description: test of a machine's ability to exhibit intelligent behavior equivalent to that of a human
226 results
by Peter Lunenfeld · 31 Mar 2011 · 239pp · 56,531 words
’s intentional blurring of the boundary between human and nonhuman is directly related to one of the foundational memes of artificial intelligence: the still-provocative Turing Test. In “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” a seminal paper from 1950, Turing created a thought experiment. He posited a person holding a textual conversation on any
…
the person believes he or she is communicating with another person, but is in reality conversing with a machine, then that machine has passed the Turing Test. In other words, the test that Turing proposes that a computer must pass to be considered “intelligent” is to simulate the conversational skills of another
by John Derbyshire · 14 Apr 2003
Table 16-1. That A.M. Turing, for example, is the very same Alan Turing who worked in mathematical logic, developing the idea of the Turing Test (a way of deciding whether a computer or its program is intelligent), and of the Turing machine (a very general, theoretical type of computer, a
…
, Harry S., 166 Turán, Paul, 238, 239, 378 Turing, Alan, 258, 261-262, 357, 377, 391; pl. 5 Turing machine, 261, 391 Turing Prize, 261 Turing Test, 261 Twiddle principle, 46 Twiddle sign, 45, 368 U Uncle Petros and Goldbach’s Conjecture (Doxiadis), 90 Universal Computer, The (Davis), 187 Universities, academies distinguished
by James Gleick · 1 Mar 2011 · 855pp · 178,507 words
the terms machine and think. His idea was to replace the question with a test called the Imitation Game, destined to become famous as the “Turing Test.” In its initial form the Imitation Game involves three people: a man, a woman, and an interrogator. The interrogator sits in a room apart and
…
THE FORMULA IS NEITHER PROVABLE NOR DISPROVABLE”: Alan M. Turing, “Intelligent Machinery, A Heretical Theory,” unpublished lecture, c. 1951, in Stuart M. Shieber, ed., The Turing Test: Verbal Behavior as the Hallmark of Intelligence (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004), 105. ♦ THE ORIGINAL QUESTION, “CAN MACHINES THINK?”: Alan M. Turing, “Computing Machinery and
…
of Communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1949. Shenk, David. Data Smog: Surviving the Information Glut. New York: HarperCollins, 1997. Shieber, Stuart M., ed. The Turing Test: Verbal Behavior as the Hallmark of Intelligence. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2004. Shiryaev, A. N. “Kolmogorov: Life and Creative Activities.” Annals of Probability 17, no
…
symbols tape, 7.1, 7.2 thermodynamics of, 13.1, 13.2 two-state model U machine, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 12.1 Turing Test, 8.1, 8.2, 8.3, 8.4 Twitter, 11.1, epl.1, epl.2 Uglow, Jenny uncertainty entropy as measure of, 7.1, 9
by Paul Davies · 31 Jan 2019 · 253pp · 83,473 words
the nature of artificial intelligence. His main contribution was to define consciousness by what he called ‘the imitation game’,fn3 often referred to as ‘the Turing test’. The basic idea is that if someone interrogates a machine and cannot tell from the answers whether the responses are coming from a computer or
…
defined as conscious. Some people object that just because a computer may convincingly simulate the appearance of consciousness doesn’t mean it is conscious; the Turing test attributes consciousness purely by analogy. But isn’t that precisely what we do all the time in relation to other human beings? Descartes famously wrote
