by Jason Fung · 3 Mar 2026 · 284pp · 76,656 words
.9% Ireland 3851 30.8% Belgium 3824 22% Turkey 3762 34.2% Austria 3739 17% Germany 3648 24.2% Italy 3621 21.6% Correlation coefficient 0.6 The correlation coefficient shows us the strength of the relationship between the two variables (calories eaten and obesity rate). While the correlation is positive, meaning that the
by Charles Murray · 28 Jan 2020 · 741pp · 199,502 words
it becomes obvious why merchandisers should care deeply about the personalities of their customers.”9 They offered a new set of guidelines based on the correlation coefficient (r). In the summary that follows, I have replaced the value of r with the equivalent value of Cohen’s d. The authors argued that
…
size of the gender difference should be negative (the effect sizes should be smaller for more egalitarian or developed societies). The table below shows the correlation coefficients from the Lippa study after controlling for age and education. Index of national development: UN Gender Development Index Correlation after adjusting for age and education
…
. Let’s return to our running example, height. If you divide a perfectly random assortment of people into two groups and correlate their heights, the correlation coefficient will be around zero. If the assortment of people consists instead of pairs of half siblings, the correlation will be around +.25. For full siblings
…
to best reflect this upward-sloping trend. Now continue to read and see how well you have intuitively produced the basis for a correlation coefficient and a regression coefficient. The Correlation Coefficient Modern statistics provide more than one method for measuring correlation, but we confine ourselves to the one that is most important in
…
both use and generality: the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient (named after Karl Pearson, the English mathematician and biometrician). To get at this coefficient, let us first replot the graph of the class, replacing inches
…
. The variables are now expressed in general terms. Remember: Any set of measurements can be transformed similarly. The next step on our way to the correlation coefficient is to apply a formula that finds the best possible straight line passing through the cloud of points—the mathematically “best” version of the line
…
250 18-year-old males is identical to the third decimal place with the relationship among all 6,068 males in the NLSY sample (the correlation coefficient is .501 in both cases). This is closer than we have any right to expect, but other random samples of only 250 generally produce correlations
…
would go downhill for pairs of variables that are negatively correlated. We focus on the slope of the best-fitting line because it is the correlation coefficient—in this case, equal to .50, which is quite large by the standards of variables used by social scientists. The closer it gets to ±1
…
best-fitting line is horizontal; hence its slope is 0. Anything other than 0 signifies a relationship, albeit possibly a very weak one. Whatever the correlation coefficient of a pair of variables is, squaring it yields another notable number. Squaring .50, for example, gives .25. The significance of the squared correlation is
…
original axes—inches and pounds—instead of standardizing them, the slope of the best-fitting line would have been a regression coefficient, rather than a correlation coefficient. For example, the regression coefficient for weight regressed on height tells us that for each additional inch in height, we can expect an increase of
by Pierre Vernimmen, Pascal Quiry, Maurizio Dallocchio, Yann le Fur and Antonio Salvi · 16 Oct 2017 · 1,544pp · 391,691 words
and Criteo fluctuate together. It is equal to: Here, pi,j is the probability of joint occurrence and rH,C is the correlation coefficient of returns offered by Heineken and Criteo. The correlation coefficient is a number between −1 (returns 100% inversely proportional to each other) and 1 (returns 100% proportional to each other
