Murray Gell-Mann

back to index

description: an American physicist who received the Nobel Prize in Physics in 1969 for his work on the theory of elementary particles

80 results

Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman

by James Gleick  · 1 Jan 1992  · 795pp  · 215,529 words

of their publisher these became popular best-sellers. After his death in 1988 his sometime friend, collaborator, office neighbor, foil, competitor, and antagonist, the acerbic Murray Gell-Mann, angered his family at a memorial service by asserting, “He surrounded himself with a cloud of myth, and he spent a great deal of time

himself was thriving as head of a fruitful group at Columbia. “Theoreticians were in disgrace”—so it seemed to one especially precocious student of physics, Murray Gell-Mann. “The theory of elementary particles has reached an impasse,” Victor Weisskopf wrote. Everyone had been struggling futilely, he said, especially since the war, and everyone

at the lunch table; a group of his graduate students protected themselves with a conversational convention in which Schwinger meant Feynman and Feynman meant Schwinger.) Murray Gell-Mann later spent a semester staying in Schwinger’s house in Cambridge and loved to say afterward that he had searched everywhere for the Feynman diagrams

important catchphrase. Experimenters looked for examples or counterexamples. In the longer term its main contribution to physics was that its popularity rankled a younger theorist, Murray Gell-Mann. He thought Pais was wrong, and he was jealous. Murray At fourteen he had been declared “Most Studious” and “wonder boy” by his classmates at

, taught himself a few words of Samoan and then resignedly told a friend, “The only person who will know I’m pronouncing this wrong is Murray.” Gell-Mann attended Columbia Grammar on full scholarship. His father, born in Austria, had learned to speak a perfectly unaccented English and so, in the early 1920s

beyond human understanding, and scientists may be the world’s happiest consumers of such stories. A modern example: A physicist studying quantum field theory with Murray Gell-Mann at the California Institute of Technology in the 1950s, before standard texts have become available, discovers unpublished lecture notes by Richard Feynman, circulating samizdat style

did have some kind of handedness built into its guts, then an experimenter might be able to find events that did not conserve parity. When Murray Gell-Mann was a graduate student at MIT, a standard problem in one course was to derive the conservation of parity by mathematical logic, transforming coordinates from

moments after the reception he ran out of gasoline on the Pasadena Freeway. He told Gweneth cheerfully: So this is how we’re starting life. Murray Gell-Mann, who had married an Englishwoman he met at the Institute for Advanced Study several years before, thought Feynman was playing catch-up—now he, too

knowledge of the movements of sun, moon, and planets. Codes, mathematics, and astronomy—eventually he delivered a lecture at Caltech on deciphering Mayan hieroglyphics. Afterward, Murray Gell-Mann “countered,” Feynman said, with a series of six lectures on the languages of the world.) The Maya had a theory of astronomy that enabled them

I’ve forgotten,” he said. Quarks and Partons In 1983, looking back on the evolution of particle physics since the now-historic Shelter Island conference, Murray Gell-Mann said, uncontroversially, that he and his colleagues had developed a theory that “works.” He summed it up in one intricately crafted sentence (rather more refined

a small first printing early in 1985. It sold out quickly, and within weeks the publisher had a surprising best-seller. One unhappy reader was Murray Gell-Mann. His attention focused on Feynman’s description of the joy of discovering the “new law” of weak interactions in 1957: “It was the first time

sue. For late editions of the paperback Feynman added a parenthetical disclaimer: “Of course it wasn’t true, but finding out later that at least Murray Gell-Mann—and also Sudarshan and Marshak—had worked out the same theory didn’t spoil my fun.” Surely You’re Joking gave offense in another way

of these things is nonsense! You’re trying to make something difficult and complicated out of something that’s simple and beautiful.” Across the hall Murray Gell-Mann looked out of his office. “I see you’ve met Dick,” he said. Feynman had always set high standards for fundamental work, although he meant

play the largest roles in this book agreed to provide their own recollections in interviews that sometimes extended over many sessions: Hans Bethe, Freeman Dyson, Murray Gell-Mann, Julian Schwinger, Victor Weisskopf, John Archibald Wheeler, and Robert R. Wilson. Feynman’s own voice is everywhere in his published work, of course, and toward

