Andrew Wiles

back to index

description: British mathematician; (born 1953)

person

43 results

Think Like a Rocket Scientist: Simple Strategies You Can Use to Make Giant Leaps in Work and Life

by Ozan Varol  · 13 Apr 2020  · 389pp  · 112,319 words

(and made them wish Fermat had a bigger book to write on). Generations of mathematicians tried—and failed—to prove Fermat’s last theorem. Until Andrew Wiles came along. For most ten-year-olds, the definition of a good time doesn’t include reading math books for fun. But Wiles was no

you start walking. William Herschel started walking, grinding mirrors, and reading astronomy-for-dummies books even though he had no idea he would discover Uranus. Andrew Wiles started walking when he picked up a book on Fermat’s last theorem as a teenager, not knowing where his curiosity might lead. Steve Squyres

we own the process or does the process own us?”7 When necessary, we must unlearn what we know and start over. This is why Andrew Wiles—the mathematician who solved the centuries-old Fermat’s last theorem—said, “It’s bad to have too good a memory if you want to

, and sometimes years. Research shows that incubation periods—the time you spend feeling stuck—boosts the ability to solve problems.40 As we saw earlier, Andrew Wiles became a mathematical celebrity after proving Fermat’s last theorem. Being stuck, according to Wiles, is “part of the process.”41 But “people don’t

Last Theorem: The Story of a Riddle That Confounded the World’s Greatest Minds for 358 Years (London: Fourth Estate, 1997); NOVA, “Solving Fermat: Andrew Wiles,” interview with Andrew Wiles, PBS, October 31, 2000, www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/proof/wiles.html; Gina Kolata, “At Last, Shout of ‘Eureka!’ in Age-Old Math Mystery

-you. 7. Jeff Bezos, Letter to Amazon Shareholders, 2016, Ex-99.1, SEC.gov, www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1018724/000119312517120198/d373368dex991.htm. 8. Andrew Wiles, quoted in Ben Orlin, “The State of Being Stuck,” Math with Bad Drawings (blog), September 20, 2017, https://mathwithbaddrawings.com/2017/09/20/the-state

(blog), September 20, 2017, https://mathwithbaddrawings.com/2017/09/20/the-state-of-being-stuck. 42. NOVA, “Solving Fermat: Andrew Wiles,” interview with Andrew Wiles, PBS, October 31, 2000, www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/article/andrew-wiles-fermat. 43. Judah Pollack and Olivia Fox Cabane, Butterfly and the Net: The Art and Practice of Breakthrough Thinking

The Runaway Species: How Human Creativity Remakes the World

by David Eagleman and Anthony Brandt  · 30 Sep 2017  · 345pp  · 84,847 words

only to die unfulfilled. No one was sure if Fermat was correct, or if a proof were even possible. When he was ten years old, Andrew Wiles learned about Fermat’s Last Theorem by pulling down a book at random in his public library. “It looked so simple, and yet all the

A. The Design of Everyday Things: Revised and Expanded Edition. New York: Basic Books, 2013. NOVA, “Andrew Wiles on Solving Fermat.” PBS. November 1, 2000. Accessed May 11, 2016. <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/andrew-wiles-fermat.html> Oates, Joyce Carol. “The Myth of the Isolated Artist.” Pyschology Today 6, 1973: 74

Karin Bijsterveld, The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012). 9 NOVA, “Andrew Wiles on Solving Fermat,” PBS, November 1, 2000, accessed May 11, 2016, <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/andrew-wiles-fermat.html> 10 Simon Singh, Fermat’s Enigma: The Epic Quest to Solve the World’s

Karin Bijsterveld, The Oxford Handbook of Sound Studies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012). 9 NOVA, “Andrew Wiles on Solving Fermat,” PBS, November 1, 2000, accessed May 11, 2016, <http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics/andrew-wiles-fermat.html> 10 Simon Singh, Fermat’s Enigma: The Epic Quest to Solve the World’s