…
). Correlation coefficients are usually positive, as most stocks rise together in a bullish market and fall together in a bearish market. By plugging the variables back into
…
stocks are positively correlated with each other, having both together in a portfolio creates a less risky profile than investing in them individually. Only a correlation coefficient of 1 creates a portfolio risk that is equal to the average of its component risks. CORRELATION BETWEEN DIFFERENT STOCK MARKETS (2011–2017) Brazil China
…
markets still bring diversification and are more correlated among themselves than with developed countries. However, sector diversification is still highly efficient thanks to the low correlation coefficients among different industries: CORRELATION BETWEEN ECONOMIC SECTORS WORLDWIDE (2011–2017) Sector Banks Automotive Pharmaceuticals & Biotech. Oil & Gas Construction Web Energy Agriculture & Food chain Retailing Metals
…
measured in relation to the market portfolio? Above all, what is the market portfolio? To begin, it is useful to study the impact of the correlation coefficient on diversification. Again, the same two securities will be analysed: Criteo (C) and Heineken (H). By varying ρH,C between −1 and +1, we obtain
…
.8 12.3 13.5 14.7 15.3 17.0 Note the following caveats: If Criteo and Heineken were perfectly correlated (i.e. the correlation coefficient was 1), then diversification would have no effect. All possible portfolios would lie on a line linking the risk/return point of Criteo with that
…
of Heineken. Risk would increase in direct proportion to Criteo’s stock added. If the two stocks were perfectly inversely correlated (correlation coefficient −1), then diversification would be total. However, there is little chance of this occurring, as both companies are exposed to the same economic conditions. Generally
…
speaking, Criteo and Heineken are positively, but imperfectly, correlated and diversification is based on the desired amount of risk. With a fixed correlation coefficient of 0.3, there are portfolios that offer different returns at the same level of risk. Thus, a portfolio consisting of two-thirds Heineken and
…
shows the same risk (10%) as a portfolio consisting of just Heineken, but returns 8.3% vs. only 6% for Heineken. As long as the correlation coefficient is below 1, diversification will be efficient. There is no reason for an investor to choose a given combination if another offers a better (efficient
…
average risk of the shares making up that portfolio. This happens because returns on shares do not all vary to exactly the same degree, since correlation coefficients are rarely equal to 1. As a result, some portfolios will deliver better returns than others. Those portfolios that are located on the portion of
…
? Security A carries little risk and security B has great risk. Which would you choose if you wanted to take the least risk possible? The correlation coefficient between French equities and European equities developed as follows: Years 1970–1979 1980–1989 1990–1999 2000–2009 Coefficient 0.43 0.42 0.73
…
reflects advances in European integration and globalisation, which both increase the synchronisation of economies. No, as long as correlation coefficients remain lower than 1, although they are now very close. Yes. Steel, because correlation coefficients with the other sectors are lower. A risk-free asset. There must be no doubts about the solvency of
…
investment covenant clauses corporate managers corporate profitability analysis corporate purgatory corporate risk corporate strategy corporate structure choice corporate value at risk corporate ventures corporation concept correlation coefficients diversification portfolio risk cost(s) accruals agency theory bank loans/bonds bankruptcy breakeven point control measures convertible bonds financial distress income statement formats intangible fixed
