Panopticon Jeremy Bentham

back to index

97 results

System Error: Where Big Tech Went Wrong and How We Can Reboot

by Rob Reich, Mehran Sahami and Jeremy M. Weinstein  · 6 Sep 2021

Decisions How to Govern Algorithms Opening the “Black Box” Chapter 5: What’s Your Privacy Worth? The Wild West of Data Collection A Digital Panopticon? From the Panopticon to a Digital Blackout Technology Alone Won’t Save Us We Can’t Count on the Market, Either A Privacy Paradox Protecting Privacy for

often, social consequences are not considered until a major screw-up makes the problem transparent for everyone. At that point, it may be too late. Jeremy Weinstein went to Washington with President Barack Obama in 2009. A key staffer in the White House, he foresaw how new technologies might remake the

us understand, anticipate, and even mitigate the impacts of technology on society. When he returned to Stanford in 2015 as a professor of political science, Jeremy made it his top priority to teach young computer scientists and to bring social science to the study of how technologies are reshaping our social

should be able to develop technology—for example, encryption—to ensure that no one, not even the government with a warrant, can access personal information. Jeremy saw such debates play out over years in government, where the White House Situation Room was a mirror of society’s broader disagreements, with the

data access, ownership, and protection rose to the fore. What the British philosopher and social reformer Jeremy Bentham proposed in the eighteenth century as a tool of desirable social control—an omnipresent surveillance of prisoners, or “panopticon”—is no longer just a philosopher’s fantasy. But nobody expects, much less desires, to be

the kind of privacy protection we need and should demand in the online world. A Digital Panopticon? In a public lobby of University College London, you will find a most peculiar sight. The embalmed corpse of Jeremy Bentham, clad in one of his favorite black suits, sits on a chair accompanied by his

pass him every day. The arrangement is not due to some macabre wish to honor the eighteenth-century British philosopher; it is a reflection of Bentham’s own wishes, expressed in his 1832 will. In addition to detailing the transformation of his body into an Auto-Icon

, Bentham’s will specified that on occasions when his friends and disciples gathered at the university to discuss utilitarianism, the box should from time to time

be taken to the room and stationed as if to take part in the discussion. Philosophers can be strange, even in death. Bentham is widely regarded as the founder of utilitarianism, a philosophy that espouses achieving the greatest good for the greatest number of people. In essence, utilitarianism

renders ethics as a system of moral mathematics. Not just a philosopher scribbling out the abstractions of utilitarianism, Bentham was also an important social reformer. He deployed the ideas of utilitarianism to justify a wide range of progressive policy changes. He engaged in the

, many of them quite radical, meant to deliver enormous benefits to society. Perhaps the most famous of such proposals is his idea of a panopticon. The panopticon refers to the architectural design of a prison where a watchtower sits in the middle of a circular edifice of prison cells. The tower shines

bright light from the center outward so that the watchman is able to monitor everyone in the cells. Why call the design a panopticon? It was Bentham’s invented term for an all (pan)-seeing (optic) mechanism, a novel construction that would allow a watchman to observe the prison’s occupants

without their knowing whether they are being watched. Prisons were dangerous, dirty places. Bentham thought his proposal to construct prisons as panopticons would be a great step forward, allowing for cleaner, safer, and more efficient systems of incarceration. Fewer guards would be required

costs would be lower and outcomes better. All privacy for prisoners was sacrificed in the name of improved security. The preface to his short treatise “Panopticon,” in which he introduced the idea to the world, offered a catalogue of the social benefits to be gained from his clever “inspection-house”: morals

would be reformed, health preserved, industry invigorated, and public burdens lightened. Bentham was clear-minded about why the panopticon could be so powerful: it was a revolutionary unidirectional form of psychological control over prisoners. He described it as a “new mode

will the purpose of the establishment have been attained.” Prison reformers in the twentieth century adopted Bentham’s proposal and built a number of prisons based on his panopticon design. One of many, the last roundhouse Panopticon prison, F-House at the Stateville Correctional Center in Illinois, closed only in 2016 (and temporarily

the world, including France, the Netherlands, and Cuba. Today, however, the idea of a panopticon summons to mind not progressive prison reform but dystopian social control and a surveillance state. The French philosopher Michel Foucault invoked Bentham’s idea in the 1970s to describe the growth of modern techniques of surveillance in

—with multiple authorities. The growth of surveillance made its presence, paradoxically, more insidious and hidden. Modern conditions of surveillance amount, Foucault thought, to an omnipresent panopticon of unparalleled social control. We accustom ourselves to its operation, and we adapt and conform to its power. Surveillance could be permanent in effect, even

freedom by an invasion of our privacy. All of which leads to the obvious question: Given modern technology, do we now live in a digital panopticon where nearly every last bit of privacy has been eroded? We know that we are observed a millionfold more than before the advent of digital

technology and unimaginably more than would have been possible in Bentham’s day. The prison panopticon seems positively quaint by modern standards. As we’ve seen, the Wild West of data collection by tech companies goes far beyond what

playful project created recently by students at University College London. Deploying modern-day technology, they installed two webcams, one in the public lobby pointing toward Bentham’s Auto-Icon and another atop the Auto-Icon pointing outward toward the people who pass by to gawk at his body encased in a

a constant livestream to anyone in the world of people looking at Bentham and of the view of Bentham gazing at passersby. You could watch Bentham watching others omnipresently—all from the comfort of your home. Thinking about a digital panopticon makes painfully clear what is lost in a world when everything is observed

: we lose our privacy, and with that, we undermine our freedom, diminish the possibility of intimacy, and compromise our capacity to control what others know about us. As Bentham so clearly understood, surveillance

), and innovation (think of personalized medicine). But none of this is to say that privacy has no value. And with the arrival of a digital panopticon, there has never been less weight placed on privacy. Indicators of this view were present more than twenty years ago. As Scott McNealy, the CEO

to explore important topics, like sensitive health issues, sexuality or religion. If the digital age has delivered to us the technologies that constitute a digital panopticon, we have good reason to worry that we have sacrificed the value of privacy entirely. Is there any way out? From the

Panopticon to a Digital Blackout In 2009, Stanford graduate Brian Acton and his friend Jan Koum developed WhatsApp, now the most popular messaging app in the

that can effectively balance our interest in privacy with our needs for security and safety. Technology Alone Won’t Save Us Between the poles of Bentham’s fully transparent world and WhatsApp’s fully opaque world, we might imagine technological solutions that could help us achieve some level of privacy while

, the only important thing in life? In answering that question in the negative, he was taking aim at utilitarianism, the philosophical creed first developed by Jeremy Bentham. Utilitarianism holds that the ultimate good in life—the summum bonum—is happiness, understood as the experience of pleasure, and that the morally correct action

important supporters. Rob thanks Heather Kirkpatrick, who is optimal in every possible way. Mehran thanks Heather Sahami, who always keeps focus on what truly matters. Jeremy thanks Rachel Gibson, who demonstrates every day the love and compassion that humans offer but robots never will. Notes PREFACE former president of the university

’s Terms of Service,” Facebook, https://www.facebook.com/terms.php. Bentham’s own wishes: “Extract from Bentham’s Will,” Bentham Project, May 30, 1832, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/bentham-project/who-was-jeremy-bentham/auto-icon/extract-benthams-will. his idea of a panopticon: Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings, ed. Miran Božovič (London: Verso, 1995). a catalogue of the

: The Birth of the Prison (New York: Pantheon, 1977). they installed two webcams: “Watching You Watching Bentham: The PanoptiCam,” UCL News, March 17, 2015, https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2015/mar/watching-you-watching-bentham-panopticam. “It doesn’t really bother me”: Katherine Noyes, “Scott McNealy on Privacy: You Still Don

.gov/resource/mtj1.048_0731_0734. “To refuse a hearing”: John Stuart Mill, Utilitarianism and On Liberty: Including Mill’s ‘Essay on Bentham’ and Selections from the Writings of Jeremy Bentham and John Austin, ed. Mary Warnock, 2nd ed, (Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell, 2003), 100. freedom to choose their own: Ibid, 134. Denying freedom

Barlow, John Perry, 25, 46, 52, 61 bartenders, robotic, 163 Bates, Laura, 220 Bedoya, Alvaro, 47 Belsky, Marcia, 188 Benjamin, Ruha, 98 Bentham, Jeremy, 113–14, 120–24, 168 Bentham display, University College London, 120–21, 124 Berners-Lee, Tim, 29, 126, 149–50 Bezos, Jeff, 30. See also Amazon bias elimination, 80

political power, 63 See also winner-take-all, disruption vs. democracy differential privacy, 130–33 Digital Equipment Corporation, 35 Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 225 digital panopticon, 113–14, 121–26 digital trustmediary, 149 dignity, 13, 190–1, 198–202, 208, 209 DiResta, Renee, 218 disinformation, xii, xiii, xxviii, 40, 188, 190

Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), 174 Oversight Board of Facebook, 213–16 Oxford University, 174 Page, Larry, 27–28 Panopti-Cam, 124 panopticon, digital, 113–14, 121–26 “Panopticon” (Bentham), 121–22 parking tickets, social harm or social benefit, xix–xxi Perkins, Frances, 54, 55 personal computing industry, 26 personal ethics, xxix

politics, xxxii–xxxiii, 25, 52, 67, 75–76 Popper, Karl, xxxii–xxxiii, 75–76 Postal Service Act (1792), 3 poverty, escaping from, 170–71 prison panopticon, 123 privacy, 111–51 overview, 114–15 anonymization, 129–30 Apple’s privacy by design, 134–35 beyond GDPR, 145–47 consumer privacy, 125, 126

data mining vs., 84–87, 115–20 differential privacy, 130–33 digital blackout, 127–29 digital panopticon, 121–26 digital trustmediary, 149 effect of COVID-19 pandemic, 139 FTC regulation role, 150–51 GDPR data protection, 142–45 harm from lack of

, 254, 260–62 United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), 173 United States Postal Service, 3–4 universal basic income (UBI), 182–84, 185 University College London Jeremy Bentham display, 120–21, 124 unsupervised data, 85 US Air Force Academy, 103 US Capitol assault (Jan. 6, 2021), xi-xii, xxvi, 115, 187, 209, 215

washing machines and laundry, 157–58 watch time metric, 34 Watchdog.net, xxiii Weapons of Math Destruction (O’Neil), 98 Weinberg, Gabriel, 135–36 Weinstein, Jeremy, xv–xvi, 72 Weld, William, 130 Western Union, 57 Westin, Alan, 137–38 WhatsApp, 127–28 Wheeler, Tom, 63, 76 Whitt, Richard, 149 “Why Software

