Simon Kuznets

back to index

138 results

Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War

by Branko Milanovic  · 9 Oct 2023

(clockwise from top left): Adam Smith (Science Source/Getty Images); Vilfredo Pareto; David Ricardo (Hulton Archive/Getty Images); Portrait du docteur François Quesnay (Musée Carnavalet); Simon Kuznets (AFP via Getty Images); Karl Marx (Hulton Archive/Getty Images) 978-0-674-26414-4 (cloth) 978-0-674-29462-2 (EPUB) 978-0-674

–Efficiency Trade-off 4     Karl Marx: The Decreasing Rate of Profit but Constant Pressure on Labor Incomes 5     Vilfredo Pareto: From Classes to Individuals 6     Simon Kuznets: Inequality during Modernization 7     The Long Eclipse of Inequality Studies during the Cold War Epilogue: The New Beginning Notes Acknowledgments Index Prologue The objective of

to deal, directly or indirectly, with income distribution and income inequality. They are Fran ç ois Quesnay, Adam Smith, David Ricardo, Karl Marx, Vilfredo Pareto, Simon Kuznets, and a group of economists from the second half of the twentieth century (the latter collectively influential even as they individually lack the iconic status

in Europe) 1867 (Meiji Restoration) 1883 (Just before the division of Africa conference) Vilfredo Pareto (75) 1848 (Revolutions in Europe) 1896 1923 (Mussolini in power) Simon Kuznets (84) 1901 1955 (Cold War) 1985 (Gorbachev in power) While writing this book, I unexpectedly encountered a similar structure in Leszek Kolakowski’s Main Currents

on which the elite is built may vary, but the elite versus the population split remains. Elites just take different sociological forms in different societies. Simon Kuznets worked and lived in the United States of the 1950s and the 1960s, in an entirely different environment from the other authors considered here. Inequality

early twentieth. The sixth author marks a break in the lineage. Perhaps too much time—time that included two world wars—elapsed between Pareto and Simon Kuznets. Kuznets’s work was strongly empirical, and he did not have much (or almost anything) in common with Ricardo or Marx. Nor did he and

be impervious to subjective feelings or preferences, might have been duped at that very point—the same one where he saw many others commit mistakes. Simon Kuznets would, about a half century after Pareto, go precisely in the direction Pareto refused to take: he would argue that income inequality changes in a

because there is no ceiling to income. This is, of course, very different from other phenomena, where there are natural limits. CHAPTER SIX Simon Kuznets: Inequality during Modernization Simon Kuznets was arguably (with the other contender being John Maynard Keynes) the most important economist of the twentieth century. 1 He laid the foundations of

by technological revolutions. Despite its ups and downs, the Kuznets hypothesis is still with us. Kuznets’s Contributions Several very important contributions were made by Simon Kuznets. For the first time in the history of economics, his hypothesis clearly linked movements in income inequality to structural transformations of economies (or to rising

, British Economic Growth 1270–1870: An Output-Based Approach (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015). 14 . Modern growth, according to Simon Kuznets, implies a per-capita growth rate of 2 percent per year. Simon Kuznets, Economic Growth of Nations: Total Output and Production Structure (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1971), 10–27

China: An Empirical Investigation,” Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality Working Paper 64, April 2023. 49 . Pareto, Manual of Political Economy, 199–200. 6. Simon Kuznets 1 . Simon Kuznets was born in 1901 in the city of Pinsk, then part of the Russian Empire and now in Belarus. During World War I and the

, Kuznets emigrated, via Danzig (Gda ń sk), to the United States. The only detailed account of his early life can be found in Moshe Syrquin, “Simon Kuznets and Russia: An Uneasy Relationship,” in Russian and Western Economic Thought: Mutual Influences and Transfer of Ideas, ed. Vladimir Avtonomov and Harald Hagemann (Berlin: Springer

, 2022). 2 . Simon Kuznets, “Regional Economic Trends and Levels of Living” (1954), reprinted in Kuznets, Economic Growth and Structure: Selected Essays (New York: W. W. Norton, 1965). 3 . Branko

Development Center, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, https://www.rug.nl/ggdc/historicaldevelopment/maddison/releases/maddison-project-database-2020?lang = en . 6 . Simon Kuznets, “Inequalities in the Size Distribution of Income” (1963), reprinted in Kuznets, Economic Growth and Structure: Selected Essays (New York: W. W. Norton, 1965), 303. 7

Marx and Engels in their correspondence but was never adequately reflected in Marx’s own economic research. 14 . Simon Kuznets, “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review 45 (1955): 1–28, 18. 15 . Simon Kuznets, Modern Economic Growth (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966), 217. 16 . For support of the assumption of less

and Row, 1968), 6. 24 . See Gertrude Himmelfarb, “Introduction,” in Alexis de Tocqueville’s Memoir on Pauperism, trans. Seymour Drescher (London: Civitas, 1997) , 3. 25 . Simon Kuznets, Shares of Upper Income Groups in Income and Savings (New York: National Bureau of Economic Research, 1953). 26 . Arthur F. Burns, “Looking Forward,” in Burns

The State and the Stork: The Population Debate and Policy Making in US History

by Derek S. Hoff  · 30 May 2012

the first meeting they fielded papers from several influential population experts with a wide range of views: Spengler; Arnold Harberger, a University of Chicago economist; Simon Kuznets, one of the giants of twentieth-century economics; geochemist Harrison Brown; Ansley Coale of Coale-Hoover fame; and Theodore Schultz, an agricultural economist about to