. 277 ALTHOUGH ‘ONE’ IS NOT PERFECTLY: Bernstein 1987, 63. 277 THEY ALSO WORRIED ABOUT SCHWINCER’S ABILITY: Sheldon Glashow, interview, Cambridge, Mass. 277 MURRAY GELL-MANN LATER SPENT A SEMESTER: Murray Gell-Mann, interviews, Pasadena and Chicago. 278 THERE WAS A NEW NOTE: E.g., Virginia Prewett, “I Homesteaded in Brazil,” Saturday Evening Post, 22 April

Burton Richter provided useful on-site guidance at the Stanford Linear Accelerator Center; James Bjorken, George Zweig, Sidney Drell, Yung-Su Tsai, and, of course, Murray Gell-Mann were among those with especially helpful reminiscences. For the record of Feynman’s illnesses I relied on notes and correspondence in his files and interviews

AT FIRST HE KEPT HER PRESENCE SECRET: Gweneth Feynman, Gell-Mann, interviews. 346 SO THIS IS HOW WE’RE STARTING LIFE: Gweneth Feynman, interview. 346 MURRAY GELL-MANN, WHO HAD MARRIED: Gell-Mann 1989a, 50. 346 AN IMAGE LODGED IN GELL-MANN’S MEMORY: Ibid. 347 HELLO, MY SWEETHEART: Feynman to Gweneth Feynman

of Ponderable Bodies,” Journal of the Franklin institute 225 (1938):277. Quoted by Schweber, forthcoming. 366 AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE LAW: CPL, 169. 367 AFTERWARD, MURRAY GELL-MANN “COUNTERED”: SYJ, 290. 367 THEY COUNTED A CERTAIN NUMBER: CPL, 169. 367 “YES,” SAYS THE ASTRONOMER: Ibid., 170. 368 TO DYSON’S ASTONISHMENT: Dyson to

RAGE COULD BE HEARD: E.g., Tuck, interview. 411 OF COURSE IT WASN’T TRUE: SYJ, 229. He also changed “Murray Gell-Mann and I wrote a paper on the theory” to “Murray Gell-Mann compared and combined our ideas and wrote a paper on the theory” (232). Gell-Mann still called it “that joke book

de Guixols, Catalunya, Spain. ——. 1989a. “Dick Feynman—The Guy Down the Hall.” Physics Today, February, 50. ——. 1989b. Remarks at a Conference Celebrating the Birthday of Murray Gell-Mann, 27–28 January. Gell-Mann, Murray, and Ne’eman, Yuval. 1964. The Eightfold Way. New York: Benjamin. Gemant, Andrew. 1961. The Nature of the Genius

The Infinity Puzzle

by Frank Close  · 29 Nov 2011  · 449pp  · 123,459 words

or T turned out to be flawed, and new experiments favored a combination of V and A. Marshak discussed the matter with several colleagues, including Murray Gell-Mann, a young theorist who would almost single-handedly redefine the frontiers of particle physics. However, that would come later, as we shall see. Meanwhile, unaware

a possibility for physics to make a great advance. However, it would turn out that there are many possible paths through the Yang-Mills jungle. Murray Gell-Mann, who also had recognized the V – A option, spent a considerable amount of 1958 and ’59 trying to unite weak and electromagnetic forces but failed

with his pursuit of a unified theory. Fortune came his way the next year, 1960, following a seminar that he gave in Paris, attended by Murray Gell-Mann. Gell-Mann was only three years older than Glashow but already had a huge reputation. By the age of thirty he had introduced the concept

and Z 0. To see how, we need to take a brief detour. “ess-you-two-cross-you-one” At the beginning of the 1960s Murray Gell-Mann was becoming interested in the branch of mathematics known as group theory. This classifies sets of common things into families—the groups. The multitude of

Israeli theorist Yuval Ne’eman had identified the group SU3 as a way of describing the properties of the hadrons—a feature independently discovered by Murray Gell-Mann. At one point in 1965, Salam thought that he had found the ultimate description of strong interactions, marrying SU3 with the theory of relativity in

in his singleminded refusal to give up attempting to tame the Infinity Puzzle. “And Now I Introduce Mr. ’t Hooft” 209 In 1961 Glashow and Murray Gell-Mann at Cal Tech had been investigating mathematical group theory, and Gell-Mann had become interested in the way these techniques lead to Yang-Mills theory