The Music of the Primes

by Marcus Du Sautoy  · 26 Apr 2004  · 434pp  · 135,226 words

to fly in to Princeton to share the moment. Memories were still fresh with the excitement of a few years earlier when an English mathematician, Andrew Wiles, had announced a proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem in a lecture delivered in Cambridge in June 1993. Wiles had proved that Fermat had been

. Fermat’s Last Theorem had fallen foul of an April Fool prank that emerged just after a gap had appeared in the first proof that Andrew Wiles had proposed in Cambridge. With Bombieri’s email, the mathematical community had been duped again. Eager to relive the buzz of seeing Fermat proved, they

enjoyed the attention that Wiles’s solution to Fermat had brought them as mathematicians. This feeling undoubtedly contributed to the desire to believe Bombieri. Suddenly, Andrew Wiles was being asked to model chinos for Gap. It felt good. It felt almost sexy to be a mathematician. Mathematicians spend so much time in

seven problems to challenge the mathematical community for the new millennium. They were proposed by a small group of the world’s finest mathematicians, including Andrew Wiles and Alain Connes. The seven problems were new except for one that had appeared on Hilbert’s list: the Riemann Hypothesis. In obeisance to the

and elegance of mathematics that drive mathematicians.’ But Clay is not naive, and as a businessman he knows how a million dollars might inspire another Andrew Wiles to join the chase for the solutions of these great unsolved problems. Indeed, the Clay Mathematics Institute’s website, where the Millennium Problems were posted

the occasion of the International Congress of Mathematicians. The first ones were awarded in Oslo in 1936. The age limit is strictly adhered to. Despite Andrew Wiles’s extraordinary achievement in proving Fermat’s Last Theorem, the Fields Medal committee weren’t able to award him a medal at the Congress in

the page. Fermat never recorded his supposed proof anywhere, and his marginal comments became the biggest mathematical tease in the history of the subject. Until Andrew Wiles provided an argument, a proof of why Fermat’s equations really had no interesting solutions, it actually remained a hypothesis – merely wishful thinking. Gauss’s

. Within ten years the seventh problem had fallen. It is also just possible that some young graduate at Hilbert’s 1919 lecture lived to witness Andrew Wiles’s proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem in 1994. Despite exciting progress over the last few decades, the Riemann Hypothesis might indeed still be unresolved

appeared in the Annals of Mathematics, the Princeton-based publication generally regarded as one of the three leading mathematical journals in the world, and where Andrew Wiles eventually published his proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. Erdos was furious. He asked Hermann Weyl to adjudicate the issue. Selberg recounts, ‘I take pleasure

behind these new codes, but something more exotic: elliptic curves. These curves are defined by special types of equations, and lay at the heart of Andrew Wiles’s proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. They had already found their way into the cryptographic world as part of a new method to crack

function, he was yet to be convinced of a genuine link. Sarnak is one of the leading lights at Princeton and was a confidant of Andrew Wiles during Wiles’s secretly mounted attack on Fermat’s Last Theorem. Sarnak’s interest in the Riemann Hypothesis began in the mid-1970s, when he

up, not without regret.’ Weil was in close contact throughout his life with Goro Shimura, one of the Japanese mathematicians who formulated the conjecture that Andrew Wiles solved on his way to Fermat’s Last Theorem. Shimura recalls how Weil admitted to him once in later life, ‘I’d like to see

the Hypothesis to be proved before they can be launched. The solution will be just a beginning, an opening up of uncharted virgin territory. In Andrew Wiles’s words, the proof of the Riemann Hypothesis will allow us the possibility to navigate this world in the same way that the solution to

Fermat’s Last Theorem

by Simon Singh  · 1 Jan 1997  · 289pp  · 85,315 words

celebration. On that particular afternoon, there were not so very many people around, but enough for me to be uncertain as to which one was Andrew Wiles. After a few moments I picked out a shy-looking man, listening to the conversation around him, sipping tea, and indulging in the ritual gathering