by Ilija I. Zovko · 1 Nov 2008 · 119pp · 10,356 words
have discrete ternary values. Later in the text we use a bootstrap approach to test the significance. Now, however, we test the significance of the correlation coefficients using a standard algorithm as in ref. (Best and Roberts, 1975). The algorithm calculates the approximate tail probabilities for Spearman’s
…
correlation coefficient ρ. Its precision unfortunately degrades when there are ties in the data, which is the case here. With this caveat in mind, as a preliminary
…
test, we find that, for example, for on-book trading in Vodafone for the month of May 2000, 10.3% of all correlation coefficients are significant at the 5% level. Averaging over all stocks and months, the average percentage of significant coefficients for on-book trading is 10.5
…
a 5% acceptance level of the test. 4.2 Significance and structure in the correlation matrices The preliminary result of the previous section that some correlation coefficients are non-random is further corroborated by testing for non-random structure in the correlation matrices. The hypothesis that there is structure in the correlation
…
satisfying the properties of being a metric is (Bonanno et al., 2000) # (4.2) di,j = 2 · (1 − ρi,j ), where ρi,j is the correlation coefficient between strategies i and j. We have tried several reasonable modifications to this form but without obvious differences in the results. Ultimately the choice of
…
four market imbalance variables and price returns. The diagonal shows the histogram. Values in the matrix below the diagonal are the absolute values of the correlation coefficients between the corresponding variables. The font size is proportional to the value of the coefficient. In the plots above the diagonal, we show scatter plots
by David Spiegelhalter · 2 Sep 2019 · 404pp · 92,713 words
Scale 2.4 Reported Number of Lifetime Opposite-Sex Partners 2.5 Survival Rates Against Number of Operations in Child Heart Surgery 2.6 Pearson Correlation Coefficients of 0 2.7 World Population Trends 2.8 Relative Increase in Population by Country 2.9 Popularity of the Name ‘David’ Over Time 2
…
summarize a steadily increasing or decreasing relationship between the pairs of numbers shown on a scatter-plot. This is generally chosen to be the Pearson correlation coefficient, an idea originally proposed by Francis Galton but formally published in 1895 by Karl Pearson, one of the founders of modern statistics.* A Pearson correlation
…
the points are closer to an increasing curve than a straight line. Figure 2.6 Two sets of (fictitious) data-points for which the Pearson correlation coefficients are both 0. This clearly does not mean there is no relationship between the two variables being plotted. From Alberto Cairo’s wonderful Datasaurus Dozen4
…
−0.03, suggesting that there is no longer any clear relationship between the number of cases and survival rates. However, with so few hospitals the correlation coefficient can be very sensitive to individual data-points—if we remove the smallest hospital, which has a high survival rate, the Pearson correlation jumps to
…
0.42. Correlation coefficients are simply summaries of association, and cannot be used to conclude that there is definitely an underlying relationship between volume and survival rates, let alone
…
, an example of what is known as ascertainment bias in epidemiology. ‘Correlation Does Not Imply Causation’ We saw in the last chapter how Pearson’s correlation coefficient measures how close the points on a scatter-plot are to a straight line. When considering English hospitals conducting children’s heart surgery in the
…
