RFC: Request For Comment

back to index

49 results

What the Dormouse Said: How the Sixties Counterculture Shaped the Personal Computer Industry

by John Markoff  · 1 Jan 2005  · 394pp  · 108,215 words

. After the March 1969 meeting, Steve Crocker, a member of the UCLA group, had drawn up a preliminary set of notes he referred to as “Request for Comments 1.” Such RFCs would become a rich Internet tradition and a simple and efficient way to produce technical standards for the network. The first

Study Project Genie Project One proof-of-correctness problem psychodrama PUB Pynchon, Thomas Ram Dass RAND Corporation Rathbun, Emilia Rathbun, Harry Raymond, Dick Reddy, Raj Request for Comments (RFC) Reson, Sherry Resource One Reynolds, Walt Roberts, Ed Roberts, Larry robots Rogers, William P. Rolling Stone Rosen, Charlie Rosenbaum, Ron Roshi, Richard Baker Rossman, Michael

Protocol: how control exists after decentralization

by Alexander R. Galloway  · 1 Apr 2004  · 287pp  · 86,919 words

a set of recommendations and rules that outline specific technical standards. The protocols that govern much of the Internet are contained in what are called RFC (Request For Comments) documents.8 Called “the primary documentation of the Internet,”9 these technical memoranda detail the vast majority of standards and protocols in use on the

agreed “scientific” rules of the system. For the Internet, these scientific rules are written down. Called protocols, they are available in documents known as RFCs, or “Requests for Comments.” Each RFC acts as a blueprint for a specific protocol. It instructs potential software designers and other computer scientists how to correctly implement each protocol in

other RFC subseries that warrant special attention: the Best Current Practice (BCP) documents and informational documents known as FYI. Each new protocol specification is drafted in accordance with RFC 1111, “Request for Comments on Request for Comments: Instructions to RFC Authors,” which specifies guidelines, text formatting and otherwise, for

160, 178 _readme (Bunting), 225 Reaper, 182 Recode, 215 Record, 72 Redcode, 182 Refresh (Shulgin), 215–216 Index 257 Reid, Brian, 147 Request for Comments (RFC), 6, 38, 133–137, 140 editor (see RFC editor) “Requiem for the Media” (Baudrillard), 58 Resistance, 16, 105, 147, 150, 158, 160–161, 176, 244 Resolution (DNS), 9, 47

Open Standards and the Digital Age: History, Ideology, and Networks (Cambridge Studies in the Emergence of Global Enterprise)

by Andrew L. Russell  · 27 Apr 2014  · 675pp  · 141,667 words

Working Group OSI Open Systems Interconnection OSIC Open Systems Interconnection Committee PRnet Packet Radio Network PTT Post, Telegraph, and Telephone RCA Radio Corporation of America RFC Request for Comments ROAD Routing and Addressing SATnet Satellite Radio Network SC Subcommittee SNA System Network Architecture SPARC Standards Planning and Requirements Committee TC Technical Committee TCP Transmission

of technical correspondence with around two dozen recipients, including engineers at Western Electric and the chief engineers of regional Bell operating companies. Some GECs were requests for comments on issues such as underground construction in central offices; others described field experiments conducted in one part of the country; still others were draft proposals

the International Federation for Information Processing (IFIP) or X3. In the absence of any obvious external authority, Crocker initiated a document series in 1969 – the Request for Comments (RFCs) – whose name and structure perfectly captured NWG’s informal and experimental ethos. Crocker later recalled, “Most of us were graduate students … we kept expecting

The basic ground rules were that anyone could say anything and that nothing was official. And to emphasize the point, I labeled the notes ‘Request for Comments.’”21 The RFCs soon became the vehicle for the Network Working Group to publish consensus statements and technical standards for the Arpanet – even though they were specifically

at INWG’s first meeting in October 1972 established a document series of General Notes modeled on the tentative and research-oriented spirit of the Request for Comments used to communicate research questions and findings within the Arpanet community. The first INWG General Notes (numbers 0, 1, and 2) carry no founding

technical work in a way that could inform the ongoing efforts of the “official protocol designers” that Steve Crocker anticipated when he created the Arpanet Request for Comments series in 1969. Their desire to design protocols that would connect private and public networks – that is, telecommunication networks that, in most countries, were

his students at Stanford, Yogen Dalal and Carl Sunshine, published the “Specification of Internet Transmission Control Program” as contributions to both the Arpanet Request for Comments series (where it was RFC 675) and as INWG General Note 72.62 Arpanet researcher Alex McKenzie, deeply concerned that INWG was splintering into two rival camps, proposed

