Monroe Doctrine

back to index

129 results

America in the World: A History of U.S. Diplomacy and Foreign Policy

by Robert B. Zoellick  · 3 Aug 2020

. Foreign Policy in 1823: Problems and Principles The debates that led to Monroe’s declaration two months later—which came to be known as the Monroe Doctrine—stemmed from the need to address a problem. Canning had made a proposal about a specific situation; the United States needed to decide on an

knew that the office of secretary of state had been the stepping-stone to the presidency. Professor Ernest May’s book The Making of the Monroe Doctrine develops a powerful case that the administration’s answer to Canning’s overture of 1823 was driven by domestic politics, and especially Adams’s adroit

of the Post Office, the Cumberland Road, and finances, as well as foreign policy. The three nonsequential paragraphs that came to be known as the Monroe Doctrine took less than one thousand words. To place them in context, however, Monroe’s introductory and closing paragraphs are worth recalling. Monroe opened by stating

opinion. The Times of London, rarely a friend of Washington, flattered Monroe’s statement as “a policy so directly British.” The Economist maintained that “the Monroe Doctrine might quite as fairly be called the Canning Doctrine.” Canning recovered by releasing the memorandum of his earlier warning to the French ambassador. By early

resolution to declare this country an asylum for all fugitives from oppression.”50 From Declaration to Doctrine Over the years, Monroe’s declaration became the Monroe Doctrine. Later presidents would endow the statement of 1823 with meanings to fit changed circumstances, and those experiences helped define the potential—and pitfalls—of the

by the United States on an [international] controversy that did not immediately touch its own citizens or territory.” Dexter Perkins, dean of historians of the Monroe doctrine, wrote that the Doctrine, “in its broad lines, is a prohibition on the part of the United States against the extension of European influence and

state in the early twentieth century, who will make an appearance in chapters 8 and 9. Both were respected international lawyers. Both determined that the Monroe Doctrine was a declaration about acts that would threaten U.S. security, based on the right of self-protection. They eschewed alleged rights to interfere in

weaker American states, rights of control, protectorates, or even a claim under international law. The Monroe Doctrine, the two men concluded, should not intrude on Pan-American cooperation or ties with other regions. They stressed that Monroe’s words stood for independence

back. Most public reaction was congratulatory. A number of headlines proclaimed a great diplomatic victory, foreseeing a twentieth-century complement to the nineteenth century’s Monroe Doctrine. The New York Post, an anti-imperialist paper, recognized Hay’s and America’s diplomatic innovation: “No treaties; just an exchange of official notes. No

’s mediation of the Russo-Japanese War and the Moroccan crisis, Roosevelt stepped in to “police” a troubled Santo Domingo (creating a “corollary” to the Monroe Doctrine) and organized the engineering project to dig the Panama Canal, his great achievement. The president had protected the North American and Caribbean homeland against threats

of [such a] peace.” The president was also speaking to the American people and their elected representatives. His idea, Wilson explained, was to propose the Monroe Doctrine “as the doctrine of the world.” He rejected the intrigues and selfish rivalries of entangling alliances not only for America, but for the world. “There

’ external defense perimeter. The United States might need to intervene to prevent foreign intrusions. Root felt that U.S. policy needed a legal footing. The Monroe Doctrine, Root understood, was a statement of U.S. policy, not international law. The peace treaty with Spain had transferred sovereignty over Cuba to the United

addition to protecting the United States’ freedom to act under Article X and clarifying the procedure to withdraw from the League, the reservations protected the Monroe Doctrine. Root also urged a resolution pressing the president to negotiate stronger international arbitration and legal institutions. In March 1920, a Senate majority approved the treaty

sense of irony, a State Department white paper described the treaty as the “most important step in American foreign policy since the promulgation of the Monroe Doctrine”—which John Quincy Adams had drafted to keep the United States out of Europe’s squabbles.167 More honestly, the State Department’s John Hickerson

diplomatic traditions. He redefined neutrality as an agenda to rewrite the rules of international politics. He said that he was applying the ideas of the Monroe Doctrine to the world. Wilson still rejected old-style alliances, but he pledged to create a new type of collective security. At first, Wilson’s vision

Colors over Louisiana, by Thure de Thulstrup, 1904. (7) Westerner and futurist. Portrait of Thomas Jefferson, by Rembrandt Peale, 1805. (8) The Birth of the Monroe Doctrine, by Clyde O. DeLand, 1912. John Quincy Adams, to the left of the globe, sits uncharacteristically silent. (9) American realist. Daguerreotype of John Quincy Adams

Sons, 1921), 48–49. Chapter 3. John Quincy Adams and Henry Clay: American Realism and the American System 1. Ernest May, The Making of the Monroe Doctrine (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1975), 1. 2. James Traub, John Quincy Adams: Militant Spirit (New York: Basic Books, 2016), 203; Samuel

. See Kissinger, World Restored. 4. For the circumstances of Canning’s proposal, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 1–4; Dexter Perkins, A History of the Monroe Doctrine (Boston: Little, Brown, 1955), 36–38; Jay Sexton, The Monroe Doctrine: Empire and Nation in Nineteenth-Century America (New York: Hill and Wang, 2011), 49–51. 5

. For naval comparisons, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 4. 6. For the international comparison, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 11. 7. May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 6. For the original, see “Mr. Rush to Mr. John Quincy Adams,” August 23, 1823, no

. 323, in The Clayton-Bulwer Treaty and the Monroe Doctrine: A Letter from the Secretary of State to the Minister of the United States at London (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1882), 36. 8. For

Canning’s policy of cabinet maneuvers, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 122–28. 9. May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 190–91. 10. For Alexander and Russia, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 66–85. For the ukase and Russia in North America, see ibid., 79–80. For the

., 66. For geographic references, see Traub, John Quincy Adams, 276–77. 11. For JQA’s discussions with Baron de Tuyll, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 194–96; Traub, John Quincy Adams, 276–77. 12. For Greece, including references to U.S. public opinion and the press, see May, Making of

the Monroe Doctrine, 9–10. 13. For the background on Monroe, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 12–24. See also the Monroe biography by Harry Ammon, James Monroe: The Quest for National Identity (New York

: McGraw-Hill, 1971). 14. For Monroe’s principles, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 21. For the original Monroe quote, see Monroe to Thomas Jefferson, January 11, 1807, in The Writings of James Monroe, vol. 5, 1807–1816, ed