. I had met some of the finest mathematicians alive, and begun to gain an insight into their world. But despite every attempt to pin down Andrew Wiles, to speak to him, and to convince him to take part in a BBC Horizon documentary film on his achievement, this was our first meeting

vessel. He had found a flaw in his heralded proof. The story of Fermat’s Last Theorem is unique. By the time I first met Andrew Wiles, I had come to realise that it is truly one of the greatest stories in the sphere of scientific or academic endeavour. I had seen

. From his friends in Princeton I heard of the intricate progress of Andrew’s years of isolated study. I built up an extraordinary picture around Andrew Wiles, and the puzzle that dominated his life, but I seemed destined never to meet the man himself. Although the maths involved in Wiles’s proof

its centrality to maths never diminished. Problems around numbers, such as the one Fermat posed, are like playground puzzles, and mathematicians like solving puzzles. To Andrew Wiles it was a very special puzzle, and nothing less than his life’s ambition. Thirty years before, as a child, he had been inspired by

worlds. For many, the goal of one unified mathematics is supreme, and this was a glimpse of just such a world. So in proving Fermat, Andrew Wiles had cemented some of the most important number theory of the post-war period, and had secured the base of a pyramid of conjectures that

time when maths was in its infancy, had been waiting for this moment. The story of Fermat had ended in the most spectacular fashion. For Andrew Wiles, it meant the end of professional isolation of a kind almost alien to maths, which is usually a collaborative activity. Ritual afternoon tea in mathematics

central to the proof, only half jokingly suggested to me that it is the insecurity of mathematicians that requires the support structure of their colleagues. Andrew Wiles had eschewed all that, and kept his work to himself in all but the final stages. That too was a measure of the importance of

. In writing this book I have chosen a largely chronological structure which begins by describing the revolutionary ethos of the Pythagorean Brotherhood, and ends with Andrew Wiles’s personal story of his struggle to find a solution to Fermat’s conundrum. Chapter 1 tells the story of Pythagoras, and describes how Pythagoras

the last forty years which have revolutionised the study of Fermat’s Last Theorem. In particular Chapters 6 and 7 focus on the work of Andrew Wiles, whose breakthroughs in the last decade astonished the mathematical community. These later chapters are based on extensive interviews with Wiles. This was a unique opportunity

areas of mathematics. This book would not have been possible without the help and involvement of many people. In particular I would like to thank Andrew Wiles, who went out of his way to give long and detailed interviews during a time of intense pressure. During my seven years as a science

. Were they watching a complete proof to Fermat’s Last Theorem, or was the lecturer merely outlining an incomplete and anticlimactic argument? The lecturer was Andrew Wiles, a reserved Englishman who had emigrated to America in the 1980s and taken up a professorship at Princeton University where he had earned a reputation

past fifty.’ Middle-aged mathematicians often fade into the background and occupy their remaining years teaching or administrating rather than researching. In the case of Andrew Wiles nothing could be further from the truth. Although he had reached the grand old age of forty he had spent the last seven years working

had alighted on the problem which was to dominate the rest of his life. The Last Problem In 1963, when he was ten years old, Andrew Wiles was already fascinated by mathematics. ‘I loved doing the problems in school, I’d take them home and make up new ones of my own

and its infinity of triples was discussed in E.T. Bell’s The Last Problem, the library book which caught the attention of the young Andrew Wiles. Although the Brotherhood had achieved an almost complete understanding of Pythagorean triples, Wiles soon discovered that this apparently innocent equation, x2 + y2 = z2, has a

it is enough to know that Fermat’s Last Theorem, a problem that had captivated mathematicians for centuries, had captured the imagination of the young Andrew Wiles. Sat in Milton Road Library was a ten-year-old boy staring at the most infamous problem in mathematics. Usually half the difficulty in a

recreate the proof. Perhaps he could find something that everyone else, except Fermat, had overlooked. He dreamed he could shock the world. Thirty years later Andrew Wiles was ready. Standing in the auditorium of the Isaac Newton Institute, he scribbled on the board and then, struggling to contain his glee, stared at

I’ll stop here.’ Two hundred mathematicians clapped and cheered in celebration. Even those who had anticipated the result grinned in disbelief. After three decades Andrew Wiles believed he had achieved his dream, and after seven years of isolation he could reveal his secret calculation. However, while euphoria filled the Newton Institute