1,500 students per year. Mehran is also a limited partner in several VC funds and serves as an adviser to high-tech start-ups. JEREMY M. WEINSTEIN went to Washington with President Obama in 2009. A key staffer in the White House, he foresaw how new technologies might remake the

relationship between governments and citizens, and launched Obama’s Open Government Partnership. When Samantha Power was appointed US Ambassador to the United Nations, she brought Jeremy to New York, first as her chief of staff and then as her deputy. He returned to Stanford in 2015 as a professor of political

leads Stanford Impact Labs. Discover great authors, exclusive offers, and more at hc.com. Copyright SYSTEM ERROR. Copyright © 2021 by Rob Reich, Mehran Sahami, and Jeremy M. Weinstein. All rights reserved under International and Pan-American Copyright Conventions. By payment of the required fees, you have been granted the nonexclusive, nontransferable

Data and Goliath: The Hidden Battles to Collect Your Data and Control Your World

by Bruce Schneier  · 2 Mar 2015  · 598pp  · 134,339 words

no longer matter whether or not you’re wearing one. It’s kind of like herd immunity, but in reverse. UBIQUITOUS SURVEILLANCE Philosopher Jeremy Bentham conceived of his “panopticon” in the late 1700s as a way to build cheaper prisons. His idea was a prison where every inmate could be surveilled at any

, all the time, and that data is being stored forever. This is what an information-age surveillance state looks like, and it’s efficient beyond Bentham’s wildest dreams. 3 Analyzing Our Data In 2012, the New York Times published a story on how corporations analyze our data for advertising advantages

groups that are out of favor with the ruling elite, will be affected more. Jeremy Bentham’s key observation in conceiving his panopticon was that people become conformist and compliant when they believe they are being observed. The panopticon is an architecture of social control. Think of how you act when a police car

has emerged. (Honestly, it blows me away that most of this surveillance has emerged in less than two decades.) We’re growing accustomed to the panopticon. You can see it writ large, when people shrug and say, “What are you going to do?” You can see it in a microcosm every

surveillance storage: How much is enough?” http://m.seagate.com/files/staticfiles/docs/pdf/whitepaper/video-surv-storage-tp571-3-1202-us.pdf. Jeremy Bentham conceived of his “panopticon”: Jeremy Bentham (1791), The Panopticon, or the Inspection-House, T. Payne, http://cartome.org/panopticon2.htm. idea has been used as a metaphor: Oscar H. Gandy Jr

Political Economy of Personal Information, Westview Press, http://books.google.com/books?id=wreFAAAAMAAJ. on the Internet and off: Tom Brignall III (2002), “The new panopticon: The Internet viewed as a structure of social control,” Tennessee Tech University, http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan003570.pdf. All of

. terrorism agency to tap a vast database of citizens,” Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324478304578171623040640006. procedures for getting on these lists: Jeremy Scahill and Ryan Devereaux (5 Aug 2014), “Watch commander: Barack Obama’s secret terrorist-tracking system, by the numbers,” Intercept, https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article

Agency (24 Jun 2008), “HALLUXWATER: ANT product data,” http://leaksource.files.wordpress.com/2013/12/nsa-ant-halluxwater.jpg. American-made equipment sold in China: Jeremy Hsu (26 Mar 2014), “U.S. suspicions of China’s Huawei based partly on NSA’s own spy tricks,” IEEE Spectrum, http://spectrum.ieee.org

2014), “Man jailed for offensive Ann Maguire Facebook post,” BBC News, http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-27696446. US military targets drone strikes: Jeremy Scahill and Glenn Greenwald (10 Feb 2014), “The NSA’s secret role in the U.S. assassination program,” Intercept, https://firstlook.org/theintercept/article/2014

Setty (Jul 2012), “The rise of national security secrets,” Connecticut Law Review 44, http://connecticutlawreview.org/files/2012/09/5.Setty-FINAL.pdf. D. A. Jeremy Telman (Mar 2012), “Intolerable abuses: Rendition for torture and the state secrets privilege,” Alabama Law Review 63, http://scholar.valpo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article

so uncool,” Forbes, http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterhimler/2014/08/12/uber-so-cool-but-so-uncool. different prices and options: Jennifer Valentino-DeVries, Jeremy Singer-Vine, and Ashkan Soltani (24 Dec 2012), “Websites vary prices, deals based on users’ information,” Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles

cutting edge, anonymity in name only,” Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748703294904575385532109190198. other companies … are also adjusting prices: Jennifer Valentino-DeVries, Jeremy Singer-Vine, and Ashkan Soltani (24 Dec 2012), “Websites vary prices, deals based on users’ information,” Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles

.org/comment/the-eu-general-data-protection-regulation-toward-a-property-regime-for-protecting-data-privacy. They pay for this information: Jennifer Valentino-DeVries and Jeremy Singer-Vine (7 Dec 2012), “They know what you’re shopping for,” Wall Street Journal, http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424127887324784404578143144132736214

. Jeremy Singer-Vine (7 Dec 2012), “How Dataium watches you,” Wall Street Journal, http://blogs.wsj.com/digits/2012/12/07/how-dataium-watches-you. transparency

mining by, 137 base rate fallacy, 323–24 Bates, John, 172, 337 behavior: anomalous, 39 data mining and, 38–40 Benkler, Yochai, 99, 341–42 Bentham, Jeremy, 32, 97 Beria, Lavrentiy, 92 Bermuda, NSA recording of all phone conversations in, 36 Berners-Lee, Tim, 210 Bill of Rights, 210 Bing, paid search

, of government surveillance, 161–63, 169, 172–78 Oyster cards, 40, 262 packet injection, 149–50 PageRank algorithm, 196 Palmer Raids, 234 Panetta, Leon, 133 panopticon, 32, 97, 227 panoptic sort, 111 parallel construction, 105, 305 Pariser, Eli, 114–15 Parker, Theodore, 365 PATRIOT Act, see USA PATRIOT Act pen registers

Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia

by Anthony M. Townsend  · 29 Sep 2013  · 464pp  · 127,283 words

the walls of the smart city ourselves, for they will be the ultimate setup for surveillance. Will smart cities become the digital analogue of the Panopticon, Jeremy Bentham’s 1791 prison design, where the presence of an unseen watcher kept order more effectively than the strongest bars?36 In the 1990s, the Surveillance

stream for the city—by licensing the data. A growing number of start-ups and open-source projects, like the Personal Locker project started by Jeremie Miller, are exploring ways for individuals to control and even pool their private data to trade with companies. (As the creator of Jabber, the dominant

/bhoomi-e-governance.pdf. 35Kevin Donovan, “Seeing Like a Slum: Towards Open, Deliberative Development,” Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 13, no. 1 (2012): 97. 36Jeremy Bentham. The Panopticon Writings (London: Verso, 1995), 29–95. 37Farah Mohamed, “Sen. Franken on facial recognition and Facebook,” Planet Washington, last modified July 18, 2012, http://blogs

Batty, Michael, 85–87, 295–97, 313, 315–16 Becker, Gene, 112–13 Beijing, 49, 273–74 Belloch, Juan Alberto, 223 Beniger, James, 42–43 Bentham, Jeremy, prison design of, 13 Berlin, 38 Bernstein, Phil, 302 Bettencourt, Luis, 312–13 Betty, Garry, 196 Bhoomi, 12–13 big data, 29, 87, 191, 292

, 113–14, 283351 Menino, Tom, 212–13, 240 microcontroller, 135–36, 138–39 Microsoft, 13, 290 alliance with Intel of, 290 Miller, Elan, 319 Miller, Jeremie, 293 Minnesota, University of, 35 Minot, Charles, 5 Mirror Worlds (Gelernter), 69–73, 89, 298 MIT, 25, 59, 76–77, 218–20 Media Lab Lincos

Paes, Eduardo, 66–68, 223–24 Pahlka, Jennifer, 237–43, 291 Pakistan, 233 Palmisano, Sam, 62–63, 68, 223–24 PalmPilot, 121–22 Panasonic, 127 Panopticon, 13 Paris, bicycle sharing in, 11 ParkNOW!, 244–45 patents, 60–61 Path Intelligence, 271 Pattern Language, A (Alexander), 144, 285–86 Paulos, Eric, 41

Dark Matters: On the Surveillance of Blackness

by Simone Browne  · 1 Oct 2015  · 326pp  · 84,180 words

and applies it to an understanding of surveillance. I work across multiple spaces (the airport, the plan of the Brooks slave ship, the plan for Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon, Internet art) and different segments of time (the period of transatlantic chattel slavery, the British occupation of New York City during the American Revolution

1851). Library of Congress, Printed Ephemera Collection; Portfolio 60, Folder 22. 30.5 × 25 cm. The Chapters If, for Foucault, “the disciplinary gaze of the Panopticon is the archetypical power of modernity,” as Lyon has suggested in the introduction to Surveillance Studies: An Overview,66 then it is my contention that

the operation of disciplinary and sovereign forms of power over black life under slavery by looking at plantation management and running away. In Jeremy Bentham’s plan for the Panopticon, small lamps worked to “extend to the night the security of the day.”69 I examine this idea of the security of the

to the Door of No Return: Notes to Belonging In early August 1785, English social reformer Jeremy Bentham set out from Brighton, England, destined for Krichëv, Russia. It was in Russia where Bentham would first conceive of the Panopticon in a series of letters “from Crecheff in White Russia, to a friend in England

those eighteen “young Negresses” held captive in the hatches of that cramped Turkish caïque. That somewhere along a journey that ends in The Panopticon; or, The Inspection House Jeremy Bentham traveled with “18 young Negresses (slaves)” guides me to question the ways that the captive black female body asks us to conceptualize the

links between race, gender, slavery, and surveillance. In other words, how must we grapple with the Panopticon, with the knowledge that somewhere within the

history of its formation are eighteen “young Negresses” held “under the hatches”? If Bentham’s Panopticon depended on an exercise of power where the inspector sees everything while remaining unseen, how might the view from “under the hatches” be another site

to think creatively about what happens if we center the conditions of blackness when we theorize surveillance. Seeing without Being Seen: The Plan of the Panopticon The Panopticon was conceived by Jeremy Bentham in 1786 and then amended and produced diagrammatically in 1791 with the assistance of English architect Willey Reveley

. Bentham first came upon the idea through his brother Samuel, an engineer and naval architect who had envisioned the Panopticon as a model for workforce supervision. Pan, in Greek mythology, is

prefix pan- gestures to pastoral power. Pastoral power is a power that is individualizing, beneficent, and “essentially exercised over a multiplicity in movement.”5 Bentham imagined the Panopticon to be, as the name suggests, all-seeing and also polyvalent, meaning it could be put to use in any establishment where persons were

