double helix

back to index

300 results

Double Helix

by James D. Watson and Gunther S. Stent  · 1 Jan 1968  · 134pp  · 43,617 words

By James D. Watson THE DOUBLE HELIX 1968 THE MOLECULAR BIOLOGY OF THE GENE 1965 (Second Edition, 1970; Third Edition, 1976) SCRIBNER 1230 Avenue of the Americas New York, NY 10020 www.

United States of America 7 9 10 8 6 The Library of Congress has cataloged the Atheneum edition as follows: Watson, James D. 1928- The double helix. 1. Deoxyribonucleic acid. I. Title. [DNLM: 1. DNA. 2. Biochemistry—History. QU58W339d 1968a] QD435.W37 1980 574.87′3282 80-13990 ISBN 0-684-85279

. L. B. Sir Lawrence Bragg (b. 1890) was the director of the Cavendish Laboratory of Cambridge University at the time of the discovery of the Double Helix. He and his father, William Henry, the originators of X-ray crystallography, received the Nobel Prize in 1915. Preface HERE I relate my version of

the structure was established. Nonetheless, I feel the story should be told, partly because many of my scientific friends have expressed curiosity about how the double helix was found, and to them an incomplete version is better than none. But even more important, I believe, there remains general ignorance about how science

of ambition and the sense of fair play. The thought that I should write this book has been with me almost from the moment the double helix was found. Thus my memory of many of the significant events is much more complete than that of most other episodes in my life. I

deduced the molecular structure of deoxyribonucleic acid, DNA. That structure, they reported in a short article in Nature just weeks later, was the beguilingly beautiful “double helix.” Noting that the helix could “unzip” and copy itself, Crick and Watson confirmed what had hitherto only been suspected: that DNA was the substance that

. Watson tells how they pulled it off in this now-classic memoir. First published in 1968 and in print for more than three decades, The Double Helix remains unique in the annals of science writing. The discovery it describes was of a magnitude comparable, in terms of scientific and social significance, to

is also a wonderfully readable human drama that lets nonscientists share some of the intellectual excitement, high emotion, and incredible suspense. Small wonder that The Double Helix became the inspiration for the whole genre of science best-sellers. Its enduring freshness owes much to Watson’s decision to write it from the

the time of the book’s initial publication, of Watson’s candid and sometimes barbed sketches of scientists at work. Yes, the theme of The Double Helix is the unbridled lust for fame. (“It was certainly better to imagine myself becoming famous than maturing into a stifled academic who never risked a

x-ray photographs of DNA and tragically died of cancer at thirty-seven in 1958 before reaping the rewards her critical experimental work deserved. The Double Helix is also an affectionate paean to a rare friendship, and, perhaps more surprisingly, a joyous celebration of the importance of being playful while pursuing a

at the movies, or a bottle of burgundy, anything at all to avoid “narrow-mindedness and dullness.” Neither is dullness something that readers of The Double Helix run the slightest risk of encountering. Sylvia Nasar holds the Knight Chair in Journalism at Columbia University and is the author of A Beautiful Mind

the Italim Alps, August 1952 Early ideas on the DNA-RNA-protein relation X-ray diffraction photograph of DNA, B form Original model of the double helix Watson and Crick in front of the model Photograph A. C. Barrington Brown Morning coffee in the Cavendish photograph A. C. Barrington Brown Letter to

-with-like base pairs Base pairs for the like-with-like structure Tautomeric forms of guanine and thymine Base pairs for the double helix Schematic illustration of the double helix DNA replication THE DOUBLE HELIX IN THE summer of 1955, I arranged to join some friends who were going into the Alps. Alfred Tissieres, then a

him whether this time he had any objection to my new base pairs. The adenine-thymine and guanine-cytosine base pairs used to construct the double helix (hydrogen bonds are dotted). The formation of a third hydrogen bond between guanine and cytosine was considered, but rejected because a crystallographic study of guanine

with cytosine. Chargaff’s rules then suddenly stood out as a consequence of a double-helical structure for DNA. Even more exciting, this type of double helix suggested a replication scheme much more satisfactory than my briefly considered like-with-like pairing. Always pairing adenine with thymine and guanine with cytosine meant

. It seemed almost unbelievable that the DNA structure was solved, that the answer was incredibly exciting, and that our names would be associated with the double helix as Pauling’s was with the alpha helix. When the Eagle opened at six, I went over with Francis to talk about what must be

the possibility that he might stumble upon the base pairs before we told him the answer. That night, however, we could not firmly establish the double helix. Until the metal bases were on hand, any model building would be too sloppy to be convincing. I went back to Pop’s to tell

nucleotide. Because of the helical symmetry, the locations of the atoms in one nucleotide would automatically generate the other positions. A schematic illustration of the double helix. The two sugar-phosphate backbones twist about on the outside with the flat hydrogen-bonded base pairs forming the core. Seen this way, the structure

DNA. But with the sugar-phosphate backbone on the outside, it did not matter which salt was present. Either would fit perfectly well into the double helix. Bragg had his first look late that morning. For several days he had been home with the flu and was in bed when he heard

tension now off, I went to play tennis with Bertrand, telling Francis that later in the afternoon I would write Luria and Delbrück about the double helix. It was also arranged that John Kendrew would call up Maurice to say that he should come out to see what Francis and I had

he was now about to go full steam ahead on DNA and intended to place emphasis on model building. The original demonstration model of the double helix (the scale gives distances in Angstroms). 28 MAURICE needed but a minute’s look at the model to like it. He had been forewarned by

sort of X-ray diagram the structure should produce, then becoming strangely noiseless when he perceived that Maurice’s wish was to look at the double helix, not to receive a lecture in crystallographic theory which he could work out by himself. There was no questioning of the decision to put guanine

in London only two days before he rang up to say that both he and Rosy found that their X-ray data strongly supported the double helix. They were quickly writing up their results and wanted to publish simultaneously with our announcement of the base pairs. Nature was the place for rapid

her sharp, stubborn mind, caught in her self-made antihelical trap, might dig up irrelevant results that would foster uncertainty about the correctness of the double helix. Nonetheless, like almost everyone else, she saw the appeal of the base pairs and accepted the fact that the structure was too pretty not to

saw no reason to argue about. At the same time, her fierce annoyance with Francis and me collapsed. Initially we were hesitant to discuss the double helix with her, fearing the testiness of our previous encounters. But Francis noticed her changed attitude when he was in London to talk with Maurice about

structure I had written Delbrück about. Reading his letter, I drew a deep breath, for I realized that Delbrück did not know of the complementary double helix at the time of Linus’ talk. Instead, he was referring to the like-with-like idea. Fortunately, by the time my letter reached Cal Tech

to postpone a visit which now had the bonus of letting me be the first to tell Ephrussi’s and Lwoff’s labs about the double helix. Francis, however, was not happy, telling me that a week was far too long to abandon work of such extreme significance. A call for seriousness

for information on what his scientific clowns were up to. Watson and Crick in front of the DNA model. 29 PAULING first heard about the double helix from Delbrück. At the bottom of the letter that broke the news of the complementary chains, I had asked that he not tell Linus. I

phages contained a modified type of cytosine called 5-hydroxy-methyl cytosine. Most important, its amount equaled the amount of guanine. This beautifully supported the double helix, since 5-hydroxy-methyl cytosine should hydrogen-bond like cytosine. Also pleasing was the great accuracy of the data, which illustrated better than any previous

and on Wednesday, April 2,went off to the editors of Nature. Morning coffee in the Cavendish just after publication of the manuscript on the double helix. Linus arrived in Cambridge on Friday night. On his way to Brussels for the Solvay meeting, he stopped off both to see Peter and to

. Maurice Wilkins’ work remained centered on DNA for some years until he and his collaborators established beyond any doubt that the essential features of the double helix were correct. After then making an important contribution to the structure of ribonucleic acid, he has changed the direction of his research to the organization

working on a high level until a few weeks before her death. On the six following pages: The letter written to Delbrück telling of the double helix. In Stockholm for their Nobel Prizes, December 1962: Maurice Wilkins, John Steinbeck, John Kendrew, Max Perutz, Francis Crick, and James D. Watson. JAMES D. WATSON

of proteins. In 1962, together with Francis Crick and Maurice Wilkins, Dr. Watson was awarded the Nobel Prize for Medicine and Physiology. Prior to The Double Helix, he wrote The Molecular Biology of the Gene, which is now in a third edition. * For a clear description of X-ray diffraction technique, see

Life at the Speed of Light: From the Double Helix to the Dawn of Digital Life

by J. Craig Venter  · 16 Oct 2013  · 285pp  · 78,180 words

continue to publish books for every reader. LIBRARY OF CONGRESS CATALOGING-IN-PUBLICATION DATA Venter, J. Craig. Life at the speed of light : from the double helix to the dawn of digital life / J. Craig Venter. pages cm Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-101-63802-6 1. Science—Social

code-script, which ultimately led them to DNA and to discover the most beautiful structure in all biology, the double helix, within whose turns lay the secrets of all inheritance. Each strand of the double helix is complementary to the other, and they therefore run in opposite (anti-parallel) directions. As a result the

double helix can unzip down the middle, and each side can serve as a pattern or template for the other, so that the DNA’s information can

allow of thirty different specifications.”23 Even though von Neumann conceived his self-replicating automaton some years before the actual hereditary code in the DNA double helix was discovered, he did lay stress on its ability to evolve. He told the audience at his Hixon lecture that each instruction that the machine

crystal data obtained by Rosalind Franklin and Raymond Gosling at King’s College London. Watson and Crick described the elegantly functional molecular structure of the double helix, and how DNA is reproduced so its instructions can be passed down the generations. This is nature’s self-reproducing automaton. The onset of efforts

May 1952, revealed a black cross of reflections and would prove the key to unlocking the molecular structure of DNA, revealing it to be a double helix, where the letters of the DNA code corresponded to the rungs.9 On April 25, 1953, Watson and Crick’s article “Molecular Structure of Nucleic

Hochschule (ETH), in Zürich, where he was a professor until he moved to Freiburg, in 1926. It was only in 1953 (the year of the double-helix discovery) that Staudinger was eventually awarded the Nobel Prize for his important contribution. In recent years we have come to regard that basic unit of

Overall, protein synthesis is extremely fast, requiring only seconds to make chains of one hundred or so amino acids. As was the case with the double helix, X-ray crystallography was needed to reveal the ribosome’s detailed structure. First, however, someone had to make the ribosomes crystallize—like salt in a

reveal how the ribosome enforces the pairing of the first two letters of RNA code: molecules flip out to “feel” for a groove in the double helix of well-matched RNAs to ensure that the code is read with high fidelity. A “wobble” makes this mechanism less stringent in checking the third

importance. According to the central dogma, RNA functioned as a mere middleman, carrying out the commands encoded in DNA. In that model the DNA’s double helix unwinds, and its genetic code is copied onto a single-stranded mRNA. In turn, the mRNA shuttles the code from the genome to ribosomes. It

small enough to be jostled by the constant pounding of the surrounding sea of atoms and molecules. So while DNA is indeed shaped like a double helix, it is a writhing, twisting, spinning helix as a result of the forces of random Brownian motion. The protein robots of living cells are only

in its DNA as its software. All the information needed to make a living, self-replicating cell is locked up within the spirals of its double helix. As we read and interpret that code, we should, in the fullness of time, be able to completely understand how cells work, then change and

’s president, David Schlessinger, of Washington University, in St. Louis, announced what he described as an “historic event.” With Haemophilus influenzae we had transformed the double helix of biology into the digital world of the computer, but the fun was only now beginning. While we had used its genome to explore the

DNA, Sinsheimer found that immediately after it had infected its host, enzymes present in the bacterium converted the circle of DNA to the familiar linear double helix. This discovery illuminated a problem encountered by Kornberg in his first efforts to make a copy of the virus genome: while DNA polymerase could copy