, he created an equation which, though very similar to Pythagoras’ equation, had no solutions at all. This was the equation which the ten-year-old Andrew Wiles read about in the Milton Road Library. Instead of considering the equation Fermat was contemplating a variant of Pythagoras’ creation: As mentioned in the last

explorers have gone elsewhere. W.S. Anglin ‘Since I first met Fermat’s Last Theorem as a child it’s been my greatest passion,’ recalls Andrew Wiles, in a hesitant voice which conveys the emotion he feels about the problem. ‘I’d found this problem which had been unsolved for three hundred

and integers. For over two centuries every attempt to rediscover the proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem had ended in failure. Throughout his teenage years Andrew Wiles had studied the work of Euler, Germain, Cauchy, Lamé and finally Kummer. He hoped he could learn by their mistakes, but by the time he

a puzzle, which nobody else in the world has been able to solve, and then figuring out the solution. These are the same reasons why Andrew Wiles became fascinated by Fermat: ‘Pure mathematicians just love a challenge. They love unsolved problems. When doing maths there’s this great feeling. You start with

Last Theorem should not turn out to be as cruel and deceptive as Euler’s conjecture or the overestimated prime conjecture. The Graduate In 1975 Andrew Wiles began his career as a graduate student at Cambridge University. Over the next three years he was to work on his Ph.D. thesis and

in print over the years. However, I will refer to the conjecture by its original title, the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture. Professor John Coates, who guided Andrew Wiles when he was a student, was himself a student when the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture became a talking point in the West. ‘I began research in

conjecture was a foundation for a whole new architecture of mathematics, but until it could be proved the whole structure was vulnerable. At the time, Andrew Wiles was a young researcher at Cambridge University, and he recalls the trepidation that plagued the mathematics community in the 1970s: ‘We built more and more

Taniyama–Shimura conjecture was completely inaccessible. I didn’t bother to try and prove it. I didn’t even think about trying to prove it. Andrew Wiles was probably one of the few people on earth who had the audacity to dream that you can actually go and prove this conjecture.’ 6

never let that go. I just knew that I would go home and work on the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture.’ Over two decades had passed since Andrew Wiles had discovered the library book that inspired him to take up Fermat’s challenge, but now, for the first time, he could see a path

and it didn’t seem to be anything out of the ordinary until people started telling me that they had been hearing weird rumours about Andrew Wiles’s proposed series of lectures. The rumour was that he had proved Fermat’s Last Theorem, and I just thought this was completely nuts. I

Times, where Andrew asked me to speak to the reporter in his place, and the article said, ‘Ribet who is acting as a spokesperson for Andrew Wiles …’, or something to that effect. After that I became a magnet for all kinds of interest in Fermat’s Last Theorem, both from inside and

to solve a seventeenth-century riddle, he has nonetheless met Fermat’s challenge according to the rules of the Wolfskehl committee. On June 27, 1997, Andrew Wiles collected the Wolfskehl Prize, worth $50,000. Fermat’s Last Theorem had been officially solved. Wiles realises that in order to give mathematics one of

. 13 Lectures on Fermat’s Last Theorem, by Paulo Ribenboim, 1980, Springer. An account of Fermat’s Last Theorem, written prior to the work of Andrew Wiles, aimed at graduate students. Mathematics: The Science of Patterns, by Keith Devlin, 1994, Scientific American Library. A beautifully illustrated book which conveys the concepts of

Society 10 (1984), 177–219. A technical explanation of the Langlands programme aimed at mathematical researchers. Modular elliptic curves and Fermat’s Last Theorem, by Andrew Wiles, Annals of Mathematics 141 (1995), 443–551. This paper includes the bulk of Wiles’s proof of the Taniyama–Shimura conjecture and Fermat’s Last

Theorem. Ring-theoretic properties of certain Hecke algebras, by Richard Taylor and Andrew Wiles, Annals of Mathematics 141 (1995), 553–572. This paper describes the mathematics which was used to overcome the flaws in Wiles’s 1993 proof. You