Bemis, John Quincy Adams and the Foundations of American Foreign Policy, 243. 17. Quoted in Traub, John Quincy Adams, 69, 78. 18. Quoted in Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 29. For the original, see JQA, Memoirs of John Quincy Adams, vol. 4, 438. 19. Stratford Canning was Britain’s minister to the United States

to Colin Powell, ed. Edward S. Mihalkanin (Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 2004), 23. 26. Traub, John Quincy Adams, 239. 27. See May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, x, xi, 35–36. For a differing view, see Traub, John Quincy Adams, 270. 28. On British bullying, see Traub, John Quincy Adams, 261. On

condescension and arrogance, see Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 39. JQA quoted in May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 28. For the original JQA quote, see JQA, The Writings of John Quincy Adams, vol. 1, 1779–1796, ed. Worthington Chauncey

Ford (New York: Macmillan Company, 1913), 478. 29. Quoted in May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 28. For the original, see JQA, The Writings of John Quincy Adams, vol. 3, 1801–1810, ed. Worthington Chauncey Ford (New York: Macmillan Company, 1914

. W. Norton, 1991); David S. and Jeanne T. Heidler, Henry Clay: The Essential American (New York: Random House, 2010). See also May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 50–57. Quotes from Remini, Henry Clay, 155. For the original, see Annals of Congress, 15th Congress, 1st Session (Washington, D.C.: Gales and Seaton

and C. James Taylor (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2014), 252. 33. For Clay’s political strategy, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 173–81. 34. On Clay’s speech, see Remini, Henry Clay, 174–75. For the original speech, see Henry Clay, The Life, Correspondence, and Speeches

, vol. 5, ed. Calvin Colton (New York: A. S. Barnes & Co., 1857), 243. 35. On Clay’s speech at Lexington, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 180. For the original speech, see Henry Clay, The Life, Correspondence, and Speeches of Henry Clay, vol. 1, ed. Calvin Colton (New York: A. S

., 1857), 241. 36. Traub, John Quincy Adams, 258–59. 37. May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 191, 197. 38. For JQA discussions with de Tuyll see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 196, 199; Traub, John Quincy Adams, 276–77, 279; Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 40. 39. On the cabinet meeting discussion, see May, Making of the

Monroe Doctrine, 198–200; Traub, John Quincy Adams, 279–80; Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 41–42. 40. May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 200–208; Traub, John Quincy Adams

, 280–81. 41. May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 204, 208–10. 42. May

, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 210. 43. For Monroe’s draft

and debate, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 211–18; Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 43–44; Traub, John Quincy Adams, 281–82. 44. For Wirt, see May, Making

of the Monroe Doctrine, 220–21; Traub, John Quincy Adams, 285; Sexton, Monroe Doctrine, 61. 45. On the length and context of Monroe’s message

, see Sexton, Monroe Doctrine, 47–48. On the text, including the less noted opening and closing paragraphs, see ibid

., 53–62. On “open diplomacy,” see Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 62. On JQA’s anticolonialism, see Traub, John Quincy Adams, 285. 46. May, Making of the

Monroe Doctrine, 219–28. For Monroe’s letter to Jefferson, see Monroe to Jefferson, December 4, 1823, in The

. P. Putnam’s Sons, 1903), 342–45. 47. For Canning’s reaction and response, see May, Making of the Monroe Doctrine, 240–44; Sexton, Monroe Doctrine, 65–66. 48. Quoted in Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 56–57. 49. Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 57–58. 50. Quoted in Remini, Henry Clay, 221–22. For the original, see JQA, Memoirs of John

Quincy Adams, vol. 6, ed. Charles Francis Adams (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co., 1875), 224. 51. Cobbs Hoffman, American Umpire, 105; Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 4, 387–89. 52. Traub, John Quincy Adams, 286. 53. Traub, John Quincy Adams, 286. 54. See the essays by Root and Hughes in The

Monroe Doctrine: Its Modern Significance, ed. Donald Marquand Dozer (New York: Knopf, 1965), 51, 87, respectively. 55. Ammon, James Monroe, 491. 56. Sexton, Monroe Doctrine, 61. 57. On Bolivar, see Kinley Brauer, “Henry Clay,” in Mihalkanin, American Statesmen, 129

. On the U.S. invitation to the Panama Congress, see Remini, Henry Clay, 285; Perkins, Monroe Doctrine, 71; Sexton, Monroe Doctrine, 74; Heidler and Heidler, Henry Clay, 194; Traub, John Quincy Adams, 342. 58. On Clay’s instructions, see Remini, Henry Clay, 297–300. For

. Remini, Henry Clay, 297–300. 60. Remini, Henry Clay, 287–97. On the popularity of the Panama Congress, see Traub, John Quincy Adams, 345; Sexton, Monroe Doctrine, 75–80; Heidler and Heidler, Henry Clay, 195. 61. Remini, Henry Clay, 300–301. 62. Traub, John Quincy Adams, 259–60. 63. For an account

, Root, vol. 1, 453; Leopold, Root, 72. 22. “Above all things” quote from Zimmermann, First Great Triumph, 146. For the original source, see Root, “The Monroe Doctrine: Address at the Ninety-Ninth Annual Banquet of the New England Society of New York,” December 22, 1904, in Elihu Root, Miscellaneous Addresses, eds. Robert

The Tragedy of Great Power Politics

by John J. Mearsheimer  · 1 Jan 2001  · 637pp  · 199,158 words

influence and warning the other great powers not to help China in its struggle with Japan. In effect, Japan fashioned its own version of the Monroe Doctrine for East Asia.27 Japan finally launched a full-scale assault against China in the late summer of 1937.28 By the time Hitler invaded

Destiny” and 2) minimizing the influence of the United Kingdom and the other European great powers in the Americas, a policy commonly known as the “Monroe Doctrine.” Manifest Destiny The United States started out in 1776 as a weak confederation cobbled together from the thirteen colonies strung along the Atlantic seaboard. The

twentieth century, the United Kingdom would almost surely have abandoned the Western Hemisphere to its offspring, which had definitely come of age by then. The Monroe Doctrine American policymakers in the nineteenth century were not just concerned with turning the United States into a powerful territorial state, they were also deeply committed

had belonged to the United Kingdom, France, and Spain, thus weakening their influence in the Western Hemisphere. But it also used the Monroe Doctrine for that same purpose. The Monroe Doctrine was laid out for the first time in President James Monroe’s annual message to Congress on December 2, 1823. He made three

the time to check the British everywhere in the Western Hemisphere. Indeed, the United States probably did not have sufficient military might to enforce the Monroe Doctrine in the first decades after it was enunciated. Nevertheless, this problem proved illusory, as the European empires shrivelled away over the course of the nineteenth