by Ray Kurzweil · 13 Nov 2012 · 372pp · 101,174 words
messages.13 Turing felt that all of human intelligence was embodied and represented in language, and that no machine could pass a Turing test through simple language tricks. Although the Turing test is a game involving written language, Turing believed that the only way that a computer could pass it would be for it
…
these forms of information in a true test of intelligence. Yet I agree with Turing’s original insight that the text-only version of the Turing test is sufficient. Adding visual or auditory input or output to the test would not actually make it more difficult to pass. One does not need
…
remember who she is for subsequent requests.) Tracking all of the information in a conversation—a task that would clearly be required to pass the Turing test—is a significant additional requirement but not fundamentally more difficult than what Watson is doing already. After all, Watson has read hundreds of millions of
…
other thinkers, is another matter. Doing so would constitute a higher-level task than Watson is capable of today—it is what I call a Turing test–level task. (That being said, I will point out that most humans do not come up with their own original thoughts either but copy the
…
ideas of their peers and opinion leaders.) At any rate, this is 2012, not 2029, so I would not expect Turing test–level intelligence yet. On yet another hand, I would point out that evaluating the answers to questions such as finding key ideas in a novel
…
largely assigned our personal, social, and historical memories to them. Although I’m not prepared to move up my prediction of a computer passing the Turing test by 2029, the progress that has been achieved in systems like Watson should give anyone substantial confidence that the advent of Turing-level AI is
…
close at hand. If one were to create a version of Watson that was optimized for the Turing test, it would probably come pretty close. American philosopher John Searle (born in 1932) argued recently that Watson is not capable of thinking. Citing his “Chinese
…
neocortex has enabled us to sublimate them. Watson’s goal was to respond to Jeopardy! queries. Another simply stated goal could be to pass the Turing test. To do so, a digital brain would need a human narrative of its own fictional story so that it can pretend to be a biological
…
to turn a computer into a brain. Alan Turing introduced this goal in his 1950 paper “Computing Machinery and Intelligence,” which includes his now-famous Turing test for ascertaining whether or not an AI has achieved a human level of intelligence. In 1956 von Neumann began preparing a series of lectures intended
…
, and my prediction is that the consensus in society will accept them as well. Note that this definition extends beyond entities that can pass the Turing test, which requires mastery of human language. The latter are sufficiently humanlike that I would include them, and I believe that most of society will as
…
well, but I also include entities that evidence humanlike emotional reactions but may not be able to pass the Turing test—for example, young children. Does this resolve the philosophical question of who is conscious, at least for myself and others who accept this particular leap
…