The Creativity Code: How AI Is Learning to Write, Paint and Think

by Marcus Du Sautoy  · 7 Mar 2019  · 337pp  · 103,522 words

theorems? One of my crowning pinnacles as a mathematician was getting a theorem published in the Annals of Mathematics. It is the journal in which Andrew Wiles published his proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. It is the mathematician’s Nature. So how long would it be before we might expect to

that every number can be written as the sum of at most three triangular numbers (writing ‘Eureka’ next to his discovery). And eventually my colleague Andrew Wiles proved that Fermat was right in his hunch that the equations xn + yn = zn don’t have solutions when n>2. These breakthroughs are representative

the Millennium Prizes are released within two years of publication: twenty-four months is regarded as enough time for a mistake to reveal itself. Take Andrew Wiles’s first proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem. Referees spotted a mistake before it ever made it to print. The miracle was that Wiles was

been so enjoying the journey Fermat’s equations had taken us on that there was a sense of disappointment mixed with the elation that greeted Andrew Wiles’s solution to this 350-year-old enigma. That is why proofs that open up the ground for new stories are so highly valued. The

The Simpsons and Their Mathematical Secrets

by Simon Singh  · 29 Oct 2013  · 262pp  · 65,959 words

was wrong and out of date, because the episode was set in the twenty-fourth century and the theorem was actually proven in 1995 by Andrew Wiles at Princeton University.5 Wiles had dreamed about tackling Fermat’s challenge ever since he was ten years old. The problem then obsessed him for

seventeenth century, Pierre de Fermat states that he can prove that the equation xn + yn = zn (n > 2) has no whole number solutions. In 1995, Andrew Wiles discovers a new proof that verifies Fermat’s statement. In 2010, the Doctor reveals Fermat’s original proof. Everyone agrees that the equation has no

Fermat’s last theorem. Cohen obviously knew that Fermat’s equation had no solutions, but he wanted to pay homage to Pierre de Fermat and Andrew Wiles by creating a solution that was so close to being correct that it would apparently pass the test if checked with only a simple calculator

a story that is close to my heart, as I have written a book and directed a BBC documentary about Fermat’s last theorem and Andrew Wiles’s proof. Coincidentally, during a brief stint at Harvard University, Wiles lectured Al Jean, who went on to write for The Simpsons. 6. We can

Elliptic Tales: Curves, Counting, and Number Theory

by Avner Ash and Robert Gross  · 12 Mar 2012

, 1995; Taylor and Wiles, 1995; Breuil et al., 2001). In turn, that equality can be used to prove Fermat’s Last Theorem, as British mathematician Andrew Wiles (1953–) did. Dirichlet’s L-functions can be thought of as a generalization of the Riemann zeta-function ζ (s). In the next section, we

the modularity of elliptic curves over Q: Wild 3-adic exercises, J. Amer. Math. Soc., 14, no. 4, 843–939. Carlson, James, Arthur Jaffe, and Andrew Wiles (eds.), The Millennium Prize Problems, Clay Mathematics Institute, Cambridge, MA, 2006. Available at http://www.claymath.org/library/monographs/MPP.pdf. Conrad, Keith. 2008. The

, Dordrecht, 2009. Silverman, Joseph H., and John Tate, Rational Points on Elliptic Curves, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992. Taylor, Richard, and Andrew Wiles. 1995. Ring-theoretic properties of certain Hecke algebras, Ann. of Math. (2), 141, no. 3, 553–572. Thomas, Ivor (trans.), Greek Mathematical Works, revised, Vol

Slow Productivity: The Lost Art of Accomplishment Without Burnout

by Cal Newport  · 5 Mar 2024  · 233pp  · 65,893 words

to implement the first principle of slow productivity—to do fewer things—it makes sense to start with a famous example of professional simplification: mathematician Andrew Wiles’s pursuit of Fermat’s last theorem, a deceptively simple number theory problem first identified in the seventeenth century by the French polymath Pierre de