States, they were the dangerous potential aggressors. The best way to hold them off was to acquire the periphery. This was the meaning of the Monroe Doctrine in the age of Manifest Destiny.”49 THE UNITED STATES AND EUROPE, 1900–1990 Offensive realism predicts that the United States will send its army

that are so powerful that those other states would not dare challenge it. We would also expect China to develop its own version of the Monroe Doctrine, directed at the United States. Just as the United States made it clear to distant great powers that they were not allowed to meddle in

States and Right-Wing Dictatorships, 1921–1965 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1999), chaps. 4–6; Gaddis Smith, The Last Years of the Monroe Doctrine, 1945–1993 (New York: Hill and Wang, 1994); Tony Smith, America’s Mission: The United States and the Worldwide Struggle for Democracy in the Twentieth

Labs,” Security Studies 1, No. 3 (Spring 1992), pp. 448–82. 4. See Steven J. Valone, “’Weakness Offers Temptation’: Seward and the Reassertion of the Monroe Doctrine,” Diplomatic History 19, No. 4 (Fall 1995), pp. 583–99. As discussed in Chapter 7, the United States has worried throughout its history about the

Quagmire: Japan’s Expansion on the Asian Continent, 1933–1941 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1983), pp. 3–230. 27. George H. Blakeslee, “The Japanese Monroe Doctrine,” Foreign Affairs 11, No. 4 (July 1933), pp. 671–81. 28. Ikuhiko Hata, “The Marco Polo Bridge Incident, 1937,” trans. David Lu and Katsumi Usui

Bemis, John Quincy Adams, esp. chaps. 28–29; Ernest R. May, The Making of the Monroe Doctrine (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1975); and Dexter Perkins, A History of the Monroe Doctrine (Boston: Little, Brown, 1963). For a copy of Monroe’s address laying out the doctrine, from which the quotes in this paragraph

: University of Georgia Press, 1975). 47. This subject is discussed at length in Frederick Merk, The Monroe Doctrine and American Expansionism, 1843–1849 (New York: Knopf, 1966). Also see Pletcher, Diplomacy of Annexation. 48. Quoted in Merk, Monroe Doctrine, p. 6. Also see Sam W. Haynes, James K. Polk and the Expansionist Impulse (New

York: Longman, 1997). 49. Merk, Monroe Doctrine, p. 289. 50. There is evidence that the founders’ resistance to a continental commitment was

The Internationalists: How a Radical Plan to Outlaw War Remade the World

by Oona A. Hathaway and Scott J. Shapiro  · 11 Sep 2017  · 850pp  · 224,533 words

U.S. Senate, Kellogg explained that the treaty would not interfere with the right of self-defense. He even said it would not disturb the Monroe Doctrine—which prohibited European intervention in the Western Hemisphere.4 These assurances persuaded the Japanese Foreign Ministry that the concept of self-defense in the Pact

1898 Spanish-American War, though he rejected incorporating them as states because of their “inferior” populations. And he supported the 1904 Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine, under which the U.S. would intervene to ensure that other nations in the Western Hemisphere fulfilled their obligations to international creditors so that European

1, 1939, he set out a new alternative: the theory of the Grossraum—literally, “Great Space.” The inspiration for Schmitt’s Grossraum theory was the Monroe Doctrine. Just as the Americans had prevented European nations from intervening in the Western Hemisphere, Germany had the legal right to exclude intruders from its own

asserted the right of a Great Power to protect its friends against their common enemies. Schmitt’s speech on the Grossraum and the new “German Monroe Doctrine” was reported in the British press. The Daily Mail, in fine tabloid style, commented not only on his proposal, but on his appearance. “Herr Hitler

would feel if Germany asked for the same assurances. “In this event Mr. Roosevelt would, I must admit, have every right to refer to the Monroe Doctrine and to decline to comply with such a request as an interference in the internal affairs of the American Continent.” Hitler was simply asserting the

the talking.”133 He also drew up a talking points memo. His advisers were to say that “[j]ust as on the basis of the Monroe Doctrine the United States would firmly reject any interference by European governments in Mexican affairs, for example, Germany regards the Eastern European area as her sphere

likely, he had his eyes shut because he was reciting Hitler’s instructions from memory. Ribbentrop parroted over and over that “Germany must have her ‘Monroe Doctrine’ in Central Europe.”137 Ribbentrop was lecturing the wrong person. In his scholarly study on the Dominican Republic Welles had authored during his exile from

his extensive diplomatic experience in Latin America, he had also helped conceive Roosevelt’s Good Neighbor Policy, which was effectively a rejection of a muscular Monroe Doctrine.139 Once Ribbentrop finished speaking, Welles explained that “the Minister was laboring under a misapprehension as to the nature of that policy.”140 Though the

United States may have used the Monroe Doctrine as an instrument of political control in the past, it no longer views it in this way now. “At this moment, I was glad to

say, a new relationship existed in the Western Hemisphere.”141 Hitler deployed Schmitt’s Monroe Doctrine idea the next day when he met Welles, and he repeated it in other venues as well.142 Schmitt had regained his influence. But, as

, 1904, accessed January 31, 2016, http://www.ourdocuments.gov/print_friendly.php?page=transcript&doc=56&title=Transcript+of+Theodore+Roosevelt%27s+Corollary+to+the+Monroe+Doctrine+(1905). 63. Benjamin Franklin remarked that Vattel’s book had “been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress now sitting.” Francis Wharton

Mississippi, 135–36 Mitteis, Heinrich, 524n Molé, Count, 64 Molina, Mario, 385 Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact (1939), 318–19, 506n monopolies, 22–23, 50 monopsony, 50 Monroe Doctrine, 159, 163, 241–43 Montreal Protocol on Substances That Deplete the Ozone Layer (1987), 387 Moore, John Bassett, 170, 171 Moore, R. Walton, 188, 197