Annals of the History of Computing 29 (2007): 40–51. 21 Stephen D. Crocker, “The Origins of RFCs,” in Joyce Reynolds and Jon Postel, eds. (1987), “The Request for Comments Reference Guide,” RFC 1000, http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1000 (accessed September 25, 2013). 22 Steve Crocker, oral history interview by Judy E. O’Neill, October

written for implementers. International [OSI] standards were written as documents to be obeyed.” Although the technical functions of the OSI international standards and an IETF Request for Comments (RFCs) were functionally equivalent from a technical perspective – since they both defined protocols to allow computer users to exchange data across different types of networks – they

naming of 166 Network Control Program (NCP) 168 NWG and 168, 169–170 overview 24, 270 packet-switching and 167–168 public unveiling of 170 Requests for Comments (RFCs) 169–170 Arrhenius, Svante 39–40 ASA. See American Standards Association (ASA) Aschenbrenner, John 227 ASME. See American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Associated

The Future of the Internet: And How to Stop It

by Jonathan Zittrain  · 27 May 2009  · 629pp  · 142,393 words

-flung, unincorporated group of engineers who work on Internet standards and who have defined its protocols through a series of formal “request for comments” documents, or RFCs, published informational RFC 1135, titled “The Helminthiasis of the Internet.”25 RFC 1135 was titled and written with whimsy, echoing reminiscences of the worm as a fun challenge. The

degrees. His previous edits—and corresponding discussions in which he invoked his credentials—were called into question. In response to the controversy, and after a request for comments from the Wikipedia community,59 Jimbo proposed a rule whereby the credentials of those Wikipedia administrators who chose to assert them would be verified.60

be sure, from the earliest days of the Internet the people who designed its protocols acceded to some formality and diplomacy. Recall that they published “RFCs,” requests for comments designed to write up their ideas, creating institutional structure and memory as the project became bigger than just a few researchers in a room. The

, 116 HARV. L. REV. 749 (2003). 64. Jon Postel was the RFC editor for twenty-eight years, choosing which drafts of requests for comment to publish as IETF RFCs. RFC Editor et al., RFC 2555; 30 Years of RFCs (Apr. 7, 1999), http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2555.txt. He was also the Internet Assigned Numbers Authority, a name

Practical Packet Analysis: Using Wireshark to Solve Real-World Network Problems

by Chris Sanders  · 15 Mar 2007

won't make sense. Note I won't go into great detail about the design of each individual protocol; instead, I have provided the associated RFC number for each. An RFC, or request for comments, is the official document that defines the implementation standards for protocols in the TCP/IP stack. You can search for

Service Design Patterns: Fundamental Design Solutions for SOAP/WSDL and RESTful Web Services

by Robert Daigneau  · 14 Sep 2011

in the development of the Internet and its standards. Postel’s Law has been found in many Request For Comments (RFCs) as early as RFC 760 in 1980 (re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/ rfc760, section 3.2). RFC 1122 (re: http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1122#page-12) suggests that one should “Be liberal in

Smart Grid Standards

by Takuro Sato  · 17 Nov 2015

be used to build a new network for the Smart Grid. A core set which consists of more than 150 individual Request for the Comments (RFCs) protocols has been developed for communications and cybersecurity. In the field of energy, NIST has set up six subject areas: alternative energy, electric power metrology

of an adaptation layer Smart Energy Consumption 211 interface to Internet Protocol (IP) Network Layer. Specification of IPv6 packet transmission over Ethernet is provided in Request for Comments (RFC), 2464 [22]. Other Networks The Adaptation Layer of other networks actually depends on the used PHY/MAC technology. In general, it is important to provide

Bootstrapping: Douglas Engelbart, Coevolution, and the Origins of Personal Computing (Writing Science)

by Thierry Bardini  · 1 Dec 2000

Kleinrock's team of graduate students, volunteered to write the first meeting note, which he labeled "Request For Comments" in order "to avoid sounding too declarative," according to Hafner and Lyon (1996, 144). The accumulated archive of Requests For Comments (RFCs) documents not just the NGW's work, but the role that Engelbart's crusade played in