. But we could not conclude that bigger hospitals caused the lower mortality. This cautious attitude has a long pedigree. When Karl Pearson’s newly developed correlation coefficient was being discussed in the journal Nature in 1900, a commentator warned that ‘correlation does not imply causation’. In the succeeding century this phrase has
…
.2 shows the correlations between parent and offspring heights, and the gradients of regression lines.* There is a simple relationship between the gradients, the Pearson correlation coefficient and the standard deviations of the variables.* In fact if the standard deviations of the independent and dependent variables are the same, then the gradient
…
is simply the Pearson correlation coefficient, which explains their similarity in Table 5.2. The meaning of these gradients depends completely on our assumptions about the relationship between the variables being
…
Jerzy Neyman, a brilliant Polish mathematician and statistician, and Egon Pearson, Karl Pearson’s son.* The work of deriving the necessary probability distributions of estimated correlation coefficients and regression coefficients had been going on for decades beforehand, and in standard academic statistics courses the mathematical details of these distributions would be provided
…
, a British psychologist who was renowned for his research on the heritability of IQ, was posthumously accused of fraud when it was found that the correlation coefficients he quoted for the IQ of twins who had been reared apart hardly changed over time in spite of a steadily increasing group of twins
…
, so that RSS = . The least-squares line is defined as the line that minimizes the residual sum of squares. – The gradient b1 and Pearson’s correlation coefficient r are related through the formula b1 = rsy / sx. So if the standard deviations of the xs and ys are the same, then the gradient
…
is exactly equal to the correlation coefficient. likelihood: a measure of the evidential support provided by data for particular parameter values. When a probability distribution for a random variable depends on a
…
to training data, so that its predictive ability starts to decline. parameters: the unknown quantities in a statistical model, generally denoted with Greek letters. Pearson correlation coefficient: for a set of n paired numbers, (x1, y1), (x2, y2)… (xn, yn), when , sx are the sample mean and standard deviation of the xs
…
, and , sy are the sample mean and standard deviation of the ys, the Pearson correlation coefficient is given by Suppose xs and ys have both been standardized to Z-scores given by us and vs respectively, so that ui = (xi − )/sx
…
, and vi = (yi − )/sy. Then the Pearson correlation coefficient can be expressed as , that is the ‘cross-product’ of the Z-scores. percentile (of a population): there is, for example, a 70% chance of
by Mark S. Joshi · 24 Dec 2003
((Yt - (Xrl) YS) - Xs 1))) = p(t - s). (11.5) As Yt - YS and Xtl) - XSl) both have variance t - s, this means that the correlation coefficient is p. Thus we have constructed a Brownian motion whose increments are correlated to those of X(1) with correlation p. More generally, we could
…
-dimensional Ito calculus: dWrj)dW(k) = pjkdt. To summarize, we have Theorem 11.1 (Multi-dimensional Ito lemma) Let Wtj) be correlated Brownian motions with correlation coefficient pjk between the Brownian motions WU) and Wtk). Let Xj be an Ito process with respect to Wt W. Let f be a smooth function
…
length of the resultant vector is IIv1112 + 2 cos(9)IIv111. i1v211 + IIv2112, where 9 is the angle between the vectors. If we interpret the correlation coefficient as being the cosine of the angle between the two Brownian motions, then this means that the new volatility is just the length of the
…