Destined for War: America, China, and Thucydides's Trap

by Graham Allison  · 29 May 2017  · 518pp  · 128,324 words

campaign features prominently in high school textbooks read by every student in China today.) Proclaiming “Asia for the Asians,” in 1933 Tokyo announced a “Japanese Monroe Doctrine.” It declared that hereafter “Japan is responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in the Far East,” in what the country later christened the

nation has dominated it in recent time . . . I look forward to the next ten years as probably the culminating period of America.”35 ENFORCING THE MONROE DOCTRINE Following the Spanish-American War, and after a brief stint as governor of New York, Roosevelt accepted the invitation to rejoin McKinley’s administration by

forth by James Monroe in 1823: the Western Hemisphere was no longer open for European colonization or foreign interference.40 While sweeping in scope, the Monroe Doctrine was originally aspirational rather than operational and remained so for the remainder of the nineteenth century. Since the US lacked the means to enforce it

of the peace faction has convinced me that this country needs a war.”43 The Cleveland administration eventually warned the British not to violate the Monroe Doctrine with encroachments from its colony in British Guiana into territory also claimed by Venezuela, asserting that “today the United States is practically sovereign on this

who questioned whether it was sensible (or legal) for the US to threaten Britain over its actions in a remote part of South America. The Monroe Doctrine, Roosevelt wrote, “is not a question of law at all. It is a question of policy . . . To argue that it cannot be recognized as a

Venezuelan waters and to settle their dispute at The Hague on terms satisfactory to the US. The results vindicated Roosevelt in his determination that “the Monroe Doctrine should be treated as the cardinal feature of American foreign policy.” But, he warned, “it would be worse than idle to assert it unless we

audience, “If the American nation will speak softly and yet build, and keep at a pitch of the highest training, a thoroughly efficient navy, the Monroe Doctrine will go far.”47 The world would soon find out just how far Roosevelt intended to take it. THE PANAMA CANAL Since the sixteenth century

, may in America, as elsewhere, ultimately require intervention by some civilized nation, and in the Western Hemisphere the adherence of the United States to the Monroe Doctrine may force the United States, however reluctantly, in flagrant cases of such wrongdoing or impotence, to the exercise of an international police power.”76 This

resolution became known as the Roosevelt Corollary to the Monroe Doctrine. Political cartoon from the Montreal Star (1903) depicting the American eagle as a vulture in search of new prey following US actions in Panama and

domain. In 1895, when a territorial dispute arose between Venezuela and British Guiana, Secretary of State Richard Olney demanded that Britain accept arbitration under the Monroe Doctrine, arguing that “the United States is practically sovereign on this continent.”25 London rejected Washington’s demands, with British colonial secretary Joseph Chamberlain insisting that

factor in avoiding war. Over territorial disputes in Venezuela, for example, Britain ultimately agreed to the US demand that the British accept arbitration under the Monroe Doctrine. Similarly, Britain exempted the United States from the Two-Power Standard, which committed the UK to maintain naval forces equal to those of the next

. [back] 20. Theodore Roosevelt, “The Strenuous Life,” April 10, 1899, http://voicesofdemocracy.umd.edu/roosevelt-strenuous-life-1899-speech-text/. [back] 21. Theodore Roosevelt, “The Monroe Doctrine,” The Bachelor of Arts 2, no. 4 (March 1896), 443. [back] 22. Louis Pérez Jr., Cuba in the American Imagination: Metaphor and the Imperial Ethos

in the Caribbean. Roosevelt’s big stick . . . was directed at Europe, not Latin America.” See Collin’s Theodore Roosevelt’s Caribbean: The Panama Canal, the Monroe Doctrine, and the Latin American Context (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1990), xii. For details of Roosevelt’s suspicions about Germany’s designs on Venezuela

Morris in both Theodore Rex, 183–91, and “A Few Pregnant Days,” 2–13. [back] 39. Morris, “A Few Pregnant Days,” 2. [back] 40. The Monroe Doctrine declared that countries in the Western Hemisphere were “not to be considered as subjects for future colonization by any European powers” and warned that the

of Theodore Roosevelt, 112. [back] 44. The 1895 dispute is described in detail in Schoultz, Beneath the United States, 107–24. [back] 45. Roosevelt, “The Monroe Doctrine,” 437–39. [back] 46. See Theodore Roosevelt, “Second Annual Message,” December 2, 1902, UCSB American Presidency Project, www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29543. [back

, 311 n124 Molucca Islands, 340 n12 monarchy, 32, 43, 53 See also specific monarchs Monck, George, 256 Mongolia, xviii Monnet, Jean, 192 Monroe, James, 97 Monroe Doctrine, 45, 96–99, 104–5, 195, 222, 315 n41 Montreal Star, 105 Morocco, 73, 78, 222 Morris, Edmund, 97, 317 n65 mujahideen, 203, 225 Muslims

Paris 1919: Six Months That Changed the World

by Margaret Macmillan; Richard Holbrooke; Casey Hampton  · 1 Jan 2001

Latin American examples, since most of his formative experiences in foreign relations had been there. He had recast, at least to his own satisfaction, the Monroe Doctrine, that famous defiance hurled at the Europeans in 1823 to warn them off attempting to colonize the New World again. The doctrine had become a

; and the mandates over the former German colonies and the Ottoman empire still had to be awarded. There was also the tricky matter of the Monroe Doctrine, underpinning U.S. policy toward the Americas. Would the League have the power, as many of Wilson’s conservative opponents feared, to override the doctrine

to men he loathed, he agreed on his return to Paris to negotiate a special reservation saying that nothing in the League covenant invalidated the Monroe Doctrine.32 He found himself embroiled, this time with the British, in the sort of diplomatic game that he had always regarded with contempt. Although Cecil

success to get an agreement with the United States to prevent a naval race; he now hinted that he might oppose any reservation on the Monroe Doctrine. There was also a difficulty with the Japanese, who, it was feared, might ask for recognition of an equivalent doctrine for Japan warning other nations

, Wilson introduced a carefully worded amendment to the effect that nothing in the League covenant would affect the validity of international agreements such as the Monroe Doctrine, designed to preserve the peace. The French, resentful over their failure to get a League with teeth, attacked with impeccable logic. There was already a

in the covenant saying that all members would make sure that their international agreements were in accordance with the League and its principles. Was the Monroe Doctrine not in conformity? Of course it was, said Wilson; indeed, it was the model for the League. Then, said Bourgeois and Larnaude, why did the