, due to the chemical attraction of the complementary bases on each strand, à la Watson and Crick. To ensure that we ended up with complete double-helix strands, we then added DNA polymerase, as well as some free nucleotides, so that any place where the 3'-exonuclease chewed away too much of

suggests, means wrapping up coils within coils. Most bacterial genomes are “negatively supercoiled,” meaning that the DNA is twisted in the opposite direction of the double helix. Some preliminary experiments had suggested that the precise state of the DNA was important, in that intact, circular chromosomes appeared to work best for transplantation

, 177 Dirac, Paul, 163 Discourse on Method (Descartes), 10 DNA: and cells, 145 composition of, 28–9 digital, 163–4 digitized-life-sending-unit, 177 double helix structure of, 4, 21, 28–9, 45 electrical charge of, 104 forensic, 111 fragility of, 103 as genetic material, 4, 24, 26–31 half-life

The Gene: An Intimate History

by Siddhartha Mukherjee  · 16 May 2016  · 824pp  · 218,333 words

form and function. James Watson, Francis Crick, Maurice Wilkins, and Rosalind Franklin solve the three-dimensional structure of DNA, producing the iconic image of the double helix. The three-letter genetic code is deciphered. Two technologies transform genetics in the 1970s: gene sequencing and gene cloning—the “reading” and “writing” of

tucked against each other. The zipper’s teeth had to intercalate. For A, T, G, and C to sit in the interior of the DNA double helix, they had to have some interaction, some relationship. But what did one base—A, say—have to do with another base? One lone chemist

triangle, like the cave paintings at Lascaux, like the Pyramids in Giza, like the image of a fragile blue planet seen from outer space, the double helix of DNA is an iconic image, etched permanently into human history and memory. I rarely reproduce biological diagrams in text—the mind’s eye is

. But sometimes one must break rules for exceptions: A schematic of the double-helical structure of DNA, showing a single helix (left) and its paired double helix (right). Note the complementarity of bases: A is paired with T, and G with C. The winding “backbone” of DNA is made of a

One million helices stacked side by side would fit in this letter: o. The biologist John Sulston wrote, “We see it as a rather stubby double helix, for they seldom show its other striking feature: it is immensely long and thin. In every cell in your body, you have two meters of

a yin-and-yang structure). Molecular forces between the A:T and G:C pairs lock the two strands together, as in a zipper. A double helix of DNA can thus be envisioned as a code written with four alphabets—ATGCCCTACGGGCCCATCG . . .—forever entwined with its mirror-image code. “To see,” the

—I know I am right.’ ” He returned to London and confirmed that his most recent crystallographic data, as well as Franklin’s, clearly supported a double helix. “I think you’re a couple of old rogues, but you may well have something,” Wilkins wrote from London on March 18, 1953. “I

living organism could be stored in such a regular structure had to be solved.” Old questions were replaced by new ones. What features of the double helix enabled it to bear the code of life? How did that code become transcribed and translated into actual form and function of an organism? Why

acids—Methionine, Glycine, Leucine, and so forth—strung together in a chain. Unlike a chain of DNA, which exists primarily in the form of a double helix, a protein chain can twist and turn in space idiosyncratically, like a wire that has been sculpted into a unique shape. This shape-acquiring ability

themselves: How are genes replicated when a cell divides into two cells, or when a sperm or egg is generated? To Watson and Crick, the double-helix model of DNA—with two complementary “yin-yang” strands counterposed against each other—instantly suggested a mechanism for replication. In the last sentence of the

function. Watson and Crick proposed that each DNA strand was used to generate a copy of itself—thereby generating two double helices from the original double helix. During replication, the yin-yang strands of DNA were peeled apart. The yin was used as a template to create a yang, and the

yang to make a yin—and this resulted in two yin-yang pairs. But a DNA double helix cannot autonomously make a copy of itself; otherwise, it might replicate without self-control. An enzyme was likely dedicated to copying DNA—a replicator

Remarkably, the three R’s of gene physiology are acutely dependent on the molecular structure of DNA—on the Watson-Crick base pairing of the double helix. Gene regulation works through the transcription of DNA into RNA—which depends on base pairing. When a strand of DNA is used to build the

DNA is, once again, copied using its image as a guide. Each strand is used to generate a complementary version of itself, resulting in one double helix that splits into two double helices. And during the recombination of DNA, the strategy of interposing base against base is deployed yet again to restore

DNA. The damaged copy of a gene is reconstructed using the complementary strand, or the second copy of the gene, as its guide.V The double helix has solved all three of the major challenges of genetic physiology using ingenious variations on the same theme. Mirror-image chemicals are used to generate

spread linearly along chromosomes. In the 1940s and 1950s, Avery, Watson, and Crick identified DNA as the gene molecule, and described its structure as a double helix—thereby bringing the anatomical conception of the gene to its natural culmination. Between the late 1950s and the 1970s, however, it was the physiology of

development of an organism is addressed in a subsequent chapter. IV. DNA replication requires many more proteins than just DNA polymerase to unfold the twisted double helix and to ensure that the genetic information is copied accurately. And there are multiple DNA polymerases, with slightly different functions, found in cells. V.

the Latin word ligare—“to tie together”), chemically stitches the two pieces of the broken backbone of DNA together, thus restoring the integrity of the double helix. Occasionally, the DNA-copying enzyme, “polymerase,” might also be recruited to fill in the gap and repair a broken gene. The cutting enzymes came

proteins are called “restriction” enzymes because they restrict infections by certain viruses. Like molecular scissors, these enzymes recognize unique sequences in DNA and cut the double helix at very specific sites. The specificity is key: in the molecular world of DNA, a targeted gash at the jugular can be lethal. One microbe

by identifying the chemical form of that material: genetic information was carried in DNA. Watson, Crick, Wilkins, and Franklin solved its molecular structure as a double helix, with two paired, complementary strands. In the 1930s, Beadle and Tatum solved the mechanism of gene action by discovering that a gene “worked” by specifying

four quarters of the century.” “The first established the cellular basis of heredity: the chromosomes. The second defined the molecular basis of heredity: the DNA double helix. The third unlocked the informational basis of heredity [i.e., the genetic code], with the discovery of the biological mechanism by which cells read the

to photograph and study the structure of DNA. Photograph 51 is the clearest of Franklin’s photographs of a DNA crystal. The photo suggested a double-helix structure, although the precise orientations of the bases A, C, T, and G were not clear from it. James Watson and Francis Crick demonstrate

their model of DNA as a double helix in Cambridge in 1953. Watson and Crick solved the structure of DNA by realizing that the A in one strand was paired against the T

.nlm.nih.gov/ps/retrieve/Narrative/CC/p-nid/35. No one knew or understood the chemical structure: Robert C. Olby, The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA (New York: Dover Publications, 1994), 107. Swiss biochemist, Friedrich Miescher: George P. Sakalosky, Notio Nova: A New Idea (Pittsburgh, PA:

Dorrance, 2014), 58. extremely “unsophisticated” structure: Olby, Path to the Double Helix, 89. “stupid molecule”: Garland Allen and Roy M. MacLeod, eds., Science, History and Social Activism: A Tribute to Everett Mendelsohn, vol. 228 (Dordrecht: Springer Science

& Business Media, 2013), 92. “structure-determining, supporting substance”: Olby, Path to the Double Helix, 107. “primordial sea”: Richard Preston, Panic in Level 4: Cannibals, Killer Viruses, and Other Journies to the Edge of Science (New York: Random House, 2009

perspective,” Zebrafish 5, no. 4 (2008): 243–45. “Important Biological Objects Come in Pairs” One could not be a successful scientist: James D. Watson, The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1981), 13. It is the molecule that has the glamour: Francis

Research: A Risk Worth Taking (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2004), 85. Among the early converts: Maurice Wilkins, Maurice Wilkins: The Third Man of the Double Helix: An Autobiography (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003). Ernest Rutherford: Richard Reeves, A Force of Nature: The Frontier Genius of Ernest Rutherford (New York: W. W

Physiology: A Biographical Dictionary (New York: Garland, 1990), 575. She “barks often, doesn’t succeed in biting me”: James D. Watson, The Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, ed. Alexander Gann and J. A. Witkowski (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2012), letter to Crick, 151. “Now she’s trying to drown me”: Brenda

Rosalind Franklin: The Dark Lady of DNA (New York: HarperCollins, 2002), 164. Franklin found most of her male colleagues “positively repulsive”: Watson, Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, letter from Rosalind Franklin to Anne Sayre, March 1, 1952, 67. It was not just sexism: Crick never believed that Franklin was affected by sexism

, if any, excitement: Watson Fuller, “For and against the helix,” Maurice Wilkins Papers, no. 00c0a9ed-e951-4761-955c-7490e0474575. “Before Maurice’s talk”: Watson, Double Helix, 23. “Maurice was English”: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/SCBBKH.pdf. “nothing about the X-ray diffraction”: Watson

, or TMV. But he was vastly more interested in DNA and soon abandoned all other projects to focus on DNA. Watson, Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, 127. “A youthful arrogance”: Crick, What Mad Pursuit, 64. “The trouble is, you see, that there is”: Watson, Annotated and Illustrated

of the polypeptide chain,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 37, no. 4 (1951): 205–11. “product of common sense”: Watson, Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, 44. “like trying to determine the structure of a piano”: http://www.diracdelta.co.uk/science/source/c/r/crick%20francis/source.html#.Vh8XlaJeGKI. The

British: A Genetic Journey (Edinburgh: Berlinn, 2014); and from Rosalind Franklin’s laboratory notebooks, dated 1951. “Superficially, the X-ray data”: Watson, Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, 73. “check it with”: Ibid. Wilkins, Franklin, and her student, Ray Gosling: Bill Seeds and Bruce Fraser accompanied them on this visit. As Gosling recalled

, “Rosalind let rip”: Watson, Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, 91. “His mood”: Ibid., 92. In the first weeks of January 1953: Linus Pauling and Robert B. Corey, “A proposed structure for the nucleic

, no. 2 (1953): 84–97. “V.Good. Wet Photo”: http://profiles.nlm.nih.gov/ps/access/KRBBJF.pdf. “important biological objects come in pairs”: Watson, Double Helix, 184. he would later write defensively: Anne Sayre, Rosalind Franklin & DNA (New York: W. W. Norton, 1975), 152. “Suddenly I became aware”: Watson, Annotated

.2046%2C0.5569%2C0.3498. “I like the idea”: Fuller, “Who said helix?” with related papers. “The positioning of the backbone”: Watson, Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, 222. On April 25, 1953: J. D. Watson and F. H. C. Crick, “Molecular structure of nucleic acids: A structure for deoxyribose nucleic acid,”

and metabolism in Neurospora,” Physiological reviews 25, no. 4 (1945): 643–63. “For over a year”: James D. Watson, Genes, Girls, and Gamow: After the Double Helix (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 2002), 31. “I am playing with complex organic”: http://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/coll/pauling/dna/corr/sci9.001.43

. Müller-Wille, Staffan, and Hans-Jörg Rheinberger. A Cultural History of Heredity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2012. Olby, Robert C. The Path to the Double Helix: The Discovery of DNA. New York: Dover Publications, 1994. Paley, William. The Works of William Paley. Philadelphia: J. J. Woodward, 1836. Patterson, Paul H.