, however, Simon’s views shifted 180 degrees to a full rejection of Malthusianism. Simon’s about-face came partly from studying the historical analyses of Simon Kuznets, Richard Easterlin, and others who noted the absence of a strict relationship between population and economic growth, as well as the work of the agricultural

the high-birthrate 1950s was one of the few decades in modern American history during which the gap between the rich and poor narrowed. See Simon Kuznets, “Economic Growth and Income Inequality,” American Economic Review 45 (March 1955): 1–28. On postwar inequality, see Derek S. Hoff, “Statistical Appendix: Historical Income Inequality

Labor Statistics, “Summaries of Studies and Reports,” Monthly Labor Review 82 (February 1959): 25. 103. For the place of population in modern growth theory, see Simon Kuznets, Postwar Economic Growth: Four Lectures (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1964), esp. lecture 1; Moses Abramovitz, Thinking about Growth and other Essays

not only in product per capita but also in population does not imply that the latter was a necessary condition for the former” (2). 119. Simon Kuznets, Six Lectures on Economic Growth (New York: Free Press of Glencoe, 1959), 37. The next year, Kuznets suggested that larger populations 298 notes to chapter

happily produce more geniuses (“Population Change and Aggregate Output,” in Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries [Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960], 324–39). 120. Simon Kuznets, “Toward a Theory of Economic Growth,” in National Economic Welfare at Home and Abroad, ed. Robert Lekachman (Garden City, N.Y.: Doubleday, 1955; New York

in the Records of the Population Council, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, N.Y., Box 39, Folder 560, “Schultz, Theodore W., 1956–1966.” 76. For example, Simon Kuznets believed that the ability of societies to invest in human capital upset traditional assumptions about the effects of population growth on capital formation. See his

Stealth of Nations

by Robert Neuwirth  · 18 Oct 2011  · 340pp  · 91,387 words

limited. “There is social and psychological justification for significant inequalities of incomes and wealth,” he wrote, “but not for such large disparities as exist today.” Simon Kuznets, the great modern explicator of inequality, won the Nobel Prize in economics in 1971 for his work suggesting that inequality starts out as relatively minor

Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization

by Branko Milanovic  · 10 Apr 2016  · 312pp  · 91,835 words

in some cases to the Middle Ages, to reformulate the Kuznets hypothesis, the workhorse of inequality economics. This hypothesis, formulated by Nobel Prize–winning economist Simon Kuznets in the 1950s, states that as countries industrialize and average incomes grow, inequality will at first increase and then decrease, resulting in an inverted-U

long swings in income inequality must be viewed as part of a wider process of economic growth and interrelated with similar movements in other elements. —SIMON KUZNETS The Origins of Dissatisfaction with the Kuznets Hypothesis Dissatisfaction with the Kuznets hypothesis—the idea that inequality is low at very low income levels, then

to discuss these four tensions. The fallacy is the view that the reduction of absolute poverty worldwide would somehow alleviate or even eliminate these tensions. Simon Kuznets dismissed this idea long ago (in 1954). Huge gaps in income and standard of living between, for example, a New Yorker and a member of

.7 percent) to $4.5 trillion out of world GDP of $73 trillion (6.1 percent). 2. Inequality within Countries Epigraph: Kuznets (1955, 21). 1. Simon Kuznets first stated this hypothesis in his 1955 presidential address to the American Economic Association; he later restated and expanded it (Kuznets 1966). An important precursor

The Growth Delusion: Wealth, Poverty, and the Well-Being of Nations

by David Pilling  · 30 Jan 2018  · 264pp  · 76,643 words

contribution. Modern national accounts of the type used by virtually every country in the world today only really began to take shape in the 1930s. Simon Kuznets is usually credited with the invention of GDP, the quintessence of the national accounting system. But Kuznets, rather like Victor Frankenstein, soon saw his creation

the anomalies in how countries compile their national accounts is their treatment of illegal activities, such as gambling, prostitution, and the handling of stolen goods. Simon Kuznets thought only activities that contribute to human welfare should be counted, but who was to decide what they were? He thought advertising was worthless. Perhaps

,” he says, conjuring up a metaphor that makes the comparison of apples and oranges seem mundane. So he has adapted the “rhubarb” methodology designed by Simon Kuznets to measure the US economy to the realities of an “elephant” economy like Kenya’s. “It’s perfectly correct for the developed world,” he says

order. “If there is a higher rate of disorder, you need a bigger police force to keep the peace,” he says, sounding like a Chinese Simon Kuznets. “That also creates GDP, but you shouldn’t count it because it is unnecessary. Is that the kind of growth we want?” Niu’s proposal

is subjective well-being that you’re after, then, objectively speaking, you’d rather be in Tromsø than in Thimphu. 13 GDP 2.0 If Simon Kuznets could choose where to be reborn, he might well choose Maryland. The inventor of GDP had serious reservations about his own measure of economic activity

. But more income—more GDP—should never itself be the goal. At most, it should be the means by which we achieve our ends. As Simon Kuznets himself asked, “What are we growing? And why?” Our priesthood of economists depends on “the idea that there are economic laws we cannot contradict any

see no statistical evidence for Kuznets’s theory. 8. For a good description of Kuznets’s character and methods see Robert William Fogel, Political Arithmetic: Simon Kuznets and the Empirical Tradition in Economics, University of Chicago Press, 2013. 9. Ehsan Masood, The Great Invention, Saqi Books, 2014, p. 15. 10. Kuznets originally