destruction, and may not have a need for the emotions we see in humans or in any biological creature. Perhaps they could still pass the Turing test, or perhaps they wouldn’t even be willing to try. We do in fact build robots today that do not have a sense of self
…
discussion of the issue of consciousness I noted that my own leap of faith is that I would consider a computer that passed a valid Turing test to be conscious. The best chatbots are not able to do that today (although they are steadily improving), so my conclusion with regard to consciousness
…
answer questions in Chinese. Searle compares this to a computer and concludes that a computer that could answer questions in Chinese (essentially passing a Chinese Turing test) would, like the man in the Chinese room, have no real understanding of the language and no consciousness of what it was doing. There are
…
. It appears to me that many critics will not be satisfied until computers routinely pass the Turing test, but even that threshold will not be clear-cut. Undoubtedly, there will be controversy as to whether claimed Turing tests that have been administered are valid. Indeed, I will probably be among those critics disparaging early
…
claims along these lines. By the time the arguments about the validity of a computer passing the Turing test do settle down, computers will have long since surpassed unenhanced human intelligence. My emphasis here is on the word “unenhanced,” because enhancement is precisely the
…
, 273, 280 invariance and, 197 memory requirements of, 196–97 parallel processing in, 197 processing speed in, 195–96 redundancy in, 197 singularity and, 194 Turing test and, 159–60, 169, 170, 178, 191, 213, 214, 233, 276, 298n von Neumann on, 191–95 see also neocortex, digital brain, mammalian: hierarchical thinking
…
–60, 185, 191 thought experiments of, 185–87, 188 unsolvable problem theorem of, 187, 207–8 Turing machine, 185–87, 186, 188, 192, 207–8 Turing test, 159–60, 169, 170, 178, 191, 213, 214, 233, 276, 298n UIMA (Unstructured Information Management Architecture), 167–68 Ulam, Stan, 194 Unitarianism, 222 universality of
by Jimmy Soni and Rob Goodman · 17 Jul 2017 · 415pp · 114,840 words
of the last thing to be putting up a fight.” While Shannon did not expect a computer to pass the famous, and famously open-ended, Turing Test—a machine indistinguishably mimicking a human—within his lifetime, in 1984 he did propose a set of more discrete goals for artificial intelligence. Computer scientists
…
Turing, Alan, xiii, 42–43, 99, 150 cryptography and, 103–6 CS’s friendship with, 104, 106–9 death of, 109 Turing Machines, 103, 106 Turing Test, 209 “Turk, The” (hoax), 210–11, 212 Turkey, 261 Tuxedo Park laboratory, 93 U-boats, 167 Ultimate Machine, xv, 207, 278 uncertainty, in information theory
by John MacCormick and Chris Bishop · 27 Dec 2011 · 250pp · 73,574 words
computer could masquerade as a human. The paper introduced a scientific way of evaluating the similarity between computers and humans, known these days as a “Turing test.” But in a less well-known passage of the same paper, Turing directly analyzed the possibility of modeling a human brain using a computer. He
…
data transaction: abort; atomic; in a database; on the internet; rollback travel agent Traveling Salesman Problem trick, definition of TroubleMaker.exe Turing, Alan Turing machine Turing test TV Twain, Mark twenty questions, game of twenty-questions trick two-dimensional parity. See parity two-phase commit U.S. Civil War Ullman, Jeffrey D
