution of Order, From Atoms to Economies

by Cesar Hidalgo  · 1 Jun 2015  · 242pp  · 68,019 words

Artificial Intelligence: A Guide for Thinking Humans

by Melanie Mitchell  · 14 Oct 2019  · 350pp  · 98,077 words

The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution That Made Computing Personal

by M. Mitchell Waldrop  · 14 Apr 2001

Where Good Ideas Come from: The Natural History of Innovation

by Steven Johnson  · 5 Oct 2010  · 298pp  · 81,200 words

A World Beneath the Sands: The Golden Age of Egyptology

by Toby Wilkinson  · 19 Oct 2020

The Equality Machine: Harnessing Digital Technology for a Brighter, More Inclusive Future

by Orly Lobel  · 17 Oct 2022  · 370pp  · 112,809 words

The Musical Human: A History of Life on Earth

by Michael Spitzer  · 31 Mar 2021  · 632pp  · 163,143 words

The Story of Crossrail

by Christian Wolmar  · 5 Sep 2018  · 292pp  · 85,381 words

The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility

by Robert Zubrin  · 30 Apr 2019  · 452pp  · 126,310 words

Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI

by Karen Hao  · 19 May 2025  · 660pp  · 179,531 words

Wonderland: How Play Made the Modern World

by Steven Johnson  · 15 Nov 2016  · 322pp  · 88,197 words

The Aristocracy of Talent: How Meritocracy Made the Modern World

by Adrian Wooldridge  · 2 Jun 2021  · 693pp  · 169,849 words

The Myth of Artificial Intelligence: Why Computers Can't Think the Way We Do

by Erik J. Larson  · 5 Apr 2021

The Music of the Primes

by Marcus Du Sautoy  · 26 Apr 2004  · 434pp  · 135,226 words

The Perfect Bet: How Science and Math Are Taking the Luck Out of Gambling

by Adam Kucharski  · 23 Feb 2016  · 360pp  · 85,321 words

When Things Start to Think

by Neil A. Gershenfeld  · 15 Feb 1999  · 238pp  · 46 words

The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty

by Benjamin H. Bratton  · 19 Feb 2016  · 903pp  · 235,753 words

Artificial Unintelligence: How Computers Misunderstand the World

by Meredith Broussard  · 19 Apr 2018  · 245pp  · 83,272 words

The Man From the Future: The Visionary Life of John Von Neumann

by Ananyo Bhattacharya  · 6 Oct 2021  · 476pp  · 121,460 words

Exponential: How Accelerating Technology Is Leaving Us Behind and What to Do About It

by Azeem Azhar  · 6 Sep 2021  · 447pp  · 111,991 words

Humans Are Underrated: What High Achievers Know That Brilliant Machines Never Will

by Geoff Colvin  · 3 Aug 2015  · 271pp  · 77,448 words

The Data Detective: Ten Easy Rules to Make Sense of Statistics

by Tim Harford  · 2 Feb 2021  · 428pp  · 103,544 words

Material World: A Substantial Story of Our Past and Future

by Ed Conway  · 15 Jun 2023  · 515pp  · 152,128 words

Cataloging the World: Paul Otlet and the Birth of the Information Age

by Alex Wright  · 6 Jun 2014

The Runaway Species: How Human Creativity Remakes the World

by David Eagleman and Anthony Brandt  · 30 Sep 2017  · 345pp  · 84,847 words

QI: The Second Book of General Ignorance

by Lloyd, John and Mitchinson, John  · 7 Oct 2010  · 469pp  · 97,582 words

Servants: A Downstairs History of Britain From the Nineteenth Century to Modern Times

by Lucy Lethbridge  · 18 Nov 2013  · 457pp  · 128,640 words

Geek Wisdom

by Stephen H. Segal  · 2 Aug 2011

Leonardo Da Vinci

by Walter Isaacson  · 16 Oct 2017  · 799pp  · 187,221 words

Novacene: The Coming Age of Hyperintelligence

by James Lovelock  · 27 Aug 2019  · 94pp  · 33,179 words

The Molecule of More: How a Single Chemical in Your Brain Drives Love, Sex, and Creativityand Will Det Ermine the Fate of the Human Race

by Daniel Z. Lieberman and Michael E. Long  · 13 Aug 2018  · 287pp  · 78,609 words