7 This is control by design, where population management and the transmission of knowledge about the subject could, as Bentham explains, be achieved, “all by a simple idea of Architecture!”8 The Panopticon’s floor plan is this: a circular building where the prisoners would occupy cells situated along its circumference (figure

s presence is unverifiable; and there is said to be no privacy for those that are subject to this architecture of control. Security in the Panopticon, as Bentham asserts, is achieved by way of small lamps, lit after dark and located outside each window of the inspection tower, that worked to “extend

in this instance, power is covert and achieved by a play of light. FIGURE 1.1. The plan of the Panopticon (1791). Published in 1843 (originally 1791) in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. IV, pp. 172–173. If an act that is deemed criminal is an assault on the sovereign’s power

to conceptualize disciplinary power and the ways that it comes to be internalized by some. Some theorists of surveillance have used the metaphor of the Panopticon to generate other ways of conceptualizing surveillance. For example, Thomas Mathiesen’s synopticon (1997) is a reversal of the panoptic schema where the many

offers a critique of panopticism in which he contends that “post-Panoptical subjects reliably watch over themselves” without need of the physical structure of the Panopticon.26 He suggests that panopticism has been “transcended by the emergent practice of pre-visualization” where simulation, profiling, and prevention occur, rather than merely

into categories of risk, are offered as a means of qualifying and understanding forms of surveillance that are sometimes overlooked. On the overrepresentation of the panopticon and accounts that take power as unilaterally exercised, Lyon writes that “not only does this kind of account distract attention from the subtle interplay

instances in which the body is used as a means of resistance, and she argues that these acts are expressions of inmates’ struggles with the panopticon.36 Intensive management units, or special housing units, are solitary confinement units where certain inmates are segregated from the general prison population, spending up

of documentary accumulation.”45 The examination in the disciplinary institution seeks to objectify and transform individuals through architectural arrangements, registration, and documentation. Prefiguring Bentham’s design of the Panopticon and the seventeenth- and eighteenth-century disciplinary institutions that Foucault lays out in Discipline and Punish, the architectural design, registration, documentation, and

Through its creative remembering of the brutalities of slavery and its afterlife, Caryl Phillips’s short story “The Cargo Rap” (1989) makes links between the Panopticon, captivity, the slave ship, plantation slavery, racism, and the contemporary carceral practices of the U.S. prison system. Racism is, as Ruth Wilson Gilmore

of the Society for Effecting the Abolition of the Slave Trade produced and distributed Description of a Slave Ship (figure 1.2). Unlike Bentham’s blueprint of the Panopticon, this schematic diagram of a maritime prison is populated with tiny figures dressed in loincloths to represent the legally allotted amount of enslaved

make dark matter visible. Rhode’s subject in the Pan’s Opticon series is suited up with a prosthetic look. His ocular interrogation confronts the Panopticon and the architecture of surveillance—corners, shadows, reflections, and light—covering the wall with dark matter. On the subject of walls and architecture, Rhode

writes that “when one speaks of walls, one speaks of security, privacy, and demarcation.”127 Rhode’s Pan’s Opticon is a play on Bentham’s Panopticon. Rhode’s naming of his series of photographs with the possessive noun Pan’s is a claiming of

Bentham’s eighteenth-century plan for “obtaining power of mind over mind.”128 Rhode’s black subject is not backed into a corner, but facing it,

of the State closes with Dean and Brill turning the tables on the NSA agents and analysts that have tracked them throughout the film. Answering Jeremy Bentham’s question of “quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” (who watches the watchers?), Dean and Brill surveil their surveillers; they watch the watchers. In this way,

13. 66. Lyon, Surveillance Studies, 57. 67. The call for a “critical reinterpretation” of panopticism is made by David [Murakami] Wood in “Foucault and the Panopticon Revisited,” an editorial in the journal Surveillance and Society, where in a discussion of the ways that panopticism is taken up by scholars and academics

(in the same issue) mapping of “appropriation and application; rejection; and qualified acceptance subject to empirically-dependent limitations” (236). 68. Ibid., 235. 69. Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 4, 41. 70. City of New York, Minutes of the Common Council of the City of New York, 1675–1776, vol. 4, 86

pre-9/11 protocol in place if such an event were to occur are discussed in detail. 1. Notes on Surveillance Studies 1. Jeremy Bentham to his father, Jeremiah Bentham, “On board a Turkish Caïk from Smyrna to Constantinople, E. of the Island of Metelin,” letter 550, November 9, 1785, in Christie,

The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham, 387. The City of İzmir was formerly called Smyrna. 2. Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 1, 443–444. 3. Ibid., 444. 4. Ibid. This passage was first published in 1812 in Étienne

Richard Smith and published in 1825 as “Rationale of Punishment.” Smith’s English version was published in the 1843 Bowring edition of The Works of Jeremy Bentham as book 2 of Principles of Penal Law. However, it is not clear how faithful Dumont was to

Bentham’s original writings. The original manuscripts for Principles of Penal Law are held at the Bentham Project at the University College of London. According to Philip Schofield, director of the Bentham Project and general editor of the Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Hugo Bedau, who produced the

transcripts, thought them to be written by Bentham in the 1770s, but “as so often

is the case with Bentham’s texts, it has a complex history.” P. Schofield

, personal communication, December 15, 2012. 5. Foucault, Security, Territory, Population, 125. 6. Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 4, 40. 7. Ibid. 8. Ibid., 39. 9. Foucault, Discipline and Punish, 200. 10.

Ibid., 41. 11. Foucault, Psychiatric Power, 77. 12. Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 4, 41. 13. Foucault, Discipline and Punish, 49. 14. Ibid., 3. 15. See McKittrick, Demonic Grounds, chapter 4, in which she writes on the

associated “tsotsi aesthetic” with criminal gang activity. 127. Robin Rhode in “Robin Rhode and Catharina Manchanda in Conversation” in Manchanda, Catch Air, 19. 128. Bentham, The Works of Jeremy Bentham, vol. 4, 39. 129. hooks, Talking Back, 9. 2. “Everybody’s Got a Little Light under the Sun” 1. After the race is

Surveillance and Policing, edited by Elia Zureik and Mark B. Salter. Portland: Willan, 2005. Bentham, Jeremy. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, volume 1. Published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843. _____. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, volume 2. Published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait,

1843. _____. The Works of Jeremy Bentham, volume 4. Published under the Superintendence of his Executor, John Bowring. Edinburgh: William Tait, 1843. Best

New York: Monthly Review Press, 1972. Cherki, Alice. Frantz Fanon: A Portrait. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2006. Christie, Ian R., ed. The Correspondence of Jeremy Bentham: Volume 3, January 1781 to October 1788. London: Athlone, 1971. Clarkson, Thomas. The Argument That the Colonial Slaves Are Better Off Than the British Peasantry

Americans and the Politics of Representation. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 2005. Haggerty, Kevin D. “Tear Down the Walls: On Demolishing the Panopticon.” In Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond, edited by David Lyon, 23–45. Portland, OR: Willan, 2006. Haggerty, Kevin D., and Richard V. Ericson. “The Surveillant Assemblage.”

. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1994. _____. Identifying Citizens: ID Cards as Surveillance. London: Polity Press, 2010. _____. “The Search for Surveillance Theories.” In Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond, edited by David Lyon, 3–20. Portland, OR: Willan, 2006. _____. Surveillance after September 11. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 2003. _____. “Surveillance, Security and

.edu/gtmarx/www/surandsoc.html. _____. Undercover: Police Surveillance in America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1998. Mathiesen, Thomas. “The Viewer Society: Michel Foucault’s Panopticon Revisited.” Theoretical Criminology 1, no. 2 (1997): 215–234. McAllister, Marvin. White People Do Not Know How to Behave at Entertainments Designed for Ladies and

, no. 4 (2012): 600–607. _____. The New Politics of Race: Globalism, Difference, Justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2004. Wood, David. “Foucault and the Panopticon Revisited.” Surveillance and Society 1, no. 3 (2003): 234–239. Wood, Marcus. Blind Memory: Visual Representations of Slavery in England and North America, 1780–1865

P., 91 banopticon, 38–39 Baraka, Amiri, 172n92 Barbot, John, 94–95, 97 Bedau, Hugo, 169n4 Beloved (Morrison), 93, 100 Bennett, Colin J., 135, 152 Bentham, Jeremy, 7, 24, 31–38, 121 Bertillon, Alphonse, 112, 180n77 Bertillonage, 112, 180n77. See also finger-printing Best, Stephen, 43 Better Off Ted (TV show), 189n5

digital epidermalization, 26, 109–10, 113 Digitizing Race (Nakamura), 108 disabilities, 25, 55–57, 70–71, 94–95 discipline and disciplinary practices. See gaze, the; Panopticon; surveillance Discipline and Punish (Foucault), 35–37, 41–42 Discrim-FRO-nation, 131–32, 156, 159, 164 Dix, Cuffe, 71 DNA analysis, 109, 114,

place (term), 16, 25, 54, 60, 72, 98–99, 110, 129, 179n32 Pamela Z, 8, 134, 152–56, 159 panopticism, 24, 32, 38–42, 168n67 panopticon: Bentham and, 7, 11, 24, 31–38, 35, 42, 45, 121, 169n4; Brooks and, 24; design of, 32–35; Foucault on, 24, 34–35, 37–38

43–44, 50, 97, 124, 182n115 Priceless #1 (Thomas), 123–25, 125 Principles of Penal Law (Bentham), 169n4 print (technology), 11, 25, 51–55, 66–76, 83–88, 175n8 prisons, 40, 43. See also panopticon Private Lives and Public Surveillance (Rule), 14 prototypical whiteness, 26–27, 92, 110, 113–18, 122, 162

Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity

by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson  · 15 May 2023  · 619pp  · 177,548 words

the rough edges later. WE HAVE BEEN here before, many times. One vivid example began in 1791, when Jeremy Bentham proposed the panopticon, a prison design. In a circular building and with the right lighting, Bentham argued, centrally positioned guards could create the impression of watching everyone all the time, without themselves being observed

idea at first found some traction with the British government, but sufficient funding was not forthcoming, and the original version was never built. Nevertheless, the panopticon captured the modern imagination. For the French philosopher Michel Foucault, it is a symbol of oppressive surveillance at the heart of industrial societies. In George

of the Galaxy, it proves to be a flawed design that facilitates an ingenious prison breakout. Before the panopticon was proposed as a prison, it was a factory. The idea originated with Samuel Bentham, Jeremy’s brother and an expert naval engineer then working for Prince Grigory Potemkin in Russia. Samuel’s idea

was to enable a few supervisors to watch over as many workers as possible. Jeremy’s contribution was to extend that principle to many

kinds of organizations. As he explained to a friend, “You will be surprised when you come to see the efficacy which this simple and seemingly obvious contrivance promises to be to the business of schools, manufactories, Prisons, and even Hospitals.…” The panopticon