Engelbart's design, PODAC underwent an internal evaluation. Each POD was asked to reflect on its own experience and discuss it with other PODs ("PODCOM Request for Comments on PODAC Evaluation," JE#10221, April 27). Some PODs considered the experiment very successful, while oth- ers disagreed and wanted to end it. For instance

that "Roberts changed his mind, however, and continued with the work- ing group despite the difficultIes." 7. Crocker detailed the use and style of these Requests For Comments (RFCs) in the third note, dIstributed two days later and entitled "Documentation Conven- tions": "The Network Working Group (NWG) IS concerned with the HOST soft- ware

-5,258n7 Raskin, Jeffrey, 226 - 27 Raytheon Corporation, 25 8n6 RD, 192 READMAIL, 192 Rech, Paul, 198 RelativIty, 47-52 Remington, 74-79, 235 n2 Requests for Comments (RFCs), 185- 9 6 passim, 258nn7,9, 259nI3 RIder, Ronald, 173 Roberts, Larry, 146, 183-84, 192, 208, 248nI4, 255n3, 257nn5-6, 25 8nn 7,9

Principles of Protocol Design

by Robin Sharp  · 13 Feb 2008

can be purchased via the website or by contacting ITU-T. B.2.3 Internet standards Internet standards are so-called RFCs – Requests for Comments – which are available via the Internet itself. Each RFC has a number which identifies the topic. For example: RFC793, which describes TCP. Numbers are allocated in the order in which

object 310 Remote Object Invocation (ROI) 309 remote procedure call (RPC) 97, 299 renaming 11, 20, 22, 33, 39 replay attack 164 replicated directory 201 Request for Comments (RFC) 374 request primitive 94 resegmentation 114, 281 reset 58 residual error 57 residual error rate (RER) 57, 284 resolver 204 resource 340 responding entity 95

Broad Band: The Untold Story of the Women Who Made the Internet

by Claire L. Evans  · 6 Mar 2018  · 371pp  · 93,570 words

country, often talking to people she’d never met in the flesh. She joined technical conversations on the Request for Comments (RFC), an ongoing interoffice memo authored collectively by researchers across the ARPANET. Although the first RFCs were print memos, once the NIC put them online, they became a shared hangout, much like a bulletin

, 89, 90 Directory for, 113, 118–19 Host Table registry of, 113, 114, 120 mix of people using, 119 NIC and, see Network Information Center Requests for Comments (RFCs), 117–18, 120, 129 Resource Handbook for, 112–13, 118 artificial intelligence, 174, 226 Asimov, Isaac, 171 Association for Computing Machinery, 67 astronomy, 9–11

America (RCA), 69 Radio Shack, 225 Raisch, Charles, 96 Razorfish, 191, 197–99 Reddit, 149 Reed, Lou, 192 Remington Rand, 60–63, 65–70, 73 Requests for Comments (RFCs), 117–18, 120, 129 Reson, Sherry, 95, 96, 103–7 Resource One, 96–108, 109, 130, 132, 215, 242 Resource One Generalized Information Retrieval System

ZeroMQ

by Pieter Hintjens  · 12 Mar 2013  · 1,025pp  · 150,187 words

UNIX® Network Programming, Volume 1: The Sockets Networking API, 3rd Edition

by W. Richard Stevens, Bill Fenner, Andrew M. Rudoff  · 8 Jun 2013

Where Wizards Stay Up Late: The Origins of the Internet

by Katie Hafner and Matthew Lyon  · 1 Jan 1996  · 352pp  · 96,532 words

The Tangled Web: A Guide to Securing Modern Web Applications

by Michal Zalewski  · 26 Nov 2011  · 570pp  · 115,722 words

Exim: The Mail Transfer Agent

by Philip Hazel  · 7 Jul 2001  · 632pp  · 223,899 words

The Art of Software Security Assessment: Identifying and Preventing Software Vulnerabilities

by Justin Schuh  · 20 Nov 2006  · 2,054pp  · 359,149 words

Nagios: System and Network Monitoring, 2nd Edition

by Wolfgang Barth  · 19 Aug 2009  · 996pp  · 180,520 words

Nagios: System and Network Monitoring

by Wolfgang Barth  · 25 May 2006

The Art of UNIX Programming

by Eric S. Raymond  · 22 Sep 2003  · 612pp  · 187,431 words

The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution That Made Computing Personal

by M. Mitchell Waldrop  · 14 Apr 2001

Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms, and Source Code in C

by Bruce Schneier  · 10 Nov 1993

Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions

by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths  · 4 Apr 2016  · 523pp  · 143,139 words