Michel Levy had established the Institut des Sciences at Cargese, adjacent to a beach. That already made a memorable environment. He had also worked with Murray Gell-Mann, and they had invented the “pi sigma model,” which built on the original ideas of Nambu and went beyond the original ideas of Matthews and

his equations. part  revelation Chapter 12 b. j. and the cosmic quarks Birth of the quark model: George Zweig is told it’s complete rubbish; Murray Gell-Mann says quarks are unphysical; James “B. J.” Bjorken has a big idea, which leads to their discovery. Feynman invents the “parton model.” The strong force

a limb in 1966. For the idea that quarks might be concrete particles—real particles—had been widely disparaged at the time, not least by Murray Gell-Mann, one of the creators of the quark model. That the proton and the neutron are not the ultimate seeds of the atomic nucleus was already

my thesis on the quark model. the quark model The idea of quarks had been born in 1964, independently by two Americans, George Zweig and Murray Gell-Mann. By the 1960s, experiments with cosmic rays and at accelerators had revealed scores of hadrons. In 1962 Gell-Mann found a way of gathering the

” came to nothing, there was retribution following the earlier hyperbole. In 1965 Salam ran a research conference at the new International Centre in Trieste.27 Murray Gell-Mann had given one of the talks, and in the questions afterward was asked about “U-twiddle-12.” The episode may have become embellished in memories

Glashow’s and was very conscious that Glashow had made his entrance in the electroweak unification saga in his doctoral thesis, his insight recognized by Murray Gell-Mann at the fateful lunch in France in 1960. Glashow had then developed and completed his publications during his time in Cal Tech, which is where

spontaneous symmetry breaking into the mix relative to having identified the importance of SU2 × U1. This has been the subject of much debate. In particular, Murray Gell-Mann said that he had “argued a little bit” with 310 the infinity puzzle the Nobel authorities: “the only time I ever have.”47 While he

. Zweig, e-mail to the author, October 3, 2010, and Memories of Murray and the Quark Model: talk presented at the “Conference in Honor of Murray Gell-Mann’s 80th Birthday,” Nanyang Technical University, Singapore, February 24, 2010. 5. Bjorken, e-mail to the author, October 1, 2010. 6. Recall that in 1960

Coming of Age in the Milky Way

by Timothy Ferris  · 30 Jun 1988  · 661pp  · 169,298 words

aid and criticism provided by William Alexander, Sherry Arden, Hans Bethe, Nancy Brackett, Ken Broede, Robert Brucato, Lisa Drew, Ann Druyan, David Falk, Andrew Fraknoi, Murray Gell-Mann, Owen Gingerich, J. Richard Gott III, Stephen Jay Gould, Alan Guth, Stephen Hawking, He Xiang Tao, Karen Hitzig, Larry Hughes, Res Jost, Kathy Lowry, Owen

exclusion principle, let each skater wear a hoopskirt that forbids their colliding…. And that is quite enough of that. *The name “quark” was conferred by Murray Gell-Mann, the Caltech physicist who came up with the idea. It comes from a line in James Joyce’s Finnegans Wake, “Three quarks for Muster Mark

and weak forces? That question was taken up by one of the first to appreciate the beauty of the Yang-Mills approach, the American physicist Murray Gell-Mann. Some smart scientists (Dirac, Bohr, and the elder Einstein) are modest in demeanor. Others are brash. (Wolfgang Pauli disrupted Yang’s first explication of gauge

it did not fare well, and most physicists soon dropped the idea. One of the few to appreciate its potential was (once again) the perspicacious Murray Gell-Mann, who encouraged the American physicist John Schwarz that even if string theory appeared sterile at present, “somehow, sometime, somewhere, it would still be useful.”31

and quasars, while cosmologists were hiring on at CERN and Fermilab to do high-energy physics at underground installations blind to the stars. By 1985, Murray Gell-Mann could declare that “elementary particle physics and the study of the very early universe, the two most fundamental branches of natural science, have, essentially, merged

finds that the Cepheid variable stars used in measuring intergalactic distances actually come in two varieties, with different magnitude-periodicity relationships, Time: 1953 Noteworthy Events: Murray Gell-Mann proposes a new quantum number called strangeness, notes that it is conserved in strong interactions. Time: 1954 Noteworthy Events: Walter Baade and Rudolph Minkowski identify

redshift in the spectral lines of a quasar, indicating that quasars are the most distant class of objects in the universe. Time: 1964 Noteworthy Events: Murray Gell-Mann and George Zweig independently propose that protons, neutrons, and other hadrons are composed of still smaller particles, which Gell-Mann dubs “quarks.” Noteworthy Events: The