Monroe Doctrine need to be mentioned at all? Cecil tried to come to Wilson’s rescue: the reference to the Monroe Doctrine was really a sort of illustration. Wilson sat by silently, his lower lip quivering. Toward midnight

very long and learned speech, which started with Aristotle and ended with Woodrow Wilson, about peace. The delegate from Honduras spoke in Spanish about the Monroe Doctrine clause but, since few people understood him, his objections were ignored. Clemenceau, as chairman, moved matters along with his usual dispatch, limiting discussion of hostile

had steered the covenant in the direction he wanted; he had blocked demands for a military force; and he had inserted a reservation on the Monroe Doctrine that should ensure its passage in the United States. The League, he felt confident, would grow and change over the years. In time, it would

was celebrated by poetry and transformed into a martyr by his execution.” In a spirit of compromise (and perhaps to get the amendment on the Monroe Doctrine that he wanted in the League covenant), Wilson finally agreed to a clause accusing Wilhelm of “a supreme offence against international morality and the sanctity

to agree to it. To Benson that would have been treason to his own country.” The British threatened to oppose the special amendment on the Monroe Doctrine in the covenant of the League. Lloyd George told Daniels over breakfast on April Fool’s Day that the League would be useless if the

11, the commission met until late in the evening, trying to come up with a formula that would allow the United States to keep the Monroe Doctrine and join the League. Everyone was exhausted when the Japanese finally moved that a reference to racial equality be included in the preamble to the

not exist without China and the Japanese people could not stand without the Chinese.”10 That was why the Japanese often referred to an “Asian Monroe Doctrine.” Just as the United States for its own security treated Latin America as its backyard, so Japan had to worry about China and neighbors such

be done which could be interpreted as a recognition of a special position of Japan,” he warned, “either in the form of a so-called Monroe Doctrine or in any other way, forces will be set in action which make a huge armed conflict absolutely inevitable within one generation. There is no

Flight of the WASP

by Michael Gross  · 562pp  · 177,195 words

. That inspired Henry to study the narrow subject of sovereignty over derelict islands, as well as the broader one of inter-American trade. After the Monroe Doctrine had claimed the Western Hemisphere as America’s exclusive sphere of influence, businessmen like Sanford became stalking horses of a nascent American imperialism, soon to

, Peter, 32, 58 Mississippi, 161–162 Missouri Compromise, 133 Mohican tribe, 38 Monkey Trial, 320–321 Monroe, James, 93, 119, 134, 154, 165, 168–169 Monroe Doctrine, 208 Montagu, Ashley, 312 Morgan, Jack, 235 Morgan, John Taylor, 224 Morgan, Joseph, 244 Morgan, J. Pierpont, 3, 12, 198, 244–246, 247–248, 250

The Greek Revolution: 1821 and the Making of Modern Europe

by Mark Mazower  · 4 Nov 2021  · 887pp  · 242,125 words

independent nation. That she may obtain that rank is the object of our most ardent wishes. This is the often forgotten Greek dimension of the Monroe Doctrine – a justification as much as a warning. It was a formulation that carefully trod a middle path between Secretary of State John Adams’s desire

never taken any part, nor does it comport with our policy to do so.’ It was a statement to keep the philhellenes at bay. The Monroe Doctrine served to set an imaginary line between Europe and the Americas; it stated that the political norms applicable in one hemisphere were inapplicable in the

, ‘The United States and Spain in 1822’, AHR, 20:4 (July 1915), 781–800, here 798 10 Cited in W. P. Cresson, ‘Chateaubriand and the Monroe Doctrine’, North American Review, 217:809 (April 1923), 475–87 11 For a detailed treatment of the entire story see the classic work by Temperley, The

, ‘La curieuse vie de l’Abbé de Pradt’, Revue des études historiques, 95 (1929), 295; On de Pradt and his possible influence on the Monroe Doctrine: T. R. Schellenberg, ‘Jeffersonian origins of the Monroe Doctrine’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 14:1 (Feb. 1934), 1–31, and Laura Bornholdt, ‘The Abbé de Pradt and the

Monroe Doctrine’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 24:2 (May 1944), 201–21, for both sides of the argument. 13 De Pradt, Vrai Système de l’Europe relativement

American independence’, AHR, 112:3 (June 2007), 742–63 Bogdanovich, E. V., Navarin, 1827–1877 (Moscow, 1877) Bornholdt, L., ‘The Abbé de Pradt and the Monroe Doctrine’, Hispanic American Historical Review, 24:2 (May 1944), 201–21 Boukalas, P., ed., The Klephtic Ballads: An Anthology of 19th-Century Greek Popular Songs (Athens

of Greek Independence (Cambridge, 1930) —‘A forgotten prophecy (Greece 1820–21)’, Cambridge Historical Journal, 1:2 (1924), 209–13 Cresson, W. P., ‘Chateaubriand and the Monroe Doctrine’, North American Review, 217:809 (April 1923), 475–87 Dakin, D., British and American Philhellenes during the War of Greek Independence, 1821–1833 (Thessaloniki, 1955

edn.), 308–30 Sakellariou, S., I Filiki Etaireia (Odessa, 1909) Sarantakes, N., To zorbaliki ton rayiadon (Athens, 2020) Schellenberg, T. R., ‘Jeffersonian origins of the Monroe Doctrine’, Hispanic Atlantic Historical Review, 14:1 (Feb. 1934), 1–31 Sfoini, A., ‘“Epanastasi”: chriseis kai simasies tis lexis sta keimena tou ’21’, in D. Dimitropoulos

, 429 joint fleet to enforce Treaty of London, 409–18 liberal principle of non-intervention, 399–401 Mavrokordatos’s paper on the Ottomans, 97–8 Monroe Doctrine, 399–401 and plight of Greek non-combatants, 379–82, 451–2 post-1828 Great Power policy, 427–8 pre-national era, xxi, xxvi–xxvii

American Civil War, 453 and Chateaubriand, 401, 402 coronavirus pandemic, xxxiv gaining of independence, xxi Greek Committee of New York, 379, 380, 382, 452, 458 Monroe Doctrine, 399–401 philhellene’s tolerance of American slavery, 452 presence in eastern Mediterranean, 429 Varnakiotis, Georgios, 103–4, 105–6, 116, 169 battle of Aetos

The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty

by Benjamin H. Bratton  · 19 Feb 2016  · 903pp  · 235,753 words

by other forms of transactional sovereignty. In Schmitt's history, this shift also validated transnational claims of sovereignty over entire continental zones, such as the Monroe Doctrine, which Schmitt greatly admired as a model of how a multipolar nomos should work. The catastrophes of World War I and II led to the