’s appeal is easy to understand—if you are in charge—and was not missed by contemporaries. Better surveillance would lead to more compliant behavior, and it was easy to imagine how this could be in the broader interest of society. Jeremy Bentham was a philanthropist, animated by

schemes to improve social efficiency and help everyone to greater happiness, at least as he saw it. Bentham is credited today as the founder of the philosophy of utilitarianism, which means maximizing

the combined welfare of all people in society. If some people could be squeezed a little in return for a few people gaining a great deal, that was an improvement worth considering. The panopticon was not

factory system spread rapidly in the second half of the eighteenth century across Britain. Even though they did not rush to install panopticons, many employers organized work in line with Bentham’s general approach. Textile manufacturers took over activities previously performed by skilled weavers and divided them up more finely, with key

, “I am determined for my part, that if they will invent machines to supersede manual labour, they must find iron boys to mind them.” To Jeremy Bentham, it was self-evident that technology improvements enabled better-functioning schools, factories, prisons, and hospitals, and this was beneficial for everyone. With his flowery language

, formal dress, and funny hat, Bentham would cut an odd figure in modern Silicon Valley, but his thinking is remarkably fashionable. New technologies, according to this view of the world, expand

the flourishing circumstances of the society, the real price of labour should rise very considerably.… In any case, resistance is futile. Edmund Burke, contemporary of Bentham and Smith, referred to the laws of commerce as “the laws of nature, and consequently the laws of God.” How can you resist the laws

Britain 250 years ago. We are living in an age that is even more blindly optimistic and more elitist about technology than the times of Jeremy Bentham, Adam Smith, and Edmund Burke. As we document in Chapter 1, people making the big decisions are once again deaf to the suffering created in

expansion in food production, and shoppers do not live differently. The situation is similarly dire for workers when new technologies focus on surveillance, as Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon intended. Better monitoring of workers may lead to some small improvements in productivity, but its main function is to extract more effort from workers and

limited set of actions. Those actions needed to be precise; any deviation from the required pattern could disrupt production or damage the equipment. Even if Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon, which we discussed in the Prologue, was not adopted widely, employees were closely supervised to ensure that they paid sufficient attention and followed orders

political leaders were the vanguards of progress, and everybody would benefit from this progress, even if they did not fully understand it. The views of Jeremy Bentham, like those of Saint-Simon, Enfantin, and Lesseps in France, are emblematic of this vision. In addition to a firm belief in technology and progress

. In fact, in many jurisdictions it was illegal to connect flushing toilets to sewers. Edwin Chadwick changed all of that. He was a follower of Jeremy Bentham, but over time he started paying more attention to the plight of ordinary people. He undertook an extensive investigation into urban sanitary conditions, with a

: “The marketing power of AI is such that many companies use it without knowing why. Everyone wanted to get on the AI bandwagon.” The Modern Panopticon Another popular use of modern AI illustrates how enthusiasm for autonomous technology, together with massive data collection, has forged a very specific direction for digital

things we hear consistently from workers is that they are treated like robots in effect because they’re monitored and supervised by these automated systems.” Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon was meant to be a model not only for prisons but also for early British factories. But eighteenth- and nineteenth-century bosses did not

path of technological change. The same can be done for the future direction of digital technologies. 1. Ferdinand de Lesseps: “the great canal digger.” 2. Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon—proposed in 1791 for more “efficient” surveillance in prisons, schools, and factories. 3. The Suez Canal. According to Lesseps, “The name of the Prince

more balanced portfolio of new innovations. Part II: Sources and References, by Chapter Epigraph “If we combine…” is from Wiener (1949). Prologue: What Is Progress? Jeremy Bentham, “You will be surprised…,” is from Steadman (2012), with details in his note 7. This is from a letter from

Bentham to Charles Brown in December 1786. For context and details, see Bentham (1791). “No man would like” appears in Select Committee (1834, 428, paragraph 5473), testimony of Richard Needham on July 18

Snoswell (2022), Pan, Bhatia, and Steinhardt (2022), and Ilyas, Santurkar, Tsipras, Engstrom, Tran, and Mądry (2019). “The marketing power…” is from Romero (2021). The Modern Panopticon. “The ETS…” is from Zuboff (1988, 263). “One of the things we hear…” is from Lecher (2019). “They basically can see…” is from Greene (2021

, Gary S. 1993. Human Capital, 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Beckert, Sven. 2014. Empire of Cotton: A Global History. New York: Vintage. Bentham, Jeremy. 1791. Panopticon, or The Inspection House. Dublin: Thomas Payne. Beraja, Martin, Andrew Kao, David Y. Yang, and Noam Yuchtman. 2021. “AI-tocracy.” NBER Working Paper no. 29466

. Statute of Labourers. 1351. From Statutes of the Realm, 1:307. https://avalon.law.yale.edu/medieval/statlab.asp. Steadman, Philip. 2012. “Samuel Bentham’s Panopticon.” Journal of Bentham Studies 14, no. 1: 1–30. Steinfeld, Robert J. 1991. The Invention of Free Labor: The Employment Relation in English and American Law and

Coded Age, we need not only trade unions, civil society, and trustbusters, but also legislative and regulatory reforms to prevent the advent of a new panopticon of AI-enabled surveillance. This book will not endear the authors to Microsoft executives, but it’s a bracing wake-up call for the rest

The Internet Is Not the Answer

by Andrew Keen  · 5 Jan 2015  · 361pp  · 81,068 words

immensely powerful new monopolists like Google and Amazon. Its cultural ramifications are equally chilling. Rather than creating transparency and openness, the Internet is creating a panopticon of information-gathering and surveillance services in which we, the users of big data networks like Facebook, have been packaged as their all-too-transparent

is a monopolist with control of an astounding 91% of the search market,26 things got so bad in 2011 that the British culture secretary, Jeremy Hunt, warned Google that unless it worked on demoting illegal sites in its search results, the government itself would introduce new laws forcing it to

and Facebook updates, however, we are choosing to live in a crystal republic where our networked cars, cell phones, refrigerators, and televisions watch us. The Panopticon “On Tuesday I woke up to find myself on page 3 of the Daily Mail,” wrote a young Englishwoman named Sophie Gadd in December 2013

hadn’t been the only late-eighteenth-century European to go to Russia to enjoy Catherine the Great’s largesse. Two English brothers, Samuel and Jeremy Bentham, also spent time there gainfully employed by Catherine’s autocratic regime. Samuel worked for Count Grigory Potemkin, one of Catherine’s many lovers, whose name

has been immortalized for his “Potemkin villages” of fake industrialization he built to impress her. Potemkin gave Bentham the job of managing Krichev, his hundred-square-mile estate on the Polish border that boasted fourteen thousand male serfs.38And it was here that

1786 in Krichev and is best known today as the father of the “greatest happiness” principle, invented the idea of what they called the “Panopticon,” or the “Inspection House.” While Jeremy Bentham—who happened to have graduated from the same Oxford college as Tim Berners-Lee—is now considered the author of the

Panopticon, he credits his brother Samuel with its invention. “Morals reformed—health preserved—industry invigorated—instruction diffused—public burthens lightened—Economy seated, as it were, upon

a rock—the Gordian knot of the poor law not cut, but untied—all by a simple idea in Architecture!” Jeremy Bentham wrote triumphantly

from Krichev to describe this new idea. What Jeremy Bentham called a “simple idea in Architecture” reflected his brother’s interest in disciplining the serfs on Potemkin’s Krichev estate. Borrowing from the Greek myth of Panoptes, a giant with a hundred eyes, the Panopticon—intended to house a large institution like a

prison, a school, or a hospital—was a circular structure designed to house a single watchman to observe everyone in the building. This threat of being watched, Jeremy Bentham believed, represented “a new mode of obtaining

power of mind over mind.” The Panopticon was a “vividly imaginative” fusion of architectural form with social purpose,” the architectural historian Robin Evans explains. And

this purpose was discipline. The more we imagined we were being watched, Jeremy and Samuel Bentham imagined, the harder we would work and the fewer

rules we would break. Michel Foucault thus described the Panopticon as a “cruel, ingenious cage.” It was “a microcosm of Benthamite society,” according to one

historian, and “an existential realization of Philosophical Radicalism,” according to another.39 As the founder of Philosophical Radicalism, a philosophical school better known today as utilitarianism, Jeremy Bentham saw human beings as calculating

machines driven by measurable pleasure and pain. Society could be best managed, Bentham believed, by aggregating all these pleasures and pains in order to determine the greatest collective happiness. In

the words of the British legal philosopher H. L. A. Hart, Bentham was a “cost-benefit expert on the grand scale.”40 And

the nineteenth-century Scottish thinker Thomas Carlyle criticized Bentham as a philosopher focused on “counting up and estimating men’s motives.” Half a century before

his compatriot Charles Babbage invented the first programmable computer, Bentham was already thinking about human beings as calculating machines. And the Panopticon—which he spent much of his life futilely trying to build—is a “simple idea in Architecture” that enables everything

and everyone to be watched and measured. The establishment of a Bentham-style electronic panopticon, fused with his utilitarian faith in the quantification of society, is what is so terrifying about twenty-first-century networked society. We are drifting

.41 And with its Gross National Happiness Index and its secret experiments to control our moods, Facebook is even resurrecting Bentham’s attempt to quantify our pleasure and pain. In an electronic panopticon of 50 billion intelligent devices, a networked world where privacy has become a privilege of the wealthy, it won

-erasure and self-invention in today’s digital panopticon, with products like the aptly named Panono ball camera that films everything it sees? What is the fate of privacy in an Internet of Everything and Everyone? Today’s “simple idea of Architecture,” as Jeremy Bentham put it, is an electronic network in which

everything we do is recorded and remembered. Bentham’s eighteenth-century Panopticon has been upgraded to a twenty-first-century instrument of mass surveillance. Like Vannevar Bush’s

project,” which, he told me, would build community and understanding in San Francisco. With his half-British accent and eccentric air, he might have been Jeremy Bentham detailing, with mathematical precision, the social utility of his greatest happiness principle. “How do you become a member?” I asked. “We want diversity. Anyone original

the equivalent of the environmental movement for the digital age. Web 2.0 companies like Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram have reassembled the Bentham brothers’ eighteenth-century Panopticon as data factories. Bentham’s utilitarianism, that bizarre project to quantify every aspect of the human condition, has reappeared in the guise of the quantified-self

movement. Even the nineteenth-century debate between Bentham’s utilitarianism and John Stuart Mill’s liberalism over individual rights has reappeared in what Harvard

, “Five Things I’ve Learned.” 38 Simon Sebag Montefiore, Potemkin: Catherine the Great’s Imperial Partner (New York: Vintage, 2005), p. 299. 39 John Dinwiddy, Bentham (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989). 40 Ibid., p. 109. 41 Parmy Olson, “The Quantified Other: Nest and Fitbit Chase a Lucrative Side Business,” Forbes, April