by Benjamin H. Bratton · 19 Feb 2016 · 903pp · 235,753 words
has Turing's later conceptualization of “thinking machines,” verified by their ability to convincingly simulate the performance of human-to-human interaction, the so-called Turing test.8 In the decades since Turing's logic machine, computation-in-theory became computers-in-practice, and the digitalization of formal systems into mechanical systems
…
high-speed trading algorithms that even their programmers cannot entirely predict and comprehend). The forms of inhuman intelligence that they manifest will never pass the Turing test, nor should we bother asking this of them. It is an absurd and primitive request.18 It is inevitable that synthetic algorithmic intelligences can and
…
(September 2012). 17. Luciana Parisi, Contagious Architecture: Computation, Aesthetics, and Space (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013). 18. See my editorial “Outing A.I.: Beyond the Turing Test,” New York Times, February 23, 2015. 19. To me this is the purchase of the Promethean accelerationism of Reza Negarastani and Ray Brassier. See Brassier
…
unclear for everyday human-robotic interaction whether one is encountering a fully autonomous, partially autonomous, or completely human-piloted synthetic intelligence. Everyday interactions replay the Turing test over and over. Is there a person behind this machine, and if so how much? In time, the answer will matter less, and the postulation
…
(The Real-Time Operating system Nucleus) (Sakamura), 59–61 Tsar Bomba, 182 Tsiolkovsky, Konstantin, 328 tungsten (wolframite), 82 Turing, Alan, 78–80, 262, 388n5, 389n9 Turing test, 78, 81, 362 Turkey, 403n63 Twitter, 401n47, 403n63, 428n58 2001: A Space Odyssey, 319 Typhoon Morakot, 96 Uber, 308 ubiquitous computing, 198, 200–201, 203
by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne · 16 May 2011 · 561pp · 120,899 words
universities. Among that handful of men was Alan Mathison Turing, who would father the modern computer, computer science, software, artificial intelligence, the Turing machine, the Turing test—and the modern Bayesian revival. Turing had studied pure mathematics at Cambridge and Princeton, but his passion was bridging the gap between abstract logic and
…
for Britain’s atomic bomb. Working in Manchester, Turing pioneered the first computer software, gave the first lecture on computer intelligence, and devised his famous Turing Test: a computer is thinking if, after five minutes of questioning, a person cannot distinguish its responses from those of a human in the next room
…
of sequential analysis (obituary note on retired RAdm. Garret Lansing Schuyler). Amstat News (33:3). Epstein R, Robert G, Beber G., eds. (2008) Parsing the Turing Test: Philosophical and Methodical Issues in the Quest for the Thinking Computer. Springer. Erskine, Ralph. (October 2006) The Poles reveal their secrets: Alastair Denniston’s account
by Daniel C. Dennett · 7 Feb 2017 · 573pp · 157,767 words
a term means unless we can define an operation that we can use to determine when it applies to something. Some have declared that the Turing Test is to be taken as an operationalist definition of intelligence. The “operationalist sleight of hand” that Searle warns against is the claim that we really
…