The Technology Trap: Capital, Labor, and Power in the Age of Automation

by Carl Benedikt Frey  · 17 Jun 2019  · 626pp  · 167,836 words

, found that virtually all economic advance over the twentieth century had been thanks to technology. And others documented that those gains had been widely shared. Simon Kuznets found that America had become more equal and advanced his theory of capitalist development in which inequality automatically decreases along the industrialization path. Nicholas Kaldor

facts of economic growth, showing that the labor share of income had remained roughly constant, at two-thirds of national income, despite rapid mechanization; and Simon Kuznets advanced his hugely optimistic theory of economic progress in which inequality automatically decreases, regardless of economic policy choices.54 Their optimism surely seemed warranted at

Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy That Works for Progress, People and Planet

by Klaus Schwab  · 7 Jan 2021  · 460pp  · 107,454 words

: The Issues of the World Economy Today There might have been no better person to piece together the puzzle of the world economy today than Simon Kuznets, a Russian-born1 American economist, who died in 1985. It may seem odd at first that a man who passed away in the mid-1980s

the root of the feeling of betrayal people have toward their leaders. But before we get deeper into this curse, let's examine who exactly Simon Kuznets was and find out what people remembered him for. The Original Kuznets’ Curse: GDP as Measure of Progress Simon Smith Kuznets was born in Pinsk

our policy answers will work? Economic metrics were scarce, and GDP, the measure we use today to value our economy, had not been invented. Enter Simon Kuznets. An expert in statistics, mathematics, and economics, he developed a standard way of measuring the gross national income (GNI) or gross national product (GNP) of

growth is good reigned supreme. But there is a painful end to this story, and we could have foreseen it had we better listened to Simon Kuznets himself. In 1934, long before the Bretton Woods Agreement, Kuznets warned US Congress not to focus too narrowly on GNP/GDP: “The welfare of a

: lacking public investments—an increasingly likely reality for budget-strained governments—economic mobility in many countries could get worse, rather than better. So, what would Simon Kuznets have to say about all these findings, many of which go against his own theory? We do not need to speculate. According to his colleague

many people behind economically. It was Kuznets’ final curse. He had never suggested that our economic system was indefinitely sustainable. ▪ ▪ ▪ We did not listen to Simon Kuznets’ cautious warnings: he told us GDP was a poor measure for broad societal progress, as it was more geared toward measuring production capacity than any

was born in Pinsk, then part of the Russian Empire. Nowadays, Pinsk is part of Belarus. 2 “Political Arithmetic: Simon Kuznets and the Empirical Tradition in Economics”, Chapter 5: The Scientific Methods of Simon Kuznets, Robert William Fogel, Enid M. Fogel, Mark Guglielmo, Nathaniel Grotte, University of Chicago Press, p. 105, https://www.nber

.org/system/files/chapters/c12917/c12917.pdf. 3 A direct quotation of Kuznets’ autobiography for the Nobel Prize committee. The Nobel Prize, “Simon Kuznets Biographical,” 1971, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1971/kuznets/biographical/. 4 “GDP: A brief history,” Elizabeth Dickinson, Foreign Policy, January 2011, https://foreignpolicy

://www.oecd.org/economy/outlook/Decoupling-of-wages-from-productivity-november-2018-OECD-economic-outlook-chapter.pdf. 36 “Some Notes on the Scientific Methods of Simon Kuznets,” Robert Fogel, National Bureau of Economic Research, December 1987, https://www.nber.org/papers/w2461.pdf. 37 “Global Inequality is Declining—Largely Thanks to China

.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/publication/fair-progress-economic-mobility-across-generations-around-the-world. 59 “ibidem”. 60 “Some Notes on the Scientific Methods of Simon Kuznets,” Robert Fogel, NBER, December 1987, https://www.nber.org/papers/w2461.pdf. 61 These two sentences are adapted from “The World Economic Forum, A Partner

production capacity of a country—no luxury with the Second World War around the corner. Since then, however, not only the inventor of the metric, Simon Kuznets, but many other economists, including Mariana Mazzucato, Diane Coyle, and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, pointed out some of the fundamental flaws of GDP.39

Zealand's focus on social issues instead of, 234–236 post-World War II low level of, 105 private sector percentage of China's, 172 Simon Kuznets' warning on progress measured by, 21–25, 34, 46, 53 Singapore (1965–2019), 123–125 stakeholder model going beyond profits and, 189–193 trade globalization

Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy That Works for Progress, People and Planet

by Klaus Schwab and Peter Vanham  · 27 Jan 2021  · 460pp  · 107,454 words

: The Issues of the World Economy Today There might have been no better person to piece together the puzzle of the world economy today than Simon Kuznets, a Russian-born1 American economist, who died in 1985. It may seem odd at first that a man who passed away in the mid-1980s

the root of the feeling of betrayal people have toward their leaders. But before we get deeper into this curse, let's examine who exactly Simon Kuznets was and find out what people remembered him for. The Original Kuznets’ Curse: GDP as Measure of Progress Simon Smith Kuznets was born in Pinsk

our policy answers will work? Economic metrics were scarce, and GDP, the measure we use today to value our economy, had not been invented. Enter Simon Kuznets. An expert in statistics, mathematics, and economics, he developed a standard way of measuring the gross national income (GNI) or gross national product (GNP) of

growth is good reigned supreme. But there is a painful end to this story, and we could have foreseen it had we better listened to Simon Kuznets himself. In 1934, long before the Bretton Woods Agreement, Kuznets warned US Congress not to focus too narrowly on GNP/GDP: “The welfare of a