Lee, eds. Genetics and the Unsettled Past: The Collision of DNA, Race, and History. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2012. Watson, James D. The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1981. ———. Recombinant DNA: Genes and Genomes: A Short Course. New York

. Mapping Fate: A Memoir of Family, Risk, and Genetic Research. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1995. Wilkins, Maurice. Maurice Wilkins: The Third Man of the Double Helix: An Autobiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. Wright, William. Born That Way: Genes, Behavior, Personality. London: Routledge, 2013. Yi, Doogab. The Recombinant University: Genetic

creativity bipolar disease and, 448–49, 453 gene variants linked to, 386, 450 Crick, Francis, 147 background and training of, 147 DNA replication and, 179 double-helix DNA model of, 13, 148–49, 150–52, 154–56, 158, 159, 160, 161, 179, 182, 314, 502 Franklin’s talk on DNA structure

microbial defense system, 472, 477, 478, 489 Cro-Magnons, 332–33 crossing over, 96, 97, 182, 208, 334–35, 502 Crow, James, 274, 275 crystallography double-helix model using, 152, 158 three-dimensional structure of DNA on, 142, 143, 147 Culver, Kenneth, 424n Curie, Marie, 145 Cutshall, Cynthia, 426, 427–28, 429

experiments to form, 411 recombinant. See recombinant DNA replication of, 179–80, 180n, 182, 288, 296 sequencing of. See gene sequencing Watson and Crick’s double-helix model of, 13, 150–51, 154–59, 160, 179, 182, 314, 502 Watson on Wilkin’s research on, 146 Wilkin on three-dimensional structure of

, in humans, 451 Dolly (sheep cloning experiment), 397 dominant traits, Mendel’s plant-breeding experiments, 51–52 dopamine-receptor gene, 385 Doppler, Christian, 20, 52 double-helix model of DNA, 13, 150–51, 154–59, 160, 179, 182, 314, 502 Doudna, Jennifer, 470, 471–72, 474, 476 Down syndrome description of

, 30 human origin and migration theory and, 336 Foucault, Michel, 462 Franklin, Rosalind background and training of, 143–44 criticism of Watson and Crick’s double-helix DNA model by, 151–52 imaging research on DNA structure by, 13, 144–45, 149–50, 153, 153n, 155, 158, 159, 314, 502 Watson’

Celera’s genome sequencing and, 319 Crick’s relationship with, 147–48, 147n decision to work on DNA structure by, 146 DNA replication and, 179 double-helix DNA model of, 13, 150–51, 154–59, 160, 161, 179, 182, 314, 502 evaluation of genome sequencing by, 302, 303 Franklin’s research

, 13 three-dimensional structure of DNA and, 13, 142–44, 145–46, 149, 153–54, 153n, 155, 158, 159, 314, 502 Watson and Crick’s double-helix DNA model and, 151, 158 Wilson, Allan, 333, 333n, 334–36, 438, 439 Wilson, Edmund, 358, 359 Wilson, James, 429–30, 431, 432, 434,

The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race

by Walter Isaacson  · 9 Mar 2021  · 700pp  · 160,604 words

. It was an echo of the work Rosalind Franklin had done with DNA, which was used by James Watson and Francis Crick to discover the double-helix structure of DNA in 1953. As it happens, Watson, a complex figure, would weave in and out of Doudna’s life. Doudna’s expertise in

like I was the son that he wanted to have,” she says. “I was treated a bit differently than my sisters.” James Watson’s The Double Helix Doudna’s father was a voracious reader who would check out a stack of books from the local library each Saturday and finish them by

from the library or the local secondhand bookstore, for her to read. And that is how a used paperback copy of James Watson’s The Double Helix ended up on her bed one day when she was in sixth grade, waiting for her when she got home from school. She put the

the reasons why nature worked the way it did.” Doudna’s career would be shaped by the insight that is at the core of The Double Helix: the shape and structure of a chemical molecule determine what biological role it can play. It is an amazing revelation for those who are interested

molecules—becomes biology. In a larger sense, her career would also be shaped by the realization that she was right when she first saw The Double Helix on her bed and thought that it was one of those detective mysteries that she loved. “I have always loved mystery stories,” she noted years

make what Watson, with his typical grandiosity cloaked in the pretense of humility, would later tell her was the most important biological advance since the double helix. Darwin Mendel CHAPTER 2 The Gene Darwin The paths that led Watson and Crick to the discovery of DNA’s structure were pioneered a century

unable to refrain from correcting his colleagues’ sloppy thinking and then crowing about it. As Watson memorably put it in the opening sentence of The Double Helix, “I have never seen Francis Crick in a modest mood.” It was a line that could likewise have been written of Watson, and they admired

the atoms comported with the X-ray data and the laws of chemical bonds. In Watson’s memorable and only slightly hyperbolic phrase in The Double Helix, “Francis winged into the Eagle to tell everyone within hearing distance that we had found the secret of life.” The solution was too beautiful not

that science could be fun. All of the previous science books she read had “pictures of emotionless men wearing lab coats and glasses.” But The Double Helix painted a more vibrant picture. “It made me realize that science can be very exciting, like being on a trail of a cool mystery and

sleeping grass that curled when you touched it, and the human cells that became cancerous: they were all connected to the detective story of the double helix. She decided that she wanted to study chemistry at college, but like many female scientists of the time, she met resistance. When she explained her

of the many roots of the Human Genome Project involved Doudna’s childhood hero James Watson and his son Rufus. The provocative author of The Double Helix was the director of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, a haven for biomedical research and seminars on a 110-acre wooded campus on the north shore

laugh. “That was his way. You know how it is.” Despite his frequent public comments about women’s looks, beginning with Rosalind Franklin in The Double Helix, he was a good mentor to women. “He was very supportive to a close woman friend of mine who was a postdoc,” Doudna says. “That

molecules. Linus Pauling worked out the spiral structure of proteins in the early 1950s, which was followed by Watson and Crick’s paper on the double-helix structure of DNA. Doudna realized that she would need to learn more about structural biology if she wanted to truly understand how some RNA molecules

to create its three-dimensional shape. A cluster of metal ions in that domain formed a core around which the structure folded. Just as the double-helix structure of DNA revealed how it could store and transmit genetic information, the structure discovered by Doudna and her team explained how the RNA could

, Doudna’s thesis advisor, discovered in the 1980s one of the keys to editing a gene: causing a break in both strands of the DNA double helix, known as a double-strand break. When this happens, neither strand can serve as a template to repair the other. So the genome repairs itself

appear ambitious, but she knew how to balance this by being collegial and forthright. She had learned about the importance of competition from reading The Double Helix, which describes how the perceived footsteps of Linus Pauling were a catalyst for James Watson and Francis Crick. “Healthy rivalries,” she later wrote, “have fueled

we could genetically engineer height or eye color? What about intelligence? Would we do that? Should we? Francis Crick, the co-discoverer of DNA’s double-helix structure, was there, but he stayed silent as he sipped his beer.6 The discussions led Berg to convene a group of biologists in January

first arose.” Her parents, she recalls, were shocked when the first test-tube baby was born in 1978. She was fourteen, had just read The Double Helix, and remembers discussing with them why they thought creating babies by in vitro fertilization was unnatural and felt wrong. “But then it came to be

, it’s genetic.” Later, there was a moment of self-awareness. “It should be no surprise that someone who won the race to find the double helix should think that genes are important.” The documentary aired the first week of January 2019, and Amy Harmon of the New York Times wrote a

with their greatness. But Watson is an important part of the story I am writing—this book begins with Doudna picking up his seminal The Double Helix and deciding to become a biochemist—and his views on genetics and human enhancement are an undercurrent of the policy debates over gene editing. So

is the most important discovery since DNA’s structure,” he tells Doudna, “is that it not only describes the world, as we did with the double helix, but makes it easy to change the world.” He and Doudna discuss the Watsons’ other son, Duncan, who lives in Berkeley near Doudna. “We were

’s home, I ask Doudna her thoughts. “I was thinking back to when I was twelve and began reading the dog-eared copy of The Double Helix,” she says. “It would have been wild to know that years later I would be visiting with him in his home having that conversation.” She

says. “He has said some really bad things, but every time I see him, I am brought back to that day when I read The Double Helix and first started thinking, ‘Gee, I wonder if I could do that kind of science someday.’ ”2 PART NINE Coronavirus I have no idea what

him to give me and our daughter who lives in Paris a Zoom lecture on the book.”2 Like Doudna, Urnov read Watson’s The Double Helix when he was about thirteen and decided to become a biologist. “Jennifer and I joke about the fact that we both read The

Double Helix at about the same age,” he says. “For all of Watson’s shortcomings as a human being, which are substantial, he produced a ripping good

. It celebrated the hundredth anniversary of the birth of Rosalind Franklin, whose pioneering work on the structure of DNA inspired Doudna, when she read The Double Helix as a young girl, to believe that women could do science. The cover of the meeting’s program featured a colorized photograph of Franklin peering

the Plague made me realize that I was understating the case. A few weeks ago, I found my old copy of James Watson’s The Double Helix. Like Doudna, I got the book as a gift from my father when I was in school. It’s a first edition with the pale

section draws from my multiple interviews with James Watson over a period of years and from his book The Double Helix, originally published by Atheneum in 1968. I used The Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, compiled by Alexander Gann and Jan Witkowski (Simon & Schuster, 2012), which includes the letters describing the DNA model and

’s interviews with George Church, Eric Lander, and James Watson. 6. Frederic Golden and Michael D. Lemonick, “The Race Is Over,” and James Watson, “The Double Helix Revisited,” Time, July 3, 2000; author’s conversations with Al Gore, Craig Venter, James Watson, George Church, and Francis Collins. 7. Author’s own notes

–46 cowpox, 436 Crichton, Michael, 271 Crick, Francis, 20–28, 47, 166, 389, 475 at Asilomar, 269 on central dogma of biology, 44 in DNA double-helix structure discovery, xviii, 7, 11, 26–28, 29–31, 46, 51, 58, 159, 423, 470 with DNA model, 16 Franklin’s work and, 25, 26

biology, 44, 47, 270 cloning, 34–35, 98, 153, 280, 313, 415–16 CRISPR sequences of, see CRISPR crystallography and, 19–23, 51 discovery of double-helix structure of, xviii, 7, 11, 26–28, 29–31, 46, 51, 58, 159, 386, 390, 395, 397, 423, 470 editing of, see gene editing Franklin

, 74, 79, 80, 83, 172 vaccines, 439–41, 444–45, 456 in viruses, 65 in yeast, 35, 45 Dolly the sheep, 280, 313, 415–16 Double Helix, The (Watson), xix, 6–8, 9, 20, 21, 27, 29–31, 50, 157, 328, 391, 397, 398, 414, 459, 477–78 Doudna, Dorothy (mother), 2

), 215 Zhang’s emails and, 200–201, 207 see also CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing curiosity of, xix, 4, 5, 8, 31, 46, 51, 479 The Double Helix read by, xix, 6–8, 29–31, 157, 328, 391, 397, 398, 414, 459, 477 first marriage of, 54–56, 63 Genentech and, 97–102

Doudna, Martin (father), 2, 3–8, 32, 34, 58–60, 397–98, 472–73 cancer of, 58–59 death of, 59–60 Watson’s The Double Helix given to Jennifer by, xix, 6–8, 477 Doudna, Sarah (sister), 2, 3, 472–73 Down’s syndrome, 337 Doxzen, Kevin, 255 dragonflies, 170 Dr

, 18 as Cold Spring Harbor director, 37 Cold Spring Harbor’s cutting of ties with, 386, 387, 390 Crick’s meeting of, 20 in DNA double-helix structure discovery, xviii, 7, 11, 26–28, 29–31, 46, 51, 58, 159, 386, 390, 395, 397, 423, 470 with DNA model, 16 The

Double Helix, xix, 6–8, 9, 20, 21, 27, 29–31, 50, 157, 328, 391, 397, 398, 414, 459, 477–78 Doudna and, xviii, 8, 29, 48–