deserve an A+ in any case!) Then how about the task of simply having a sensible conversation with a human being? This is the classic Turing Test, and it really can separate the wheat from the chaff, the sheep from the goats, quite definitively. Watson may beat Ken Jennings and Brad Rutter
…
lists of known side effects whenever they advertise a new drug on television). Contests to expose the limits of comprehension, along the lines of the Turing Test, might be a good innovation, encouraging people to take pride in their ability to suss out the fraudulence in a machine the same way they
…
” (1984c) that can be found on my website: http://ase.tufts.edu/cogstud/dennett/recent.html. 395Turing Test. For an analysis and defense of the Turing Test as a test of genuine comprehension, see my “Can Machines Think?” (1985), reprinted in Brainchildren, with two postscripts (1985) and (1997); “Fast Thinking” in The
…
imagination. I discuss the prospects of such a powerful theory or model of an intelligent agent, and point out a key ambiguity in the original Turing Test, in an interview with Jimmy So about the implications of Her, in “Can Robots Fall in Love” (2013), The Daily Beast, http://www.thedailybeast.com
…
natural selection in, 385 plasticity and, 164–65 self-revision and, 158 symbolists and, 384–85 top-down approach to, 195n Turing and, 56, 72 Turing Test in, 395–96 working assumptions of, 156 artists, tradition and, 377 Aspects of the Novel (Forster), 345–46 Aspen groves, 144–45, 146 Asperger’s
…
, 58–59 inversion of reasoning by, 4, 55–56, 57–58, 68–69, 75, 162, 411 Pilot ACE computer of, 59 Turing-compatibility, 55–56 Turing Test, 365n, 395–96, 403 types, tokens vs., 182–83, 186–87, 200 typos, 321 Uexküll, Jakob von, 78–79 Umwelt, 88, 98–99, 122, 125
by Paul J. Nahin · 27 Oct 2012 · 229pp · 67,599 words
by Rizwan Virk · 31 Mar 2019 · 315pp · 89,861 words
by Stuart Russell · 7 Oct 2019 · 416pp · 112,268 words
by Tyler Cowen · 11 Sep 2013 · 291pp · 81,703 words
by Jaron Lanier · 12 Jan 2010 · 224pp · 64,156 words
by Lance Fortnow · 30 Mar 2013 · 236pp · 50,763 words
by Daniel Susskind · 14 Jan 2020 · 419pp · 109,241 words
by Dennis Yi Tenen · 6 Feb 2024 · 169pp · 41,887 words
by Sonja Thiel and Johannes C. Bernhardt · 31 Dec 2023 · 321pp · 113,564 words
by George Zarkadakis · 7 Mar 2016 · 405pp · 117,219 words
by Stross, Charles · 22 Jan 2005 · 489pp · 148,885 words
by Chris Bernhardt · 12 May 2016 · 210pp · 62,771 words
by Brian Christian · 1 Mar 2011 · 370pp · 94,968 words
by Noam Chomsky · 16 Apr 2007
by Geoff Cox and Alex McLean · 9 Nov 2012
by Daniel C. Dennett · 15 Jan 1995 · 846pp · 232,630 words
by Cade Metz · 15 Mar 2021 · 414pp · 109,622 words
by M. Mitchell Waldrop · 14 Apr 2001
by Kenneth Payne · 16 Jun 2021 · 339pp · 92,785 words
by Jerry Kaplan · 3 Aug 2015 · 237pp · 64,411 words
by Byron Reese · 23 Apr 2018 · 294pp · 96,661 words
by Jeffrey D. Sachs · 2 Jun 2020
by Jeff Hawkins and Sandra Blakeslee · 1 Jan 2004 · 246pp · 81,625 words
by Luke Dormehl · 10 Aug 2016 · 252pp · 74,167 words
by Melanie Mitchell · 14 Oct 2019 · 350pp · 98,077 words
by Howard Rheingold · 14 May 2000 · 352pp · 120,202 words
by Martin Ford · 28 May 2011 · 261pp · 10,785 words
by David Deutsch · 30 Jun 2011 · 551pp · 174,280 words
by Ed Finn · 10 Mar 2017 · 285pp · 86,853 words
by Charles Petzold · 28 Sep 1999 · 566pp · 122,184 words
by Henry A Kissinger, Eric Schmidt and Daniel Huttenlocher · 2 Nov 2021 · 194pp · 57,434 words
by Frank Pasquale · 14 May 2020 · 1,172pp · 114,305 words