: lacking public investments—an increasingly likely reality for budget-strained governments—economic mobility in many countries could get worse, rather than better. So, what would Simon Kuznets have to say about all these findings, many of which go against his own theory? We do not need to speculate. According to his colleague

many people behind economically. It was Kuznets’ final curse. He had never suggested that our economic system was indefinitely sustainable. ▪ ▪ ▪ We did not listen to Simon Kuznets’ cautious warnings: he told us GDP was a poor measure for broad societal progress, as it was more geared toward measuring production capacity than any

was born in Pinsk, then part of the Russian Empire. Nowadays, Pinsk is part of Belarus. 2 “Political Arithmetic: Simon Kuznets and the Empirical Tradition in Economics”, Chapter 5: The Scientific Methods of Simon Kuznets, Robert William Fogel, Enid M. Fogel, Mark Guglielmo, Nathaniel Grotte, University of Chicago Press, p. 105, https://www.nber

.org/system/files/chapters/c12917/c12917.pdf. 3 A direct quotation of Kuznets’ autobiography for the Nobel Prize committee. The Nobel Prize, “Simon Kuznets Biographical,” 1971, https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/economic-sciences/1971/kuznets/biographical/. 4 “GDP: A brief history,” Elizabeth Dickinson, Foreign Policy, January 2011, https://foreignpolicy

://www.oecd.org/economy/outlook/Decoupling-of-wages-from-productivity-november-2018-OECD-economic-outlook-chapter.pdf. 36 “Some Notes on the Scientific Methods of Simon Kuznets,” Robert Fogel, National Bureau of Economic Research, December 1987, https://www.nber.org/papers/w2461.pdf. 37 “Global Inequality is Declining—Largely Thanks to China

.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/publication/fair-progress-economic-mobility-across-generations-around-the-world. 59 “ibidem”. 60 “Some Notes on the Scientific Methods of Simon Kuznets,” Robert Fogel, NBER, December 1987, https://www.nber.org/papers/w2461.pdf. 61 These two sentences are adapted from “The World Economic Forum, A Partner

production capacity of a country—no luxury with the Second World War around the corner. Since then, however, not only the inventor of the metric, Simon Kuznets, but many other economists, including Mariana Mazzucato, Diane Coyle, and Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, pointed out some of the fundamental flaws of GDP.39

Zealand's focus on social issues instead of, 234–236 post-World War II low level of, 105 private sector percentage of China's, 172 Simon Kuznets' warning on progress measured by, 21–25, 34, 46, 53 Singapore (1965–2019), 123–125 stakeholder model going beyond profits and, 189–193 trade globalization

GDP: The World’s Most Powerful Formula and Why It Must Now Change

by Ehsan Masood  · 4 Mar 2021  · 303pp  · 74,206 words

to calculate incomes. Offices for national statistics in most countries will report on the results of all three methods. In the 1930s, Colin Clark and Simon Kuznets favoured an incomes approach. Much of the global media at the time of writing concentrates on the expenditures approach. This book will do the same

by a committee of the US Senate a year earlier. The task was handed to a talented young economist who had emigrated from Russia. For Simon Kuznets, National Income would be the job that would define the rest of his career. But it would also eventually estrange him from later US administrations

and fossil fuels. Governments also like to know how much their citizens earn, so that they can levy the appropriate amount of tax. But before Simon Kuznets’s 1932 report on national income, governments in the Western Hemisphere had a weaker grip on this kind of knowledge. Unlike the more centrally planned

reading too much into GDP beyond what it says about the state of production, or spending, or incomes. From the earliest days, its inventors, including Simon Kuznets and the British economist John Maynard Keynes, understood that it is not really a measure of prosperity, and Kuznets in particular became skeptical of the

estimate of total US national income for 1929, 1930, and 1931 and to provide this information before December 15, 1933. That task was assigned to Simon Kuznets (1901–1985), who had emigrated to America from Russia at age twenty-two, in 1922, five years after the Russian Revolution. Kuznets started work on

economy where incomes not only had stayed constant but had even managed to register a small increase. This was the column marked “Government.” According to Simon Kuznets and his team, between 1929 and 1932 income distributed by government entities was up from $6.5 billion to $6.8 billion, reflecting a small

in government spending isn’t as intriguing as is its inclusion in Kuznets’s national accounts. This is because, for much of his professional life, Simon Kuznets fought the inclusion of government spending in GDP. Data from businesses formed the cornerstone of his methodology, and he was confident in the quality of

statistician Colin Clark (1905–1989). Clark was an obsessive collector of data on the national income. He was the nearest that Britain had to a Simon Kuznets, although he was a Kuznets with no official mandate.14 “There is no one to-day who does not mainly depend on the brilliant private

, was the final variable in our GDP formula—the G, for government spending, which he calculated to be £850 million. In 1940, six years after Simon Kuznets had presented his national income estimates to the Senate, Keynes had written down in a table the basis for what today is the formula for

for mobilizing resources for the war, and they, as much as the Commerce Department, needed a handle on the nation’s finances. But such was Simon Kuznets’s hold on accounting methodology that these younger officials were finding it hard to have an impact. By 1940 and with America’s role in

. But he misjudged the US administration’s determination, indeed its insistence, that public spending be included as a positive indicator for economic health. By 1941 Simon Kuznets’s days as America’s chief national accountant were over. It was Keynes who had effectively helped his younger American colleagues win the argument and