The Innovators: How a Group of Inventors, Hackers, Geniuses and Geeks Created the Digital Revolution

by Walter Isaacson  · 6 Oct 2014  · 720pp  · 197,129 words

The Debian Administrator's Handbook, Debian Wheezy From Discovery to Mastery

by Raphaal Hertzog and Roland Mas  · 24 Dec 2013  · 678pp  · 159,840 words

Common Knowledge?: An Ethnography of Wikipedia

by Dariusz Jemielniak  · 13 May 2014  · 312pp  · 93,504 words

The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World

by Lawrence Lessig  · 14 Jul 2001  · 494pp  · 142,285 words

Culture & Empire: Digital Revolution

by Pieter Hintjens  · 11 Mar 2013  · 349pp  · 114,038 words

Ubuntu 15.04 Server with systemd: Administration and Reference

by Richard Petersen  · 15 May 2015

Multitool Linux: Practical Uses for Open Source Software

by Michael Schwarz, Jeremy Anderson and Peter Curtis  · 7 May 2002

The System: Who Owns the Internet, and How It Owns Us

by James Ball  · 19 Aug 2020  · 268pp  · 76,702 words

Paper Knowledge: Toward a Media History of Documents

by Lisa Gitelman  · 26 Mar 2014

Mastering Blockchain, Second Edition

by Imran Bashir  · 28 Mar 2018

Pragmatic.Programming.Erlang.Jul.2007

by Unknown

Cybersecurity: What Everyone Needs to Know

by P. W. Singer and Allan Friedman  · 3 Jan 2014  · 587pp  · 117,894 words

Exponential: How Accelerating Technology Is Leaving Us Behind and What to Do About It

by Azeem Azhar  · 6 Sep 2021  · 447pp  · 111,991 words

Working in Public: The Making and Maintenance of Open Source Software

by Nadia Eghbal  · 3 Aug 2020  · 1,136pp  · 73,489 words

Python Requests Essentials

by Rakesh Vidya Chandra and Bala Subrahmanyam Varanasi  · 16 Jun 2015  · 134pp  · 29,488 words

The Art of Scalability: Scalable Web Architecture, Processes, and Organizations for the Modern Enterprise

by Martin L. Abbott and Michael T. Fisher  · 1 Dec 2009

Rebel Code: Linux and the Open Source Revolution

by Glyn Moody  · 14 Jul 2002  · 483pp  · 145,225 words

WTF?: What's the Future and Why It's Up to Us

by Tim O'Reilly  · 9 Oct 2017  · 561pp  · 157,589 words

Coding Freedom: The Ethics and Aesthetics of Hacking

by E. Gabriella Coleman  · 25 Nov 2012  · 398pp  · 107,788 words

Erlang Programming

by Francesco Cesarini  · 496pp  · 70,263 words

Smart Cities: Big Data, Civic Hackers, and the Quest for a New Utopia

by Anthony M. Townsend  · 29 Sep 2013  · 464pp  · 127,283 words

Amateurs!: How We Built Internet Culture and Why It Matters

by Joanna Walsh  · 22 Sep 2025  · 255pp  · 80,203 words

Howard Rheingold

by The Virtual Community Homesteading on the Electronic Frontier-Perseus Books (1993)  · 26 Apr 2012

The Infinite Machine: How an Army of Crypto-Hackers Is Building the Next Internet With Ethereum

by Camila Russo  · 13 Jul 2020  · 349pp  · 102,827 words

Underground

by Suelette Dreyfus  · 1 Jan 2011  · 547pp  · 160,071 words

Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI

by Karen Hao  · 19 May 2025  · 660pp  · 179,531 words

Designing Social Interfaces

by Christian Crumlish and Erin Malone  · 30 Sep 2009  · 518pp  · 49,555 words