by David Golumbia · 31 Mar 2009 · 268pp · 109,447 words
by Tim Berners-Lee · 8 Sep 2025 · 347pp · 100,038 words
by Keith Houston · 22 Aug 2023 · 405pp · 105,395 words
by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson · 15 May 2023 · 619pp · 177,548 words
by Steven Johnson · 329pp · 88,954 words
by Jeanette Winterson · 15 Mar 2021 · 256pp · 73,068 words
by Peter Seibel · 22 Jun 2009 · 1,201pp · 233,519 words
by Paul Sen · 16 Mar 2021 · 444pp · 111,837 words
by Jim Holt · 14 May 2018 · 436pp · 127,642 words
by Jeff Hawkins · 15 Nov 2021 · 253pp · 84,238 words
by Scott J. Shapiro · 523pp · 154,042 words
by Max More and Natasha Vita-More · 4 Mar 2013 · 798pp · 240,182 words
by Yuval Noah Harari · 1 Mar 2015 · 479pp · 144,453 words
by Ray Kurzweil · 31 Dec 1998 · 696pp · 143,736 words
by John Brockman · 5 Oct 2015 · 481pp · 125,946 words
by Martin Ford · 16 Nov 2018 · 586pp · 186,548 words
by Sherry Turkle · 11 Jan 2011 · 542pp · 161,731 words
by Calum Chace · 4 Feb 2014 · 345pp · 104,404 words
by Lane Greene · 15 Dec 2018 · 284pp · 84,169 words
by Richard Bookstaber · 1 May 2017 · 293pp · 88,490 words
by Brett King · 5 May 2016 · 385pp · 111,113 words
by James Bridle · 6 Apr 2022 · 502pp · 132,062 words
by Christopher Summerfield · 11 Mar 2025 · 412pp · 122,298 words
by Martin Ford · 13 Sep 2021 · 288pp · 86,995 words
by Anthony Berglas, William Black, Samantha Thalind, Max Scratchmann and Michelle Estes · 28 Feb 2015
by Amy Webb · 5 Mar 2019 · 340pp · 97,723 words
by Noam Chomsky · 4 Dec 2003
by Steven Johnson · 15 Nov 2016 · 322pp · 88,197 words
by Walter Isaacson · 6 Oct 2014 · 720pp · 197,129 words
by John Brockman · 19 Feb 2019 · 339pp · 94,769 words
by Robert Skidelsky Nan Craig · 15 Mar 2020
by Meredith Broussard · 19 Apr 2018 · 245pp · 83,272 words
by Robert Elliott Smith · 26 Jun 2019 · 370pp · 107,983 words
by Scott Rosenberg · 2 Jan 2006 · 394pp · 118,929 words
by Pedro Domingos · 21 Sep 2015 · 396pp · 117,149 words
by Michael Wooldridge · 2 Nov 2018 · 346pp · 97,890 words
by Erik J. Larson · 5 Apr 2021
by Thierry Bardini · 1 Dec 2000
by Ray Kurzweil · 14 Jul 2005 · 761pp · 231,902 words
by James Barrat · 30 Sep 2013 · 294pp · 81,292 words
by Ethan Mollick · 2 Apr 2024 · 189pp · 58,076 words
by Mustafa Suleyman · 4 Sep 2023 · 444pp · 117,770 words
by Mo Gawdat · 29 Sep 2021 · 259pp · 84,261 words
by Stuart Russell and Peter Norvig · 14 Jul 2019 · 2,466pp · 668,761 words
by Noam Chomsky · 1 Jan 1966
by Jaron Lanier · 6 May 2013 · 510pp · 120,048 words
by Andy Kessler · 13 Jun 2005 · 218pp · 63,471 words
by William Davidow and Michael Malone · 18 Feb 2020 · 304pp · 80,143 words
by Ray Kurzweil · 25 Jun 2024
by Don Tapscott and Alex Tapscott · 9 May 2016 · 515pp · 126,820 words
by Calum Chace · 28 Jul 2015 · 144pp · 43,356 words
by Neil A. Gershenfeld · 15 Feb 1999 · 238pp · 46 words
by Joanna Walsh · 22 Sep 2025 · 255pp · 80,203 words
by Nicole Kobie · 3 Jul 2024 · 348pp · 119,358 words
by Nouriel Roubini · 17 Oct 2022 · 328pp · 96,678 words
by Timothy Morton · 14 Oct 2017 · 225pp · 70,180 words
by Stephen Baker · 17 Feb 2011 · 238pp · 77,730 words
by Garry Kasparov · 1 May 2017 · 331pp · 104,366 words
by Kim Stanley Robinson · 22 May 2012 · 561pp · 167,631 words
by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb · 16 Apr 2018 · 345pp · 75,660 words
by Noam Chomsky · 7 Dec 2015
by Peter Gutmann
by Steven Pinker · 1 Jan 1994 · 661pp · 187,613 words