, 1998. This is a Harvard Business School case study in which the authors reproduce three primary documents, including the 1932 US Senate resolution in which Simon Kuznets was commissioned. 2. Carol S. Carson, “The History of the United States National Income and Product Accounts,” Review of Income and Wealth 21 (1975): 153

exist online. However, the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington, DC, has only a six-page summary. Staff told me that for some reason Simon Kuznets’s original document was never saved or archived. They added that it is possible that a copy may exist in Senator La Follette’s private

separated. —Richard Stone, “The Fortune Teller,” Economica X (1943) John Maynard Keynes’s role in constructing what eventually became GDP, and his concurrent debate with Simon Kuznets about the place for public spending—the G in the GDP formula—has been one of economic history’s best-kept secrets. But Keynes wasn

’t working alone. He had a partner in this endeavor, another of his students and fellow Cambridge economist Richard Stone (1913–1991). After Simon Kuznets, Stone, too, would win a Nobel Prize for his work on national income accounting.1 Shortly before his death on April 21, 1946, Keynes persuaded

his US counterparts were looking for. By 1944 civil servants in the US administration had still largely been unsuccessful in shaking off the influence of Simon Kuznets. On their own they needed all the external support they could get. In order to search for a consensus, a three-way meeting was arranged

to the world. In doing so, perhaps most important of all, Stone used Keynes’s definition of GDP, and not that of Colin Clark and Simon Kuznets. In tapping Stone for the job, Keynes had chosen wisely. He understood that national income accounting needed economists who were good with figures. That sounds

place in Konstanz, then in West Germany. Anyone who was anyone in academic economics seemed to have been invited. There was GDP’s co-creator Simon Kuznets; the historian of the British industrial revolution, Phyllis Deane; and the growth theorist Robert Solow. It must have been quite an event, though evidently not

one. As we saw in Chapter 2, the idea didn’t even need to be expressed in this way. Indeed, it wasn’t, not by Simon Kuznets, not by John Maynard Keynes. National income accounting was represented by both men as a table with different columns for different kinds of spending. The

. I am especially grateful to Kate Mollan of the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington DC for dogged pursuit of an original copy of Simon Kuznets’s 261-page report National Income 1929–32; and to the staff at the library of the Institute of Development Studies in Sussex for material

The Haves and the Have-Nots: A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality

by Branko Milanovic  · 15 Dec 2010  · 251pp  · 69,245 words

.8 - Can Several Countries Exist in One? Vignette 1.9 - Will China Survive in 2048? Vignette 1.10 - Two Students of Inequality: Vilfredo Pareto and Simon Kuznets CHAPTER 2 Vignette 2.1 - Why Was Marx Led Astray? Vignette 2.2 - How Unequal Is Today’s World? Vignette 2.3 - How Much of

there were no laws of its “change” with development. There was, Pareto argued, only a “law of its fixity.” It wasn’t until 1955 that Simon Kuznets, a Russian-American economist and statistician, proposed the first real theory of what propels change in income distribution. (He is profiled, together with Pareto, in

hardly speak of anything serious and usable before approximately the early 1950s. (You may recall that Pareto’s speculations were based on fiscal data, whereas Simon Kuznets had hardly a dozen surveys to draw upon—even as late as 1955.) For developing countries the situation is even worse; very often there is

national unity, it is very likely to come from the economic split within the nation. Vignette 1.10 Two Students of Inequality: Vilfredo Pareto and Simon Kuznets It may surprise the reader that there are few theories or theoretical insights into the formation and evolution in time of income distribution among individuals

to be “guillotined” as one ascended the income distribution ladder. Pareto thought that an “iron law” of income distribution was uncovered—thus spoke Pareto.11 Simon Kuznets, the second apostle of income distribution studies, was an entirely different man. Born in the Russian Empire (in what is today Belarus) in 1901, he

, Kuznets treated every number with skepticism; one reveled in his aristocratic academic maverick status, while the other was a prototypical professor. From such scant “matériel,” Simon Kuznets produced in 1955 what became, and still remains, the workhorse of the modern theory of income distribution. It is a hypothesis that at the early

and interpersonal inequality and redistribution and of social arrangements Karenin, Alexei Aleksandrovich Karenina, Anna Kenya Keynes, John Maynard Khodorovsky, Mikhail Kirchner, Nestor Korea Kosovo Kuznets, Simon Kuznets’ hypothesis Kynaston, David Labor government employment and migration of Lampedusa detention camp Landlords Laos Latin America Asia as mirror image of GDP per capita in

Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist

by Kate Raworth  · 22 Mar 2017  · 403pp  · 111,119 words

Capital in the Twenty-First Century

by Thomas Piketty  · 10 Mar 2014  · 935pp  · 267,358 words

The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality From the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century

by Walter Scheidel  · 17 Jan 2017  · 775pp  · 208,604 words

Growth: A Reckoning

by Daniel Susskind  · 16 Apr 2024  · 358pp  · 109,930 words

Career and Family: Women’s Century-Long Journey Toward Equity

by Claudia Goldin  · 11 Oct 2021  · 445pp  · 122,877 words

The Globalization of Inequality

by François Bourguignon  · 1 Aug 2012  · 221pp  · 55,901 words

Unsustainable Inequalities: Social Justice and the Environment

by Lucas Chancel  · 15 Jan 2020  · 191pp  · 51,242 words

The Limits of the Market: The Pendulum Between Government and Market

by Paul de Grauwe and Anna Asbury  · 12 Mar 2017

Growth: From Microorganisms to Megacities

by Vaclav Smil  · 23 Sep 2019

Plenitude: The New Economics of True Wealth

by Juliet B. Schor  · 12 May 2010  · 309pp  · 78,361 words

Double Entry: How the Merchants of Venice Shaped the Modern World - and How Their Invention Could Make or Break the Planet

