correlation coefficient

back to index

125 results

The Hunger Code: How to Reset Your Body's Fat Thermostat by Breaking the Ultra-Processed Food Habit

by Jason Fung  · 3 Mar 2026  · 284pp  · 76,656 words

.9% Ireland 3851 30.8% Belgium 3824 22% Turkey 3762 34.2% Austria 3739 17% Germany 3648 24.2% Italy 3621 21.6% Correlation coefficient 0.6 The correlation coefficient shows us the strength of the relationship between the two variables (calories eaten and obesity rate). While the correlation is positive, meaning that the

Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class

by Charles Murray  · 28 Jan 2020  · 741pp  · 199,502 words

it becomes obvious why merchandisers should care deeply about the personalities of their customers.”9 They offered a new set of guidelines based on the correlation coefficient (r). In the summary that follows, I have replaced the value of r with the equivalent value of Cohen’s d. The authors argued that

size of the gender difference should be negative (the effect sizes should be smaller for more egalitarian or developed societies). The table below shows the correlation coefficients from the Lippa study after controlling for age and education. Index of national development: UN Gender Development Index Correlation after adjusting for age and education

. Let’s return to our running example, height. If you divide a perfectly random assortment of people into two groups and correlate their heights, the correlation coefficient will be around zero. If the assortment of people consists instead of pairs of half siblings, the correlation will be around +.25. For full siblings

to best reflect this upward-sloping trend. Now continue to read and see how well you have intuitively produced the basis for a correlation coefficient and a regression coefficient. The Correlation Coefficient Modern statistics provide more than one method for measuring correlation, but we confine ourselves to the one that is most important in

both use and generality: the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (named after Karl Pearson, the English mathematician and biometrician). To get at this coefficient, let us first replot the graph of the class, replacing inches

. The variables are now expressed in general terms. Remember: Any set of measurements can be transformed similarly. The next step on our way to the correlation coefficient is to apply a formula that finds the best possible straight line passing through the cloud of points—the mathematically “best” version of the line

250 18-year-old males is identical to the third decimal place with the relationship among all 6,068 males in the NLSY sample (the correlation coefficient is .501 in both cases). This is closer than we have any right to expect, but other random samples of only 250 generally produce correlations

would go downhill for pairs of variables that are negatively correlated. We focus on the slope of the best-fitting line because it is the correlation coefficient—in this case, equal to .50, which is quite large by the standards of variables used by social scientists. The closer it gets to ±1

best-fitting line is horizontal; hence its slope is 0. Anything other than 0 signifies a relationship, albeit possibly a very weak one. Whatever the correlation coefficient of a pair of variables is, squaring it yields another notable number. Squaring .50, for example, gives .25. The significance of the squared correlation is

original axes—inches and pounds—instead of standardizing them, the slope of the best-fitting line would have been a regression coefficient, rather than a correlation coefficient. For example, the regression coefficient for weight regressed on height tells us that for each additional inch in height, we can expect an increase of

Corporate Finance: Theory and Practice

by Pierre Vernimmen, Pascal Quiry, Maurizio Dallocchio, Yann le Fur and Antonio Salvi  · 16 Oct 2017  · 1,544pp  · 391,691 words

and Criteo fluctuate together. It is equal to: Here, pi,j is the probability of joint occurrence and rH,C is the correlation coefficient of returns offered by Heineken and Criteo. The correlation coefficient is a number between −1 (returns 100% inversely proportional to each other) and 1 (returns 100% proportional to each other

). Correlation coefficients are usually positive, as most stocks rise together in a bullish market and fall together in a bearish market. By plugging the variables back into

stocks are positively correlated with each other, having both together in a portfolio creates a less risky profile than investing in them individually. Only a correlation coefficient of 1 creates a portfolio risk that is equal to the average of its component risks. CORRELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT STOCK MARKETS (2011–2017) Brazil China

markets still bring diversification and are more correlated among themselves than with developed countries. However, sector diversification is still highly efficient thanks to the low correlation coefficients among different industries: CORRELATION BETWEEN ECONOMIC SECTORS WORLDWIDE (2011–2017) Sector Banks Automotive Pharmaceuticals & Biotech. Oil & Gas Construction Web Energy Agriculture & Food chain Retailing Metals

measured in relation to the market portfolio? Above all, what is the market portfolio? To begin, it is useful to study the impact of the correlation coefficient on diversification. Again, the same two securities will be analysed: Criteo (C) and Heineken (H). By varying ρH,C between −1 and +1, we obtain