by Anil Seth · 29 Aug 2021 · 418pp · 102,597 words
by Marcus Du Sautoy · 7 Mar 2019 · 337pp · 103,522 words
by Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie · 1 Mar 2018
by Michael Harris · 6 Aug 2014 · 259pp · 73,193 words
by Orly Lobel · 17 Oct 2022 · 370pp · 112,809 words
by Brian Clegg · 8 Dec 2015 · 315pp · 92,151 words
by Paul Scharre · 23 Apr 2018 · 590pp · 152,595 words
by Cory Doctorow · 15 Sep 2008 · 189pp · 57,632 words
by Susan Schneider · 1 Oct 2019 · 331pp · 47,993 words
by Adam Becker · 14 Jun 2025 · 381pp · 119,533 words
by Eric Siegel · 19 Feb 2013 · 502pp · 107,657 words
by Harry Harrison and Marvin Minsky · 2 Jan 1992 · 532pp · 140,406 words
by Jacob Turner · 29 Oct 2018 · 688pp · 147,571 words
by Keach Hagey · 19 May 2025 · 439pp · 125,379 words
by Karen Hao · 19 May 2025 · 660pp · 179,531 words
by Jimmy Soni · 22 Feb 2022 · 505pp · 161,581 words
by David de Cremer · 25 May 2020 · 241pp · 70,307 words
by Gordon Bell and Jim Gemmell · 15 Feb 2009 · 291pp · 77,596 words
by James Vlahos · 1 Mar 2019 · 392pp · 108,745 words
by Anders Lisdorf
by Jeff Booth · 14 Jan 2020 · 180pp · 55,805 words
by John Markoff · 24 Aug 2015 · 413pp · 119,587 words
by John Markoff · 1 Jan 2005 · 394pp · 108,215 words
by Ben Goertzel and Pei Wang · 1 Jan 2007 · 303pp · 67,891 words
by Nick Bostrom · 26 Mar 2024 · 547pp · 173,909 words
by Adrienne Mayor · 27 Nov 2018
by Richard Susskind and Daniel Susskind · 24 Aug 2015 · 742pp · 137,937 words
by Kariappa Bheemaiah · 26 Feb 2017 · 492pp · 118,882 words
by Gardner Dozois · 23 Jun 2009 · 1,263pp · 371,402 words
by Ed West · 19 Mar 2020 · 530pp · 147,851 words
by Justin E. H. Smith · 22 Mar 2022 · 198pp · 59,351 words
by Kim Stanley Robinson · 6 Jul 2015 · 488pp · 148,340 words
by Erik Brynjolfsson · 23 Jan 2012 · 72pp · 21,361 words
by Noam Chomsky · 16 Sep 2015
by Tim Harford · 3 Oct 2016 · 349pp · 95,972 words
by Richard Yonck · 7 Mar 2017 · 360pp · 100,991 words
by Gardner R. Dozois · 1 Jan 2005 · 1,280pp · 384,105 words
by Nate Silver · 12 Aug 2024 · 848pp · 227,015 words
by Richard Watson · 1 Jan 2008
by P. W. Singer · 1 Jan 2010 · 797pp · 227,399 words
by Tom Chivers · 12 Jun 2019 · 289pp · 92,714 words
by Steven Bird, Ewan Klein and Edward Loper · 15 Dec 2009 · 504pp · 89,238 words
by Nicholas Carr · 5 Sep 2016 · 391pp · 105,382 words
by Bill Gates, Nathan Myhrvold and Peter Rinearson · 15 Nov 1995 · 317pp · 101,074 words
by James D. Miller · 14 Jun 2012 · 377pp · 97,144 words
by Nassim Nicholas Taleb · 1 Jan 2001 · 111pp · 1 words
by Francesco Cesarini · 496pp · 70,263 words
by John E. Kelly Iii · 23 Sep 2013 · 118pp · 35,663 words
by Stross, Charles · 1 Jan 2002
by Cory Efram Doctorow, Jonathan Coulton and Russell Galen · 7 Dec 2010 · 549pp · 116,200 words
by Craig Lambert · 30 Apr 2015 · 229pp · 72,431 words
by Richard Watson · 5 Nov 2013 · 219pp · 63,495 words
by David Sumpter · 18 Jun 2018 · 276pp · 81,153 words
by Ryan Mitchell · 14 Jun 2015 · 255pp · 78,207 words
by Carl Benedikt Frey · 17 Jun 2019 · 626pp · 167,836 words
by Rob Reich, Mehran Sahami and Jeremy M. Weinstein · 6 Sep 2021
by Marcus Du Sautoy · 18 May 2016
by Douglas Rushkoff · 22 Jan 2019 · 196pp · 54,339 words
by Kai-Fu Lee and Qiufan Chen · 13 Sep 2021
by Jaron Lanier · 21 Nov 2017 · 480pp · 123,979 words
by Thierry Poibeau · 14 Sep 2017 · 174pp · 56,405 words
by Pistono, Federico · 14 Oct 2012 · 245pp · 64,288 words
by Eric Topol · 6 Jan 2015 · 588pp · 131,025 words