The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality Created Modern Science

by Michael Strevens  · 12 Oct 2020

integral to the science below. The same is true today. Yet it is not as if the strangeness of the theory is invisible to scientists. Murray Gell-Mann, the discoverer of quarks, called quantum mechanics a “mysterious, confusing discipline.” According to Roger Penrose, one of the late twentieth century’s foremost mathematical physicists

in Figure 10.7—than like Byrhtferth’s realization of the power of four? Or would someone find hidden order and simplicity in the zoo? Murray Gell-Mann grew up in straitened circumstances in New York City, the child of immigrants from Eastern Europe who never quite secured their hold on the American

-Mann had predicted the omega-minus, and sure enough it—or rather its distinctive bubble-chamber signature, shown in Figure 10.13—had been observed. Murray Gell-Mann had secured his Nobel Prize. Figure 10.12. A decuplet that would be completed by a particle filling the gray zone at the bottom left

French), or thinkers as familiar with history and literature as they are with the technical apparatus of their craft, such as Stephen Jay Gould and Murray Gell-Mann. They may write books about beauty in nature that celebrate the ideas of Pythagoras and Plato, like the theoretical physicist Frank Wilczek. They may champion

wide open to untrammeled Cartesian hubbub. Indeed, scientific discovery relies to a not inconsiderable extent on this furtive openness, which has allowed thinkers such as Murray Gell-Mann, D’Arcy Thompson, and Albert Einstein to use their aesthetic and philosophical senses in the search for extraordinary theories. These great scientists were exceptional in

’s scheme also implied the existence of another particle, the eta, just as experimenters were beginning to see evidence for it in their data. 233 Murray Gell-Mann had secured his Nobel Prize: The prize was awarded in 1969. Along with the Nobel’s exclusivity come invidious distinctions. Each of Gell-Mann’s

. New York: Knopf, 2016. Jasanoff, S. “Transparency in Public Science: Purposes, Reasons, Limits.” Law and Contemporary Problems 69 (2006): 21–45. Johnson, G. Strange Beauty: Murray Gell-Mann and the Revolution in Twentieth-Century Physics. New York: Knopf, 1999. Keller, A. “Has Science Created Technology?” Minerva 22 (1984): 160–82. Kennefick, D. “Testing

The Greatest Story Ever Told--So Far

by Lawrence M. Krauss  · 21 Mar 2017  · 335pp  · 95,280 words

Corporation in Los Angeles and invited Sudarshan and another student to join him. The two most renowned particle theorists in the world then, Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann, were at Caltech, and each had become obsessed with unraveling the form of the weak interaction. Feynman had missed out on the discovery of parity

to be heavy since the interactions it mediated would have to be weak as well. Glashow’s ideas were reported to the physics community by Murray Gell-Mann at the 1960 Rochester meeting, as Gell-Mann had by then recruited Glashow to Caltech to work in Gell-Mann’s group. Glashow’s paper

complex interactions between nucleons and other particles. In response to this notion that some kind of Yang-Mills symmetry might be behind the strong interaction, Murray Gell-Mann developed an elegant symmetry scheme he labeled in a Zen-like fashion the Eightfold Way. It not only allowed a classification of eight different vector

The Jasons: The Secret History of Science's Postwar Elite

by Ann Finkbeiner  · 26 Mar 2007

: “I wasn’t about to stop working in physics,” he said. Watson, Brueckner, and Murph—along with a fourth, younger member of Theoretical Physics, Incorporated, Murray Gell-Mann—appointed themselves the first steering committee. Next, Jason had to get the right people. With the cooperation of York and Townes, the new steering committee

science but also on social science—an area not typically undertaken by physicists. Jason briefly got into the social science of the insurgency anyway because Murray Gell-Mann, whose interests were catholic and compelling, was interested in human behavior. “To some of his Jason colleagues,” Gell-Mann’s biographer wrote, “Gell-Mann seemed