Editing Humanity: The CRISPR Revolution and the New Era of Genome Editing

by Kevin Davies  · 5 Oct 2020  · 741pp  · 164,057 words

have even expanded the original four-letter genetic alphabet by synthesizing novel chemical building blocks that can substitute for the naturally occurring ones in the double helix. This paves the way for designing synthetic proteins containing novel building blocks.20 Advances in reading and writing are very important. But if I could

applications. According to the doyen of DNA, Jim Watson, what Doudna and Charpentier did was “the biggest advance in science since the discovery of the double helix.” But it’s important to use it so that it’s equitable. “If it’s only used to solve the problems and desires of the

torn or out of order—was a monumental achievement. This was the moonshot of biology, arguably the biggest event since Crick and Watson assembled the double helix in 1953. We had become the first species to translate the instruction manual, even if we couldn’t describe how much of it works. Textbook

.15 One of the simplest arrangements—Type II—features an enzyme called Cas9. This nuclease makes a clean break on both strands of the DNA double helix like a pair of nail clippers, but not indiscriminately. It grabs an RNA tag, holding it like a mugshot, searching the incoming DNA for a

cue to briefly caress the DNA. “That ephemeral interaction results in a distortion of the DNA,” explains Wiedenheft. By bending the DNA, Cas9 unzips the double helix to allow the guide RNA to slip into the resulting crevice (forming a so-called R-loop).18 The guide conducts a quick sequence check

, each Cas9 molecule scours the densely packed coils of DNA to identify PAM sites, which occur on average once every full 360° rotation of the double helix. In principle, the enzyme has to interrogate 300–400 million bases to identify its precise target. Johan Elf, a biophysicist at Uppsala University in Sweden

hours to search through every PAM sequence in the bacterial genome, pausing at each prospective site for a mere twenty milliseconds to peer into the double helix to see if it has found the correct target.21 But the packaging of DNA in a eukaryotic cell nucleus is far more complex than

of a PAM sequence, which is the cue to check for a sequence match. 2. Locking In: Cas9 binds to the DNA and unzips the double helix, allowing the crRNA to align to the single-stranded DNA. 3. Cutting: If there is a perfect DNA:RNA match, Cas9 undergoes a conformational change

can be any of the four bases. IV. Cas9 actually has two active sites, providing two separate cutting actions, one for each strand of the double helix. V. ZFN, zinc finger nuclease; TALEN, transcription activator-like effector nuclease (see chapter 8). VI. It will never catch on, but Patrick Harrison, a geneticist

and ponder their evolution. When she was about twelve, Doudna’s father left a book on her bed—a dog-eared paperback copy of The Double Helix, Jim Watson’s riveting personal tale of the discovery of the structure of DNA. She ignored it at first, assuming it was a detective novel

—which, in a sense, it was. The Double Helix remains an astonishing story of naked scientific ambition and fierce rivalries. Watson was widely criticized for the sexist manner in which he portrayed Rosalind Franklin

and thus was denied a share of the Nobel Prize, which was awarded to Crick, Watson, and her former colleague, Maurice Wilkins, in 1962. The Double Helix captured Doudna’s imagination, as it has countless young scientists, revealing how biologists could solve the secrets of life by probing the atomic structure of

Crick—DNA >>> RNA >>> protein—RNA was sometimes overlooked. It was considered by some a disposable copy of the genome, lacking the majestic symmetry of the double helix or the exquisite three-dimensional complexity and diversity of proteins, which carry out the essential functions in life. In 1960, Crick and Sydney Brenner postulated

Research Council report containing Rosalind Franklin’s unpublished DNA crystallography data with Crick and Watson. That sneak peak proved critical in the assembly of the double helix. CHAPTER 5 DNA SURGERY In March 2011, Doudna and Charpentier met for the first time at a small conference at the InterContinental San Juan in

of a eukaryote cell nucleus? Human DNA might have the same four-letter alphabet as bacterial or viral DNA, but in its natural habitat, the double helix in eukaryotic cells is wrapped, bundled, and looped like a garden hose around protein cores in a material called chromatin. Nobody knew for sure how

good collaborate [sic] on in the future! Very best wishes, Feng The Boston bombshell came from Feng Zhang at the Broad Institute. Just like the double helix, the story of CRISPR genome editing has a complementary strand, the twists and turns of which are still being unraveled. I. Cool’s scope of

scientific household, Urnov’s father was friends with the family of the great Russian molecular biologist Vladimir Engelhardt, who lent him a copy of The Double Helix. Watson’s book had a profound effect on the fourteen-year-old Urnov, especially the “incomparable taste of having discovered a secret.” After one reading

CXCR4 co-receptor. CHAPTER 9 DELIVERANCE OR DISASTER The conceptual seeds of genetic engineering date back deep into the 20th century, two decades before the double helix and more than a decade before the demonstration that DNA, not protein, was the genetic material. In 1932, some five hundred scientists traveled to Ithaca

the banks of time with the dinosaurs and trilobites—if he will only accept the new science of genetic engineering. Written two years before the double helix, Williamson understandably took some pleasure in his foresight—only to learn that the Oxford English Dictionary had unearthed a previous use of the phrase in

I have made the most remarkable discovery. We have solved the structure of deoxyribosenucleic acid (D.N.A.)…” On the next page, Crick sketched the double helix, showing the pairing of the four bases—C with G, A with T. After several more pages of near textbook detail, Crick invited his son

his twenty-fifth birthday. A few weeks later, on April 25, 1953, the world—or at least Nature subscribers—got their first glimpse of the double helix. It was a family affair: the eight-hundred-word report was typed up by Watson’s sister Elizabeth, while the

traveled slowly in those days. It took the New York Times six weeks before it saw fit to print a front-page story on the double helix. Watson and Crick published a follow-up paper in which they proposed that “the precise sequence of the bases is the code which carries the

diseases. Only then could they contemplate how to fix it. Watson has been justifiably criticized for his sexist portrayal of Franklin (“terrible Rosie”) in The Double Helix, which was published over Crick’s objections in 1968. In subsequent editions and other venues, he has acknowledged the importance of her scientific contributions. But

1977. Along the way, Sinsheimer demonstrated that the viral genome was merely a single strand of DNA, a stunning result that overturned six years of double helix dogma, like “finding a unicorn in the ruminant section of the zoo,” Sinsheimer said. He followed that with another heretical result: the ΦX174 DNA wasn

event. * * * Sinsheimer’s vision of “genetic change, specifically of mankind,” was fueled by the successful elucidation of the universal genetic code. The beauty of the double helix had immediately suggested how DNA could replicate itself, each strand unzipped becoming the template for a new daughter strand. Kornberg won the Nobel Prize for

summit he had wanted to conquer since his audacious manifesto was dismissed by the medical establishment two decades earlier. As a student, inspired by the double helix and Roger Bannister’s four-minute mile, Anderson had two goals in life: “I was going to be in the Olympics and I was going

Tokyo by showing a picture of the serpent-entwined Rod of Asclepius, the ancient Greek symbol of medicine. Next he substituted the snake with the double helix—the repository of all genetic information. “We would like to think that knowledge of this molecule is going to markedly change the way we understand

acid to valine) in the beta globin chain. Ingram made his breakthrough at the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, where Crick and Watson had assembled the double helix four years earlier, although Ingram’s lab was a converted bicycle shed.18 A decade later, Makio Murayama showed how the appearance of that rogue

joking with colleagues, and proudly displaying an encyclopedia of books he had published containing a complete human genome sequence, dozens of volumes stacked in a double helix tower configuration. There were also scenes of him enthusiastically playing five-a-side soccer as his wife and baby look on.34 Early in 2018

six months later. It was logical that JK would select Nature as the prize venue for his CRISPR babies report. The journal had published the double helix of course, but also the seminal IVF papers of JK’s idol Robert Edwards, as well as the first (and only) two human embryo editing

Halcyon that could read gene sequences by stretching a DNA molecule like a piece of bubble gum, allowing scientists to visualize the rungs of the double helix under an electron microscope. He also founded Knome,I the first company to offer personal genome sequencing years before the $1,000 genome became a

in the 20th century, the new century will be driven by the parts list of biology—the seminal discoveries of molecular biology spinning off the double helix and the genomic revolution. In the first two decades of the 21st century, we advanced from a White House celebration of the first human genome

off. “Single-stranded DNA is a lot more reactive than when it is double-stranded,” Komor says. When Cas9 binds to DNA, it unzips the double helix to expose a stretch of about five bases of single-stranded DNA. Here, then, was a window to perform some cool chemistry. Komor began with

that cleaves DNA. By replacing a single amino acid in the enzyme, Komor could restore a “nickase” function that would clip one strand of the double helix. By nicking the G-containing strand (leaving the U intact) she could trigger the cell’s DNA repair machinery to fix the G rather than

pegRNA and RT enzyme to copy the pegRNA strand into DNA. This results in a flap of DNA that needs to be stitched into the double helix. (Helpfully, cells have enzymes called “flap nucleases” that help in this process.) Finally, the method introduces a nick into the complementary strand, which is then

induced “a kind of moral vertigo.”49 That unease has been triggered numerous times before and after the genetic engineering revolution—the structure of the double helix, the solution of the genetic code, the recombinant DNA revolution, prenatal genetic diagnosis, embryonic stem cells, and the cloning of Dolly. “Test tube baby” was

supported. I believe that day will come eventually. Perhaps by 2032, the centennial of Brave New World. Or 2053, the one hundredth anniversary of the double helix. Or 2078, when Louise Brown turns one hundred. Or 2100, a century since we first cracked the sequence of the human genome. No drug comes

have made over the past fifty to seventy-five years, unraveling the secrets of the gene and the genome like the Cas enzyme unzipping the double helix. Francis Crick and Jim Watson’s classic 1953 letter to Nature consisted of eight hundred words and one diagram—a beautiful, elegant pencil drawing of

the double helix courtesy of Crick’s wife Odile. CRISPR has given us the means to modify the DNA code as easily (almost) as a deft flick of

Odile’s pencil eraser. Odile Crick was a professional painter with a penchant for nudes. She wasn’t as enamored with the double helix breakthrough as her husband. “You were always coming home and saying things like that, so naturally I thought nothing of it,” she recalled. Nevertheless, her

double helix became not only the most famous scientific drawing of the 20th century but also the universal symbol of humankind’s quest to understand, repair, manipulate,

Body. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1994. Luke Timmerman. Hood: Trailblazer of the Genomics Age. Seattle: Bandera Press, 2016. James D. Watson. The Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2012. James D. Watson, Andrew Berry, and Kevin Davies. DNA: The Story of the Genetic Revolution. New York: Knopf, 2017. Timothy

Delbruck, March 12, 1953, http://scarc.library.oregonstate.edu/coll/pauling/dna/corr/corr432.1-watson-delbruck-19530312-transcript.html. 7. Brenda Maddox, “DNA’s double helix: 60 years since life’s deep molecular secret was discovered,” Guardian, February 22, 2013, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/feb/22/watson-crick-dna

-60th-anniversary-double-helix. 8. J. D. Watson and F. H. C. Crick, “Molecular Structure of Nucleic Acids: A Structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid,” Nature 171, (1953):737–738

, http://dosequis.colorado.edu/Courses/MethodsLogic/papers/WatsonCrick1953.pdf. 9. Brenda Maddox, “DNA’s double helix: 60 years since life’s deep molecular secret was discovered,” Guardian, February 22, 2013, https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/feb/22/watson-crick-dna

-60th-anniversary-double-helix. 10. Symposium held at Ohio Wesleyan University, Delaware, on April 6, 1963. The proceedings were published in The Control of Human Heredity and Evolution (1965

, 182–186, 322, 327–328 cutting, xii, 7, 20–21, 24, 26–29, 28, 45, 55, 65, 69, 99–100, 112–113, 180, 296, 324 double helix, xvi, 7, 18, 26–28, 47–48, 60, 68, 100, 123–130, 154–155, 227, 280, 327–328, 333–334, 355, 362, 367 editing, xii

–354 sponsored sequencing, 281 views on, xiv–xv DNA surgery, 63–75 Dobbs, David, 147 “Don’t Edit the Human Germline,” 197 Doomsday Clock, 5 Double helix. See also DNA anniversary of, 362 assembly of, 18, 60, 123–125, 154–155 description of, 68 discovery of, 7, 18, 123–130 glimpse of

