by Linda Yueh · 15 Mar 2018 · 374pp · 113,126 words
productivity across the economy. Solow’s 1987 observation that ‘You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics’ is known as the Solow paradox.6 He revisited this question decades later, but concluded that we still do not know, as the role of computing is still evolving. Solow points
…
of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), pp. 312–20. 6. Paul A. David, 1990, ‘The Dynamo and the Computer: A Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox’, American Economic Review, 80(2), pp. 355–61. 7. Douglas Clement, 2002, ‘Interview with Robert Solow’, The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1 September
…
the European Economic Association, 3(2/3), pp. 525–34 David, Paul A., 1990, ‘The Dynamo and the Computer: A Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox’, American Economic Review, 80(2), pp. 355–61 De Vecchi, Nicolò, 2006, ‘Hayek and the General Theory’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
by Linda Yueh · 4 Jun 2018 · 453pp · 117,893 words
productivity across the economy. Solow’s 1987 observation that ‘You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics’ is known as the Solow paradox.6 He revisited this question decades later, but concluded that we still do not know, as the role of computing is still evolving. Solow points
…
the European Economic Association, 3(2/3), pp. 525–34 David, Paul A., 1990, ‘The Dynamo and the Computer: A Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox’, American Economic Review, 80(2), pp. 355–61 De Vecchi, Nicolò, 2006, ‘Hayek and the General Theory ’, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought
…
of Economics and Statistics, 39(3), pp. 312–20. 6. Paul A. David, 1990, ‘The Dynamo and the Computer: A Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox’, American Economic Review, 80(2), pp. 355–61. 7. Douglas Clement, 2002, ‘Interview with Robert Solow’, The Region, Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis, 1 September
by Robert J. Gordon · 12 Jan 2016 · 1,104pp · 302,176 words
Perspective,” in Engerman and Gallman (2000), pp. 1–92. Acemoglu, Daron, Autor, David H., Dorn, David, Hanson, Gordon, and Price, Brendan. (2014). “Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in U.S. Manufacturing,” NBER Working Paper 19837, January. Acs, Zoltan J., and Lyles, Alan. (2007). Obesity, Business and Public Policy
…
Journal of Political Economy. 84, no. 1 (February): 1–16. David, Paul A. (1990). “The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox,” American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 80, no. 2 (May): 355–61. Davis, Steven J., and Haltiwanger, John. (2014). “Labor Market Fluidity and Economic Performance
by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson · 15 May 2023 · 619pp · 177,548 words
Earnings.” Handbook of Labor Economics 4:1043‒1171. Acemoglu, Daron, David H. Autor, David Dorn, Gordon H. Hanson, and Brendan Price. 2014. “Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in US Manufacturing.” American Economic Review 104, no. 5: 394‒399. Acemoglu, Daron, David H. Autor, David Dorn, Gordon H. Hanson
…
, Thomas H. 1992. Process Innovation: Reengineering Work Through Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press. David, Paul A. 1989. “Computer and Dynamo: The Modern Productivity Paradox in a Not-Too-Distant Mirror.” www.gwern.net/docs/eco nomics/automation/1989-david.pdf. David, Paul A., and Gavin Wright. 2003. “General Purpose
…
: Penguin. Perlstein, Rick. 2009. Before the Storm: Barry Goldwater and the Unmaking of the American Consensus. New York: Bold Type Books. Pethokoukis, James. 2016. “The Productivity Paradox: Why the US Economy Might Be a Lot Stronger Than the Government Is Saying.” AEI Blog, May 20. www.aei.org/technology-and-innovation/the
…
-productivity-paradox-us-economy-might-be-a-lot-stronger. Pethokoukis, James. 2017a. “Google Economist Hal Varian Tries to Explain America’s Productivity Paradox, and How Workers Should Deal with Automation,” May 5. www.aei.org/economics/google-economist
…
-hal-varian-tries-to-explain-americas-productivity-paradox-and-how-workers-should-deal-with-automation. Pethokoukis, James. 2017b. “If Not Mismeasurement, Why Is Productivity Growth So Slow?” AEI Blog, February 14. https://www.