, the story of this theorem’s eventual solution begins in dramatic fashion. The scene opens on a library in the 1960s. A ten-year-old Andrew Wiles comes across a book that introduces him to the theorem. He’s entranced. “Here was a problem that I, a ten-year-old, could understand

meant that my childhood dream was now a respectable thing to work on. I just knew that I could never let that go.” What makes Andrew Wiles relevant to slow productivity is how he reacts to this fateful decision to focus all of his energy on this singular pursuit. As Singh summarizes

proof, Wiles quipped, “I think I’ll stop here.” Then the camera flashes began. * * * — Assuming you’re not a tenured mathematics professor, the specific actions Andrew Wiles took to simplify his workload are likely not that relevant. What is useful for our discussion, however, is the general approach he deployed. To prepare

out his already completed research)—all directed toward minimizing the number of big items tugging at his attention. This first proposition suggests that you follow Andrew Wiles’s example and implement a systematic plan for limiting significant commitments in your own professional life. There are many ways to pursue this goal. In

can sound grandiose. For our purposes, we’ll demote it to a more pragmatic definition: any ongoing goal or service that directs your professional life. Andrew Wiles had a mission to solve Fermat’s last theorem. Winning grants, effectively managing HR requests, producing new creative briefs, and crafting elegant computer programs are

What We Cannot Know: Explorations at the Edge of Knowledge

by Marcus Du Sautoy  · 18 May 2016

of his copy of Diophantus’ Arithmetica that the margin was too small for his remarkable proof. It took another 350 years before my Oxford colleague Andrew Wiles finally produced a convincing argument to explain why you will never find whole numbers that solve Fermat’s equations. Wiles’s proof runs to over

think we were enjoying the challenge of Fermat’s equations so much that there was a sense of depression mixed with the elation that greeted Andrew Wiles’s solution of this 350-year-old enigma. It is important to recognize that we must live with uncertainty, with the unknown, the unknowable. Even

Prime Obsession:: Bernhard Riemann and the Greatest Unsolved Problem in Mathematics

by John Derbyshire  · 14 Apr 2003

Fermat’s Last Theorem—for centuries, has an irresistible attraction for most mathematicians. They know that they can achieve great fame by solving it, as Andrew Wiles did when he proved Fermat’s Last Theorem. They know, too, from the history of their subject, that even failed attempts can generate powerful new

, only to find, going over his arguments (or more commonly, having them peer-reviewed), that there is a logical flaw in them. This happened with Andrew Wiles’s first proof of Fermat’s Last Theorem in 1993. It happens somewhat more dramatically to the narrator of Philibert Schogt’s 2000 novel The

made a note of it, thinking I might find some place for it in this book. Then that evening I happened to be talking to Andrew Wiles, who knows Sarnak and Katz both very well. I mentioned Katz’s not liking big oh. “That’s all nonsense,” said Wiles. “They’re just

, Weil, and Deligne apply. On the other side of the argument, though, the techniques developed for the manipulation of those artificial fields have considerable power—Andrew Wiles used them to prove Fermat’s Last Theorem! IV. The physical thread of Riemann Hypothesis studies, whose genesis I shall describe in Section VI, and

mentioned in these last few chapters were present, too, including both halves of the Montgomery-Odlyzko Law. Other attendees included the current superstar of math, Andrew Wiles, famous for having proved Fermat’s Last Theorem; Harold Edwards, whose definitive book on the zeta function I have mentioned several times in these pages

10 years later, by Alexander Gel’fond and Theodor Schneider working independently. Hilbert was right, at a stretch, about Fermat’s Last Theorem, proved by Andrew Wiles in 1994, when younger members of Hilbert’s audience would have been in their nineties. He was drastically wrong about the RH, though. Should the