–28, 28, 47–48, 100, 124–130, 227, 327–328, 333–334, 355 symmetry of, 47–48 unzipping, 26–28, 28, 130, 327–328, 367 Double Helix, The, 47–48, 108, 126 Doudna, Andrew, 10 Doudna, Jennifer, x–xii, xvi, 7–10, 13, 21, 29, 46–67, 70–74, 84, 87–106

A Crack in Creation: Gene Editing and the Unthinkable Power to Control Evolution

by Jennifer A. Doudna and Samuel H. Sternberg  · 15 Mar 2017

four compounds. The letters of these molecules are connected in long single strands. Two of these strands come together to form the famous double-helix structure of DNA. The double helix is a bit like a ladder twisted into a long, spiraling coil. Two strands of DNA wrap around each other along a central

A from one strand always pairs with T on the other strand, and G always pairs with C. These are known as base pairs. The double helix beautifully reveals the molecular basis of heredity; this is how a relatively simple chemical like DNA can transmit genetic information to two daughter cells upon

strand acts as a perfect template for its matching pair. Shortly before cell reproduction, the two strands are separated by an enzyme that “unzips” the double helix right down the middle. After that, other enzymes build a new partner strand for each single strand simply by using the same base-pairing rules

, resulting in two exact copies of the original double helix. My own introduction to the DNA double helix coincided with my discovery that scientists could learn about molecules that were too tiny to see with even the most powerful light

microscopes. I came home from school one day when I was about twelve or so to find a tattered copy of James Watson’s The Double Helix lying on my bed. (My dad would occasionally pick up books for me at used bookstores to see if they sparked any interest.) Thinking this

microscopes. I came home from school one day when I was about twelve or so to find a tattered copy of James Watson’s The Double Helix lying on my bed. (My dad would occasionally pick up books for me at used bookstores to see if they sparked any interest.) Thinking this

-start my own scientific career by determining some of the first three-dimensional structures of far more complex RNA molecules.) The structure of the DNA double helix In the years that followed Watson and Crick’s discovery, scientists sought to understand how this molecule’s structure and rather simple chemical ingredients could

had culminated in the fantastically exciting discovery that RNA can fold up into three-dimensional structures that are very different from the elegantly simple DNA double helix. But my joy in determining the ribozyme structure, work I did with graduate student Jamie Cate, was accompanied by personal tragedy. That fall, my father

exciting potential. Comparisons with known genes suggested that cas genes coded for specialized enzymes whose functions might include unzipping the two strands of the DNA double helix or slicing up RNA or DNA molecules, just like the DNA-cutting function of restriction endonucleases. Given how useful the discovery of restriction endonucleases had

RNA is chemically so similar to DNA, it can create double helixes of its own by using base-pairing interactions, the same process that forms the famous double helix of DNA. Matching RNA strands can pair with each other, forming an RNA-RNA double helix, but a single strand of RNA can also pair with a

matching single strand of DNA, forming an RNA-DNA double helix. This versatility, and the variety of different sequences found in CRISPR RNA, gave scientists an intriguing idea. It seemed possible that these CRISPR RNA molecules

been posited in that paper that lured me into CRISPR research in the first place! In RNA interference, animal and plant cells form RNA-RNA double helixes to destroy invading viruses. In much the same way, CRISPR RNA molecules might target phage RNA during an immune response by using RNA-RNA

double helixes. I was fascinated by the added possibility that, unlike in RNA interference, CRISPR RNAs might be able to recognize matching DNA too—a power that

CRISPR RNA, meaning that the CRISPR RNA and one of the two DNA strands should be able to form their own double helix through complementary base pairing. Such an RNA-DNA double helix could be the key to the specificity of Cas9’s DNA-cutting activity. Cas9 cuts DNA using two RNA molecules Monitoring

test tube required a sensitive detection method, since there was no way to directly visualize the DNA being cut. At fifty letters long, the DNA double helix would be just seventeen nanometers, or seventeen-billionths of a meter, long, roughly one-thousandth the width of a human hair. Not even the most

and Krzysztof labored tirelessly to answer these questions, and, quickly, an incredible picture began to emerge. They found that Cas9 could latch onto a DNA double helix, pry open the two strands to form a new helix between the CRISPR RNA and one strand of DNA, and then use two nuclease modules

, and his graduate student Terry Orr-Weaver. At the time, many scientists were puzzled by their model describing how cells repaired damage to the DNA double helix, and they were even more flummoxed by the idea, advanced by Memorial Sloan Kettering’s Maria Jasin and others, that researchers could harness this mode

of designer molecular scissors because of its core function: to home in on specific twenty-letter DNA sequences and cut apart both strands of the double helix. Yet the types of gene-editing outcomes that scientists can achieve with this technology are remarkably diverse. For this reason, it might be better to

first characterizing Cas9’s biochemical function, he demonstrated exactly which amino acids of the enzyme chemically cleaved, or sliced apart, each strand of the DNA double helix. By mutating those amino acids, he created a version of Cas9 that had completely lost the ability to cut DNA but, remarkably, could still interact

recessive, 169 diseases, mitochondrial, 196 diversity, 233 DMD (Duchenne muscular dystrophy), 169–70 DMD gene, 169 DNA, 8, 9–15, 104–8 base pairs, 9 double helix, 9–11, 10 editing source code of, 22–26 mutations, 223 repair process, 92–93, 104–8 repeating sequences, 41–42, 43. See also CRISPR

DNA, lab-made, 22 DNA, recombinant, 19, 201, 205, 207 DNA repair, 104–8 dogs, 143–44 Dolly (sheep), 191 double helix, 9–11, 10 double helix, DNA-RNA, 58, 79 double helix, RNA-RNA, 58 Double Helix, The (Watson), 10 double muscling, 130–32, 132, 133, 143 double-strand-break model, 27–29 Doudna, Jennifer American Society

on animal models, 139–40 Caribou Biosciences, 66 Cas9. See Cas9 as classroom guest, 101–2 CRISPR, introduction to, 39–45 CRISPR article (Science), 85 Double Helix, The (Watson), 10–11 dream of, xi–xii education, 21, 25, 27 on ethics of germline editing, 225–30, 234–35 father’s death, 37

defense, 57–58 DNA cutting and, 81, 83 targeting of DNA, 59, 61, 62 RNA interference, 39–40, 44, 45, 58 RNA-DNA double helix, 58, 79 RNA-RNA double helix, 58 Rogers, Stanfield, 16–17 Rothstein, Rodney, 27 Royal Society, 220 S Sabatini, David, 174 Sabine, Charles, 234 safety, of germline editing, 160

Life's Greatest Secret: The Race to Crack the Genetic Code

by Matthew Cobb  · 6 Jul 2015  · 608pp  · 150,324 words

the deepest level. It’s a bloody brilliant book.’ Professor Brian Cox ‘Life’s Greatest Secret is the logical sequel to Jim Watson’s The Double Helix. While Watson and Crick deserve their plaudits for discovering the structure of DNA, that was only part of the story. Beginning to understand how

(1944–2014) – historian, colleague, friend. CONTENTS Foreword 1Genes before DNA 2Information is everywhere 3The transformation of genes 4A slow revolution 5The age of control 6The double helix 7Genetic information 8The central dogma 9Enzyme cybernetics 10Enter the outsiders 11The race Update 12Surprises and sequences 13The central dogma revisited 14Brave new world 15Origins and

the mitochondria that are found in our cells – see Chapter 12. An outline of how the genetic code works during protein synthesis. A DNA double helix in the cell nucleus is partially unravelled and one strand is transcribed into RNA (mRNA). In organisms with a cell nucleus, this mRNA often contains

protein chain. AUG FOREWORD In April 1953, Jim Watson and Francis Crick published a scientific paper in the journal Nature in which they described the double helix structure of DNA, the stuff that genes are made of. In a second article that appeared six weeks later, Watson and Crick put forward

variation that might explain the many functions of genes.22 However perceptive this idea might look in the light of what we now know – the double helix structure of DNA and the fact that genes are composed of molecular sequences – Koltsov’s argument was purely theoretical. Furthermore, it was not unique –

infected cell. And when he made his first public presentation of the results, at the June 1953 Cold Spring Harbor meeting, speaking after the double helix structure of DNA had been described, Hershey was still sure that DNA could not be the sole carrier of hereditary specificity. He addressed this issue

J. ‘The birth of information in the brain: Edgar Adrian and the vacuum tube’, Science in Context, vol. 27, 2015, pp. 31–52. –SIX– THE DOUBLE HELIX On 6 August 1945, when the atomic bomb destroyed Hiroshima, Maurice Wilkins was a 28-year-old British physicist working on the Manhattan Project. Like

between Wilkins and Crick led to what is probably the most intensely studied moment in the history of twentieth century science: the discovery of the double helix structure of DNA. The events surrounding this event have been described in memoirs, biographies, exhibitions, TV programmes, countless academic articles, many inaccurate blog posts

Watson and Crick had already crossed the finishing line. By the end of February 1953, Watson and Crick had agreed the basic outline of the double helix model, but this was merely a seductive concept. It needed to be turned into precise numbers, spatial relationships and chemical bonds, in the shape

of a physical model. It took a week of calculation and intense work before the double helix, with complementary base pairing between A and T and between C and G, finally emerged from a tangle of precise metal templates held together by

four years before the Nobel Prize was awarded to Watson, Crick and Wilkins for their work on DNA structure. In 1968 Jim Watson published The Double Helix, in which he gave a gripping but partial account of events and a frank description of his own bad behaviour, particularly with regard to Franklin

. The epilogue to the book contains a generous and fair description of Franklin’s vital contribution and a recognition of his own failures. The Double Helix also suggested that Max Perutz had given Watson and Crick a confidential document when he handed over the MRC report containing those vital paragraphs by

rap contest can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35FwmiPE9tI. –SEVEN– GENETIC INFORMATION On 19 March 1953, about two weeks after the double helix model had been completed, Francis Crick wrote a letter to his 12-year-old son, Michael, who was at boarding school. Crick told Michael

our notice …’. Much of Watson and Crick’s second article was devoted to expanding on that cheeky insight. They described how, during gene duplication, the double helix could unwind, with each chain forming the template for the construction of a new molecule, leading to the creation of two identical daughter double helices

was Wilkins himself.6 Despite these doubts, the advantage of Crick’s approach was that it explicitly set out the two revolutionary implications of the double helix: complementary base pairing explained gene duplication, while the sequence of bases explained genetic specificity. Here were two hypotheses that would revolutionise biology, if they

were true. Crick recognised the links between the discovery of the double helix and Schrödinger’s ideas from a decade earlier. On 12 August 1953, he sent copies of the two Nature articles to Schrödinger, accompanied by a

much about the relationship between a base sequence in DNA and the amino acid sequence – they were more focused on the problem of how the double helix might unwind during gene replication. They suggested that the sequence was ‘the code that carries the genetical information’, but they had not thought beyond

sequence of amino acids.39 This pointed question went to the heart of everything that had been done since Watson and Crick had discovered the double helix – they had been avoiding the central issues of what the sequence of bases did, or to put it another way, what information they contained.

this time it was generally accepted as a working hypothesis that all genes in all organisms were made of DNA and that the Watson–Crick double helix structure was also correct. Joshua Lederberg, a stickler for terminology, declared audaciously that ‘“gene” is no longer a useful term in exact discourse’.33

Frank Stahl, who carried out what has been described as ‘the most beautiful experiment in biology’.39 One of the problems raised by the double helix structure was how the DNA molecule copied itself. The complementarity of the base pairs on the two strands suggested that the cell used each strand