by Philipp Carlsson-Szlezak and Paul Swartz · 8 Jul 2024 · 259pp · 89,637 words
in products and services fully. If those were accounted for accurately, the price index would be lower, real output higher—and there would be no productivity paradox. Why? Consider first a case where measurement is easy. If computing power doubles and the price stays the same, the price of computing power has
…
in 1987 lamented that “you can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.”8 Yes, what is today referred to as the Solow paradox was on full display in 1987. But 10 years later, the productivity surge had arrived. The magnitude of the productivity growth upshift in basis points
…
skepticism toward doom and gloom, 10 toward theories, 21–22 societal frictions, productivity and, 94 soft landings, 39–40, 144, 145 Solow, Robert, 57, 96 Solow paradox, 96 Sony, 73 South Africa, 231, 238 South Korea, 123 Soviet Union Cold War trade with, 224–225 experts’ predictions on, 209–210 gravity of
by Martin Ford · 16 Nov 2018 · 586pp · 186,548 words
the McKinsey Global Institute, Bob Solow, the Nobel laureate. We were looking at the last productivity paradox back in the late 1990s. In the late ‘80s, Bob had made the observation that became known as The Solow Paradox, that you could see computers everywhere except in the productivity numbers. That paradox was finally resolved
…
, in reality, it turns out we really haven’t yet made much widespread progress yet. So, we may be going through another round of the Solow paradox. Until we get these very large sectors highly digitized and using these technologies across business processes, we won’t see enough to move the national
by Costas Lapavitsas · 14 Aug 2013 · 554pp · 158,687 words
of the era.14 Robert Solow observed that ‘You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics’, and his quip became the ‘Solow Paradox’ characteristic of the new era.15 After 1995, however, significant technological improvements in the microprocessor industry and faster productivity growth in general seemed to materialize
…
, ‘Primitive Money’, American Anthropologist 67:1, Feb. 1965, pp. 44–65. David, Paul A., ‘The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox’, American Economic Review 80:2, 1990, pp. 355–61. Day, Richard B., The Crisis and the ‘Crash’, London: NLB, 1981. De Brunhoff, Suzanne, Marx on
by Aaron Benanav · 3 Nov 2020 · 175pp · 45,815 words
fifty years, industrialization has given way to deindustrialization, and not just in any one line, but across the manufacturing sectors of most countries.7 The Productivity Paradox In the scholarly literature, deindustrialization is “most commonly defined as a decline in the share of manufacturing in total employment.”8 That share fell first
…
pace for decades, leading economist Robert Solow to quip, “We see the computer age everywhere, except in the productivity statistics.”11 Automation theorists discuss this “productivity paradox” as a problem for their account—explaining it in terms of weak demand for products, or the persistent availability of low-wage workers—but they
…
, “US Manufacturing: Understanding Its Past and Its Potential Future,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 28, no. 1, 2014; Daron Acemoglu et al., “Return of the Solow Paradox? IT, Productivity, and Employment in US Manufacturing,” American Economic Review, vol. 104, no. 5, 2014; and Susan Houseman, “Understanding the Decline of US Manufacturing Employment
…
, 28, 107n16 unemployment rates in, 46–7 US technology share with, 24 Gershuny, Jonathan, 57–9 global deindustrialization about, 15–6 manufacturing overcapacity, 22–8 productivity paradox, 16–22 waves of, 22, 26–7 global South, employment rates in, 53–4 Gordon, Robert J., 9 Gorz, André, 8 Greece, waves of strikes
…