by Jane Gleeson-White  · 14 May 2011  · 274pp  · 66,721 words

Stuffocation

by James Wallman  · 6 Dec 2013  · 296pp  · 82,501 words

The Autonomous Revolution: Reclaiming the Future We’ve Sold to Machines

by William Davidow and Michael Malone  · 18 Feb 2020  · 304pp  · 80,143 words

Samuelson Friedman: The Battle Over the Free Market

by Nicholas Wapshott  · 2 Aug 2021  · 453pp  · 122,586 words

Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress

by Steven Pinker  · 13 Feb 2018  · 1,034pp  · 241,773 words

An Extraordinary Time: The End of the Postwar Boom and the Return of the Ordinary Economy

by Marc Levinson  · 31 Jul 2016  · 409pp  · 118,448 words

Prosperity Without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow

by Tim Jackson  · 8 Dec 2016  · 573pp  · 115,489 words

Capitalism and Its Critics: A History: From the Industrial Revolution to AI

by John Cassidy  · 12 May 2025  · 774pp  · 238,244 words

The Great Divergence: America's Growing Inequality Crisis and What We Can Do About It

by Timothy Noah  · 23 Apr 2012  · 309pp  · 91,581 words

Energy: A Human History

by Richard Rhodes  · 28 May 2018  · 653pp  · 155,847 words

The Day the World Stops Shopping

by J. B. MacKinnon  · 14 May 2021  · 368pp  · 109,432 words

GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History

by Diane Coyle  · 23 Feb 2014  · 159pp  · 45,073 words

Less Is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World

by Jason Hickel  · 12 Aug 2020  · 286pp  · 87,168 words

A Pelican Introduction Economics: A User's Guide

by Ha-Joon Chang  · 26 May 2014  · 385pp  · 111,807 words

Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages

by Carlota Pérez  · 1 Jan 2002

The Capitalist Manifesto

by Johan Norberg  · 14 Jun 2023  · 295pp  · 87,204 words

The Elusive Quest for Growth: Economists' Adventures and Misadventures in the Tropics

by William R. Easterly  · 1 Aug 2002  · 355pp  · 63 words

Milton Friedman: A Biography

by Lanny Ebenstein  · 23 Jan 2007  · 298pp  · 95,668 words

Value of Everything: An Antidote to Chaos The

by Mariana Mazzucato  · 25 Apr 2018  · 457pp  · 125,329 words

Utopia for Realists: The Case for a Universal Basic Income, Open Borders, and a 15-Hour Workweek

by Rutger Bregman  · 13 Sep 2014  · 235pp  · 62,862 words

The Economics of Inequality

by Thomas Piketty and Arthur Goldhammer  · 7 Jan 2015  · 165pp  · 45,129 words

The Vanishing Middle Class: Prejudice and Power in a Dual Economy

by Peter Temin  · 17 Mar 2017  · 273pp  · 87,159 words

Two Nations, Indivisible: A History of Inequality in America: A History of Inequality in America

by Jamie Bronstein  · 29 Oct 2016  · 332pp  · 89,668 words

The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Some So Poor

by David S. Landes  · 14 Sep 1999  · 1,060pp  · 265,296 words

The Measure of Progress: Counting What Really Matters

by Diane Coyle  · 15 Apr 2025  · 321pp  · 112,477 words

The Third Industrial Revolution: How Lateral Power Is Transforming Energy, the Economy, and the World

by Jeremy Rifkin  · 27 Sep 2011  · 443pp  · 112,800 words

The Upside of Inequality

by Edward Conard  · 1 Sep 2016  · 436pp  · 98,538 words

Equality

by Darrin M. McMahon  · 14 Nov 2023  · 534pp  · 166,876 words

Not the End of the World

by Hannah Ritchie  · 9 Jan 2024  · 335pp  · 101,992 words

This Could Be Our Future: A Manifesto for a More Generous World

by Yancey Strickler  · 29 Oct 2019  · 254pp  · 61,387 words

Grand Transitions: How the Modern World Was Made

by Vaclav Smil  · 2 Mar 2021  · 1,324pp  · 159,290 words

Wealth and Poverty: A New Edition for the Twenty-First Century

by George Gilder  · 30 Apr 1981  · 590pp  · 153,208 words

The Great Convergence: Information Technology and the New Globalization

by Richard Baldwin  · 14 Nov 2016  · 606pp  · 87,358 words

Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else

by Chrystia Freeland  · 11 Oct 2012  · 481pp  · 120,693 words

Why Information Grows: The Evolution of Order, From Atoms to Economies

by Cesar Hidalgo  · 1 Jun 2015  · 242pp  · 68,019 words

The Long Good Buy: Analysing Cycles in Markets

by Peter Oppenheimer  · 3 May 2020  · 333pp  · 76,990 words

In Defense of Global Capitalism

by Johan Norberg  · 1 Jan 2001  · 233pp  · 75,712 words

100 Plus: How the Coming Age of Longevity Will Change Everything, From Careers and Relationships to Family And

by Sonia Arrison  · 22 Aug 2011  · 381pp  · 78,467 words

Keynes Hayek: The Clash That Defined Modern Economics

by Nicholas Wapshott  · 10 Oct 2011  · 494pp  · 132,975 words

The Age of Extraction: How Tech Platforms Conquered the Economy and Threaten Our Future Prosperity