At the same 1956 Johns Hopkins meeting at which Benzer spoke, Max Delbrück outlined three models for DNA replication – ‘conservative’, in which the original DNA double helix remained intact and was entirely copied into a completely new molecule; ‘semi-conservative’, in which one strand of each molecule was copied, producing two daughter

Stahl’s interpretation. In each round of reproduction the bacterial DNA was copied, using nitrogen from the 14N medium. After one generation, each DNA double helix was composed of a new 14N strand and an old 15N DNA strand. At the second generation, some molecules were composed entirely of 14N-rich

. By resolving the thorny problem of DNA replication, Meselson and Stahl’s elegant and precise experiment represented the final confirmation of the significance of the double helix structure of DNA. As it closed one phase of the history of molecular biology, it opened another, showing that DNA molecules – and hence the

significance of their approach.48 Together, these three papers have been cited more than 5,500 times – more than Watson and Crick on the double helix structure of DNA. In their 1961 review article, Jacob and Monod brought together the ideas that they had been developing in a series of unnoticed

and algae) that indicated that the genetic code was universal; they outlined the growing conviction that only one of the two strands in the DNA double helix was used to make protein via RNA; and they described the recent discovery that non-U-containing polynucleotides could code for amino acids. But

only was Nirenberg allowed to attend, he had pride of place on the programme. In the ten years since gangly Jim Watson had presented the double helix structure of DNA in a stifling Cold Spring Harbor lecture theatre, the field of molecular biology had been utterly transformed – this was the largest

microbial genetics, which had transformed the way that genes were understood and could be studied, and Watson, Crick and Wilkins won in 1962 for the double helix structure of DNA. In 1965, Jacob, Monod and Lwoff were awarded the prize for their work on the repressor and the genetic regulation of

human nuclear genome contains about 3 billion base pairs). (Genes and genomes are measured in ‘base pairs’ because of the two strands of the DNA double helix – for each base there is a complementary base on the other strand, forming a base pair.) It appears that all mitochondria, in all the

gene expression.82 These RNA sequences bind to the DNA of the structural gene and are often produced by the complementary DNA strand in the double helix – this is called anti-sense RNA.83 A large proportion of RNA transcripts produced by mammalian genomes have an anti-sense counterpart that seems

tape, but it can be safely stored for thousands of years if kept in the right conditions. One joker has facetiously suggested that the double helix would be particularly useful for storing the wave of genetic sequence data that is being generated at an exponential rate in laboratories all over the

breakthrough brings the development of organic sensors, for both environmental and medical uses, much closer. * Although we generally describe the structure of DNA as a double helix, it is in fact a bit more complicated than this. Unlike a screw thread, which has a constant pitch or interval between each turn, the

direction – anticlockwise as seen from the top, or right-handed, like a normal screw. It is easy to get confused about which way the double helix should spiral, and in many representations of DNA the molecule spirals the wrong way. In 1996 Tom Schneider began posting images of leftward spiralling double

structures have some functional role, probably in regulating transcription, the evidence is still unclear.21 DNA is not the only molecule that can form a double helix. In 1961, Watson and Crick, together with Alexander Rich and David Davies, suggested that in certain circumstances, RNA, which is normally single-stranded, could

crystallise double stranded RNA and to describe its structure. It, too, has a right-handed spiral.23 There is no evidence that the RNA double helix has any biological function in normal cells, but it may be possible that biotechnology will be able to employ this novel molecular structure. Although RNA

performs essential functions within the cell, even if it has lost its role as the embodiment of genetic information, replaced by the semi-inert double helix of DNA. The double helix – iconic, rigid and fixed – contrasts with the many physical forms that RNA can take, enabling it to carry out such a wide

The adoption of DNA as the genetic material, with its built-in error-correction mechanism in the shape of the two complementary strands in the double helix, and the use of thymine in the sequence, provided a more reliable information store and slowed the rate of potentially damaging mutations. These kind

, vol. 13, 2012, pp. 153–62. Debré, P., Jacques Monod, Paris, Flammarion, 1996. De Chadarevian, S., ‘Portrait of a discovery: Watson, Crick, and the Double Helix’, Isis, vol. 94, 2003, pp. 90–105. Deichmann, U., ‘Early responses to Avery et al.’s paper on DNA as hereditary material’, Historical Studies in

Witkowski, J., ‘The lost correspondence of Francis Crick’, Nature, vol. 467, 2010, pp. 519–24. Gann, A. and Witkowski, J. (eds), The Annotated and Illustrated Double Helix, London, Simon & Schuster, 2012. García-Sancho, M., ‘The rise and fall of the idea of genetic information (1948- 2006)’, Genomics, Society and Policy, vol. 2

1986, p. 618. Gilbert, W., ‘Towards a paradigm shift in biology’, Nature, vol. 349, 1991, p. 99. Gingras, Y., ‘Revisiting the ‘quiet debut’ of the double helix: a bibliometric and methodological note on the ‘impact’ of scientific publications’, Journal of the History of Biology, vol. 43, 2010, pp. 159–81. Glass, B

and Biomedical Sciences, vol. 42, 2011, pp. 119–28. Hall, K., The Man in the Monkeynut Coat: William Astbury and the Forgotten Road to the Double Helix, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2014. Halloran, S. M., ‘The birth of molecular biology: An essay in the rhetorical criticism of scientific discourse’, in R.

encoded at least 10 kb upstream from their main coding regions’, Cell, vol. 12, 1977, pp. 9–21. Klug, A., ‘The discovery of the DNA double helix’, Journal of Molecular Biology, vol. 335, 2004, pp. 3–26. Kogge, W., ‘Script, code, information: How to differentiate analogies in the ‘prehistory’ of molecular

Cell Host Microbe, vol. 15, 2014, pp. 692–705. Watson, J. D., Molecular Biology of the Gene, New York, Benjamin, 1965. Watson, J. D., The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA, London, Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1968. Watson, J. D., Genes, Girls and Gamow, Oxford, Oxford University

: Nobel Lecture, December 11, 1962’, in Nobel Lectures Physiology or Medicine 1942–1962, Elsevier Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1964. Wilkins, M., The Third Man of the Double Helix: An Autobiography, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2003. Wilkins, M. H. F., Gosling, R. G. and Seeds, W. E., ‘Physical studies of nucleic acid: an

(1994, 2009), Ridley (2006), Sayre (1975), Watson (1968, 2001), Wilkins (2003). The most potent account, which has framed all others, is Jim Watson’s The Double Helix (Watson 1968, Gann and Witkowski 2012). For a collection of articles covering this period and afterwards, see Witkowski (2005). 3.Daly et al. (1950), p

genome sequencing Dobzhansky, Theodosius 38–9 Dochez, Alphonse 36 dodder 271 dogs, relatedness 239, 239n domains of life 238–9 Donohue, Jerry 106, 109 double helix A, B, C and Z forms 98–101, 103–6, 273–4 discovery, representations of 90 error-correction mechanisms 290 gene duplication via 111–12

containing Franklin’s data 105, 122 human genome project and 233 joined by Watson 97 at the Moscow Biochemistry Congress 185–6 reaction to The Double Helix 108 reaction to What is life? 17 rhino 239 whale 239, 239n phages defined 317 DNA amplification using 230 genome sequencing 229 Hershey and

243 involvement in protein synthesis 58, 71–2, 116, 184 numbering of sugars and strands 212 presence in tobacco mosaic virus 64 as single or double helix 118, 274 synthetic versions 174–7, 208–10 transgenerational epigenetic factors 258–9 uracil replacing thymine in 123 variety of forms and roles 243,

congress 186–7 attendance at Naples symposium 97 banned from further DNA work 100, 105 book, Molecular Biology of the Gene 140, 251 book, The Double Helix 105, 108 discovery of ‘split genes’ 221 failure to take notes 99–100, 109 first meeting with Crick 97 International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium

As Gods: A Moral History of the Genetic Age

by Matthew Cobb  · 15 Nov 2022  · 772pp  · 150,109 words

need to begin (there is also a glossary at the back). Our genes are made of DNA, a molecule that has two strands – the famous double helix. Each strand carries a sequence of four chemical structures called bases, which are known by their initials, A, C, G and T. The shape of

– in particular they can be structural (for example, hair) or they can alter physiology (for example, enzymes or hormones). When a gene is activated, the double helix is unravelled by enzymes in the cell and the gene is transcribed: the DNA on the strand that carries the gene is used to produce

little over five years after Jim Watson and Francis Crick, using data from Rosalind Franklin and from Maurice Wilkins, had proposed that DNA has a double-helix structure. At this time the role of DNA as the hereditary material in all life was still no more than a working hypothesis. It had

nestled on young scientists’ shelves next to Jim Watson’s recent best-selling novelised account of the race to discover the structure of DNA, The Double Helix.i Watson’s book described events that occurred fifteen years previously but the breakthrough was only now bearing fruit. Furthermore, his lively first-hand descriptions

of the young generation: although Watson’s scornful treatment of women, in particular his depiction of Rosalind Franklin, was straight out of the 1950s, The Double Helix made molecular biology seem modern, attractive, rule-breaking and sexy. These complex and contradictory cultural, political and psychological changes that were shaking the world had

solve the problem of getting two pieces of DNA to fuse together, using what were called ‘sticky ends’. Phage DNA is composed of the usual double helix, but at either end one of the strands sticks out an extra twelve bases.iii These twelve-base sequences at each end are complementary, meaning

the DNA molecule means that A can only bind with T and C can only bind with G. The result is a chain of viral double helixes, or even a circular molecule. These sticky ends would be used as pieces of molecular Velcro that would allow larger molecules to be assembled. David

organism). This had recently been isolated by Herb Boyer’s group at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF). When this enzyme cut the SV40 double helix, it left short sticky ends which Mertz and Davis used to fuse two different lengths of DNA.29 Instead of employing six enzymes with a

biologist Sydney Brenner wrote a think-piece in Nature, ‘New Directions in Molecular Biology’, to mark the twenty-first anniversary of the publication of the double-helix structure of DNA.47 Looking back, the article seems uncharacteristically out of touch. The new directions Brenner described were the basic academic problems of how

the numbers, talent, resources or perhaps simply the drugs that were available at Stanford. iii The cohesive sequences at either end of the phage lambda double helix were GGGCGGCGACCT and AGGTCGCCGCCC. The two strands of a DNA molecule point in different directions; you can see how the last T of the first

he had done in his life – far more significant than his co-discovery of the structure of DNA. He explained that the discovery of the double helix was inevitable and would eventually have been found by somebody, but his arguments had been pivotal in NIH deciding not to patent human genes. When

its report, the Commission dismissed fears that scientists ‘might remake human beings, like Dr Frankenstein’s monster’ as ‘exaggerated’ (despite this, the cover showed joyous double-helix humans emerging from a test tube). US Presidential report on genetic engineering in humans, 1982. However, the Commission also warned that ‘if beneficial rather than

are today. At the heart of this radical change has been the discovery of what happens in cells when the DNA double helix is broken. Damage to a single strand of the double helix is easy for the cell to repair – the sequence on the intact strand is used as a way of synthesising

mammalian stem cells and had a very low level of efficacy. The ideal way of changing genes precisely and effectively would be to cut the double helix at a desired point in the genome, in a cell that was in an appropriate physiological state to use homologous recombination to alter the damaged

finger recognises three base pairs, so by stringing together a number of these molecules a high degree of sequence specificity can be achieved), cutting the double helix at that point.5 These artificial zinc finger nucleases were described as chimeric, after the chimera, a hybrid animal in Greek mythology. In 1999, Chandrasegaran

involved in CRISPR, vast. The CRISPR components have to rapidly find the chromosomes, get access to the bases which are on the inside of the double helix and then screen billions of base pairs to find their unique target. And they have to do this twice, once for each chromosome that contains

challenge for our ingenuity. And as that broader focus implies, heritable human gene editing is not the only worrying application of our understanding of the double helix – scientists also have their eyes on nature itself. Footnotes i In 2022, Rebrikov revealed that as soon as he could find a willing deaf couple