trends, manufacturing vs. nonmanufacturing, 110n35 production, conquest of, 79, 82, 86, 99 productivity about, 19 growth in United States, 123–4n40 growth rates in, 20 productivity paradox, 16–22 productivity-wages gap, 9–10 protests, 95–6 public debt-to-GDP ratios, 66–8 Raising the Floor (Stern), 4 rate of growth
by David S. Evans and Richard Schmalensee · 23 May 2016 · 383pp · 81,118 words
.naa.org/Trends-and-Numbers/Circulation-Volume/Newspaper-Circulation-Volume.aspx. 19. Paul David, “The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox,” American Economic Review 80, no. 2 (1990), 356. 20. Ibid., 356–357. 21. Kirsten Korosec, “Another Ride-Sharing Startup Becomes a Unicorn: BlaBlaCar Valued at
by Klaus Schwab · 11 Jan 2016 · 179pp · 43,441 words
total-factor productivity (TFP)) has remained sluggish, despite the exponential growth in technological progress and investments in innovation.17 This most recent incarnation of the productivity paradox – the perceived failure of technological innovation to result in higher levels of productivity – is one of today’s great economic enigmas that predates the onset
by Marc Levinson · 1 Jan 2006 · 477pp · 135,607 words
by David Edgerton · 7 Dec 2006 · 353pp · 91,211 words
by Kevin Roose · 9 Mar 2021 · 208pp · 57,602 words
by Ben Horowitz · 4 Mar 2014 · 270pp · 79,068 words
by Jonathan Haskel and Stian Westlake · 7 Nov 2017 · 346pp · 89,180 words
by Alan Greenspan · 14 Jun 2007
by Peter Schwartz, Peter Leyden and Joel Hyatt · 18 Oct 2000 · 353pp · 355 words
by Adrian Wooldridge and Alan Greenspan · 15 Oct 2018 · 585pp · 151,239 words
by William R. Easterly · 1 Aug 2002 · 355pp · 63 words
by Jeremy Rifkin · 28 Dec 1994 · 372pp · 152 words
by J. Bradford Delong · 6 Apr 2020 · 593pp · 183,240 words
by Fred Turner · 31 Aug 2006 · 339pp · 57,031 words
by Adam Tooze · 15 Nov 2021 · 561pp · 138,158 words
by Peter Oppenheimer · 3 May 2020 · 333pp · 76,990 words
by Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott · 9 May 2016 · 515pp · 126,820 words
by Jeremias Prassl · 7 May 2018 · 491pp · 77,650 words
by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee · 20 Jan 2014 · 339pp · 88,732 words
by Fareed Zakaria · 5 Oct 2020 · 289pp · 86,165 words
by Klaus Schwab and Peter Vanham · 27 Jan 2021 · 460pp · 107,454 words
by Tim Harford · 15 Mar 2006 · 389pp · 98,487 words
by Edward Tenner · 1 Sep 1997
by Timothy Ferriss · 1 Dec 2010 · 836pp · 158,284 words
by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig · 14 Jul 2019 · 2,466pp · 668,761 words
by Martin Ford · 28 May 2011 · 261pp · 10,785 words
by Ruchir Sharma · 5 Jun 2016 · 566pp · 163,322 words
by Matt Ridley · 17 May 2010 · 462pp · 150,129 words
by Manuel Castells · 31 Aug 1996 · 843pp · 223,858 words
by Steven Levy · 2 Feb 1994 · 244pp · 66,599 words
by Steve Lohr · 10 Mar 2015 · 239pp · 70,206 words
by John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid · 2 Feb 2000 · 791pp · 85,159 words
by Robert Wachter · 7 Apr 2015 · 309pp · 114,984 words
by George Gilder · 23 Feb 2016 · 209pp · 53,236 words
by Joi Ito and Jeff Howe · 6 Dec 2016 · 254pp · 76,064 words
by Söderberg, Johan; Söderberg, Johan;
by Raghuram Rajan · 26 Feb 2019 · 596pp · 163,682 words
by Carl Benedikt Frey · 17 Jun 2019 · 626pp · 167,836 words
by Vaclav Smil · 23 Sep 2019
by Diane Coyle · 11 Oct 2021 · 305pp · 75,697 words
by Nate Silver · 31 Aug 2012 · 829pp · 186,976 words
by Evgeny Morozov · 16 Nov 2010 · 538pp · 141,822 words
by Laurence Scott · 11 Jul 2018 · 244pp · 81,334 words
by Enrico Moretti · 21 May 2012 · 403pp · 87,035 words
by Diane Coyle · 15 Apr 2025 · 321pp · 112,477 words
by Ethan Mollick · 2 Apr 2024 · 189pp · 58,076 words
by Nathan L. Ensmenger · 31 Jul 2010 · 429pp · 114,726 words
by Douglas McWilliams · 15 Feb 2015 · 193pp · 47,808 words
by Fredrik Erixon and Bjorn Weigel · 3 Oct 2016 · 504pp · 126,835 words
by Aaron Bastani · 10 Jun 2019 · 280pp · 74,559 words
by Klaus Schwab · 7 Jan 2021 · 460pp · 107,454 words
by Parag Khanna · 11 Jan 2011 · 251pp · 76,868 words
by Samuel I. Schwartz · 17 Aug 2015 · 340pp · 92,904 words