by Tim Wu  · 4 Nov 2025  · 246pp  · 65,143 words

Common Wealth: Economics for a Crowded Planet

by Jeffrey Sachs  · 1 Jan 2008  · 421pp  · 125,417 words

Kicking Awaythe Ladder

by Ha-Joon Chang  · 4 Sep 2000  · 192pp

Green Philosophy: How to Think Seriously About the Planet

by Roger Scruton  · 30 Apr 2014  · 426pp  · 118,913 words

It's Better Than It Looks: Reasons for Optimism in an Age of Fear

by Gregg Easterbrook  · 20 Feb 2018  · 424pp  · 119,679 words

Profiting Without Producing: How Finance Exploits Us All

by Costas Lapavitsas  · 14 Aug 2013  · 554pp  · 158,687 words

More: The 10,000-Year Rise of the World Economy

by Philip Coggan  · 6 Feb 2020  · 524pp  · 155,947 words

Britain Etc

by Mark Easton  · 1 Mar 2012  · 411pp  · 95,852 words

Capitalism in America: A History

by Adrian Wooldridge and Alan Greenspan  · 15 Oct 2018  · 585pp  · 151,239 words

Losing Control: The Emerging Threats to Western Prosperity

by Stephen D. King  · 14 Jun 2010  · 561pp  · 87,892 words

The Empathic Civilization: The Race to Global Consciousness in a World in Crisis

by Jeremy Rifkin  · 31 Dec 2009  · 879pp  · 233,093 words

The Power Elite

by C. Wright Mills and Alan Wolfe  · 1 Jan 1956  · 568pp  · 174,089 words

What's Wrong With Economics: A Primer for the Perplexed

by Robert Skidelsky  · 3 Mar 2020  · 290pp  · 76,216 words

Finance and the Good Society

by Robert J. Shiller  · 1 Jan 2012  · 288pp  · 16,556 words

The Great Divide: Unequal Societies and What We Can Do About Them

by Joseph E. Stiglitz  · 15 Mar 2015  · 409pp  · 125,611 words

Fully Automated Luxury Communism

by Aaron Bastani  · 10 Jun 2019  · 280pp  · 74,559 words

The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and Its Solutions

by Jason Hickel  · 3 May 2017  · 332pp  · 106,197 words

The Economists' Hour: How the False Prophets of Free Markets Fractured Our Society

by Binyamin Appelbaum  · 4 Sep 2019  · 614pp  · 174,226 words

Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty

by Daron Acemoglu and James Robinson  · 20 Mar 2012  · 547pp  · 172,226 words

Capitalism and Freedom

by Milton Friedman  · 1 Jan 1962  · 275pp  · 77,955 words

People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent

by Joseph E. Stiglitz  · 22 Apr 2019  · 462pp  · 129,022 words

Bourgeois Dignity: Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World

by Deirdre N. McCloskey  · 15 Nov 2011  · 1,205pp  · 308,891 words

The Great Economists Ten Economists whose thinking changed the way we live-FT Publishing International (2014)

by Phil Thornton  · 7 May 2014

After the New Economy: The Binge . . . And the Hangover That Won't Go Away

by Doug Henwood  · 9 May 2005  · 306pp  · 78,893 words

Year 501

by Noam Chomsky  · 19 Jan 2016

The Billionaire Raj: A Journey Through India's New Gilded Age

by James Crabtree  · 2 Jul 2018  · 442pp  · 130,526 words

Red Plenty

by Francis Spufford  · 1 Jan 2007  · 544pp  · 168,076 words

George Marshall: Defender of the Republic

by David L. Roll  · 8 Jul 2019

The Marginal Revolutionaries: How Austrian Economists Fought the War of Ideas

by Janek Wasserman  · 23 Sep 2019  · 470pp  · 130,269 words

Seven Crashes: The Economic Crises That Shaped Globalization

by Harold James  · 15 Jan 2023  · 469pp  · 137,880 words

Material World: A Substantial Story of Our Past and Future

by Ed Conway  · 15 Jun 2023  · 515pp  · 152,128 words

Big Three in Economics: Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes

by Mark Skousen  · 22 Dec 2006  · 330pp  · 77,729 words

What's Mine Is Yours: How Collaborative Consumption Is Changing the Way We Live

by Rachel Botsman and Roo Rogers  · 2 Jan 2010  · 411pp  · 80,925 words

The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and the Origins of Inequality

by Angus Deaton  · 15 Mar 2013  · 374pp  · 114,660 words

The Health Gap: The Challenge of an Unequal World

by Michael Marmot  · 9 Sep 2015  · 414pp  · 119,116 words

The Most Powerful Idea in the World: A Story of Steam, Industry, and Invention

by William Rosen  · 31 May 2010  · 420pp  · 124,202 words

Geek Heresy: Rescuing Social Change From the Cult of Technology

by Kentaro Toyama  · 25 May 2015  · 494pp  · 116,739 words

Culture and Prosperity: The Truth About Markets - Why Some Nations Are Rich but Most Remain Poor

by John Kay  · 24 May 2004  · 436pp  · 76 words

Age of Greed: The Triumph of Finance and the Decline of America, 1970 to the Present

by Jeff Madrick  · 11 Jun 2012  · 840pp  · 202,245 words

Human Frontiers: The Future of Big Ideas in an Age of Small Thinking

by Michael Bhaskar  · 2 Nov 2021

Crisis and Leviathan: Critical Episodes in the Growth of American Government

by Robert Higgs and Arthur A. Ekirch, Jr.  · 15 Jan 1987

Wealth, Poverty and Politics

by Thomas Sowell  · 31 Aug 2015  · 877pp  · 182,093 words

The Meritocracy Trap: How America's Foundational Myth Feeds Inequality, Dismantles the Middle Class, and Devours the Elite