. As long ago as 1990, Steven Benner – one of the founding figures of synthetic biology – created two new complementary bases that could slot into the double helix, extending the genetic code from sixty-four possible combinations to 216.86 Since then, many other researchers have introduced yet more bases, and have altered

by the past decades is utterly different and would bewilder the French philosopher. In 1953 Watson and Crick published a paper in Nature (not the double helix article but another one, which appeared six weeks later) outlining this new view. They claimed that in the DNA molecule ‘the precise sequence of the

given allele will not be dominant against all others) and in many cases both alleles are expressed. DNA. Deoxyribonucleic acid, a molecule formed of a double helix that is composed of a sugar/phosphate backbone and four bases: adenine, cytosine, guanine and thymine (A, C, G and T). The genetic material in

. Non-homologous end-joining. DNA repair mechanism in response to a double strand break, in which the cell fuses the two cut ends of the double helix. Different cells at different points in their cycle and in different organisms tend to preferentially use either homologous recombination or non-homologous end-joining. Non

, S. (1974), Nature 248:785–7. The next article in the issue described, in great detail, Rosalind Franklin’s contribution to the discovery of the double helix: Klug, A. (1974), Nature 248:785–8. 48 Morange, The Black Box of Biology, p. 197. The same was true of Brenner’s friend and

Life on the Edge: The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology

by Johnjoe McFadden and Jim Al-Khalili  · 14 Oct 2014  · 476pp  · 120,892 words

in the Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, managed to fit a remarkable structure to the experimental data obtained from DNA by their colleague Rosalind Franklin: the double helix. Each DNA strand was found to be a kind of molecular string made up of atoms of phosphorus, oxygen and a sugar called deoxyribose, with

DNA provided a mechanistic key that unlocked the mystery of genes. Genes are chemicals and chemistry is just thermodynamics; so did the discovery of the double helix finally bring life entirely into the realm of classical science? Life’s curious grin In Lewis Carroll’s Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland, the Cheshire

to life’s deepest mysteries was and continues to be so revolutionary we need to return to the beginning of the twentieth century, before the double helix had been discovered, when the world of physics was being turned upside down. The quantum revolution The explosion of scientific knowledge during the Enlightenment of

in the soil or, indeed, reading this book. The estrangement The years following the publication of Schrödinger’s book saw the discovery of the DNA double helix and the meteoric rise of molecular biology, a discipline that developed largely without reference to quantum phenomena. Gene cloning, genetic engineering, genome fingerprinting and genome

of DNA has rightly become one of the most iconic images in science, reproduced on T-shirts and websites and even in architecture. But the double helix is essentially just a scaffold. The real secret of DNA lies in what the helix supports. As we outlined briefly in chapter 2, the helical

we have postulated immediately suggests a possible copying mechanism for the genetic material.” What hadn’t escaped their notice was a crucial feature of the double helix, that the information on one of its strands—its sequence of bases—is also present as an inverse copy on the other strand: an A

make two copies of the original double-strand. This is precisely what happens when genes are copied during cell division. The two strands of the double helix with their complementary information are pulled apart to allow an enzyme called DNA polymerase access to each separated strand. The enzyme then attaches to a

same process is repeated on the other strand, giving rise to two copies of the original double helix: one for each daughter cell. Figure 7.1: The structure of DNA: (a) shows Watson and Crick’s double helix; (b) shows a close-up of the paired genetic letters A and T; (c) shows a

a message or the plot of a book is written into the position of letters on a page, so the positions of protons on the double helix determine the story of life. The Swedish physicist Per-Olov Löwdin was the first to point out what seems obvious in hindsight: that the protons

physical mechanisms were that were responsible for generating mutations—changing one marble into another. That all changed in 1953 when Watson and Crick unveiled the double helix. The gene marbles were shown to be made of DNA. The principle that mutations were random then made perfect sense, since well-established causes of

7.2: (a) A standard A–T base pair with the protons in their normal positions; (b) here the paired protons have jumped across the double helix to form the tautomeric form of both A and T. Let’s consider one possible base pair, such as A–T, with the A on

tautomers (figure 7.2b). Each of the DNA bases can therefore exist both in its common canonical form, as seen in Watson and Crick’s double helix structure, and in the rarer tautomer, with its coding protons shifted across to new positions. But remember that the protons forming the hydrogen bonds in

rate than the one in a billion or so rate of mutation we find in nature, so if tautomeric bases are indeed present in the double helix then most of the resulting errors must be removed by the various error correction (“proofreading”) processes that help to ensure the high fidelity of DNA

affect many other biomolecular processes without recourse to any quantum mechanical explanation. Jim has focused on investigating whether quantum tunneling of protons in the DNA double helix is feasible on theoretical grounds. When a theoretical physicist tackles a complex problem such as this, he or she tries to create a simplified model

it. Biologists cannot even agree on a unique definition of life itself; but that hasn’t stopped them from unraveling aspects of the cell, the double helix, photosynthesis, enzymes and a host of other living phenomena, including many driven by quantum mechanics, that have now revealed a great deal about what it

it is and what it does. RNA is DNA’s simpler chemical cousin, and it comes as a single-stranded helix compared with DNA’s double helix. Despite this difference, RNA has more or less the same genetic information coding capacity as its more famous cousin—it just doesn’t have the

chromosome, 2.1, 2.2, 7.1, 9.1 copying errors (mutations), 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 discovery of structure, 2.1, 2.2 double helix, 2.1, 2.2, 7.1, 9.1 emergence genetic engineering genetic information, 2.1, 7.1, 9.1 magnetoreception mitochondrial quantum mechanics, 1.1

The Year's Best Science Fiction: Twenty-Sixth Annual Collection

by Gardner Dozois  · 23 Jun 2009  · 1,263pp  · 371,402 words

wanted to hold time back to the twentieth century, but the Adareans had advanced far beyond that. “What? You mean like the discovery of the double helix, the first genome projects?” “More than that,” the Adarean said. “It’s the great century of political change, of people like Mahatma Gandhi and Martin

The Mutant Project: Inside the Global Race to Genetically Modify Humans

by Eben Kirksey  · 10 Nov 2020  · 599pp  · 98,564 words

Erwin Schrodinger and the Quantum Revolution

by John Gribbin  · 1 Mar 2012  · 287pp  · 87,204 words

The Gene Machine

by Venki Ramakrishnan

The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution

by Richard Dawkins  · 1 Jan 2004  · 734pp  · 244,010 words

Power, Sex, Suicide: Mitochondria and the Meaning of Life

by Nick Lane  · 14 Oct 2005  · 369pp  · 153,018 words

Epigenetics Revolution: How Modern Biology Is Rewriting Our Understanding of Genetics, Disease and Inheritance

by Nessa Carey  · 31 Aug 2011  · 357pp  · 98,854 words

A Short History of Nearly Everything

by Bill Bryson  · 5 May 2003  · 654pp  · 204,260 words

A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived

by Adam Rutherford  · 7 Sep 2016

Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science

by Michael Nielsen  · 2 Oct 2011  · 400pp  · 94,847 words

P53: The Gene That Cracked the Cancer Code

by Sue Armstrong  · 20 Nov 2014  · 260pp  · 84,847 words

Unweaving the Rainbow

by Richard Dawkins  · 7 Aug 2011  · 339pp  · 112,979 words

The Rise and Fall of Modern Medicine

by M. D. James le Fanu M. D.  · 1 Jan 1999  · 564pp  · 163,106 words

The Cancer Chronicles: Unlocking Medicine's Deepest Mystery

by George Johnson  · 26 Aug 2013  · 465pp  · 103,303 words

Where Good Ideas Come from: The Natural History of Innovation

by Steven Johnson  · 5 Oct 2010  · 298pp  · 81,200 words

France (Lonely Planet, 8th Edition)

by Nicola Williams  · 14 Oct 2010

The Scientist as Rebel

by Freeman Dyson  · 1 Jan 2006  · 332pp  · 109,213 words

The Great Influenza: The Story of the Deadliest Pandemic in History

by John M. Barry  · 9 Feb 2004  · 667pp  · 186,968 words

The Biology of Belief: Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter & Miracles

by Bruce H. Lipton  · 1 Jan 2005  · 220pp  · 66,518 words

Red Plenty

by Francis Spufford  · 1 Jan 2007  · 544pp  · 168,076 words

A Devil's Chaplain: Selected Writings

by Richard Dawkins  · 1 Jan 2004  · 460pp  · 107,712 words

Epigenetics: How Environment Shapes Our Genes

by Richard C. Francis  · 14 May 2012

Complexity: A Guided Tour

by Melanie Mitchell  · 31 Mar 2009  · 524pp  · 120,182 words

Life's Edge: The Search for What It Means to Be Alive

by Carl Zimmer  · 9 Mar 2021  · 392pp  · 109,945 words

Cooking for Geeks

by Jeff Potter  · 2 Aug 2010  · 728pp  · 182,850 words

The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood

by James Gleick  · 1 Mar 2011  · 855pp  · 178,507 words

Immortality, Inc.

by Chip Walter  · 7 Jan 2020  · 232pp  · 72,483 words

Lifespan: Why We Age—and Why We Don't Have To

by David A. Sinclair and Matthew D. Laplante  · 9 Sep 2019

The Ones We've Been Waiting For: How a New Generation of Leaders Will Transform America

by Charlotte Alter  · 18 Feb 2020  · 504pp  · 129,087 words

She Has Her Mother's Laugh

by Carl Zimmer  · 29 May 2018

Human Diversity: The Biology of Gender, Race, and Class

by Charles Murray  · 28 Jan 2020  · 741pp  · 199,502 words

The Greatest Show on Earth: The Evidence for Evolution

by Richard Dawkins  · 21 Sep 2009

The Evolution of Everything: How New Ideas Emerge

by Matt Ridley  · 395pp  · 116,675 words

Red Mars

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 23 Oct 1992  · 660pp  · 213,945 words

The Singularity Is Near: When Humans Transcend Biology

by Ray Kurzweil  · 14 Jul 2005  · 761pp  · 231,902 words

Junk DNA: A Journey Through the Dark Matter of the Genome

by Nessa Carey  · 5 Mar 2015  · 357pp  · 98,853 words

The End of Illness

by David B. Agus  · 15 Oct 2012  · 433pp  · 106,048 words

QI: The Second Book of General Ignorance

by Lloyd, John and Mitchinson, John  · 7 Oct 2010  · 469pp  · 97,582 words

Atlas Obscura: An Explorer's Guide to the World's Hidden Wonders

by Joshua Foer, Dylan Thuras and Ella Morton  · 19 Sep 2016  · 1,048pp  · 187,324 words