.8 12.3 13.5 14.7 15.3 17.0 Note the following caveats: If Criteo and Heineken were perfectly correlated (i.e. the correlation coefficient was 1), then diversification would have no effect. All possible portfolios would lie on a line linking the risk/return point of Criteo with that

of Heineken. Risk would increase in direct proportion to Criteo’s stock added. If the two stocks were perfectly inversely correlated (correlation coefficient −1), then diversification would be total. However, there is little chance of this occurring, as both companies are exposed to the same economic conditions. Generally

speaking, Criteo and Heineken are positively, but imperfectly, correlated and diversification is based on the desired amount of risk. With a fixed correlation coefficient of 0.3, there are portfolios that offer different returns at the same level of risk. Thus, a portfolio consisting of two-thirds Heineken and

shows the same risk (10%) as a portfolio consisting of just Heineken, but returns 8.3% vs. only 6% for Heineken. As long as the correlation coefficient is below 1, diversification will be efficient. There is no reason for an investor to choose a given combination if another offers a better (efficient

average risk of the shares making up that portfolio. This happens because returns on shares do not all vary to exactly the same degree, since correlation coefficients are rarely equal to 1. As a result, some portfolios will deliver better returns than others. Those portfolios that are located on the portion of

? Security A carries little risk and security B has great risk. Which would you choose if you wanted to take the least risk possible? The correlation coefficient between French equities and European equities developed as follows: Years 1970–1979 1980–1989 1990–1999 2000–2009 Coefficient 0.43 0.42 0.73

reflects advances in European integration and globalisation, which both increase the synchronisation of economies. No, as long as correlation coefficients remain lower than 1, although they are now very close. Yes. Steel, because correlation coefficients with the other sectors are lower. A risk-free asset. There must be no doubts about the solvency of

investment covenant clauses corporate managers corporate profitability analysis corporate purgatory corporate risk corporate strategy corporate structure choice corporate value at risk corporate ventures corporation concept correlation coefficients diversification portfolio risk cost(s) accruals agency theory bank loans/bonds bankruptcy breakeven point control measures convertible bonds financial distress income statement formats intangible fixed

Topics in Market Microstructure

by Ilija I. Zovko  · 1 Nov 2008  · 119pp  · 10,356 words

have discrete ternary values. Later in the text we use a bootstrap approach to test the significance. Now, however, we test the significance of the correlation coefficients using a standard algorithm as in ref. (Best and Roberts, 1975). The algorithm calculates the approximate tail probabilities for Spearman’s

correlation coefficient ρ. Its precision unfortunately degrades when there are ties in the data, which is the case here. With this caveat in mind, as a preliminary

test, we find that, for example, for on-book trading in Vodafone for the month of May 2000, 10.3% of all correlation coefficients are significant at the 5% level. Averaging over all stocks and months, the average percentage of significant coefficients for on-book trading is 10.5

a 5% acceptance level of the test. 4.2 Significance and structure in the correlation matrices The preliminary result of the previous section that some correlation coefficients are non-random is further corroborated by testing for non-random structure in the correlation matrices. The hypothesis that there is structure in the correlation

satisfying the properties of being a metric is (Bonanno et al., 2000) # (4.2) di,j = 2 · (1 − ρi,j ), where ρi,j is the correlation coefficient between strategies i and j. We have tried several reasonable modifications to this form but without obvious differences in the results. Ultimately the choice of

four market imbalance variables and price returns. The diagonal shows the histogram. Values in the matrix below the diagonal are the absolute values of the correlation coefficients between the corresponding variables. The font size is proportional to the value of the coefficient. In the plots above the diagonal, we show scatter plots

The Art of Statistics: How to Learn From Data

by David Spiegelhalter  · 2 Sep 2019  · 404pp  · 92,713 words

Scale 2.4 Reported Number of Lifetime Opposite-Sex Partners 2.5 Survival Rates Against Number of Operations in Child Heart Surgery 2.6 Pearson Correlation Coefficients of 0 2.7 World Population Trends 2.8 Relative Increase in Population by Country 2.9 Popularity of the Name ‘David’ Over Time 2

summarize a steadily increasing or decreasing relationship between the pairs of numbers shown on a scatter-plot. This is generally chosen to be the Pearson correlation coefficient, an idea originally proposed by Francis Galton but formally published in 1895 by Karl Pearson, one of the founders of modern statistics.* A Pearson correlation

the points are closer to an increasing curve than a straight line. Figure 2.6 Two sets of (fictitious) data-points for which the Pearson correlation coefficients are both 0. This clearly does not mean there is no relationship between the two variables being plotted. From Alberto Cairo’s wonderful Datasaurus Dozen4

−0.03, suggesting that there is no longer any clear relationship between the number of cases and survival rates. However, with so few hospitals the correlation coefficient can be very sensitive to individual data-points—if we remove the smallest hospital, which has a high survival rate, the Pearson correlation jumps to

0.42. Correlation coefficients are simply summaries of association, and cannot be used to conclude that there is definitely an underlying relationship between volume and survival rates, let alone