by Daniel Markovits  · 14 Sep 2019  · 976pp  · 235,576 words

The New Economics: A Bigger Picture

by David Boyle and Andrew Simms  · 14 Jun 2009  · 207pp  · 86,639 words

Homeland: The War on Terror in American Life

by Richard Beck  · 2 Sep 2024  · 715pp  · 212,449 words

The Price of Inequality: How Today's Divided Society Endangers Our Future

by Joseph E. Stiglitz  · 10 Jun 2012  · 580pp  · 168,476 words

Invisible Women

by Caroline Criado Perez  · 12 Mar 2019  · 480pp  · 119,407 words

Markets, State, and People: Economics for Public Policy

by Diane Coyle  · 14 Jan 2020  · 384pp  · 108,414 words

How to Change the World: Reflections on Marx and Marxism

by Eric Hobsbawm  · 5 Sep 2011  · 621pp  · 157,263 words

Inside the Nudge Unit: How Small Changes Can Make a Big Difference

by David Halpern  · 26 Aug 2015  · 387pp  · 120,155 words

The Rise and Fall of Nations: Forces of Change in the Post-Crisis World

by Ruchir Sharma  · 5 Jun 2016  · 566pp  · 163,322 words

The Patterning Instinct: A Cultural History of Humanity's Search for Meaning

by Jeremy Lent  · 22 May 2017  · 789pp  · 207,744 words

1873: The Rothschilds, the First Great Depression, and the Making of the Modern World

by Liaquat Ahamed  · 1 Jun 2026  · 444pp  · 114,108 words

The Second Machine Age: Work, Progress, and Prosperity in a Time of Brilliant Technologies

by Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee  · 20 Jan 2014  · 339pp  · 88,732 words

Slouching Towards Utopia: An Economic History of the Twentieth Century

by J. Bradford Delong  · 6 Apr 2020  · 593pp  · 183,240 words

Money and Government: The Past and Future of Economics

by Robert Skidelsky  · 13 Nov 2018

What Would the Great Economists Do?: How Twelve Brilliant Minds Would Solve Today's Biggest Problems

by Linda Yueh  · 4 Jun 2018  · 453pp  · 117,893 words

Termites of the State: Why Complexity Leads to Inequality

by Vito Tanzi  · 28 Dec 2017

The Great Surge: The Ascent of the Developing World

by Steven Radelet  · 10 Nov 2015  · 437pp  · 115,594 words

Other People's Money: Masters of the Universe or Servants of the People?

by John Kay  · 2 Sep 2015  · 478pp  · 126,416 words

The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities

by Mancur Olson

Men Without Work

by Nicholas Eberstadt  · 4 Sep 2016  · 126pp  · 37,081 words

Free to Choose: A Personal Statement

by Milton Friedman and Rose D. Friedman  · 2 Jan 1980  · 376pp  · 118,542 words

Forward: Notes on the Future of Our Democracy

by Andrew Yang  · 15 Nov 2021

The Hour of Fate

by Susan Berfield

Life as a Passenger: How Driverless Cars Will Change the World

by David Kerrigan  · 18 Jun 2017  · 472pp  · 80,835 words

The War on Normal People: The Truth About America's Disappearing Jobs and Why Universal Basic Income Is Our Future

by Andrew Yang  · 2 Apr 2018  · 300pp  · 76,638 words

Life Inc.: How the World Became a Corporation and How to Take It Back

by Douglas Rushkoff  · 1 Jun 2009  · 422pp  · 131,666 words

Hubris: Why Economists Failed to Predict the Crisis and How to Avoid the Next One

by Meghnad Desai  · 15 Feb 2015  · 270pp  · 73,485 words

Affluenza: The All-Consuming Epidemic

by John de Graaf, David Wann, Thomas H Naylor and David Horsey  · 1 Jan 2001  · 378pp  · 102,966 words

The AI Economy: Work, Wealth and Welfare in the Robot Age

by Roger Bootle  · 4 Sep 2019  · 374pp  · 111,284 words

The Age of Stagnation: Why Perpetual Growth Is Unattainable and the Global Economy Is in Peril

by Satyajit Das  · 9 Feb 2016  · 327pp  · 90,542 words

The Corruption of Capitalism: Why Rentiers Thrive and Work Does Not Pay

by Guy Standing  · 13 Jul 2016  · 443pp  · 98,113 words

Extreme Economies: Survival, Failure, Future – Lessons From the World’s Limits

by Richard Davies  · 4 Sep 2019  · 412pp  · 128,042 words

I'm a stranger here myself: notes on returning to America after twenty years away

by Bill Bryson  · 6 Jun 2000  · 303pp  · 93,545 words

The Tragedy of Great Power Politics

by John J. Mearsheimer  · 1 Jan 2001  · 637pp  · 199,158 words

The Great Economists: How Their Ideas Can Help Us Today

by Linda Yueh  · 15 Mar 2018  · 374pp  · 113,126 words

Radical Uncertainty: Decision-Making for an Unknowable Future

by Mervyn King and John Kay  · 5 Mar 2020  · 807pp  · 154,435 words

Pivotal Decade: How the United States Traded Factories for Finance in the Seventies

by Judith Stein  · 30 Apr 2010  · 497pp  · 143,175 words