The Infinity Puzzle

by Frank Close  · 29 Nov 2011  · 449pp  · 123,459 words

Infinite Ascent: A Short History of Mathematics

by David Berlinski  · 2 Jan 2005  · 158pp  · 49,168 words

How I Became a Quant: Insights From 25 of Wall Street's Elite

by Richard R. Lindsey and Barry Schachter  · 30 Jun 2007

From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds

by Daniel C. Dennett  · 7 Feb 2017  · 573pp  · 157,767 words

A Beautiful Mind

by Sylvia Nasar  · 11 Jun 1998  · 998pp  · 211,235 words

The Nature of Technology

by W. Brian Arthur  · 6 Aug 2009  · 297pp  · 77,362 words

The Infinite Book: A Short Guide to the Boundless, Timeless and Endless

by John D. Barrow  · 1 Aug 2005  · 292pp  · 88,319 words

I Am a Strange Loop

by Douglas R. Hofstadter  · 21 Feb 2011  · 626pp  · 181,434 words

Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future

by Peter Thiel and Blake Masters  · 15 Sep 2014  · 185pp  · 43,609 words

The Golden Ticket: P, NP, and the Search for the Impossible

by Lance Fortnow  · 30 Mar 2013  · 236pp  · 50,763 words

Framers: Human Advantage in an Age of Technology and Turmoil

by Kenneth Cukier, Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Francis de Véricourt  · 10 May 2021  · 291pp  · 80,068 words

Big Bang

by Simon Singh  · 1 Jan 2004  · 492pp  · 149,259 words

The Man From the Future: The Visionary Life of John Von Neumann

by Ananyo Bhattacharya  · 6 Oct 2021  · 476pp  · 121,460 words

Human Compatible: Artificial Intelligence and the Problem of Control

by Stuart Russell  · 7 Oct 2019  · 416pp  · 112,268 words

The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

by Richard Dawkins  · 21 Sep 2009

Obliquity: Why Our Goals Are Best Achieved Indirectly

by John Kay  · 30 Apr 2010  · 237pp  · 50,758 words

Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk

by Peter L. Bernstein  · 23 Aug 1996  · 415pp  · 125,089 words

Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World

by Jevin D. West and Carl T. Bergstrom  · 3 Aug 2020

When Einstein Walked With Gödel: Excursions to the Edge of Thought

by Jim Holt  · 14 May 2018  · 436pp  · 127,642 words

Shape: The Hidden Geometry of Information, Biology, Strategy, Democracy, and Everything Else

by Jordan Ellenberg  · 14 May 2021  · 665pp  · 159,350 words

Structure and interpretation of computer programs

by Harold Abelson, Gerald Jay Sussman and Julie Sussman  · 25 Jul 1996  · 893pp  · 199,542 words

The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date

by Samuel Arbesman  · 31 Aug 2012  · 284pp  · 79,265 words

Turing's Vision: The Birth of Computer Science

by Chris Bernhardt  · 12 May 2016  · 210pp  · 62,771 words

The Man Who Solved the Market: How Jim Simons Launched the Quant Revolution

by Gregory Zuckerman  · 5 Nov 2019  · 407pp  · 104,622 words

Alex's Adventures in Numberland

by Alex Bellos  · 3 Apr 2011  · 437pp  · 132,041 words

The Four Horsemen

by Christopher Hitchens, Richard Dawkins, Sam Harris and Daniel Dennett  · 19 Mar 2019  · 114pp  · 30,715 words

Adapt: Why Success Always Starts With Failure

by Tim Harford  · 1 Jun 2011  · 459pp  · 103,153 words

Pathfinders: The Golden Age of Arabic Science

by Jim Al-Khalili  · 28 Sep 2010  · 467pp  · 114,570 words

The Road to Conscious Machines

by Michael Wooldridge  · 2 Nov 2018  · 346pp  · 97,890 words

Numbers Rule Your World: The Hidden Influence of Probability and Statistics on Everything You Do

by Kaiser Fung  · 25 Jan 2010  · 227pp  · 62,177 words

Evidence-Based Technical Analysis: Applying the Scientific Method and Statistical Inference to Trading Signals

by David Aronson  · 1 Nov 2006

Structure and Interpretation of Computer Programs, Second Edition

by Harold Abelson, Gerald Jay Sussman and Julie Sussman  · 1 Jan 1984  · 1,387pp  · 202,295 words

Symmetry and the Monster

by Ronan, Mark  · 14 Sep 2006  · 212pp  · 65,900 words