, an example of what is known as ascertainment bias in epidemiology. ‘Correlation Does Not Imply Causation’ We saw in the last chapter how Pearson’s correlation coefficient measures how close the points on a scatter-plot are to a straight line. When considering English hospitals conducting children’s heart surgery in the

. But we could not conclude that bigger hospitals caused the lower mortality. This cautious attitude has a long pedigree. When Karl Pearson’s newly developed correlation coefficient was being discussed in the journal Nature in 1900, a commentator warned that ‘correlation does not imply causation’. In the succeeding century this phrase has

.2 shows the correlations between parent and offspring heights, and the gradients of regression lines.* There is a simple relationship between the gradients, the Pearson correlation coefficient and the standard deviations of the variables.* In fact if the standard deviations of the independent and dependent variables are the same, then the gradient

is simply the Pearson correlation coefficient, which explains their similarity in Table 5.2. The meaning of these gradients depends completely on our assumptions about the relationship between the variables being

Jerzy Neyman, a brilliant Polish mathematician and statistician, and Egon Pearson, Karl Pearson’s son.* The work of deriving the necessary probability distributions of estimated correlation coefficients and regression coefficients had been going on for decades beforehand, and in standard academic statistics courses the mathematical details of these distributions would be provided

, a British psychologist who was renowned for his research on the heritability of IQ, was posthumously accused of fraud when it was found that the correlation coefficients he quoted for the IQ of twins who had been reared apart hardly changed over time in spite of a steadily increasing group of twins

, so that RSS = . The least-squares line is defined as the line that minimizes the residual sum of squares. – The gradient b1 and Pearson’s correlation coefficient r are related through the formula b1 = rsy / sx. So if the standard deviations of the xs and ys are the same, then the gradient

is exactly equal to the correlation coefficient. likelihood: a measure of the evidential support provided by data for particular parameter values. When a probability distribution for a random variable depends on a

to training data, so that its predictive ability starts to decline. parameters: the unknown quantities in a statistical model, generally denoted with Greek letters. Pearson correlation coefficient: for a set of n paired numbers, (x1, y1), (x2, y2)… (xn, yn), when , sx are the sample mean and standard deviation of the xs

, and , sy are the sample mean and standard deviation of the ys, the Pearson correlation coefficient is given by Suppose xs and ys have both been standardized to Z-scores given by us and vs respectively, so that ui = (xi − )/sx

, and vi = (yi − )/sy. Then the Pearson correlation coefficient can be expressed as , that is the ‘cross-product’ of the Z-scores. percentile (of a population): there is, for example, a 70% chance of

The Concepts and Practice of Mathematical Finance

by Mark S. Joshi  · 24 Dec 2003

((Yt - (Xrl) YS) - Xs 1))) = p(t - s). (11.5) As Yt - YS and Xtl) - XSl) both have variance t - s, this means that the correlation coefficient is p. Thus we have constructed a Brownian motion whose increments are correlated to those of X(1) with correlation p. More generally, we could

-dimensional Ito calculus: dWrj)dW(k) = pjkdt. To summarize, we have Theorem 11.1 (Multi-dimensional Ito lemma) Let Wtj) be correlated Brownian motions with correlation coefficient pjk between the Brownian motions WU) and Wtk). Let Xj be an Ito process with respect to Wt W. Let f be a smooth function

length of the resultant vector is IIv1112 + 2 cos(9)IIv111. i1v211 + IIv2112, where 9 is the angle between the vectors. If we interpret the correlation coefficient as being the cosine of the angle between the two Brownian motions, then this means that the new volatility is just the length of the

a geometric Brownian motion and compute its drift and volatility. Solution We write dXt = aXtdt + o XtdWW 1), dYt = ,BYtdt + vYdWt(2), and take the correlation coefficient to be p. We compute d(XtYt) = XtdYt + YtdXt + dXt.dYt, = XtYt (f3dt + vdW 2) + adt + vdWr 1) + avpdt) , = XtYt ((a +,B + QVp)dt + o

. Thus suppose we have j have assets Sj such that dSl = a Sldt+QjSjdW(i), (11.32) and WO) is correlated with W (k) with correlation coefficient pjk. We shift to a risk- neutral measure in which all the assets have drift r. Let the derivative be D. We set CD(T

-1 a1.j63,j(tj+1 - ti). (14.40) We can identify this sum as fo Ul(t)U3(t)dt. We conclude that the correlation coefficient of g3(T) - g3(0) and g1 (T) - gl(0) is fo U1(t)a2(t)dt (f T 61(t)2dt) Z (IT U2

). (C.22) It is therefore sometimes useful to strip out the size of X and Y by dividing by their standard deviations to get the correlation coefficient A(X Y) , Cov(X, Y) = Var(X)Var(Y) . (C.23) It can be shown that IE(XY)I < IJE(X)E(Y)I