ASCII, Grossraum), or “great spaces” or spheres of influences and domains of dominion over which dominant political cultures reserve systemic sovereignty, such as the US Monroe Doctrine claims over North and South American continental space. However, to establish what the nomos of the Cloud may or may not be, it is necessary

makes and could make (and how hard it is to decide its inside from its outside). 7.  The Nomos of the Cloud? For Schmitt, the Monroe Doctrine symbolized an end of older Jus Publicum European system of international relations and operated in a parallel domain to that arrangement of Westphalian modules, one

model it represented appealed strongly to Schmitt, and his “advocation of a Großraum world-view … grew out of his admiration for the origins of the Monroe Doctrine, when it was a territorially delimited, hemispherical order. From economic origins, it had found continental coherence, but had then been distorted into a liberal, universal

domains gave way, however, to what was for him most dubious thing about twentieth-century globalization. In Schmitt's positive vision for it, through the Monroe Doctrine, the United States is the sole sovereign in the Western Hemisphere and its will is fiat. The doctrine reintroduced transnational territorial lines of demarcation into

established a certain claim on an embryonic political geography? Does “Google” (literally the cloud platform and the geography defined by it) represent something like a Monroe Doctrine of the Cloud, filling out and supervising a domain extended well beyond the North American continental shelf, across a more comprehensive composite spectrum? For Schmitt

, the first Monroe Doctrine represented a break with an older order, and perhaps the new one (if it so exists) does too, but just as the first lost its

. The willing and unwilling complicity of major commercial Cloud platforms in this endeavor associates them directly with the reach of that claim, and so the Monroe Doctrine of the Cloud and the Google Grossraum are seen by some to conceal only one another. This conflation may simplify things for those who prefer

another type, some incarcerating Users and others offering lines of flight, and many of them reversible. The tangles thicken. Perhaps the regional amorphousness of a “Monroe Doctrine of the Cloud” is both the wrong nomic precedent to claim and the wrong profile of empire to be resisted. The Stack appears to be

a stable relationship between great state powers. Carl Schmitt's term Grossraum, “the Large Space,” of a regional, supernational domain of sovereign control, like the Monroe Doctrine, is perhaps exemplary. For some, this suggests an ideal multipolar arrangement for global political entities and empires, and so as new claims on global space

and Sociology (Tarde), 334 money, 199, 213, 329, 335–337, 458n11. See also currency money-into-virtuality, 199 monkeys, 222 Monroe, James, 45 Monroe Doctrine, 26, 31–32 Monroe Doctrine of the Cloud, 34–35, 37 Montana East Line Telephone Association, 29 moon, owning, 456n7 Moore Ruble Yudell, 322 Moore's law, 63, 80

Liberalism at Large: The World According to the Economist

by Alex Zevin  · 12 Nov 2019  · 767pp  · 208,933 words

peeps out’). Karl Marx, The Civil War in the United States, New York 1961, pp. 5, 12–13, 42–43, 128, 145–46. 138.‘The Monroe Doctrine in 1823 and 1863’, 14 November 1863. 139.‘Negotiations for Peace’, 18 February 1865. 140.‘Abandonment of Transportation’, 25 February 1865. 141.‘Mr. Gladstone on

were ‘ludicrously unfit’ for them. ‘A policy of annexation introduces a conflict of principle into the Republic.’ Other consequences included a ‘practical renunciation of the Monroe Doctrine, on the intelligible ground that one cannot eat one’s cake and have it’. It also meant greater taxation, and centralization of power, to support

Second World: Empires and Influence in the New Global Order

by Parag Khanna  · 4 Mar 2008  · 537pp  · 158,544 words

UZBEKISTAN AND TURKMENISTAN: MEN BEHAVING BADLY 13 AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN: TAMING SOUTH-CENTRAL ASIA CONCLUSION: A CHANGE OF HEART PART III: THE END OF THE MONROE DOCTRINE 14 THE NEW RULES OF THE GAME 15 MEXICO: THE UMBILICAL CORD 16 VENEZUELA: BOLÍVAR’S REVENGE 17 COLOMBIA: THE ANDEAN BALKANS? 18 BRAZIL: THE

classic imperialist quest for land and labor, but it succeeded in supplanting European powers through a mix of pocketbook diplomacy and military conquest.3 The Monroe Doctrine, articulated by the U.S. president in 1823, promised to complete the ejection of European powers and ensure unfettered American dominance in perpetuity. America’s

, sought not only to vanquish Spain but also to control the Philippines, which the United States simultaneously seized. Almost a century after America instituted the Monroe Doctrine, the Roosevelt Corollary was an imperial anticolonialism that justified American interference. Roosevelt’s guiding premise was clear: “Peace cannot be had until the civilized nations

Caracas is named for its native son El Libertador, and it is Venezuela—not China or Europe—that most powerfully embodies the death of the Monroe Doctrine. Venezuela without oil would be just another third-world agricultural backwater with populist leaders and the occasional coup, but Venezuela with oil is something altogether

Cold War–era thinking, America for over a decade has reactively sought simply to avoid losing ground in Latin America, but the elements of the Monroe Doctrine—that America would prevent any foreign power from influencing Latin America, intervene at will to protect its interests, and manipulate each nation’s economic affairs

interests likely to yield face-saving decisions while marginalizing controversial or outside (read: U.S.-imposed) topics.12 “What we have now is a Chinese ‘Monroe Doctrine,’” the Malaysian analyst declared. “We should get it over with and accept this Chinese order. That way we can peacefully resolve the problems of Taiwan

Cuba: An American History

by Ada Ferrer  · 6 Sep 2021  · 723pp  · 211,892 words

On Grand Strategy

by John Lewis Gaddis  · 3 Apr 2018  · 461pp  · 109,656 words

A Pipeline Runs Through It: The Story of Oil From Ancient Times to the First World War

by Keith Fisher  · 3 Aug 2022

Hegemony or Survival: America's Quest for Global Dominance

by Noam Chomsky  · 1 Jan 2003  · 351pp  · 96,780 words

Year 501

by Noam Chomsky  · 19 Jan 2016

The WikiLeaks Files: The World According to US Empire

by Wikileaks  · 24 Aug 2015  · 708pp  · 176,708 words

Turning the Tide

by Noam Chomsky  · 14 Sep 2015

Presidents of War

by Michael Beschloss  · 8 Oct 2018

The Man Who Saved the Union: Ulysses Grant in War and Peace

by H. W. Brands  · 1 Oct 2012  · 939pp  · 274,289 words

A Terrible Glory: Custer and the Little Bighorn - the Last Great Battle of the American West

by James Donovan  · 24 Mar 2008

The Deluge: The Great War, America and the Remaking of the Global Order, 1916-1931