’t moo. To work out glitches in the system, DCPG conducted field tests. Jack Ruina went “trudging through Panama jungles,” with several Jasons—among them Murray Gell-Mann—to see how well the sound sensors worked, “given the wildlife and whatnot, the acoustical conditions,” Ruina said. After the test, he said, “Murray decided

but fascism. I oppose it on any forum I see, whether from the right or the left. And I will not be part of it.’” Murray Gell-Mann had a similar experience at the Collège de France in Paris. When he insisted on giving his lecture, the college administrators escorted him out of

places like Princeton, Harvard, Stanford, and Berkeley, but also at the relatively less spectacular UCSD. Nobel Prizes Eugene Wigner, Charles Townes, Hans Bethe, Luis Alvarez, Murray Gell-Mann, Steven Weinberg, Val Fitch, Leon Lederman, and Henry Kendall won Nobel Prizes in, respectively, 1963, 1964, 1967, 1968, 1969, 1979, 1980, 1988, and 1990. Four

al. Critical Assembly: A Technical History of Los Alamos During the Oppenheimer Years, 1943–1945. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 1993. Johnson, George. Strange Beauty: Murray Gell-Mann and the Revolution in Twentieth-Century Physics. New York: Vintage Books, 1999. Kevles, Daniel. The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America

The Search for Superstrings, Symmetry, and the Theory of Everything

by John Gribbin  · 29 Nov 2009  · 185pp  · 55,639 words

table, at the start of the next phase of development of particle physics. The classification system was arrived at independently by two physicists, the American Murray Gell-Mann (born in 1929) and the Israeli Yuval Ne'eman, born in 1925. Ne'eman's education and career were interrupted by the fighting in the

a fourth quark, which Glashow gave the name ‘charm’, in order to tidy up the theoretical interpretation of some other puzzling experimental observations. In 1971, Murray Gell-Mann and Harald Fritzsch, who was born in Zwickau in 1943, and is now Research Professor of Physics at the Max-Planck Institute for Physics in

the twentieth century, when Chen Ning Yang and Robert Mills found a way to describe the strong interaction in terms of Lie groups, and then Murray Gell-Mann and Yuval Ne'eman (working independently of one another) found that SU(3) provided a framework for describing mathematically the relationships between elementary particles. Since

ago by one of the greatest physicists of all time. Fritzsch, H., Quarks, Pelican, London, 1984. The author is a German physicist who worked with Murray Gell-Mann on the theory that became known as quantum chromodynamics, the ‘colour’ theory of quarks. The book, first published in German in 1981, provides a very

and 8419/TH412. A more accessible, but secondhand, account is given by Pickering. 19 Isgur, page 439, 1981. In the same report, Zweig says that ‘Murray Gell-Mann once told me that he sent his first quark paper to Physics Letters for publication because he was certain that Physical Review Letters would not

What We Cannot Know: Explorations at the Edge of Knowledge

by Marcus Du Sautoy  · 18 May 2016

line) that prevented them from crossing via the easy route to the lower valley. THERE IS NO EXQUISITE BEAUTY WITHOUT STRANGENESS The physicists Abraham Pais, Murray Gell-Mann and Kazuhiko Nishijima came up with a cunning strategy to solve this puzzle. They proposed a new property like charge that mediated the way these

trip to Cambridge. THE VEGETARIAN BUTCHER John Polkinghorne learned his physics at the feet of Paul Dirac in Cambridge and then with Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann at Caltech. You can’t ask for better teachers than that. His research has, among other things, helped to confirm the existence of the quarks

My Life as a Quant: Reflections on Physics and Finance

by Emanuel Derman  · 1 Jan 2004  · 313pp  · 101,403 words

be considered a composite of all the rest. In Cape Town in the summer of 1964, we heard popular lectures about the work of physicists Murray Gell-Mann and Yuval Ne'eman, both modern-day Mendeleyevs, who each invented their own periodic table of particles. Some of the subtables in their system contained

to be at war with Beg, and we heard reports of prolonged shouting matches. We also heard that Pais had made a bitter enemy of Murray Gell-Mann, his 1950s collaborator, who, according to George Johnson's biography of Gell-Mann, always referred to Pais as "the evil dwarf." After what I had