Data Mining: Concepts, Models, Methods, and Algorithms

by Mehmed Kantardzić  · 2 Jan 2003  · 721pp  · 197,134 words

ranking is shown in the algorithm that is based on correlation criteria. Let us consider first the prediction of a continuous outcome y. The Pearson correlation coefficient is defined as: where cov designates the covariance and var the variance. The estimate of R(i) for the given data set with samples’ inputs

the linear regression equation). One parameter, which shows this strength of linear association between two variables by means of a single number, is called a correlation coefficient r. Its computation requires some intermediate results in a regression analysis. where The value of r is between −1 and 1. Negative values for r

as a measure. Based on the available data in Figure 4.3, we obtained intermediate results and the final correlation coefficient: A correlation coefficient r = 0.85 indicates a good linear relationship between two variables. Additional interpretation is possible. Because r2 = 0.72, we can say that approximately 72%

method to calculate the parameters α and β where y = α + β x. (b) Estimate the quality of the model obtained in (a) using the correlation coefficient r. (c) Use an appropriate nonlinear transformation (one of those represented in Table 5.3) to improve regression results. What is the equation for a

new, improved, and nonlinear model? Discuss a reduction of the correlation coefficient value. 5. A logit function, obtained through logistic regression, has the form: Find the probability of output values 0 and 1 for the following samples

-means k-medoids Incremental Using genetic algorithms Clustering tree Competitive learning rule Complete-link method Confidence Confirmatory visualization Confusion matrix Contingency table Control theory Core Correlation coefficient Correspondence analysis Cosine correlation Covariance matrix Crisp approximation Crossover Curse of dimensionality Data cleansing Data scrubbing Data collection Data constellations Data cube Data discovery Data

Outlier detection, distance based Overfitting (overtraining) PageRank algorithm Parabox Parallel coordinates Parameter identification Partially matched crossover (PMC) Partitional clustering Pattern Pattern association Pattern recognition Pearson correlation coefficient Perception Perceptron Pie chart Piecewise aggregate approximation (PAA) Pixel-oriented visualization Population Possibility measure Postpruning Prediction Predictive accuracy Predictive data mining Predictive regression Prepruning Principal

Beginning R: The Statistical Programming Language

by Mark Gardener  · 13 Jun 2012

yourself in the activity that follows. Simple Correlation Simple correlations are between two continuous variables and you can use the cor() command to obtain a correlation coefficient like so: > count = c(9, 25, 15, 2, 14, 25, 24, 47) > speed = c(2, 3, 5, 9, 14, 24, 29, 34) > cor(count, speed

the variables as the following example shows: > cor(women$height, women$weight) [1] 0.9954948 In this example the cor() command has calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient between the height and weight variables contained in the women data frame. You can also use the cor() command directly on a data frame (or

show the slope and intercept values that describe this relationship. The R squared value that you obtain from the regression is the square of the correlation coefficient from the Pearson correlation, which demonstrates the similarities between the methods. The result shows you the coefficients for the regression, that is, the intercept and

Beyond the Random Walk: A Guide to Stock Market Anomalies and Low Risk Investing

by Vijay Singal  · 15 Jun 2004  · 369pp  · 128,349 words

that do not behave like other stocks in your portfolio is good and can reduce risk. The correlation is measured by what is called a correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient varies between –1 and +1. The two stocks in the above example have a correlation of –1. Unfortunately, most stocks have a positive correlation

n ρn, p σp × E(Rp ) − R f  where E(R) is the return from an asset, s is the standard deviation, r is the correlation coefficient, and the subscripts n and p refer to the new stock and existing portfolio. Rf is the return on the risk-free asset. If the

is also 12 percent with a standard deviation of 18 percent. Since the U.S. markets and foreign markets are not well correlated, let the correlation coefficient be 0.60. Putting the U.S. stocks and the non-U.S. stocks in a 50-50 combination would generate a new world portfolio

. The correlation between the S&P 500 and the emerging markets is only 0.42. With the developed markets, the S&P 500 has a correlation coefficient of 0.58. Both of these correlations are quite low. Similarly, the emerging markets and the developed markets are not well correlated. On the other

above. BONDS CAN HELP WITH DIVERSIFICATION If the correlation among different assets is important for minimizing risk, then bonds should play a critical role. Some correlation coefficients are illustrative. Based on the 1971–98 period, the correlation between U.S. stocks and Swiss bonds is –0.03, 0.21 between International Investing

effect, 317n1 pricing, 307–8 collars in mergers, 198–99, 201, 216. See also mergers and acquisitions Cordis, 217 corporate releases. See news and announcements correlation coefficients, 234, 243–45 correlations between markets currency risks, 254 in “funds of funds,” 133n7 globalization, 243–45 international investing, 238– 39, 255 mutual fund mispricings

Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques: Concepts and Techniques

by Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber and Jian Pei  · 21 Jun 2011

implies the other, based on the available data. For nominal data, we use the χ2 (chi-square) test. For numeric attributes, we can use the correlation coefficient and covariance, both of which access how one attribute's values vary from those of another. χ2 Correlation Test for Nominal Data For nominal data

reject the hypothesis that gender and preferred_reading are independent and conclude that the two attributes are (strongly) correlated for the given group of people. Correlation Coefficient for Numeric Data For numeric attributes, we can evaluate the correlation between two attributes, A and B, by computing the

correlation coefficient (also known as Pearson's product moment coefficient, named after its inventer, Karl Pearson). This is(3.3) where n is the number of tuples,

and B, that is, and The covariance between A and B is defined as(3.4) If we compare Eq. (3.3) for rA, B (correlation coefficient) with Eq. (3.4) for covariance, we see that(3.5) where σA and σB are the standard deviations of A and B, respectively. It

age and body fat given in Exercise 2.4, answer the following:(a) Normalize the two attributes based on z-score normalization. (b) Calculate the correlation coefficient (Pearson's product moment coefficient). Are these two attributes positively or negatively correlated? Compute their covariance. 3.9 Suppose a group of 12 sales price

the correlation of a dimension to the cube value, the correlation between the dimension's values and their aggregated cube measures is computed. Pearson's correlation coefficient for numeric data and the χ2 correlation test for nominal data are popularly used correlation measures, although many other measures, such as covariance, can be

similar to our target user, u. Various approaches can be used to compute the similarity between users. The most popular approaches use either Pearson's correlation coefficient (Section 3.3.2) or cosine similarity (Section 2.4.7). A weighted aggregate can be used, which adjusts for the fact that different users

correlation analysis 94 discretization by 117 interestingness measures 264 with lift 266–267 nominal data 95–96 numeric data 96–97 redundancy and 94–98 correlation coefficient 94, 96 numeric data 96–97 correlation rules 265, 272 correlation-based clustering methods 511 correlations 18 cosine measure 268 cosine similarity 77 between two

significance 312 representative 309 search space 303 strongly negatively correlated 292 structural 282 type specification 15–23 unexpected 22see alsofrequent patterns pattern-trees 264 Pearson' correlation coefficient 222 percentiles 48 perception-based classification (PBC) 348 illustrated 349 as interactive visual approach 607 pixel-oriented approach 348–349 split screen 349 tree comparison

Analysis of Financial Time Series

by Ruey S. Tsay  · 14 Oct 2001

Advanced Stochastic Models, Risk Assessment, and Portfolio Optimization: The Ideal Risk, Uncertainty, and Performance Measures

by Frank J. Fabozzi  · 25 Feb 2008  · 923pp  · 163,556 words

Statistics in a Nutshell

by Sarah Boslaugh  · 10 Nov 2012

Empirical Market Microstructure: The Institutions, Economics and Econometrics of Securities Trading

by Joel Hasbrouck  · 4 Jan 2007  · 209pp  · 13,138 words

The Elements of Statistical Learning (Springer Series in Statistics)

by Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani and Jerome Friedman  · 25 Aug 2009  · 764pp  · 261,694 words

The Book of Why: The New Science of Cause and Effect

by Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie  · 1 Mar 2018

Triumph of the Optimists: 101 Years of Global Investment Returns

by Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton  · 3 Feb 2002  · 353pp  · 148,895 words

Statistics hacks

by Bruce Frey  · 9 May 2006  · 755pp  · 121,290 words

Stocks for the Long Run 5/E: the Definitive Guide to Financial Market Returns & Long-Term Investment Strategies

by Jeremy Siegel  · 7 Jan 2014  · 517pp  · 139,477 words

Commodity Trading Advisors: Risk, Performance Analysis, and Selection

by Greg N. Gregoriou, Vassilios Karavas, François-Serge Lhabitant and Fabrice Douglas Rouah  · 23 Sep 2004

Thinking, Fast and Slow

by Daniel Kahneman  · 24 Oct 2011  · 654pp  · 191,864 words

The Investopedia Guide to Wall Speak: The Terms You Need to Know to Talk Like Cramer, Think Like Soros, and Buy Like Buffett

by Jack (edited By) Guinan  · 27 Jul 2009  · 353pp  · 88,376 words

The Art of Statistics: Learning From Data

by David Spiegelhalter  · 14 Oct 2019  · 442pp  · 94,734 words

The Art of Computer Programming

by Donald Ervin Knuth  · 15 Jan 2001

The New Science of Asset Allocation: Risk Management in a Multi-Asset World

by Thomas Schneeweis, Garry B. Crowder and Hossein Kazemi  · 8 Mar 2010  · 317pp  · 106,130 words