Deep Thinking: Where Machine Intelligence Ends and Human Creativity Begins

by Garry Kasparov  · 1 May 2017  · 331pp  · 104,366 words

Robot Rules: Regulating Artificial Intelligence

by Jacob Turner  · 29 Oct 2018  · 688pp  · 147,571 words

Code Complete (Developer Best Practices)

by Steve McConnell  · 8 Jun 2004  · 1,758pp  · 342,766 words

Work Won't Love You Back: How Devotion to Our Jobs Keeps Us Exploited, Exhausted, and Alone

by Sarah Jaffe  · 26 Jan 2021  · 490pp  · 153,455 words

Coders at Work

by Peter Seibel  · 22 Jun 2009  · 1,201pp  · 233,519 words

The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century's Greatest Dilemma

by Mustafa Suleyman  · 4 Sep 2023  · 444pp  · 117,770 words

Trees on Mars: Our Obsession With the Future

by Hal Niedzviecki  · 15 Mar 2015  · 343pp  · 102,846 words

Time Travel: A History

by James Gleick  · 26 Sep 2016  · 257pp  · 80,100 words

More: The 10,000-Year Rise of the World Economy

by Philip Coggan  · 6 Feb 2020  · 524pp  · 155,947 words

Lurking: How a Person Became a User

by Joanne McNeil  · 25 Feb 2020  · 239pp  · 80,319 words

The Hunt for Red October

by Tom Clancy  · 2 Jan 1984  · 594pp  · 165,413 words

The Road to Conscious Machines

by Michael Wooldridge  · 2 Nov 2018  · 346pp  · 97,890 words

Brotopia: Breaking Up the Boys' Club of Silicon Valley

by Emily Chang  · 6 Feb 2018  · 334pp  · 104,382 words

What We Owe the Future: A Million-Year View

by William MacAskill  · 31 Aug 2022  · 451pp  · 125,201 words

Greater: Britain After the Storm

by Penny Mordaunt and Chris Lewis  · 19 May 2021  · 516pp  · 116,875 words

Searches: Selfhood in the Digital Age

by Vauhini Vara  · 8 Apr 2025  · 301pp  · 105,209 words

The Vanishing Face of Gaia: A Final Warning

by James E. Lovelock  · 1 Jan 2009  · 239pp  · 68,598 words

The Founders: The Story of Paypal and the Entrepreneurs Who Shaped Silicon Valley

by Jimmy Soni  · 22 Feb 2022  · 505pp  · 161,581 words

Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions

by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths  · 4 Apr 2016  · 523pp  · 143,139 words

The Age of Wonder

by Richard Holmes  · 15 Jan 2008  · 778pp  · 227,196 words

Fall; Or, Dodge in Hell

by Neal Stephenson  · 3 Jun 2019  · 993pp  · 318,161 words

Men Who Hate Women: From Incels to Pickup Artists, the Truth About Extreme Misogyny and How It Affects Us All

by Laura Bates  · 2 Sep 2020  · 364pp  · 119,398 words

The Kingdom of Speech

by Tom Wolfe  · 30 Aug 2016

Incognito: The Secret Lives of the Brain

by David Eagleman  · 29 May 2011  · 383pp  · 92,837 words

Surviving AI: The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence

by Calum Chace  · 28 Jul 2015  · 144pp  · 43,356 words

The People vs Tech: How the Internet Is Killing Democracy (And How We Save It)

by Jamie Bartlett  · 4 Apr 2018  · 170pp  · 49,193 words

From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds

by Daniel C. Dennett  · 7 Feb 2017  · 573pp  · 157,767 words

To Be a Machine: Adventures Among Cyborgs, Utopians, Hackers, and the Futurists Solving the Modest Problem of Death

by Mark O'Connell  · 28 Feb 2017  · 252pp  · 79,452 words

Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup's Quest to End Privacy as We Know It

by Kashmir Hill  · 19 Sep 2023  · 487pp  · 124,008 words

Boom: Bubbles and the End of Stagnation

by Byrne Hobart and Tobias Huber  · 29 Oct 2024  · 292pp  · 106,826 words

The Blockchain Alternative: Rethinking Macroeconomic Policy and Economic Theory

by Kariappa Bheemaiah  · 26 Feb 2017  · 492pp  · 118,882 words

Rule Britannia: Brexit and the End of Empire

by Danny Dorling and Sally Tomlinson  · 15 Jan 2019  · 502pp  · 128,126 words