by Lisa Gitelman · 26 Mar 2014
by Neal Stephenson · 3 Jun 2019 · 993pp · 318,161 words
by John Seely Brown and Paul Duguid · 2 Feb 2000 · 791pp · 85,159 words
by Yuval Noah Harari · 9 Sep 2024 · 566pp · 169,013 words
by Stuart Armstrong · 1 Feb 2014 · 48pp · 12,437 words
by Clint Watts · 28 May 2018 · 324pp · 96,491 words
by William Poundstone · 3 Jun 2019 · 283pp · 81,376 words
by Christopher Mims · 13 Sep 2021 · 385pp · 112,842 words
by Adrian Hon · 5 Oct 2020 · 340pp · 101,675 words
by Timothy Garton Ash · 23 May 2016 · 743pp · 201,651 words
by Robin Hanson · 31 Mar 2016 · 589pp · 147,053 words
by Ben Goldacre · 22 Oct 2014 · 467pp · 116,094 words
by Michael Schrenk · 19 Aug 2009 · 371pp · 78,103 words
by Brian Merchant · 19 Jun 2017 · 416pp · 129,308 words
by Cory Doctorow and Charles Stross · 3 Sep 2012 · 311pp · 94,732 words
by Michal Zalewski · 26 Nov 2011 · 570pp · 115,722 words
by Derek Künsken · 1 Oct 2018 · 430pp · 107,765 words
by John Markoff · 22 Mar 2022 · 573pp · 142,376 words
by Michael Spitzer · 31 Mar 2021 · 632pp · 163,143 words
by Francis Fukuyama · 1 Jan 2002 · 350pp · 96,803 words
by Jamie Bartlett · 20 Aug 2014 · 267pp · 82,580 words
by Dariusz Jemielniak and Aleksandra Przegalinska · 18 Feb 2020 · 187pp · 50,083 words
by Robin Chase · 14 May 2015 · 330pp · 91,805 words
by Vivek Wadhwa and Alex Salkever · 2 Apr 2017 · 181pp · 52,147 words
by Astronaut Ron Garan and Muhammad Yunus · 2 Feb 2015
by Yolande Strengers and Jenny Kennedy · 14 Apr 2020
by Jeremy Lent · 22 May 2017 · 789pp · 207,744 words
by Vauhini Vara · 8 Apr 2025 · 301pp · 105,209 words
by Viktor Mayer-Schonberger and Kenneth Cukier · 5 Mar 2013 · 304pp · 82,395 words
by Rosa Brooks · 8 Aug 2016 · 548pp · 147,919 words
by Chris Beckett · 1 Jan 2012 · 425pp · 131,000 words
by James Patrick Kelly and John Kessel · 30 Sep 2007 · 571pp · 162,958 words
by Frankie Boyle · 20 Jul 2022 · 286pp · 86,480 words
by Kim Stanley Robinson · 6 Jul 1987 · 607pp · 185,228 words
by Eric Voskuil, James Chiang and Amir Taaki · 28 Feb 2020 · 365pp · 56,751 words
by Jim Al-Khalili · 17 Apr 2019 · 381pp · 120,361 words
by Ronald J. Deibert · 13 May 2013 · 317pp · 98,745 words
by Heather Adkins, Betsy Beyer, Paul Blankinship, Ana Oprea, Piotr Lewandowski and Adam Stubblefield · 29 Mar 2020 · 1,380pp · 190,710 words
by Dafydd Stuttard and Marcus Pinto · 30 Sep 2007 · 1,302pp · 289,469 words
by Alastair Reynolds · 2 Jan 2007 · 764pp · 188,807 words
by Matthew A. Russell · 15 Jan 2011 · 541pp · 109,698 words
by Peter H. Diamandis and Steven Kotler · 3 Feb 2015 · 368pp · 96,825 words
by Dipanjan Sarkar · 1 Dec 2016
by Daniel J. Levitin · 18 Aug 2014 · 685pp · 203,949 words
by Nathan Schneider · 10 Sep 2018 · 326pp · 91,559 words
by Eileen Ormsby · 1 Nov 2014 · 269pp · 79,285 words
by Douglas Rushkoff · 21 Mar 2013 · 323pp · 95,939 words
by Annie Lowrey · 10 Jul 2018 · 242pp · 73,728 words
by Douglas Rushkoff · 1 Mar 2016 · 366pp · 94,209 words
by Satyajit Das · 14 Oct 2011 · 741pp · 179,454 words
by Eric M. Jackson · 15 Jan 2004 · 398pp · 108,889 words
by Rowan Hooper · 15 Jan 2020 · 285pp · 86,858 words
by Jacob Silverman · 17 Mar 2015 · 527pp · 147,690 words
by Illah Reza Nourbakhsh · 1 Mar 2013
by Bruce Schneier · 7 Feb 2023 · 306pp · 82,909 words
by William Hertling · 9 Apr 2014 · 247pp · 71,698 words
by Jacob Ward · 25 Jan 2022 · 292pp · 94,660 words
by Jim Blandy and Jason Orendorff · 21 Nov 2017 · 1,331pp · 183,137 words