Working the Phones: Control and Resistance in Call Centres

by Jamie Woodcock  · 20 Nov 2016

the technological methods. For example, Foucault’s writing is often cited in discussions of call centres, but these mainly focus on his account of the Panopticon. While we will return to that later, Foucault’s work on discipline is also useful for our understanding of supervision. Foucault discusses factory discipline at

frequently in the academic literature on call centres. Often these involve arguments about control, either its totalisation or the effect of minimising resistance. Jeremy Bentham first discussed the Panopticon as an architectural structure that would allow ‘a new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind, in a quantity hitherto without example’.31

apparent omnipresence of the inspector . . . combined with the extreme facility of his real presence’.32 It is worth looking at Bentham’s writing before moving on to discuss Foucault’s developments. Bentham argues that when dealing with workers: ‘whatever be the manufacture, the utility 80 Management of the principle is obvious and

incontestable, in all cases where the workmen are paid according to their time’.33 He foresaw an application for the Panopticon to remedy the indeterminacy of

labour power. Bentham compares this to pay ‘by the piece’ which he regards as the superior method of payment for work. In this case

time and pays an hourly rate for shifts. However, the sales bonus introduces an element of piece-work. The call centre Panopticon is not recreated exactly along the lines described by Bentham. There is no central tower from which the supervisors can simultaneously observe all workers, while remaining unobserved themselves. The computer

surveillance is clearly analogous, offering the potential to interrogate each worker without their knowledge. Yet the arrangement of the call-centre floor is also reminiscent of the Panopticon. Each

row of desks has a supervisor seated at the end. From here they can observe individual workers, both their physical performance and their computer screens. Bentham expresses concern for finding a method to allow the inspector to view

‘funny’ pictures of cats. Unfortunately for them this 81 Working the Phones sometimes became apparent as the filter cannot prevent conversations between supervisors being overheard. Bentham’s discussion of punishment is also worthy of consideration. A critic claimed prisoners would disprove the omnipresence of the inspector through experimentation. In response

Bentham spells out a frightening response: Will he? I will soon put an end to his experiments: or rather, to be beforehand with him, I will

What is notable about this example is the role of punishment. It is not just a case of catching someone breaking the rules. Rather, ‘in Bentham’s eyes, punishment is first and foremost a spectacle: it is insofar as punishment is not intended for the punished individual, but for all others

created a spectacle of shouting. This reiterated how workers who broke the rules would be made an example of. After all, the aim of the Panopticon is, as Miran Božovič argues, to ‘deter the innocent from committing offences by producing an appearance through reality’.37 The analogue conception of the

Panopticon must therefore create the fiction of omnipresence. The advent of computer surveillance means the fiction of the ever-watching supervisor could become reality. Even if

of ways in which workers can be subjected to the management gaze. It is at this point worth turning to the notion of the ‘electronic panopticon’ that Sue Fernie and David Metcalf use,38 beginning with Foucault’s notion specifically: the perfect disciplinary apparatus would make it possible for a single

would escape and a centre towards which all gazes would be turned.39 This is the ideal type of surveillance found in architectural form in Bentham’s account. Yet this total notion of surveillance is not what management is attempting to achieve. As Foucault argues, ‘the disciplinary gaze did, in fact

the production process. The development in call centres thus builds on a long history of integrating supervision into the productive process. The notion of the Panopticon continues this integration of supervision and production to a new level. Foucault argued that the major effect of the

Panopticon was ‘to induce in the inmate a state of conscious and permanent visibility that assures the automatic functioning of power’. The ‘perfection’ of that power ‘

, that ‘the factory and the office are neither prison nor asylum, their social architectures never those of the total institution’.45 The potential of the Panopticon for surveillance, controlling and intensifying the labour process is clear. To be able to ‘diffuse the locus of supervision from the individual who can not

movements in multiple places at once’.46 That would be the dream of factory foreman of the past. new management techniques The metaphor of the Panopticon can extend beyond the workplace to take on broader implications. Massimo De Angelis argues that ‘a socially pervasive market order’ – like that found in contemporary

capitalism – ‘presents organisational and disciplinary characteristics that are similar to those of a prison, not just any prison’, but ‘the panopticon’. He remarks that some might ‘find this comparison odd, if not paradoxical’.47 On a deeper comparison, the contribution becomes clear. It focuses on the

their interaction’.48 This is particularly useful because it connects the management techniques in the call centre with the broader experiences of neoliberal capitalism. The Panopticon itself was conceived of as a physical building. Yet it ‘can be interfaced with the outside world through an administrative device, bookkeeping and the publication

neoliberal capitalism both involve ‘impersonal mechanisms of coordination of individual subjectivities that give form to social labour’. While Bentham found that the impersonal quality imbued the Panopticon with the ability to inspect, Hayek’s conception of the market emphasised ‘abstract rules of conduct, which bind together private individuals so that there is

no need for them to develop common aims’.49 For the Panopticon the observation tower mediated between individuals, distributing punishments and rewards. Now it is money and prices that play the mediating role.50 These processes of

context that De Angelis argues neoliberal capitalism can be understood as a system of interrelated virtual ‘inspection house’, which we may call the ‘fractal panopticon’ . . . each panopticon, that is each set of interrelationships of control and resistance defined by a scale of social action, is in turn a singularity within a series

stands in relation to each other in such a way that their action constitutes a ‘watchtower’ that is external to them, thus forming a greater panopticon – and so on in, in a potentially infinite series.54 This regime of surveillance utilises new technologies. The past few decades have seen many new

call duration, break length, time between calls and so on. Sue Fernie and David Metcalf argue that call centres have become organised like an ‘electronic panopticon’.79 They argue that the ‘possibilities for monitoring behaviour and measuring output are amazing to behold – the “tyranny of the assembly line” is but a

and Bain’s point that this ‘represents an unprecedented level of attempted control which must be considered a novel departure’.22 The metaphor of the Panopticon – which has been frequently referred to in the literature – was used to illustrate the process of surveillance and control in the call centre. Returning to

Bentham’s Panopticon writings23 before looking at Foucault,24 the Panopticon was here used as a theoretical metaphor to explore the empirical research in detail. The Panopticon – both physically and in terms of processes – maps easily onto the organisation of

‘disavow the possibilities for collective organisation and resistance’.26 However, as we have discussed, if these limitations are taken into account, the metaphor of the Panopticon can be used effectively to illustrate what management attempts to achieve on the call-centre floor. The example of the undercover consultant illustrates how supervision

. 27. Ibid., p. 10. 28. Ibid., p. 16. 29. Marx, Capital ([1867] 1976), p. 342. 30. Foucault, Discipline and Punish (1991), p. 167. 31. Jeremy Bentham, The Panopticon Writings (London: Verso, 1995), p. 31. 32. Ibid., p. 45. 33. Ibid., p. 80. 34. Ibid., p. 106. 35. Ibid., p. 105. 36. Miran Božovič

, ‘Introduction’, in The Panopticon Writings, by Jeremy Bentham (London: Verso, 1995). p. 4. 37. Ibid., p. 8. 38. Sue Fernie and David Metcalf, (Not) Hanging on the Telephone: Payment Systems in the

Call Centre (2013). 21. Goodrich, The Frontier of Control (1975). 22. Taylor and Bain, ‘“An Assembly Line in the Head”’ (1999), p. 109. 23. Bentham, The Panopticon Writings (1995). 24. Foucault, Discipline and Punish (1991). 25. Alan McKinlay and Phil Taylor, ‘Foucault and the Politics of Production’, in Management and Organization Theory

, CA: Semiotext(e). Bergevin, R., Kinder, A., Siegel, W. and Simpson, B. (2010) Call Centers for Dummies, Mississauga, Ontario: John Wiley and Sons Canada. Bentham, J. (1995) The Panopticon Writings, London: Verso. Beynon, H. (1973) Working for Ford, Harmondsworth: Penguin. Blackburn, R. (1967) Union Character and Social Class, London: Batsford. Brant, M

. [Originally published as Contre Feux 2: Pour un movement social européen, Paris: Éditions Raisons d’agir]. 184 References Božovič, M. (1995) ‘Introduction’, in The Panopticon Writings, by Jeremy Bentham, London: Verso. Brophy, E. (2010) ‘The Subterranean Stream: Communicative Capitalism and Call Centre Labour’, Ephemera, Vol. 10, No. 3/4. Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing

13, 51, 59, 96, 156 on growth of 50 on job quality 112, 154 on organisation 140–1 on unions 118, 161 Benefits Street 153 Bentham, Jeremy 80–3 Berardi, Franco ‘Bifo’ 52, 53, 58, 137–8 Beynon, Huw 97, 118 Blackburn, Robert 141 Boltanski, Luc 88 Bolton, A. 97 bonuses 21

–50 humiliation/infantilisation tactics 3, 8–10, 40, 71, 75–6, 90–1, 125–6 media portrayals of 1–11, 51–2, 60, 152–3 panopticon analogy 80–8, 95–6, 155–6 power abuses 9–11, 65, 70–2, 157 processes and methods 39–40, 42–3, 49, 50, 59

–2 potential for 140–4, 160–2 victimisation of activists 119, 126–7, 131, 132–4, 143 see also trade unions outsourcing 17, 18–19 panopticon analogy 80–8, 95–6, 155–6 part-time work 58 pay bonuses 21, 37–8, 39, 69–70, 81, 93 disputes over 128–9

–6 continual monitoring 39–40, 42–3, 50, 81–4, 155–6 as counterproductive 51, 53 of customers 37 to maximise value extraction 17–18 panopticon analogy 80–8, 95–6, 155–6 undercover managers 60–4, 156–7 see also management Tartanoğlu, Şafak 103 Taylor, Christopher 145, 146, 147, 160

Atlas Obscura: An Explorer's Guide to the World's Hidden Wonders

by Joshua Foer, Dylan Thuras and Ella Morton  · 19 Sep 2016  · 1,048pp  · 187,324 words

at the Hunterian Museum, also in London.) Science Museum, Exhibition Road, London. 51.498190 0.173972 Now functional: Charles Babbage’s Victorian computer. Jeremy Bentham’s Auto Icon LONDON Jeremy Bentham has been sitting in a corridor at University College London since 1850. The moral philosopher, whose advocacy of animal welfare, prison reform, universal

wooden cabinet, under a placard reading “Auto Icon.” He also suggested that his corpse could preside over regular meetings of followers of his utilitarian philosophy. Bentham’s plans for his remains became something of an obsession. For 10 years prior to his death, he reportedly carried a pair of glass eyes

in his pocket so that embalmers could easily implant them after his death. Unfortunately, when the time came, something went wrong in the preservation process. Bentham’s head took on a mottled, hollow-cheeked look, its leathery skin sagging under a pair of intensely blue glass eyes. In order to create

a less grotesque display, preservers created a wax bust of Bentham and screwed it onto the skeleton. They placed the real head between Bentham’s feet. There it sat, undisturbed, until 1975, when a group of mischievous students kidnapped it and demanded a

£100 ransom be donated to charity. The university made a counteroffer of £10, and the students caved, returning Bentham’s head to its rightful place between his legs. After a few more pranks, including one in which the skull was apparently used as a