a geometric Brownian motion and compute its drift and volatility. Solution We write dXt = aXtdt + o XtdWW 1), dYt = ,BYtdt + vYdWt(2), and take the correlation coefficient to be p. We compute d(XtYt) = XtdYt + YtdXt + dXt.dYt, = XtYt (f3dt + vdW 2) + adt + vdWr 1) + avpdt) , = XtYt ((a +,B + QVp)dt + o
…
. Thus suppose we have j have assets Sj such that dSl = a Sldt+QjSjdW(i), (11.32) and WO) is correlated with W (k) with correlation coefficient pjk. We shift to a risk- neutral measure in which all the assets have drift r. Let the derivative be D. We set CD(T
…
-1 a1.j63,j(tj+1 - ti). (14.40) We can identify this sum as fo Ul(t)U3(t)dt. We conclude that the correlation coefficient of g3(T) - g3(0) and g1 (T) - gl(0) is fo U1(t)a2(t)dt (f T 61(t)2dt) Z (IT U2
…
). (C.22) It is therefore sometimes useful to strip out the size of X and Y by dividing by their standard deviations to get the correlation coefficient A(X Y) , Cov(X, Y) = Var(X)Var(Y) . (C.23) It can be shown that IE(XY)I < IJE(X)E(Y)I
by Mehmed Kantardzić · 2 Jan 2003 · 721pp · 197,134 words
ranking is shown in the algorithm that is based on correlation criteria. Let us consider first the prediction of a continuous outcome y. The Pearson correlation coefficient is defined as: where cov designates the covariance and var the variance. The estimate of R(i) for the given data set with samples’ inputs
…
the linear regression equation). One parameter, which shows this strength of linear association between two variables by means of a single number, is called a correlation coefficient r. Its computation requires some intermediate results in a regression analysis. where The value of r is between −1 and 1. Negative values for r
…
as a measure. Based on the available data in Figure 4.3, we obtained intermediate results and the final correlation coefficient: A correlation coefficient r = 0.85 indicates a good linear relationship between two variables. Additional interpretation is possible. Because r2 = 0.72, we can say that approximately 72%
…
method to calculate the parameters α and β where y = α + β x. (b) Estimate the quality of the model obtained in (a) using the correlation coefficient r. (c) Use an appropriate nonlinear transformation (one of those represented in Table 5.3) to improve regression results. What is the equation for a
…
new, improved, and nonlinear model? Discuss a reduction of the correlation coefficient value. 5. A logit function, obtained through logistic regression, has the form: Find the probability of output values 0 and 1 for the following samples
…
-means k-medoids Incremental Using genetic algorithms Clustering tree Competitive learning rule Complete-link method Confidence Confirmatory visualization Confusion matrix Contingency table Control theory Core Correlation coefficient Correspondence analysis Cosine correlation Covariance matrix Crisp approximation Crossover Curse of dimensionality Data cleansing Data scrubbing Data collection Data constellations Data cube Data discovery Data
…
Outlier detection, distance based Overfitting (overtraining) PageRank algorithm Parabox Parallel coordinates Parameter identification Partially matched crossover (PMC) Partitional clustering Pattern Pattern association Pattern recognition Pearson correlation coefficient Perception Perceptron Pie chart Piecewise aggregate approximation (PAA) Pixel-oriented visualization Population Possibility measure Postpruning Prediction Predictive accuracy Predictive data mining Predictive regression Prepruning Principal
by Mark Gardener · 13 Jun 2012
yourself in the activity that follows. Simple Correlation Simple correlations are between two continuous variables and you can use the cor() command to obtain a correlation coefficient like so: > count = c(9, 25, 15, 2, 14, 25, 24, 47) > speed = c(2, 3, 5, 9, 14, 24, 29, 34) > cor(count, speed
…
the variables as the following example shows: > cor(women$height, women$weight) [1] 0.9954948 In this example the cor() command has calculated the Pearson correlation coefficient between the height and weight variables contained in the women data frame. You can also use the cor() command directly on a data frame (or