The Pentagon's Brain: An Uncensored History of DARPA, America's Top-Secret Military Research Agency

by Annie Jacobsen  · 14 Sep 2015  · 558pp  · 164,627 words

Alamos weapons developer, had studied at the Berkeley Radiation Laboratory with Watson and Goldberger and at the Institute for Advanced Study alongside John von Neumann. Murray Gell-Mann, the youngest member, had been a doctoral student of Manhattan Project giant Victor Weisskopf, and was someone Goldberger considered a prodigy. The four physicists agreed

was an honor to be asked.” Goldberger remembered that “everyone was excited, full of ideas, and very patriotic.” Murph Goldberger, Keith Brueckner, Kenneth Watson, and Murray Gell-Mann drew up a list of their most respected colleagues and asked them to participate. The group’s first meeting took place at IDA headquarters in

. The Jasons were quintessential defense scientists, following in the footsteps of John von Neumann, Ernest Lawrence, and Edward Teller. The core group, including Murph Goldberger, Murray Gell-Mann, John Wheeler, and William Nierenberg, had been closely intertwined, academically, since the Manhattan Project during World War II. In the early 1960s, the Jasons began

originators of the Jason concept were being met when the Vietnam War intervened,” said Gordon MacDonald, who joined the Jasons in the summer of 1963. “Murray Gell-Mann called to ask if I’d like to join Jason. I respected Murray a great deal,” and said yes to joining. The first year as

explosions, things of that sort.” But as individual Jasons became interested in Vietnam, so did the group. The first Jason to be very interested was Murray Gell-Mann. Gell-Mann was one of the most respected thinkers in the Jason group, and one of the most esoteric. In 1969 he would win the

not the first time the Jasons examined what Goldberger called “the Vietnam problem,” but it was the first time they wrote a report about it. Murray Gell-Mann invited the revered war correspondent and political scientist Bernard Fall to come and speak to the Jason scientists that summer in La Jolla. In 1964

, and in the process, there was growing discord among them about how to proceed, specifically in the scientific gray area called social science. Some, like Murray Gell-Mann, saw promise in understanding human motivation. Others believed that using advanced technology was the only way to win the war. In Gordon MacDonald’s opinion

vandalized. In New York City, a consortium of professors at Columbia demanded that the scientists resign from Jason or resign from the university. In Paris, Murray Gell-Mann was booed off a stage. Riot police were called to a physics symposium in Trieste where Jason scientist Eugene Wigner was speaking as an honored

, 2013. Jenkins, Brian Michael. Countering al Qaeda: An Appreciation of the Situation and Suggestions for Strategy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, 2002. Johnson, George. Strange Beauty: Murray Gell-Mann and the Revolution in Twentieth-Century Physics. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1999. Johnston, Rob, Ph.D. Analytic Culture in the U.S. Intelligence Community

The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom

by Graham Farmelo  · 24 Aug 2009  · 1,396pp  · 245,647 words

Why People Believe Weird Things: Pseudoscience, Superstition, and Other Confusions of Our Time

by Michael Shermer  · 1 Jan 1997  · 404pp  · 134,430 words

Complexity: A Guided Tour

by Melanie Mitchell  · 31 Mar 2009  · 524pp  · 120,182 words

Skin in the Game: Hidden Asymmetries in Daily Life

by Nassim Nicholas Taleb  · 20 Feb 2018  · 306pp  · 82,765 words

Loonshots: How to Nurture the Crazy Ideas That Win Wars, Cure Diseases, and Transform Industries