Mathematics of the Financial Markets: Financial Instruments and Derivatives Modelling, Valuation and Risk Issues

by Alain Ruttiens  · 24 Apr 2013  · 447pp  · 104,258 words

Programming Collective Intelligence

by Toby Segaran  · 17 Dec 2008  · 519pp  · 102,669 words

Finding Alphas: A Quantitative Approach to Building Trading Strategies

by Igor Tulchinsky  · 30 Sep 2019  · 321pp

Hands-On Machine Learning With Scikit-Learn and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems

by Aurélien Géron  · 13 Mar 2017  · 1,331pp  · 163,200 words

Risk Management in Trading

by Davis Edwards  · 10 Jul 2014

Mastering Machine Learning With Scikit-Learn

by Gavin Hackeling  · 31 Oct 2014

Hands-On Machine Learning With Scikit-Learn, Keras, and TensorFlow: Concepts, Tools, and Techniques to Build Intelligent Systems

by Aurelien Geron  · 14 Aug 2019

The Mathematics of Banking and Finance

by Dennis W. Cox and Michael A. A. Cox  · 30 Apr 2006  · 312pp  · 35,664 words

Stocks for the Long Run, 4th Edition: The Definitive Guide to Financial Market Returns & Long Term Investment Strategies

by Jeremy J. Siegel  · 18 Dec 2007

Advances in Financial Machine Learning

by Marcos Lopez de Prado  · 2 Feb 2018  · 571pp  · 105,054 words

The Intelligent Asset Allocator: How to Build Your Portfolio to Maximize Returns and Minimize Risk

by William J. Bernstein  · 12 Oct 2000

Beautiful Data: The Stories Behind Elegant Data Solutions

by Toby Segaran and Jeff Hammerbacher  · 1 Jul 2009

Market Sense and Nonsense

by Jack D. Schwager  · 5 Oct 2012  · 297pp  · 91,141 words

Trading Risk: Enhanced Profitability Through Risk Control

by Kenneth L. Grant  · 1 Sep 2004

The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee

by Jared Diamond  · 2 Jan 1991  · 436pp  · 140,256 words

How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine

by Trisha Greenhalgh  · 18 Nov 2010  · 321pp  · 97,661 words

Unhealthy societies: the afflictions of inequality

by Richard G. Wilkinson  · 19 Nov 1996  · 268pp  · 89,761 words

Python for Finance

by Yuxing Yan  · 24 Apr 2014  · 408pp  · 85,118 words

Principles of Corporate Finance

by Richard A. Brealey, Stewart C. Myers and Franklin Allen  · 15 Feb 2014

Capital in the Twenty-First Century

by Thomas Piketty  · 10 Mar 2014  · 935pp  · 267,358 words

The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality

by Kathryn Paige Harden  · 20 Sep 2021  · 375pp  · 102,166 words

Derivatives Markets

by David Goldenberg  · 2 Mar 2016  · 819pp  · 181,185 words

Peer-to-Peer

by Andy Oram  · 26 Feb 2001  · 673pp  · 164,804 words

Mastering Pandas

by Femi Anthony  · 21 Jun 2015  · 589pp  · 69,193 words

Guide to business modelling

by John Tennent, Graham Friend and Economist Group  · 15 Dec 2005  · 287pp  · 44,739 words

Optimization Methods in Finance

by Gerard Cornuejols and Reha Tutuncu  · 2 Jan 2006  · 130pp  · 11,880 words

The Rise of the Quants: Marschak, Sharpe, Black, Scholes and Merton

by Colin Read  · 16 Jul 2012  · 206pp  · 70,924 words

Calling Bullshit: The Art of Scepticism in a Data-Driven World

by Jevin D. West and Carl T. Bergstrom  · 3 Aug 2020

Democratizing innovation

by Eric von Hippel  · 1 Apr 2005  · 220pp  · 73,451 words

A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing

by Burton G. Malkiel  · 10 Jan 2011  · 416pp  · 118,592 words

Pure, White and Deadly: How Sugar Is Killing Us and What We Can Do to Stop It

by John Yudkin  · 1 Nov 2012  · 239pp  · 77,436 words

The Drunkard's Walk: How Randomness Rules Our Lives

by Leonard Mlodinow  · 12 May 2008  · 266pp  · 86,324 words

The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined

by Steven Pinker  · 24 Sep 2012  · 1,351pp  · 385,579 words

The Practice of Cloud System Administration: DevOps and SRE Practices for Web Services, Volume 2

by Thomas A. Limoncelli, Strata R. Chalup and Christina J. Hogan  · 27 Aug 2014  · 757pp  · 193,541 words