by Adam Tooze  · 13 Nov 2014  · 1,057pp  · 239,915 words

This Sceptred Isle

by Christopher Lee  · 19 Jan 2012  · 796pp  · 242,660 words

Reaganland: America's Right Turn 1976-1980

by Rick Perlstein  · 17 Aug 2020

A People's History of the United States

by Howard Zinn  · 2 Jan 1977  · 913pp  · 299,770 words

The Abandonment of the West

by Michael Kimmage  · 21 Apr 2020  · 378pp  · 121,495 words

The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism

by Edward E. Baptist  · 24 Oct 2016

Hopes and Prospects

by Noam Chomsky  · 1 Jan 2009

When They Go Low, We Go High: Speeches That Shape the World – and Why We Need Them

by Philip Collins  · 4 Oct 2017  · 475pp  · 156,046 words

The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money & Power

by Daniel Yergin  · 23 Dec 2008  · 1,445pp  · 469,426 words

Andrew Carnegie

by David Nasaw  · 15 Nov 2007  · 1,230pp  · 357,848 words

Empire

by Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri  · 9 Mar 2000  · 1,015pp  · 170,908 words

The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers: Economic Change and Military Conflict From 1500 to 2000

by Paul Kennedy  · 15 Jan 1989  · 1,477pp  · 311,310 words

America Right or Wrong: An Anatomy of American Nationalism

by Anatol Lieven  · 3 May 2010

The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and Its Solutions

by Jason Hickel  · 3 May 2017  · 332pp  · 106,197 words

The Great Turning: From Empire to Earth Community

by David C. Korten  · 1 Jan 2001

Prisoners of Geography: Ten Maps That Explain Everything About the World (Politics of Place)

by Tim Marshall  · 10 Oct 2016  · 306pp  · 79,537 words

Who Rules the World?

by Noam Chomsky

The Wise Men: Six Friends and the World They Made

by Walter Isaacson and Evan Thomas  · 28 Feb 2012  · 1,150pp  · 338,839 words

Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan

by Herbert P. Bix  · 1 Jan 2000  · 1,056pp  · 275,211 words

The Making of Global Capitalism

by Leo Panitch and Sam Gindin  · 8 Oct 2012  · 823pp  · 206,070 words

Kissinger: A Biography

by Walter Isaacson  · 26 Sep 2005  · 1,330pp  · 372,940 words

Falling Behind: Explaining the Development Gap Between Latin America and the United States

by Francis Fukuyama  · 1 Jan 2006

Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy

by Francis Fukuyama  · 29 Sep 2014  · 828pp  · 232,188 words

The Economic Weapon

by Nicholas Mulder  · 15 Mar 2021

Nixonland: The Rise of a President and the Fracturing of America

by Rick Perlstein  · 1 Jan 2008  · 1,351pp  · 404,177 words

Fateful Triangle: The United States, Israel, and the Palestinians (Updated Edition) (South End Press Classics Series)

by Noam Chomsky  · 1 Apr 1999

From the Ruins of Empire: The Intellectuals Who Remade Asia

by Pankaj Mishra  · 3 Sep 2012

Powers and Prospects

by Noam Chomsky  · 16 Sep 2015

Shadows of Empire: The Anglosphere in British Politics

by Michael Kenny and Nick Pearce  · 5 Jun 2018  · 215pp  · 64,460 words

Europe: A History

by Norman Davies  · 1 Jan 1996

What We Say Goes: Conversations on U.S. Power in a Changing World

by Noam Chomsky and David Barsamian  · 1 Oct 2007

Mountains Beyond Mountains: The Quest of Dr. Paul Farmer, a Man Who Would Cure the World

by Tracy Kidder  · 8 Sep 2003  · 331pp  · 107,226 words

Executive Orders

by Tom Clancy  · 2 Jan 1996

The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor

by David S. Landes  · 14 Sep 1999  · 1,060pp  · 265,296 words

On Power and Ideology

by Noam Chomsky  · 7 Jul 2015

The Marshall Plan: Dawn of the Cold War

by Benn Steil  · 13 Feb 2018  · 913pp  · 219,078 words

Interventions

by Noam Chomsky

The First Tycoon

by T.J. Stiles  · 14 Aug 2009

Zbig: The Life of Zbigniew Brzezinski, America's Great Power Prophet

by Edward Luce  · 13 May 2025  · 612pp  · 235,188 words

Beautiful security

by Andy Oram and John Viega  · 15 Dec 2009  · 302pp  · 82,233 words

The Pursuit of Power: Europe, 1815-1914

by Richard J. Evans  · 31 Aug 2016  · 976pp  · 329,519 words

George Marshall: Defender of the Republic

by David L. Roll  · 8 Jul 2019

USA Travel Guide

by Lonely, Planet

A World in Disarray: American Foreign Policy and the Crisis of the Old Order

by Richard Haass  · 10 Jan 2017  · 286pp  · 82,970 words

Border and Rule: Global Migration, Capitalism, and the Rise of Racist Nationalism

by Harsha Walia  · 9 Feb 2021

The Extreme Centre: A Warning

by Tariq Ali  · 22 Jan 2015  · 160pp  · 46,449 words

The Age of Illusions: How America Squandered Its Cold War Victory

by Andrew J. Bacevich  · 7 Jan 2020  · 254pp  · 68,133 words

The Cold War: Stories From the Big Freeze

by Bridget Kendall  · 14 May 2017  · 559pp  · 178,279 words

Connectography: Mapping the Future of Global Civilization

by Parag Khanna  · 18 Apr 2016  · 497pp  · 144,283 words

How the World Works

by Noam Chomsky, Arthur Naiman and David Barsamian  · 13 Sep 2011  · 489pp  · 111,305 words