…
show the slope and intercept values that describe this relationship. The R squared value that you obtain from the regression is the square of the correlation coefficient from the Pearson correlation, which demonstrates the similarities between the methods. The result shows you the coefficients for the regression, that is, the intercept and
by Vijay Singal · 15 Jun 2004 · 369pp · 128,349 words
that do not behave like other stocks in your portfolio is good and can reduce risk. The correlation is measured by what is called a correlation coefficient. The correlation coefficient varies between –1 and +1. The two stocks in the above example have a correlation of –1. Unfortunately, most stocks have a positive correlation
…
n ρn, p σp × E(Rp ) − R f where E(R) is the return from an asset, s is the standard deviation, r is the correlation coefficient, and the subscripts n and p refer to the new stock and existing portfolio. Rf is the return on the risk-free asset. If the
…
is also 12 percent with a standard deviation of 18 percent. Since the U.S. markets and foreign markets are not well correlated, let the correlation coefficient be 0.60. Putting the U.S. stocks and the non-U.S. stocks in a 50-50 combination would generate a new world portfolio
…
. The correlation between the S&P 500 and the emerging markets is only 0.42. With the developed markets, the S&P 500 has a correlation coefficient of 0.58. Both of these correlations are quite low. Similarly, the emerging markets and the developed markets are not well correlated. On the other
…
above. BONDS CAN HELP WITH DIVERSIFICATION If the correlation among different assets is important for minimizing risk, then bonds should play a critical role. Some correlation coefficients are illustrative. Based on the 1971–98 period, the correlation between U.S. stocks and Swiss bonds is –0.03, 0.21 between International Investing
…
effect, 317n1 pricing, 307–8 collars in mergers, 198–99, 201, 216. See also mergers and acquisitions Cordis, 217 corporate releases. See news and announcements correlation coefficients, 234, 243–45 correlations between markets currency risks, 254 in “funds of funds,” 133n7 globalization, 243–45 international investing, 238– 39, 255 mutual fund mispricings
by Jiawei Han, Micheline Kamber and Jian Pei · 21 Jun 2011
implies the other, based on the available data. For nominal data, we use the χ2 (chi-square) test. For numeric attributes, we can use the correlation coefficient and covariance, both of which access how one attribute's values vary from those of another. χ2 Correlation Test for Nominal Data For nominal data
…
reject the hypothesis that gender and preferred_reading are independent and conclude that the two attributes are (strongly) correlated for the given group of people. Correlation Coefficient for Numeric Data For numeric attributes, we can evaluate the correlation between two attributes, A and B, by computing the
…
correlation coefficient (also known as Pearson's product moment coefficient, named after its inventer, Karl Pearson). This is(3.3) where n is the number of tuples,
…
and B, that is, and The covariance between A and B is defined as(3.4) If we compare Eq. (3.3) for rA, B (correlation coefficient) with Eq. (3.4) for covariance, we see that(3.5) where σA and σB are the standard deviations of A and B, respectively. It
…
age and body fat given in Exercise 2.4, answer the following:(a) Normalize the two attributes based on z-score normalization. (b) Calculate the correlation coefficient (Pearson's product moment coefficient). Are these two attributes positively or negatively correlated? Compute their covariance. 3.9 Suppose a group of 12 sales price
…