A Random Walk Down Wall Street: The Time-Tested Strategy for Successful Investing (Eleventh Edition)

by Burton G. Malkiel  · 5 Jan 2015  · 482pp  · 121,672 words

Once the American Dream: Inner-Ring Suburbs of the Metropolitan United States

by Bernadette Hanlon  · 18 Dec 2009

The Authoritarians

by Robert Altemeyer  · 2 Jan 2007  · 298pp  · 87,023 words

Be Your Own Financial Adviser: The Comprehensive Guide to Wealth and Financial Planning

by Jonquil Lowe  · 14 Jul 2010  · 433pp  · 53,078 words

Is God a Mathematician?

by Mario Livio  · 6 Jan 2009  · 315pp  · 93,628 words

How Markets Fail: The Logic of Economic Calamities

by John Cassidy  · 10 Nov 2009  · 545pp  · 137,789 words

Trend Following: How Great Traders Make Millions in Up or Down Markets

by Michael W. Covel  · 19 Mar 2007  · 467pp  · 154,960 words

Wall Street: How It Works And for Whom

by Doug Henwood  · 30 Aug 1998  · 586pp  · 159,901 words

The Crisis of Crowding: Quant Copycats, Ugly Models, and the New Crash Normal

by Ludwig B. Chincarini  · 29 Jul 2012  · 701pp  · 199,010 words

Trading and Exchanges: Market Microstructure for Practitioners

by Larry Harris  · 2 Jan 2003  · 1,164pp  · 309,327 words

The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in a New World (Hardback) - Common

by Alan Greenspan  · 14 Jun 2007

Portfolio Design: A Modern Approach to Asset Allocation

by R. Marston  · 29 Mar 2011  · 363pp  · 28,546 words

Keeping Up With the Quants: Your Guide to Understanding and Using Analytics

by Thomas H. Davenport and Jinho Kim  · 10 Jun 2013  · 204pp  · 58,565 words

How I Became a Quant: Insights From 25 of Wall Street's Elite

by Richard R. Lindsey and Barry Schachter  · 30 Jun 2007

Succeeding With AI: How to Make AI Work for Your Business

by Veljko Krunic  · 29 Mar 2020

The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities

by Mancur Olson

Debunking Economics - Revised, Expanded and Integrated Edition: The Naked Emperor Dethroned?

by Steve Keen  · 21 Sep 2011  · 823pp  · 220,581 words

The Big Fat Surprise: Why Butter, Meat and Cheese Belong in a Healthy Diet

by Nina Teicholz  · 12 May 2014  · 743pp  · 189,512 words

The Great Mental Models: General Thinking Concepts

by Shane Parrish  · 22 Nov 2019  · 147pp  · 39,910 words

The Handbook of Personal Wealth Management

by Reuvid, Jonathan.  · 30 Oct 2011

The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature

by Steven Pinker  · 1 Jan 2002  · 901pp  · 234,905 words

All About Asset Allocation, Second Edition

by Richard Ferri  · 11 Jul 2010

Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters

by Steven Pinker  · 14 Oct 2021  · 533pp  · 125,495 words

Upheaval: Turning Points for Nations in Crisis

by Jared Diamond  · 6 May 2019  · 459pp  · 144,009 words

Quantitative Value: A Practitioner's Guide to Automating Intelligent Investment and Eliminating Behavioral Errors

by Wesley R. Gray and Tobias E. Carlisle  · 29 Nov 2012  · 263pp  · 75,455 words

Unweaving the Rainbow

by Richard Dawkins  · 7 Aug 2011  · 339pp  · 112,979 words

The Bogleheads' Guide to Investing

by Taylor Larimore, Michael Leboeuf and Mel Lindauer  · 1 Jan 2006  · 335pp  · 94,657 words

Who's Your City?: How the Creative Economy Is Making Where to Live the Most Important Decision of Your Life

by Richard Florida  · 28 Jun 2009  · 325pp  · 73,035 words

No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller

by Harry Markopolos  · 1 Mar 2010  · 431pp  · 132,416 words

The Flat White Economy

by Douglas McWilliams  · 15 Feb 2015  · 193pp  · 47,808 words

Cryptoassets: The Innovative Investor's Guide to Bitcoin and Beyond: The Innovative Investor's Guide to Bitcoin and Beyond

by Chris Burniske and Jack Tatar  · 19 Oct 2017  · 416pp  · 106,532 words

Mindware: Tools for Smart Thinking

by Richard E. Nisbett  · 17 Aug 2015  · 397pp  · 109,631 words

Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World

by Clinton V. Oster, John S. Strong and C. Kurt Zorn  · 28 May 1992  · 217pp  · 152 words