Street, between Grafton Way and University Street, enter the university grounds at Porter’s Lodge. Find the ramp entrance to the South Cloisters, Wilkins Building. Jeremy Bentham is just inside. 51.524686 0.134025 Seated in a hallway at University College London, the long-dead utilitarian philosopher guards his own head from

named after Jencks’s late wife. 55.129780 3.665830 Within these gardens are the keys to life and the universe. Also in Scotland Britannia Panopticon Music Hall Glasgow · The world’s oldest surviving music hall. Cultybraggan Camp Perth · Built to hold the worst of the worst of Nazi war prisoners

isolated from each other and the outside world in the hope that their solitude would induce profound regret. Eastern State’s design was based on Jeremy Bentham’s panopticon, with cell-block “spokes” radiating from a central observation post. Each cell was equipped with a bed, flushing toilet, skylight, and Bible. All other

Modelo housed political dissidents, counterrevolutionaries, and even Fidel Castro. Cuban president-turned-dictator Gerardo Machado oversaw the prison’s construction in 1926. Modeled after Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon design, with tiered cells surrounding a central observation post, the prison provided constant surveillance of its inmates. Fidel Castro spent two years at Presidio Modelo

of the Whales, 191 Vizcaíno Creek Fossil Bed, 408 DISEMBODIED BODY PARTS Galileo’s Middle Finger, 57 Heart of the Dauphin, 37 Holy Right, 80 Jeremy Bentham’s Auto Icon, 12 Sati Handprints, 133 St. Catherine of Siena’s Head, 55 see also Crypts and Cemeteries; Mummies and Bones EROTIC ODDITIES Good

, 421 Dashi-Dorzmo Itiligov, 159 Death Mask Collection, 97 Douaumont Ossuary, 33 Eggenburg Charnel, 25 Fire Mummies, 178 Incorruptible St. Zita, 55 Ivolginsky Datsan, 92 Jeremy Bentham’s Auto Icon, 12 Jeweled Skeleton of Saint Munditia, 43 Křtiny Ossuary, 78 Luang Pho Daeng, 159 Manna of St. Nicholas, 59 Mummies Museum, 417

Playhouse, 351 Bob Baker Marionette Theater, 281 Bok Tower Gardens, 342 Boswell Embalming Bottle House, 260 Boulders of Monsanto, 66 Bridge to Nowhere, 243 Britannia Panopticon Music Hall, 20 Bruno Weber Skulpturenpark, 72 Carriolu Miniature Village, 40 Chan, 405 Chand Baori Stepwell, 132 Cigar Band House, 65 Clown Motel, 300 Concrete

, 80 Bata Shoe Museum, 271 Battleship Island, 162 Batu Caves, 174 Beer Bottle Temple, 183 Beichuan Earthquake Museum, 150 Belogradchik Rocks, 75 Benga, Ota, 37 Bentham, Jeremy, auto icon, 12, 363 Berkeley Pit, 313 Bete Giyorgis, 209 Betty and Barney Hill Archive, 374 Beverley Sanctuary Stones, 5 Biblio-Mat, 271 Big Baobab

Bozhou Medicinal Herb Market, 148 Brahe, Tycho, 100, 108, 110 Brazilian National Pororoca Surfing Championship, 391 Bridge of Love, 94 Bridge to Nowhere, 243 Britannia Panopticon Music Hall, 20 Bruno Weber Skulpturenpark, 72 Brutalist architecture, 75, 76, 216 Buddha Statues, Giant, 172–73 Buena Vista Park Tombstones, 287 Bugarach Mountain, 40

(top); Paul Rushton p. 148; Keren Su/China Span p. 146; Sueddeutsche Zeitung Photo p. 164; Jack Sullivan p. 120 (top); SuperStock p. 137 (inset); Jeremy Sutton-Hibbert p. 163; TravelStockCollection - Homer Sykes p. 116; Tim Whitby p. 143 (btm); John Zada p. 121 (top). AP Photo: David Guttenfelder p. 165

The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time

by Karl Polanyi  · 27 Mar 2001  · 495pp  · 138,188 words

history. If the French Revolution was indebted to the thought of Voltaire and Diderot, Quesnay and Rousseau, the Poor Law discussion formed the minds of Bentham and Burke, Godwin and Malthus, Ricardo and Marx, Robert Owen and John Stuart Mill, Darwin and Spencer, who shared with the French Revolution the spiritual

Gilbert’s Act. The idea that pauperism could be made to pay had firmly gripped people’s minds. It was exactly a century later that Jeremy Bentham, the most prolific of all social projectors, formed the plan of using paupers on a large scale to run machinery devised by his even more

they were looking out for a steam engine. It had now occurred to them to employ convicts instead of steam.” This was in 1794; Jeremy Bentham’s Panopticon plan with the help of which jails could be designed so as to be cheaply and effectively supervised had been in existence for a couple

he now decided to apply it to his convict-run factory; the place of the convicts was to be taken by the poor. Presently the Bentham brothers’ private business venture merged into a general scheme of solving the social problem as a whole. The decision of the Speenhamland magistrates, Whitbread’s

, above all, Pitt’s privately circulated draft of a comprehensive bill for the reform of the Poor Law had made pauperism a topic among statesmen. Bentham, whose criticism of Pitt’s Bill was supposed to have brought about its withdrawal, now came forward in Arthur Young’s Annals with elaborate proposals

of his own (1797). His Industry-Houses, on the Panopticon plan—five stories in twelve sectors—for the exploitation of the labor of the assisted poor were to be ruled by a central board set

were to be erected, with approximately 500,000 inmates. The plan was accompanied by a detailed analysis of the various categories of unemployed, in which Bentham anticipated by more than a century the results of other investigators in this field. His classifying mind showed its capacity for realism at its best

machinery” or, in even more modern terms, from the technologically unemployed; a last group consisted of “disbanded hands,” another modern category brought into prominence, in Bentham’s time, by the French War. The most significant category, however, was that of “casual-stagnation,” mentioned above, which included not only craftsmen and artists

exercising occupations “dependent upon fashion” but also the much more important group of those unemployed “in the event of a general stagnation of manufactures.” Bentham’s plan amounted to no less than the levelling out of the business cycle through the commercialization of unemployment on a gigantic scale. Robert Owen

very similar to those sponsored by one of the greatest English experts on finance. And had not Robert Owen’s firm in New Lanark—with Jeremy Bentham as a sleeping-partner—become world famous through the financial success of its philanthropic schemes? There was yet no standard view of poverty nor an

projects reflecting minds as different as those of the Quaker Bellers, the atheist Owen, and the utilitarian Bentham. Owen, a socialist, was an ardent believer in the equality of man and his inborn rights; while Bentham despised equalitarianism, ridiculed the rights of man, and bent heavily toward laissez-faire. Yet Owen’s

“parallelograms” resembled Bentham’s Industry-Houses so closely that one might imagine he was solely inspired by them until

organization of the labor of the unemployed must produce a surplus, which Bellers, the humanitarian, hoped to use primarily for the relief of other sufferers; Bentham, the utilitarian liberal, wanted to turn over to the shareholders; Owen, the socialist, wished to return to the unemployed themselves. But while their differences merely

been meanwhile a continuous growth in the number of the poor: in 1696, when Bellers wrote, total rates approximated 400,000 pounds; in 1796, when Bentham struck out against Pitt’s Bill, they must have passed the 2 million mark; by 1818, Robert Owen’s innings, they were nearing 8 million

Concerning the Poor, 1782. Cf. also Postlethwayt’s editorial remark in the Universal Dictionary of 1757 on the Dutch Poor Law of October 7, 1531. * Bentham, J., Pauper Management. First published, 1797. C H A P T E R T E N Political Economy and the Discovery of Society When the

, at minimum cost. Let the market be given charge of the poor, and things will look after themselves. It was precisely on this point that Bentham, the rationalist, agreed with Burke, the traditionalist. The calculus of pain and pleasure required that no avoidable pain should be inflicted. If hunger would do

the job, no other penalty was needed. To the question, “What can the law do relative to subsistence?” Bentham answered, “Nothing, directly.”* Poverty was Nature surviving in society; its physical sanction was hunger. “The force of the physical sanction being sufficient, the employment of

the political sanction would be superfluous.”† All that was needed was the “scientific and economical” treatment of the poor.‡ Bentham was strongly opposed to Pitt’s Poor Law Bill, which would have amounted to an enactment of Speenhamland, as it permitted both outdoor relief and

aid-in-wages. Yet Bentham, unlike his pupils, was at this time no rigid economic liberal, nor was he a democrat. His Industry-Houses were a nightmare of minute utilitarian

. He maintained that there always would be a need for them as the community could not quite disinterest itself in the fate of the indigent. Bentham believed that poverty was part of plenty. “In the highest stage of social prosperity,” he said, “the great mass of the citizens will most probably

laws of political economy to toil in misery, what else was the idea of equality but a cruel bait to goad mankind into self-destruction? Bentham possessed neither the sleek complacency of a Townsend nor the all too precipitate historicism of a Burke. Rather, to this believer in reason and reform

from utility. Instead, he was induced by associationist psychology to give rein to his boundless imaginative faculties as a social engineer. Laissez-faire meant to Bentham only another device in social mechanics. Social not technical invention was the intellectual mainspring of the Industrial Revolution. The decisive contribution of the natural sciences

not the natural but the social sciences should rank as the intellectual parents of the mechanical revolution which subjected the powers of nature to man. Bentham himself was convinced that he had discovered a new social science, that of morals and legislation. It was to be founded on the principle of

, for that matter, prisons, education, and lotteries we might have easily adduced as many new types of ventures in respect to each of them. With Bentham’s death, approximately, this period comes to an end*; since the 1840s projectors in business were simply promoters of definite ventures, not any more the

discount. The exploration of society, at least so it was thought, was concluded; no white spots were left on the human map. A man of Bentham’s stamp had become impossible for a century. Once the market organization of industrial life had become dominant, all other institutional fields were subordinated to

this pattern; the genius for social artifacts was homeless. Bentham’s Panopticon was not only a “mill to grind rogues honest, and idle men industrious”‡; it would also pay dividends like the Bank of England. He

innovations for the betterment and the exploitation of man based on the achievements of associationist psychology. While Townsend and Burke linked laissezfaire with legislative quietism, Bentham saw in it no obstacle to broadsides of reform. Before we proceed to the answer which Malthus, in 1798, gave to Godwin and with which

bond of iron.”* It was this bond, we submit, on which the new law of wages and of population rested. Malthus himself, like Burke and Bentham, was violently opposed to Speenhamland and advocated complete repeal of the Poor Law. Neither of them had foreseen that Speenhamland would force the wages of

to save mankind from itself by the cruel operation of the abolishment of poor relief. It was on this point that Townsend, Malthus and Ricardo, Bentham, and Burke were at one. Fiercely as they differed in method and outlook, they agreed on the principles of political economy and opposition to Speenhamland