the correlation of a dimension to the cube value, the correlation between the dimension's values and their aggregated cube measures is computed. Pearson's correlation coefficient for numeric data and the χ2 correlation test for nominal data are popularly used correlation measures, although many other measures, such as covariance, can be
…
similar to our target user, u. Various approaches can be used to compute the similarity between users. The most popular approaches use either Pearson's correlation coefficient (Section 3.3.2) or cosine similarity (Section 2.4.7). A weighted aggregate can be used, which adjusts for the fact that different users
…
correlation analysis 94 discretization by 117 interestingness measures 264 with lift 266–267 nominal data 95–96 numeric data 96–97 redundancy and 94–98 correlation coefficient 94, 96 numeric data 96–97 correlation rules 265, 272 correlation-based clustering methods 511 correlations 18 cosine measure 268 cosine similarity 77 between two
…
significance 312 representative 309 search space 303 strongly negatively correlated 292 structural 282 type specification 15–23 unexpected 22see alsofrequent patterns pattern-trees 264 Pearson' correlation coefficient 222 percentiles 48 perception-based classification (PBC) 348 illustrated 349 as interactive visual approach 607 pixel-oriented approach 348–349 split screen 349 tree comparison
by Ruey S. Tsay · 14 Oct 2001
by Frank J. Fabozzi · 25 Feb 2008 · 923pp · 163,556 words
by Sarah Boslaugh · 10 Nov 2012
by Joel Hasbrouck · 4 Jan 2007 · 209pp · 13,138 words
by Trevor Hastie, Robert Tibshirani and Jerome Friedman · 25 Aug 2009 · 764pp · 261,694 words
by Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie · 1 Mar 2018
by Elroy Dimson, Paul Marsh and Mike Staunton · 3 Feb 2002 · 353pp · 148,895 words
by Bruce Frey · 9 May 2006 · 755pp · 121,290 words
by Jeremy Siegel · 7 Jan 2014 · 517pp · 139,477 words
by Greg N. Gregoriou, Vassilios Karavas, François-Serge Lhabitant and Fabrice Douglas Rouah · 23 Sep 2004
by Daniel Kahneman · 24 Oct 2011 · 654pp · 191,864 words
by Jack (edited By) Guinan · 27 Jul 2009 · 353pp · 88,376 words
by David Spiegelhalter · 14 Oct 2019 · 442pp · 94,734 words
by Donald Ervin Knuth · 15 Jan 2001
by Thomas Schneeweis, Garry B. Crowder and Hossein Kazemi · 8 Mar 2010 · 317pp · 106,130 words
by Alain Ruttiens · 24 Apr 2013 · 447pp · 104,258 words
by Toby Segaran · 17 Dec 2008 · 519pp · 102,669 words
by Igor Tulchinsky · 30 Sep 2019 · 321pp
by Aurélien Géron · 13 Mar 2017 · 1,331pp · 163,200 words
by Davis Edwards · 10 Jul 2014
by Gavin Hackeling · 31 Oct 2014
by Aurelien Geron · 14 Aug 2019
by Dennis W. Cox and Michael A. A. Cox · 30 Apr 2006 · 312pp · 35,664 words
by Jeremy J. Siegel · 18 Dec 2007
by Marcos Lopez de Prado · 2 Feb 2018 · 571pp · 105,054 words
by William J. Bernstein · 12 Oct 2000
by Toby Segaran and Jeff Hammerbacher · 1 Jul 2009
by Jack D. Schwager · 5 Oct 2012 · 297pp · 91,141 words
by Kenneth L. Grant · 1 Sep 2004
by Jared Diamond · 2 Jan 1991 · 436pp · 140,256 words
by Trisha Greenhalgh · 18 Nov 2010 · 321pp · 97,661 words
by Richard G. Wilkinson · 19 Nov 1996 · 268pp · 89,761 words
by Yuxing Yan · 24 Apr 2014 · 408pp · 85,118 words
by Richard A. Brealey, Stewart C. Myers and Franklin Allen · 15 Feb 2014
by Thomas Piketty · 10 Mar 2014 · 935pp · 267,358 words
by Kathryn Paige Harden · 20 Sep 2021 · 375pp · 102,166 words
by David Goldenberg · 2 Mar 2016 · 819pp · 181,185 words
by Andy Oram · 26 Feb 2001 · 673pp · 164,804 words
by Femi Anthony · 21 Jun 2015 · 589pp · 69,193 words
by John Tennent, Graham Friend and Economist Group · 15 Dec 2005 · 287pp · 44,739 words
by Gerard Cornuejols and Reha Tutuncu · 2 Jan 2006 · 130pp · 11,880 words
by Colin Read · 16 Jul 2012 · 206pp · 70,924 words
by Jevin D. West and Carl T. Bergstrom · 3 Aug 2020
by Eric von Hippel · 1 Apr 2005 · 220pp · 73,451 words
by Burton G. Malkiel · 10 Jan 2011 · 416pp · 118,592 words