by Safi Bahcall  · 19 Mar 2019  · 393pp  · 115,217 words

The God Equation: The Quest for a Theory of Everything

by Michio Kaku  · 5 Apr 2021  · 157pp  · 47,161 words

Turing's Cathedral

by George Dyson  · 6 Mar 2012

Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray

by Sabine Hossenfelder  · 11 Jun 2018  · 340pp  · 91,416 words

Einstein's Unfinished Revolution: The Search for What Lies Beyond the Quantum

by Lee Smolin  · 31 Mar 2019  · 385pp  · 98,015 words

Stephen Hawking

by Leonard Mlodinow  · 8 Sep 2020  · 209pp  · 68,587 words

The End of Illness

by David B. Agus  · 15 Oct 2012  · 433pp  · 106,048 words

The Meaning of Everything: The Story of the Oxford English Dictionary

by Simon Winchester  · 1 Jan 2003  · 200pp  · 71,482 words

The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology

by Ray Kurzweil  · 14 Jul 2005  · 761pp  · 231,902 words

The Pleasure of Finding Things Out: The Best Short Works of Richard P. Feynman

by Richard P. Feynman and Jeffrey Robbins  · 1 Jan 1999  · 261pp  · 86,261 words

The Man Behind the Microchip: Robert Noyce and the Invention of Silicon Valley

by Leslie Berlin  · 9 Jun 2005

How the Mind Works

by Steven Pinker  · 1 Jan 1997  · 913pp  · 265,787 words

The Fabric of the Cosmos

by Brian Greene  · 1 Jan 2003  · 695pp  · 219,110 words

Possiplex

by Ted Nelson  · 2 Jan 2010

Chaos: Making a New Science

by James Gleick  · 18 Oct 2011  · 396pp  · 112,748 words

American Prometheus: The Triumph and Tragedy of J. Robert Oppenheimer

by Kai Bird and Martin J. Sherwin  · 18 Dec 2007  · 1,041pp  · 317,136 words

How to Make a Spaceship: A Band of Renegades, an Epic Race, and the Birth of Private Spaceflight

by Julian Guthrie  · 19 Sep 2016

Beyond Weird

by Philip Ball  · 22 Mar 2018  · 277pp  · 87,082 words

When Einstein Walked With Gödel: Excursions to the Edge of Thought

by Jim Holt  · 14 May 2018  · 436pp  · 127,642 words

Physics in Mind: A Quantum View of the Brain

by Werner Loewenstein  · 29 Jan 2013  · 362pp  · 97,862 words

A Short History of Nearly Everything

by Bill Bryson  · 5 May 2003  · 654pp  · 204,260 words

Six Degrees: The Science of a Connected Age

by Duncan J. Watts  · 1 Feb 2003  · 379pp  · 113,656 words

Einstein's Dice and Schrödinger's Cat: How Two Great Minds Battled Quantum Randomness to Create a Unified Theory of Physics

by Paul Halpern  · 13 Apr 2015  · 282pp  · 89,436 words

Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think

by Alan Grafen; Mark Ridley  · 1 Jan 2006  · 286pp  · 90,530 words

Scale: The Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities, Economies, and Companies

by Geoffrey West  · 15 May 2017  · 578pp  · 168,350 words

Strategy: A History

by Lawrence Freedman  · 31 Oct 2013  · 1,073pp  · 314,528 words

This Will Make You Smarter: 150 New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking

by John Brockman  · 14 Feb 2012  · 416pp  · 106,582 words

News and How to Use It: What to Believe in a Fake News World

by Alan Rusbridger  · 26 Nov 2020  · 371pp  · 109,320 words

More Than You Know: Finding Financial Wisdom in Unconventional Places (Updated and Expanded)