. What made economic liberalism an irresistible force was this congruence of opinion between diametrically opposed outlooks; for what the ultra-reformer Bentham and the ultra-traditionalist Burke equally approved of automatically took on the character of self-evidence. One man alone perceived the meaning of the ordeal

Cooke. * Webb, S. and B., English Local Government, Vols. VII–IX, “Poor Law History.” * Bentham, J. Principles of Civil Code, Ch. 4., Browning, Vol. I, p. 333. † Bentham, J., ibid. ‡ Bentham, J., Observation on the Poor Bill, 1797. * Bentham, J., Principles of Civil Code, p. 314. * 1832. ‡ Stephen, Sir L., The English Utilitarians, 1900

less, paternalism in regard to the Poor Law. Pauperism still remained the concern of squire and countryside; and even harsh critics of Speenhamland like Burke, Bentham, and Malthus regarded themselves less as representatives of industrial progress than as propounders of sound principles of rural administration. Not until the 1830s did economic

could do nothing, especially indirectly. On the contrary, the utilitarian liberal saw in government the great agency for achieving happiness. In respect to material welfare, Bentham believed, the influence of legislation “is as nothing” in comparison with the unconscious contribution of the “minister of the police.” Of the three things needed

for economic success—inclination, knowledge, and power—the private person possessed only inclination. Knowledge and power, Bentham taught, can be administered much cheaper by government than by private persons. It was the task of the executive to collect statistics and information, to

repair, renewal, reconstruction, and adaptation to new requirements as the plant of a modern manufactory.”† This growth of administration reflected the spirit of utilitarianism. Bentham’s fabulous Panopticon, his most personal utopia, was a star-shaped building from the center of which prison wardens could keep the greatest number of jailbirds under

inventions with which the Benthamite movement was teeming. Not only the rebellious opposition, but also the respectable middle class was still in an experimentative mood. Jeremy Bentham himself invested in Owen’s futuristic education scheme in New Lanark, and earned a dividend. The Owenite Societies proper were associations or clubs designed to

by the French Revolution and by the Benthamite reforms of the 1830s and 1840s. “The condition most favourable to the prosperity of agriculture exists,” wrote Bentham, “when there are no entails, no unalienable endowments, no common lands, no right or redemptions, no tithes.…” Such freedom in dealing with property, and especially

a danger to capitalism. The experience of the labor issue was repeated on the currency issue. Here also the 1920s were foreshadowed by the 1790s. Bentham was the first to recognize that inflation and deflation were interventions with the right of property: the former a tax on, the latter an interference

price. The time was ripe for the fascist solution. * Hadley, A. T., Economics: An Account of the Relations between Private Property and Public Welfare, 1896. † Bentham, J., Manual of Political Economy, p. 44, on inflation as “forced frugality”; p. 45 (footnote) as “indirect taxation.” Cf. also Principles of Civil Code, Ch

Laws,” and pressed for their abolishment root and branch. Neither Townsend, Malthus, nor Ricardo advocated a reform of the Poor Law; they demanded its repeal. Bentham, who alone had made a study of the subject, was on this matter less dogmatic than on others. Burke and he understood what Pitt had

Thirty Years’ Peace, 1816–1846, was composed in a chastened mood and showed more sympathy toward the Chartists than toward the memory of her master, Bentham (Vol. III, p. 489, and Vol. IV, p. 453). She concluded her chronicle with this significant passage: “We have now the best heads and hearts

Reform Act. Right through the Victorian Age and after, no philosopher or historian dwelled on the petty economics of Speenhamland. Of the three historians of Benthamism, Sir Leslie Stephen did not trouble to inquire into its details; Elie Halevy, the first to recognize the pivotal role of the Poor Law in

(1788). Applegarth, Rob., A Plea for the Poor (1790). Belsham, Will, Remarks on the Bill for the Better Support and Maintenance of the Poor (1797). Bentham, J., Pauper Management Improved (1802). ———, Observation on the Restrictive and Prohibitory Commercial System (1821). ———, Observations on the Poor Bill, Introduced by the Right Honourable William

Belgium, 5, 6, 8; and currency, 238 Bellers, John, 110 ff., 115 Belsham, Will, 296 Benedict, Ruth, 278 Bentham, Jeremy, 88, 111 ff., 122, 124 ff., 145–146, 177, 189, 233, 285, 286, 296 Bentham, Sir Samuel, 111 Bergdama (tribesmen), 53 Berkshire magistrates, 82, 85, 88 Berlin, 24, 181 Berlin, Congress of. See

Societies, 176 Pacific Islands, 221 Pacifism, 5, 11 Paine, Thomas, 97, 297 Palestine, 246 Palgrave, Sir Robert Harry Inglis, 298 Palmerston, Third Viscount, 269, 274 Panopticon, 126, 146 Pantlen, Herman, 284 Papen, Franz von, 247 Paris, 181 Paris, Bourse of, 13 Parish serfdom, 289 Parliamentary Reform Act, 105, 124, 174, 232

Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age

by Viktor Mayer-Schönberger  · 1 Jan 2009  · 263pp  · 75,610 words

the growing use of surveillance technologies to track human activity, warning of a digital version of Jeremy Bentham’s “panopticon,” a prison in which guards could watch prisoners without prisoners knowing whether they were being watched. Bentham thought that such a prison architecture would force prisoners to behave—at minimal cost to society, thus

a “new mode of obtaining power of mind over mind.”30 Sociologist Michel Foucault took Bentham’s concept

and argued that the panoptic mechanism has moved well beyond prisons and Bentham’s idea of a physical structure and is now used more abstractly as a tool of exerting power

in our society. In this, communication theorist Oscar Gandy connected the panopticon with the growing trend towards mass surveillance in our times

.31 The panopticon shapes present behavior: I act as if I am watched even if I am not. Comprehensive digital memory represents

an even more pernicious version of the digital panopticon. As much of what we say and do is stored and accessible through digital memory, our words and deeds may be judged not only by

cautious about what we say—in other words, the future has a chilling effect on what we do in the present. Through digital memory, the panopticon surveys us not just in every corner but also across time. There is no question, the erosion of individual privacy is a fundamental challenge we

: the way to avoid exposure is to not criticize. This, however, solidifies the power differential between the surveyed and the surveillant, much like in Bentham’s panopticon: Because Stacy Snyder does not know whether her web page is being watched and by whom, she should assume that her supervisor does so all

interpret and weigh our words, we would be even more careful in formulating them. If Stacy’s case is part of a spatial version of Bentham’s panopticon, in which she does not know who watches her but must assume she is watched by everybody, Andrew’s story exemplifies an even more

constraining temporal panopticon. Will our children be outspoken in online equivalents of school newspapers if they fear their blunt words might hurt their future career? Will we protest

might not, may constrain our willingness to act as consumers, let alone as citizens. Two hundred years after Bentham’s original work, French philosopher Michel Foucault argued that the idea of the panopticon has spread in modern times.41 According to Foucault, not just prisons but other strongly hierarchical organizations like the

explained how comprehensive digital memory stifles societal debate. At the interface of power and time, permanent remembering creates the specter of a spatial and temporal panopticon, in which everybody may constantly be tempted to self-censor. Perhaps most importantly, comprehensive digital remembering collapses history, impairing our judgment and our capacity to

not have to fear the consequences of an enduring digital memory—neither loss of control and power over information, nor being exposed to the digital panopticon or impaired reasoning. The solution seems simple and straightforward: stay away as much as possible from interactions that force you to reveal information to others

would indeed be ironic if a DRM system protecting us from digital remembering would be implemented by creating a technical infrastructure of pervasive surveillance. A panopticon to protect us from a panoptic society? Perhaps technical innovation in the next couple of years can alleviate some of these concerns, but until then

I described, similarly relational, may be able to address this challenge. Whether they will also address the more societal danger of the spatial and temporal panopticon, I am less certain. Equally problematic is what I called the time challenge of digital remembering: that too much digital memory may overwhelm our human

a person of (relative) power brings his benign sounding metaphor right back to the kind of social control mechanism that is at the heart of Bentham’s panopticon, of an oppressive architecture of surveillance. This is exactly why many are very reluctant to share their information with others. Even lifelogger Gordon Bell

a comprehensive reconstruction of our words and deeds, even if they are long past, they create not just a spatial but a temporal version of Bentham’s panopticon, constraining our willingness to say what we mean, and engage in our society. Do we really want to live in a society of servility

Data Protection, 219; see also Bennett, Regulating Privacy, 46–60; Flaherty, Protecting Privacy in Surveillance Societies, 21–30. 30. Bentham, Panopticon (Preface), 29–95. 31. Gandy, The Panoptic Sort. On the information panopticon, see Whitaker, The End of Privacy, 32–46; Rule, Privacy in Peril; Slobogin, Privacy at Risk; see also Rosen, The

Press. 2006. Bennett, Colin J. Regulating Privacy. Data Protection and Public Policy in Europe and the United States. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 1992. Bentham, Jeremy. “Panopticon (Preface),” in The Panopticon Writings, Miran Bozovic, ed. 29–95. London: Verso. 1995. Berg, Tom. “Remembering Every Day of Your Life.” The Orange County Register (April 25

Baddely, Alan, 18 Balkin, Jack, 159 Bannon, Liam, 14 Baudelaire, Charles, 46 Bell, Gordon, 50–51, 65, 67, 85, 90, 164–66 Benkler, Yochai, 131 Bentham, Jeremy, 11 Berners-Lee, Tim, 59 Bible: printing of, 38–39 binary system, 55, 91 Blanchette, Jean-François, 14 Blue Ray Disc, 64–65 books, 73

Orkut, 2 Orwell, George, 120–21 packet-switching, 80 page numbers, 73–74 painting, 29 advantages and disadvantages of, 30–31 Palfrey, John 3, 130 panopticon, 11–12, 111–12, 165, 197 spatial, 111–12 temporal, 111–12 paper, 39–42 cost of, 39–42 papyri, 33 peer-production. See information

Howard Rheingold

by The Virtual Community Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier-Perseus Books (1993)  · 26 Apr 2012

The Happiness Industry: How the Government and Big Business Sold Us Well-Being

by William Davies  · 11 May 2015  · 317pp  · 87,566 words

In the Age of the Smart Machine

by Shoshana Zuboff  · 14 Apr 1988

The People vs Tech: How the Internet Is Killing Democracy (And How We Save It)

by Jamie Bartlett  · 4 Apr 2018  · 170pp  · 49,193 words

The Internet of Us: Knowing More and Understanding Less in the Age of Big Data

by Michael P. Lynch  · 21 Mar 2016  · 230pp  · 61,702 words

Dragnet Nation: A Quest for Privacy, Security, and Freedom in a World of Relentless Surveillance

by Julia Angwin  · 25 Feb 2014  · 422pp  · 104,457 words

The Identity Trap: A Story of Ideas and Power in Our Time

by Yascha Mounk  · 26 Sep 2023

The Wake-Up Call: Why the Pandemic Has Exposed the Weakness of the West, and How to Fix It

by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge  · 1 Sep 2020  · 134pp  · 41,085 words