Numpy Beginner's Guide - Third Edition

by Ivan Idris  · 23 Jun 2015  · 681pp  · 64,159 words

The Art of Computer Programming: Sorting and Searching

by Donald Ervin Knuth  · 15 Jan 1998

A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market

by John Allen Paulos  · 1 Jan 2003  · 295pp  · 66,824 words

Facing Reality: Two Truths About Race in America

by Charles Murray  · 14 Jun 2021  · 147pp  · 42,682 words

Rage Inside the Machine: The Prejudice of Algorithms, and How to Stop the Internet Making Bigots of Us All

by Robert Elliott Smith  · 26 Jun 2019  · 370pp  · 107,983 words

The Aristocracy of Talent: How Meritocracy Made the Modern World

by Adrian Wooldridge  · 2 Jun 2021  · 693pp  · 169,849 words

The Global Minotaur

by Yanis Varoufakis and Paul Mason  · 4 Jul 2015  · 394pp  · 85,734 words

Data Wrangling With Python: Tips and Tools to Make Your Life Easier

by Jacqueline Kazil  · 4 Feb 2016

The Impact of Early Life Trauma on Health and Disease

by Lanius, Ruth A.; Vermetten, Eric; Pain, Clare  · 11 Jan 2011

Inside the House of Money: Top Hedge Fund Traders on Profiting in a Global Market

by Steven Drobny  · 31 Mar 2006  · 385pp  · 128,358 words

Career and Family: Women’s Century-Long Journey Toward Equity

by Claudia Goldin  · 11 Oct 2021  · 445pp  · 122,877 words

On the Edge: The Art of Risking Everything

by Nate Silver  · 12 Aug 2024  · 848pp  · 227,015 words

Luxury Fever: Why Money Fails to Satisfy in an Era of Excess

by Robert H. Frank  · 15 Jan 1999  · 416pp  · 112,159 words

The Measure of Progress: Counting What Really Matters

by Diane Coyle  · 15 Apr 2025  · 321pp  · 112,477 words

Deaths of Despair and the Future of Capitalism

by Anne Case and Angus Deaton  · 17 Mar 2020  · 421pp  · 110,272 words

Ever Since Darwin: Reflections in Natural History

by Stephen Jay Gould  · 1 Jan 1977  · 266pp  · 76,299 words

Advances in Artificial General Intelligence: Concepts, Architectures and Algorithms: Proceedings of the Agi Workshop 2006

by Ben Goertzel and Pei Wang  · 1 Jan 2007  · 303pp  · 67,891 words

Fortune's Formula: The Untold Story of the Scientific Betting System That Beat the Casinos and Wall Street

by William Poundstone  · 18 Sep 2006  · 389pp  · 109,207 words

The Intelligence Trap: Revolutionise Your Thinking and Make Wiser Decisions

by David Robson  · 7 Mar 2019  · 417pp  · 103,458 words

Work Rules!: Insights From Inside Google That Will Transform How You Live and Lead

by Laszlo Bock  · 31 Mar 2015  · 387pp  · 119,409 words

The Behavioral Investor

by Daniel Crosby  · 15 Feb 2018  · 249pp  · 77,342 words

The Power of Passive Investing: More Wealth With Less Work

by Richard A. Ferri  · 4 Nov 2010  · 345pp  · 87,745 words

Cities in the Sky: The Quest to Build the World's Tallest Skyscrapers

by Jason M. Barr  · 13 May 2024  · 292pp  · 107,998 words

Big Business: A Love Letter to an American Anti-Hero

by Tyler Cowen  · 8 Apr 2019  · 297pp  · 84,009 words

Everything Is Predictable: How Bayesian Statistics Explain Our World

by Tom Chivers  · 6 May 2024  · 283pp  · 102,484 words

Mastering Private Equity

by Zeisberger, Claudia,Prahl, Michael,White, Bowen, Michael Prahl and Bowen White  · 15 Jun 2017

Trend Commandments: Trading for Exceptional Returns

by Michael W. Covel  · 14 Jun 2011

After the New Economy: The Binge . . . And the Hangover That Won't Go Away

by Doug Henwood  · 9 May 2005  · 306pp  · 78,893 words

Hubris: Why Economists Failed to Predict the Crisis and How to Avoid the Next One

by Meghnad Desai  · 15 Feb 2015  · 270pp  · 73,485 words

The Art of UNIX Programming

by Eric S. Raymond  · 22 Sep 2003  · 612pp  · 187,431 words

The Origins of the Urban Crisis

by Sugrue, Thomas J.

Heads I Win, Tails I Win

by Spencer Jakab  · 21 Jun 2016  · 303pp  · 84,023 words

Good Money: Birmingham Button Makers, the Royal Mint, and the Beginnings of Modern Coinage, 1775-1821

by George Anthony Selgin  · 13 Jul 2008  · 386pp