by Michael J. Mauboussin  · 1 Jan 2006  · 348pp  · 83,490 words

Making Sense of Chaos: A Better Economics for a Better World

by J. Doyne Farmer  · 24 Apr 2024  · 406pp  · 114,438 words

Infinite Ascent: A Short History of Mathematics

by David Berlinski  · 2 Jan 2005  · 158pp  · 49,168 words

Chaos Kings: How Wall Street Traders Make Billions in the New Age of Crisis

by Scott Patterson  · 5 Jun 2023  · 289pp  · 95,046 words

The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature

by Steven Pinker  · 1 Jan 2002  · 901pp  · 234,905 words

Massive: The Missing Particle That Sparked the Greatest Hunt in Science

by Ian Sample  · 1 Jan 2010  · 310pp  · 89,838 words

The Bill Gates Problem: Reckoning With the Myth of the Good Billionaire

by Tim Schwab  · 13 Nov 2023  · 618pp  · 179,407 words

Human Frontiers: The Future of Big Ideas in an Age of Small Thinking

by Michael Bhaskar  · 2 Nov 2021

Think Twice: Harnessing the Power of Counterintuition

by Michael J. Mauboussin  · 6 Nov 2012  · 256pp  · 60,620 words

The God Delusion

by Richard Dawkins  · 12 Sep 2006  · 478pp  · 142,608 words

Uncharted: How to Map the Future

by Margaret Heffernan  · 20 Feb 2020  · 335pp  · 97,468 words

The World According to Physics

by Jim Al-Khalili  · 10 Mar 2020  · 198pp  · 57,703 words

Dawn of the New Everything: Encounters With Reality and Virtual Reality

by Jaron Lanier  · 21 Nov 2017  · 480pp  · 123,979 words

The Lucky Years: How to Thrive in the Brave New World of Health

by David B. Agus  · 29 Dec 2015  · 346pp  · 92,984 words

Predictably Irrational, Revised and Expanded Edition: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions

by Dan Ariely  · 19 Feb 2007  · 383pp  · 108,266 words

On Nature and Language

by Noam Chomsky  · 16 Apr 2007

Filthy Rich: A Powerful Billionaire, the Sex Scandal That Undid Him, and All the Justice That Money Can Buy: The Shocking True Story of Jeffrey Epstein

by James Patterson, John Connolly and Tim Malloy  · 10 Oct 2016  · 234pp  · 63,844 words

Learning to Think: A Memoir

by Tracy King  · 12 Mar 2025  · 248pp  · 84,118 words

A Man for All Markets

by Edward O. Thorp  · 15 Nov 2016  · 505pp  · 142,118 words

The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds

by Michael Lewis  · 6 Dec 2016  · 336pp  · 113,519 words

Physics of the Future: How Science Will Shape Human Destiny and Our Daily Lives by the Year 2100

by Michio Kaku  · 15 Mar 2011  · 523pp  · 148,929 words

From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds

by Daniel C. Dennett  · 7 Feb 2017  · 573pp  · 157,767 words

Free as in Freedom

by Sam Williams  · 16 Nov 2015

Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life

by Daniel C. Dennett  · 15 Jan 1995  · 846pp  · 232,630 words

Alchemy: The Dark Art and Curious Science of Creating Magic in Brands, Business, and Life

by Rory Sutherland  · 6 May 2019  · 401pp  · 93,256 words

The Cancer Chronicles: Unlocking Medicine's Deepest Mystery

by George Johnson  · 26 Aug 2013  · 465pp  · 103,303 words

In the Graveyard of Empires: America's War in Afghanistan

by Seth G. Jones  · 12 Apr 2009  · 566pp  · 144,072 words

The Meaning of It All

by Richard P. Feynman  · 8 Jul 2012  · 107pp  · 33,799 words

Topics in Market Microstructure

by Ilija I. Zovko  · 1 Nov 2008  · 119pp  · 10,356 words

The Irrational Bundle

by Dan Ariely  · 3 Apr 2013  · 898pp  · 266,274 words

The Penguin and the Leviathan: How Cooperation Triumphs Over Self-Interest

by Yochai Benkler  · 8 Aug 2011  · 187pp  · 62,861 words

A Brief History of Time

by Stephen Hawking  · 16 Aug 2011  · 186pp  · 64,267 words

The Behavioral Investor

by Daniel Crosby  · 15 Feb 2018  · 249pp  · 77,342 words

A Short Guide to a Long Life

by David B. Agus  · 7 Jan 2014  · 100pp  · 28,911 words

Big Bang

by Simon Singh  · 1 Jan 2004  · 492pp  · 149,259 words

Hunting in the Shadows: The Pursuit of Al Qa'ida Since 9/11: The Pursuit of Al Qa'ida Since 9/11

by Seth G. Jones  · 29 Apr 2012  · 649pp  · 172,080 words

Six Not-So-Easy Pieces: Einstein’s Relativity, Symmetry, and Space-Time

by Richard P. Feynman, Robert B. Leighton and Matthew Sands  · 22 Mar 2011  · 182pp  · 51,816 words

Elemental: How the Periodic Table Can Now Explain Everything

by Tim James  · 26 Mar 2019  · 189pp  · 48,180 words