Demanding the Impossible: A History of Anarchism

by Peter Marshall  · 2 Jan 1992  · 1,327pp  · 360,897 words

The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class

by Guy Standing  · 27 Feb 2011  · 209pp  · 89,619 words

Happy City: Transforming Our Lives Through Urban Design

by Charles Montgomery  · 12 Nov 2013  · 432pp  · 124,635 words

Private Government: How Employers Rule Our Lives (And Why We Don't Talk About It)

by Elizabeth S. Anderson  · 22 May 2017  · 205pp  · 58,054 words

The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values

by Brian Christian  · 5 Oct 2020  · 625pp  · 167,349 words

Consent of the Networked: The Worldwide Struggle for Internet Freedom

by Rebecca MacKinnon  · 31 Jan 2012  · 390pp  · 96,624 words

The COVID-19 Catastrophe: What's Gone Wrong and How to Stop It Happening Again

by Richard Horton  · 31 May 2020  · 106pp  · 33,210 words

Power, for All: How It Really Works and Why It's Everyone's Business

by Julie Battilana and Tiziana Casciaro  · 30 Aug 2021  · 345pp  · 92,063 words

The Formula: How Algorithms Solve All Our Problems-And Create More

by Luke Dormehl  · 4 Nov 2014  · 268pp  · 75,850 words

The Most Powerful Idea in the World: A Story of Steam, Industry, and Invention

by William Rosen  · 31 May 2010  · 420pp  · 124,202 words

Capitalism and Its Critics: A History: From the Industrial Revolution to AI

by John Cassidy  · 12 May 2025  · 774pp  · 238,244 words

Likewar: The Weaponization of Social Media

by Peter Warren Singer and Emerson T. Brooking  · 15 Mar 2018

The Price of Time: The Real Story of Interest

by Edward Chancellor  · 15 Aug 2022  · 829pp  · 187,394 words

The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom

by Evgeny Morozov  · 16 Nov 2010  · 538pp  · 141,822 words

The London Compendium

by Ed Glinert  · 30 Jun 2004  · 1,088pp  · 297,362 words

On the Clock: What Low-Wage Work Did to Me and How It Drives America Insane

by Emily Guendelsberger  · 15 Jul 2019  · 382pp  · 114,537 words

The Googlization of Everything:

by Siva Vaidhyanathan  · 1 Jan 2010  · 281pp  · 95,852 words

What’s Your Type?

by Merve Emre  · 16 Aug 2018  · 384pp  · 112,971 words

How Democracy Ends

by David Runciman  · 9 May 2018  · 245pp  · 72,893 words

What About Me?: The Struggle for Identity in a Market-Based Society

by Paul Verhaeghe  · 26 Mar 2014  · 208pp  · 67,582 words

The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World

by Iain McGilchrist  · 8 Oct 2012

The Biggest Prison on Earth: A History of the Occupied Territories

by Ilan Pappé  · 21 Jun 2017  · 356pp  · 97,794 words

No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State

by Glenn Greenwald  · 12 May 2014  · 253pp  · 75,772 words

The Growth Delusion: Wealth, Poverty, and the Well-Being of Nations

by David Pilling  · 30 Jan 2018  · 264pp  · 76,643 words

The Decadent Society: How We Became the Victims of Our Own Success

by Ross Douthat  · 25 Feb 2020  · 324pp  · 80,217 words

Alone Together

by Sherry Turkle  · 11 Jan 2011  · 542pp  · 161,731 words

Consumed: How Markets Corrupt Children, Infantilize Adults, and Swallow Citizens Whole

by Benjamin R. Barber  · 1 Jan 2007  · 498pp  · 145,708 words

Why Aren't They Shouting?: A Banker’s Tale of Change, Computers and Perpetual Crisis

by Kevin Rodgers  · 13 Jul 2016  · 318pp  · 99,524 words

Smart Mobs: The Next Social Revolution

by Howard Rheingold  · 24 Dec 2011

Future Politics: Living Together in a World Transformed by Tech

by Jamie Susskind  · 3 Sep 2018  · 533pp

Protocol: how control exists after decentralization

by Alexander R. Galloway  · 1 Apr 2004  · 287pp  · 86,919 words

Hired: Six Months Undercover in Low-Wage Britain

by James Bloodworth  · 1 Mar 2018  · 256pp  · 79,075 words

The New Ruthless Economy: Work & Power in the Digital Age

by Simon Head  · 14 Aug 2003  · 242pp  · 245 words

Exponential: How Accelerating Technology Is Leaving Us Behind and What to Do About It

by Azeem Azhar  · 6 Sep 2021  · 447pp  · 111,991 words

The Aristocracy of Talent: How Meritocracy Made the Modern World

by Adrian Wooldridge  · 2 Jun 2021  · 693pp  · 169,849 words

A Pelican Introduction: Basic Income

by Guy Standing  · 3 May 2017  · 307pp  · 82,680 words

The Perfect Police State: An Undercover Odyssey Into China's Terrifying Surveillance Dystopia of the Future

by Geoffrey Cain  · 28 Jun 2021  · 340pp  · 90,674 words

Raw Data Is an Oxymoron

by Lisa Gitelman  · 25 Jan 2013

Your Face Belongs to Us: A Secretive Startup's Quest to End Privacy as We Know It

by Kashmir Hill  · 19 Sep 2023  · 487pp  · 124,008 words

Billionaires' Row: Tycoons, High Rollers, and the Epic Race to Build the World's Most Exclusive Skyscrapers

by Katherine Clarke  · 13 Jun 2023  · 454pp  · 127,319 words

Breaking News: The Remaking of Journalism and Why It Matters Now

by Alan Rusbridger  · 14 Oct 2018  · 579pp  · 160,351 words

Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change From the Cult of Technology

by Kentaro Toyama  · 25 May 2015  · 494pp  · 116,739 words

The Snowden Files: The Inside Story of the World's Most Wanted Man

by Luke Harding  · 7 Feb 2014  · 266pp  · 80,018 words

Nexus: A Brief History of Information Networks From the Stone Age to AI

by Yuval Noah Harari  · 9 Sep 2024  · 566pp  · 169,013 words

A Theory of the Drone

by Gregoire Chamayou  · 23 Apr 2013  · 335pp  · 82,528 words

Why Europe Will Run the 21st Century

by Mark Leonard  · 4 Sep 2000  · 131pp  · 41,052 words

Behemoth: A History of the Factory and the Making of the Modern World

by Joshua B. Freeman  · 27 Feb 2018  · 538pp  · 145,243 words

The Rights of the People

by David K. Shipler  · 18 Apr 2011  · 495pp  · 154,046 words

The Sinner and the Saint: Dostoevsky and the Gentleman Murderer Who Inspired a Masterpiece

by Kevin Birmingham  · 16 Nov 2021  · 559pp  · 155,777 words

The True and Only Heaven: Progress and Its Critics

by Christopher Lasch  · 16 Sep 1991  · 669pp  · 226,737 words

Map of a Nation: A Biography of the Ordnance Survey

by Rachel Hewitt  · 6 Jul 2011  · 595pp  · 162,258 words

Who Owns the Future?

by Jaron Lanier  · 6 May 2013  · 510pp  · 120,048 words

If Mayors Ruled the World: Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities

by Benjamin R. Barber  · 5 Nov 2013  · 501pp  · 145,943 words

The Party: The Secret World of China's Communist Rulers

by Richard McGregor  · 8 Jun 2010

Policing the Open Road

by Sarah A. Seo

The Gig Economy: A Critical Introduction

by Jamie Woodcock and Mark Graham  · 17 Jan 2020  · 207pp  · 59,298 words

A Bit of a Stretch: The Diaries of a Prisoner

by Chris Atkins  · 6 Feb 2020  · 335pp  · 98,847 words

Bricks & Mortals: Ten Great Buildings and the People They Made

by Tom Wilkinson  · 21 Jul 2014  · 341pp  · 89,986 words

From Peoples into Nations

by John Connelly  · 11 Nov 2019

Cities Are Good for You: The Genius of the Metropolis

by Leo Hollis  · 31 Mar 2013  · 385pp  · 118,314 words

Gods and Robots: Myths, Machines, and Ancient Dreams of Technology

by Adrienne Mayor  · 27 Nov 2018

Black Code: Inside the Battle for Cyberspace

by Ronald J. Deibert  · 13 May 2013  · 317pp  · 98,745 words

Lab Rats: How Silicon Valley Made Work Miserable for the Rest of Us

by Dan Lyons  · 22 Oct 2018  · 252pp  · 78,780 words

The Pursuit of Power: Europe, 1815-1914

by Richard J. Evans  · 31 Aug 2016  · 976pp  · 329,519 words

Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas

by Natasha Dow Schüll  · 19 Aug 2012

Addiction by Design: Machine Gambling in Las Vegas

by Natasha Dow Schüll  · 15 Jan 2012  · 632pp  · 166,729 words

Winners Take All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World

by Anand Giridharadas  · 27 Aug 2018  · 296pp  · 98,018 words

Smarter Than You Think: How Technology Is Changing Our Minds for the Better

by Clive Thompson  · 11 Sep 2013  · 397pp  · 110,130 words

Empire: How Britain Made the Modern World

by Niall Ferguson  · 1 Jan 2002  · 469pp  · 146,487 words

Cuba: An American History

by Ada Ferrer  · 6 Sep 2021  · 723pp  · 211,892 words

To Show and to Tell: The Craft of Literary Nonfiction

by Phillip Lopate  · 12 Feb 2013  · 207pp  · 64,598 words

Culture and Imperialism

by Edward W. Said  · 29 May 1994  · 549pp  · 170,495 words

Naked City: The Death and Life of Authentic Urban Places

by Sharon Zukin  · 1 Dec 2009  · 415pp  · 119,277 words

Empire of Guns

by Priya Satia  · 10 Apr 2018  · 927pp  · 216,549 words

The Age of Surveillance Capitalism

by Shoshana Zuboff  · 15 Jan 2019  · 918pp  · 257,605 words

Hustle and Gig: Struggling and Surviving in the Sharing Economy

by Alexandrea J. Ravenelle  · 12 Mar 2019  · 349pp  · 98,309 words

The Happiness Effect: How Social Media Is Driving a Generation to Appear Perfect at Any Cost

by Donna Freitas  · 13 Jan 2017  · 428pp  · 136,945 words

Debt: The First 5,000 Years

by David Graeber  · 1 Jan 2010  · 725pp  · 221,514 words

Behind the Berlin Wall: East Germany and the Frontiers of Power

by Patrick Major  · 5 Nov 2009  · 669pp  · 150,886 words