Why the Allies Won

by Richard Overy  · 29 Feb 2012  · 624pp  · 191,758 words

Profit Over People: Neoliberalism and Global Order

by Noam Chomsky  · 6 Sep 2011

Culture of Terrorism

by Noam Chomsky  · 19 Oct 2015

The Chomsky Reader

by Noam Chomsky  · 11 Sep 1987

Rogue States

by Noam Chomsky  · 9 Jul 2015

The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities

by John J. Mearsheimer  · 24 Sep 2018  · 443pp  · 125,510 words

Imperial Ambitions: Conversations on the Post-9/11 World

by Noam Chomsky and David Barsamian  · 4 Oct 2005  · 165pp  · 47,405 words

Rethinking Camelot

by Noam Chomsky  · 7 Apr 2015

Because We Say So

by Noam Chomsky

The Empire Project: The Rise and Fall of the British World-System, 1830–1970

by John Darwin  · 23 Sep 2009

Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History

by Stephen Jay Gould  · 1 Jan 1977  · 266pp  · 76,299 words

Crucible: The Long End of the Great War and the Birth of a New World, 1917-1924

by Charles Emmerson  · 14 Oct 2019  · 950pp  · 297,713 words

The Retreat of Western Liberalism

by Edward Luce  · 20 Apr 2017  · 223pp  · 58,732 words

Rogue State: A Guide to the World's Only Superpower

by William Blum  · 31 Mar 2002

War Without Mercy: PACIFIC WAR

by John Dower  · 11 Apr 1986  · 516pp  · 159,734 words

Pacific: Silicon Chips and Surfboards, Coral Reefs and Atom Bombs, Brutal Dictators, Fading Empires, and the Coming Collision of the World's Superpowers

by Simon Winchester  · 27 Oct 2015  · 535pp  · 151,217 words

1946: The Making of the Modern World

by Victor Sebestyen  · 30 Sep 2014  · 476pp  · 144,288 words

How the Post Office Created America: A History

by Winifred Gallagher  · 7 Jan 2016  · 431pp  · 106,435 words

A Peace to End All Peace: The Fall of the Ottoman Empire and the Creation of the Modern Middle East

by David Fromkin  · 2 Jan 1989  · 681pp  · 214,967 words

The Signal and the Noise: Why So Many Predictions Fail-But Some Don't

by Nate Silver  · 31 Aug 2012  · 829pp  · 186,976 words

Understanding Power

by Noam Chomsky  · 26 Jul 2010

Imperial Legacies

by Jeremy Black;  · 14 Jul 2019  · 264pp  · 74,688 words

The Future Is Asian

by Parag Khanna  · 5 Feb 2019  · 496pp  · 131,938 words

Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World

by Malcolm Harris  · 14 Feb 2023  · 864pp  · 272,918 words

America at the Crossroads: Democracy, Power, and the Neoconservative Legacy

by Francis Fukuyama  · 20 Mar 2007  · 214pp  · 57,614 words

Empire Lost: Britain, the Dominions and the Second World War

by Andrew Stewart  · 1 Nov 2008  · 637pp  · 117,453 words

Coffeeland: One Man's Dark Empire and the Making of Our Favorite Drug

by Augustine Sedgewick  · 6 Apr 2020  · 668pp  · 159,523 words

Culture and Imperialism

by Edward W. Said  · 29 May 1994  · 549pp  · 170,495 words

The Social Animal: The Hidden Sources of Love, Character, and Achievement

by David Brooks  · 8 Mar 2011  · 487pp  · 151,810 words

The Next Decade: Where We've Been . . . And Where We're Going

by George Friedman  · 25 Jan 2011  · 249pp  · 79,740 words

Worldmaking After Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination

by Adom Getachew  · 5 Feb 2019

The Battle of Bretton Woods: John Maynard Keynes, Harry Dexter White, and the Making of a New World Order

by Benn Steil  · 14 May 2013  · 710pp  · 164,527 words

The Long Game: China's Grand Strategy to Displace American Order

by Rush Doshi  · 24 Jun 2021  · 816pp  · 191,889 words

Britain's Europe: A Thousand Years of Conflict and Cooperation

by Brendan Simms  · 27 Apr 2016  · 380pp  · 116,919 words

Killing Hope: Us Military and Cia Interventions Since World War 2

by William Blum  · 15 Jan 2003

Homeland: The War on Terror in American Life

by Richard Beck  · 2 Sep 2024  · 715pp  · 212,449 words

Dark Laboratory: On Columbus, the Caribbean, and the Origins of the Climate Crisis

by Tao Leigh. Goffe  · 14 Mar 2025  · 441pp  · 122,013 words

Heaven's Command (Pax Britannica)

by Jan Morris  · 22 Dec 2010  · 699pp  · 192,704 words

Alphabetical: How Every Letter Tells a Story

by Michael Rosen  · 7 Nov 2013  · 321pp  · 100,923 words

Reminiscences of a Stock Operator

by Edwin Lefèvre and William J. O'Neil  · 14 May 1923  · 650pp  · 204,878 words

The Globalization Paradox: Democracy and the Future of the World Economy

by Dani Rodrik  · 23 Dec 2010  · 356pp  · 103,944 words

Bad Money: Reckless Finance, Failed Politics, and the Global Crisis of American Capitalism

by Kevin Phillips  · 31 Mar 2008  · 422pp  · 113,830 words

In Patagonia:

by Bruce Chatwin  · 5 Jun 2019  · 243pp  · 70,257 words

The Power Elite

by C. Wright Mills and Alan Wolfe  · 1 Jan 1956  · 568pp  · 174,089 words

The Myth of the Blitz

by Angus Calder  · 28 Jun 2012  · 434pp  · 127,608 words

The House of Morgan: An American Banking Dynasty and the Rise of Modern Finance

by Ron Chernow  · 1 Jan 1990  · 1,335pp  · 336,772 words

The Tyranny of Experts: Economists, Dictators, and the Forgotten Rights of the Poor

by William Easterly  · 4 Mar 2014  · 483pp  · 134,377 words

Costa Rica

by Matthew Firestone, Carolina Miranda and César G. Soriano  · 2 Jan 2008

The Establishment: And How They Get Away With It

by Owen Jones  · 3 Sep 2014  · 388pp  · 125,472 words

Shoot for the Moon: The Space Race and the Extraordinary Voyage of Apollo 11

by James Donovan  · 12 Mar 2019

Prisoner's Dilemma: John Von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb

by William Poundstone  · 2 Jan 1993  · 323pp  · 100,772 words

A History of France

by John Julius Norwich  · 30 Sep 2018  · 482pp  · 149,807 words

The Rough Guide to Mexico

by Rough Guides  · 15 Jan 2022

Ten Lessons for a Post-Pandemic World

by Fareed Zakaria  · 5 Oct 2020  · 289pp  · 86,165 words

The Cable

by Gillian Cookson  · 19 Sep 2012  · 136pp  · 42,864 words

The End of Growth

by Jeff Rubin  · 2 Sep 2013  · 262pp  · 83,548 words

Cuba Travel Guide

by Lonely Planet

Central America

by Carolyn McCarthy, Greg Benchwick, Joshua Samuel Brown, Alex Egerton, Matthew Firestone, Kevin Raub, Tom Spurling and Lucas Vidgen  · 2 Jan 2001

The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century

by George Friedman  · 30 Jul 2008  · 278pp  · 88,711 words