by John Yudkin · 1 Nov 2012 · 239pp · 77,436 words
by Leonard Mlodinow · 12 May 2008 · 266pp · 86,324 words
by Steven Pinker · 24 Sep 2012 · 1,351pp · 385,579 words
by Thomas A. Limoncelli, Strata R. Chalup and Christina J. Hogan · 27 Aug 2014 · 757pp · 193,541 words
by Burton G. Malkiel · 5 Jan 2015 · 482pp · 121,672 words
by Bernadette Hanlon · 18 Dec 2009
by Robert Altemeyer · 2 Jan 2007 · 298pp · 87,023 words
by Jonquil Lowe · 14 Jul 2010 · 433pp · 53,078 words
by Mario Livio · 6 Jan 2009 · 315pp · 93,628 words
by John Cassidy · 10 Nov 2009 · 545pp · 137,789 words
by Michael W. Covel · 19 Mar 2007 · 467pp · 154,960 words
by Doug Henwood · 30 Aug 1998 · 586pp · 159,901 words
by Ludwig B. Chincarini · 29 Jul 2012 · 701pp · 199,010 words
by Larry Harris · 2 Jan 2003 · 1,164pp · 309,327 words
by Alan Greenspan · 14 Jun 2007
by R. Marston · 29 Mar 2011 · 363pp · 28,546 words
by Thomas H. Davenport and Jinho Kim · 10 Jun 2013 · 204pp · 58,565 words
by Richard R. Lindsey and Barry Schachter · 30 Jun 2007
by Veljko Krunic · 29 Mar 2020
by Mancur Olson
by Steve Keen · 21 Sep 2011 · 823pp · 220,581 words
by Nina Teicholz · 12 May 2014 · 743pp · 189,512 words
by Shane Parrish · 22 Nov 2019 · 147pp · 39,910 words
by Reuvid, Jonathan. · 30 Oct 2011
by Steven Pinker · 1 Jan 2002 · 901pp · 234,905 words
by Richard Ferri · 11 Jul 2010
by Steven Pinker · 14 Oct 2021 · 533pp · 125,495 words
by Jared Diamond · 6 May 2019 · 459pp · 144,009 words
by Wesley R. Gray and Tobias E. Carlisle · 29 Nov 2012 · 263pp · 75,455 words
by Richard Dawkins · 7 Aug 2011 · 339pp · 112,979 words
by Taylor Larimore, Michael Leboeuf and Mel Lindauer · 1 Jan 2006 · 335pp · 94,657 words
by Richard Florida · 28 Jun 2009 · 325pp · 73,035 words
by Harry Markopolos · 1 Mar 2010 · 431pp · 132,416 words
by Douglas McWilliams · 15 Feb 2015 · 193pp · 47,808 words
by Chris Burniske and Jack Tatar · 19 Oct 2017 · 416pp · 106,532 words
by Richard E. Nisbett · 17 Aug 2015 · 397pp · 109,631 words
by Clinton V. Oster, John S. Strong and C. Kurt Zorn · 28 May 1992 · 217pp · 152 words
by Ivan Idris · 23 Jun 2015 · 681pp · 64,159 words
by Donald Ervin Knuth · 15 Jan 1998
by John Allen Paulos · 1 Jan 2003 · 295pp · 66,824 words
by Charles Murray · 14 Jun 2021 · 147pp · 42,682 words
by Robert Elliott Smith · 26 Jun 2019 · 370pp · 107,983 words
by Adrian Wooldridge · 2 Jun 2021 · 693pp · 169,849 words
by Yanis Varoufakis and Paul Mason · 4 Jul 2015 · 394pp · 85,734 words
by Jacqueline Kazil · 4 Feb 2016
by Lanius, Ruth A.; Vermetten, Eric; Pain, Clare · 11 Jan 2011
by Steven Drobny · 31 Mar 2006 · 385pp · 128,358 words
by Claudia Goldin · 11 Oct 2021 · 445pp · 122,877 words
by Nate Silver · 12 Aug 2024 · 848pp · 227,015 words
by Robert H. Frank · 15 Jan 1999 · 416pp · 112,159 words
by Diane Coyle · 15 Apr 2025 · 321pp · 112,477 words
by Anne Case and Angus Deaton · 17 Mar 2020 · 421pp · 110,272 words
by Stephen Jay Gould · 1 Jan 1977 · 266pp · 76,299 words
by Ben Goertzel and Pei Wang · 1 Jan 2007 · 303pp · 67,891 words
by William Poundstone · 18 Sep 2006 · 389pp · 109,207 words
by David Robson · 7 Mar 2019 · 417pp · 103,458 words
by Laszlo Bock · 31 Mar 2015 · 387pp · 119,409 words
by Daniel Crosby · 15 Feb 2018 · 249pp · 77,342 words
by Richard A. Ferri · 4 Nov 2010 · 345pp · 87,745 words
by Jason M. Barr · 13 May 2024 · 292pp · 107,998 words
by Tyler Cowen · 8 Apr 2019 · 297pp · 84,009 words
by Tom Chivers · 6 May 2024 · 283pp · 102,484 words
by Zeisberger, Claudia,Prahl, Michael,White, Bowen, Michael Prahl and Bowen White · 15 Jun 2017
by Michael W. Covel · 14 Jun 2011
by Doug Henwood · 9 May 2005 · 306pp · 78,893 words
by Meghnad Desai · 15 Feb 2015 · 270pp · 73,485 words
by Eric S. Raymond · 22 Sep 2003 · 612pp · 187,431 words
by Sugrue, Thomas J.
by Spencer Jakab · 21 Jun 2016 · 303pp · 84,023 words
by George Anthony Selgin · 13 Jul 2008 · 386pp