Loonshots: How to Nurture the Crazy Ideas That Win Wars, Cure Diseases, and Transform Industries

by Safi Bahcall  · 19 Mar 2019  · 393pp  · 115,217 words

The Age of Wonder

by Richard Holmes  · 15 Jan 2008  · 778pp  · 227,196 words

The Age of Spiritual Machines: When Computers Exceed Human Intelligence

by Ray Kurzweil  · 31 Dec 1998  · 696pp  · 143,736 words

The Best of Best New SF

by Gardner R. Dozois  · 1 Jan 2005  · 1,280pp  · 384,105 words

Upgrade

by Blake Crouch  · 6 Jul 2022  · 396pp  · 96,049 words

The Search for Life on Mars

by Elizabeth Howell  · 14 Apr 2020  · 530pp  · 145,220 words

We-Think: Mass Innovation, Not Mass Production

by Charles Leadbeater  · 9 Dec 2010  · 313pp  · 84,312 words

Genius: The Life and Science of Richard Feynman

by James Gleick  · 1 Jan 1992  · 795pp  · 215,529 words

The Future of Technology

by Tom Standage  · 31 Aug 2005

Evil Genes: Why Rome Fell, Hitler Rose, Enron Failed, and My Sister Stole My Mother's Boyfriend

by Barbara Oakley Phd  · 20 Oct 2008

The Invention of Science: A New History of the Scientific Revolution

by David Wootton  · 7 Dec 2015  · 1,197pp  · 304,245 words

Woolly: The True Story of the Quest to Revive History's Most Iconic Extinct Creature

by Ben Mezrich  · 3 Jul 2017

The Billion-Dollar Molecule

by Barry Werth  · 543pp  · 163,997 words

Deep Nutrition: Why Your Genes Need Traditional Food

by Catherine Shanahan M. D.  · 2 Jan 2017  · 659pp  · 190,874 words

Hacking the Code of Life: How Gene Editing Will Rewrite Our Futures

by Nessa Carey  · 7 Mar 2019  · 182pp  · 45,873 words

NeoAddix

by Jon Courtenay Grimwood  · 16 Jan 1997  · 338pp  · 92,385 words

Too Big to Know: Rethinking Knowledge Now That the Facts Aren't the Facts, Experts Are Everywhere, and the Smartest Person in the Room Is the Room

by David Weinberger  · 14 Jul 2011  · 369pp  · 80,355 words

The Science and Technology of Growing Young: An Insider's Guide to the Breakthroughs That Will Dramatically Extend Our Lifespan . . . And What You Can Do Right Now

by Sergey Young  · 23 Aug 2021  · 326pp  · 88,968 words

A Shot to Save the World: The Inside Story of the Life-Or-Death Race for a COVID-19 Vaccine

by Gregory Zuckerman  · 25 Oct 2021  · 368pp  · 106,185 words

The End of College: Creating the Future of Learning and the University of Everywhere

by Kevin Carey  · 3 Mar 2015  · 319pp  · 90,965 words

Life in the Universe: A Beginner's Guide

by Lewis Dartnell  · 1 Mar 2007  · 223pp  · 62,564 words

Green Mars

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 23 Oct 1993  · 746pp  · 239,969 words

Cosmos

by Carl Sagan  · 1 Jan 1980  · 404pp  · 131,034 words

Ageless: The New Science of Getting Older Without Getting Old

by Andrew Steele  · 24 Dec 2020  · 399pp  · 118,576 words

The New Sell and Sell Short: How to Take Profits, Cut Losses, and Benefit From Price Declines

by Alexander Elder  · 1 Jan 2008  · 394pp  · 85,252 words

The Moral Animal: Evolutionary Psychology and Everyday Life

by Robert Wright  · 1 Jan 1994  · 604pp  · 161,455 words

In Pursuit of Memory: The Fight Against Alzheimer's

by Joseph Jebelli  · 30 Oct 2017  · 294pp  · 87,429 words

Falter: Has the Human Game Begun to Play Itself Out?

by Bill McKibben  · 15 Apr 2019

Beautiful Data: The Stories Behind Elegant Data Solutions

by Toby Segaran and Jeff Hammerbacher  · 1 Jul 2009

The Half Has Never Been Told: Slavery and the Making of American Capitalism

by Edward E. Baptist  · 24 Oct 2016

Fool Me Twice: Fighting the Assault on Science in America

by Shawn Lawrence Otto  · 10 Oct 2011  · 692pp  · 127,032 words

Sex, Time, and Power: How Women's Sexuality Shaped Human Evolution

by Leonard Shlain  · 2 Aug 2004  · 607pp  · 168,497 words

How to Create a Mind: The Secret of Human Thought Revealed

by Ray Kurzweil  · 13 Nov 2012  · 372pp  · 101,174 words

Structures: Or Why Things Don't Fall Down

by J. E. Gordon  · 1 Jan 1978  · 382pp  · 112,061 words

Lonely Planet France

by Lonely Planet Publications  · 31 Mar 2013

The Healing of America: A Global Quest for Better, Cheaper, and Fairer Health Care

by T. R. Reid  · 15 Aug 2009  · 294pp  · 85,811 words

The Demon in the Machine: How Hidden Webs of Information Are Finally Solving the Mystery of Life

by Paul Davies  · 31 Jan 2019  · 253pp  · 83,473 words

Nonzero: The Logic of Human Destiny

by Robert Wright  · 28 Dec 2010

The Half-Life of Facts: Why Everything We Know Has an Expiration Date

by Samuel Arbesman  · 31 Aug 2012  · 284pp  · 79,265 words

Adaptive Markets: Financial Evolution at the Speed of Thought

by Andrew W. Lo  · 3 Apr 2017  · 733pp  · 179,391 words

Is God a Mathematician?

by Mario Livio  · 6 Jan 2009  · 315pp  · 93,628 words

An Optimist's Tour of the Future

by Mark Stevenson  · 4 Dec 2010  · 379pp  · 108,129 words

Lonely Planet London City Guide

by Tom Masters, Steve Fallon and Vesna Maric  · 31 Jan 2010

Horizons: The Global Origins of Modern Science

by James Poskett  · 22 Mar 2022  · 564pp  · 168,696 words

As the Future Catches You: How Genomics & Other Forces Are Changing Your Work, Health & Wealth

by Juan Enriquez  · 15 Feb 2001  · 239pp  · 45,926 words

The Clockwork Universe: Saac Newto, Royal Society, and the Birth of the Modern WorldI

by Edward Dolnick  · 8 Feb 2011  · 439pp  · 104,154 words

Originals: How Non-Conformists Move the World

by Adam Grant  · 2 Feb 2016  · 410pp  · 101,260 words

The Strangest Man: The Hidden Life of Paul Dirac, Mystic of the Atom

by Graham Farmelo  · 24 Aug 2009  · 1,396pp  · 245,647 words

The Vanishing Neighbor: The Transformation of American Community

by Marc J. Dunkelman  · 3 Aug 2014  · 327pp  · 88,121 words

Daemon

by Daniel Suarez  · 1 Dec 2006  · 562pp  · 146,544 words

Anathem

by Neal Stephenson  · 25 Aug 2009  · 1,087pp  · 325,295 words

Troublemakers: Silicon Valley's Coming of Age

by Leslie Berlin  · 7 Nov 2017  · 615pp  · 168,775 words

The Autistic Brain: Thinking Across the Spectrum

by Temple Grandin and Richard Panek  · 15 Feb 2013

Longshot

by David Heath  · 18 Jan 2022

The Nature of Technology

by W. Brian Arthur  · 6 Aug 2009  · 297pp  · 77,362 words

Turing's Cathedral

by George Dyson  · 6 Mar 2012

Martians

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 6 Jul 1999  · 443pp  · 131,268 words

The botany of desire: a plant's-eye view of the world

by Michael Pollan  · 27 May 2002  · 273pp  · 83,186 words

Geektastic: Stories From the Nerd Herd

by Holly Black and Cecil Castellucci  · 1 Aug 2009  · 390pp  · 108,811 words

Seveneves

by Neal Stephenson  · 19 May 2015  · 945pp  · 292,893 words

The Rise and Fall of the Third Chimpanzee

by Jared Diamond  · 2 Jan 1991  · 436pp  · 140,256 words

End of the World Blues

by Jon Courtenay Grimwood  · 24 Sep 2006  · 445pp  · 114,134 words

From Bacteria to Bach and Back: The Evolution of Minds

by Daniel C. Dennett  · 7 Feb 2017  · 573pp  · 157,767 words

Use of Weapons

by Iain M. Banks  · 14 Jan 2011  · 270pp  · 132,960 words

Fully Automated Luxury Communism

by Aaron Bastani  · 10 Jun 2019  · 280pp  · 74,559 words

Infinite Powers: How Calculus Reveals the Secrets of the Universe

by Steven Strogatz  · 31 Mar 2019  · 407pp  · 116,726 words

The Man Who Loved China: The Fantastic Story of the Eccentric Scientist Who Unlocked the Mysteries of the Middle Kingdom

by Simon Winchester  · 1 Jan 2008  · 385pp  · 105,627 words

Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions

by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths  · 4 Apr 2016  · 523pp  · 143,139 words

The Rise and Fall of the British Nation: A Twentieth-Century History

by David Edgerton  · 27 Jun 2018

The Human Age: The World Shaped by Us

by Diane Ackerman  · 9 Sep 2014  · 380pp  · 104,841 words

Science...For Her!

by Megan Amram  · 4 Nov 2014

12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next

by Jeanette Winterson  · 15 Mar 2021  · 256pp  · 73,068 words

Origin Story: A Big History of Everything

by David Christian  · 21 May 2018  · 334pp  · 100,201 words

The Code of Capital: How the Law Creates Wealth and Inequality

by Katharina Pistor  · 27 May 2019  · 316pp  · 117,228 words

The Soul of Wealth

by Daniel Crosby  · 19 Sep 2024  · 229pp  · 73,085 words

Protocol: how control exists after decentralization

by Alexander R. Galloway  · 1 Apr 2004  · 287pp  · 86,919 words

Warnings

by Richard A. Clarke  · 10 Apr 2017  · 428pp  · 121,717 words

A Natural History of Beer

by Rob DeSalle  · 14 Jun 2019

The World According to Physics

by Jim Al-Khalili  · 10 Mar 2020  · 198pp  · 57,703 words

The Case for Space: How the Revolution in Spaceflight Opens Up a Future of Limitless Possibility

by Robert Zubrin  · 30 Apr 2019  · 452pp  · 126,310 words

The Death of Cancer: After Fifty Years on the Front Lines of Medicine, a Pioneering Oncologist Reveals Why the War on Cancer Is Winnable--And How We Can Get There

by Vincent T. Devita, Jr., M. D. and Elizabeth Devita-Raeburn  · 3 Nov 2015  · 386pp  · 114,405 words

Soonish: Ten Emerging Technologies That'll Improve And/or Ruin Everything

by Kelly Weinersmith and Zach Weinersmith  · 16 Oct 2017  · 398pp  · 105,032 words

My Father's Brain: Life in the Shadow of Alzheimer's

by Sandeep Jauhar  · 11 Apr 2023  · 220pp  · 67,661 words

Lost in Math: How Beauty Leads Physics Astray

by Sabine Hossenfelder  · 11 Jun 2018  · 340pp  · 91,416 words

Richard Dawkins: How a Scientist Changed the Way We Think

by Alan Grafen; Mark Ridley  · 1 Jan 2006  · 286pp  · 90,530 words

River Out of Eden: A Darwinian View of Life

by Richard Dawkins  · 28 Feb 1995  · 141pp  · 46,879 words

We Are Electric: Inside the 200-Year Hunt for Our Body's Bioelectric Code, and What the Future Holds

by Sally Adee  · 27 Feb 2023  · 329pp  · 101,233 words

Framers: Human Advantage in an Age of Technology and Turmoil

by Kenneth Cukier, Viktor Mayer-Schönberger and Francis de Véricourt  · 10 May 2021  · 291pp  · 80,068 words

Frommer's England 2011: With Wales

by Darwin Porter and Danforth Prince  · 2 Jan 2010

Scale: The Universal Laws of Growth, Innovation, Sustainability, and the Pace of Life in Organisms, Cities, Economies, and Companies

by Geoffrey West  · 15 May 2017  · 578pp  · 168,350 words

Frommer's London 2009

by Darwin Porter and Danforth Prince  · 25 Aug 2008

Never Enough: The Neuroscience and Experience of Addiction

by Judith Grisel  · 15 Feb 2019  · 213pp  · 68,363 words

Palo Alto: A History of California, Capitalism, and the World

by Malcolm Harris  · 14 Feb 2023  · 864pp  · 272,918 words

Life Is Simple: How Occam's Razor Set Science Free and Shapes the Universe

by Johnjoe McFadden  · 27 Sep 2021

Germany Travel Guide

by Lonely Planet

How to Survive a Pandemic

by Michael Greger, M.D., FACLM  · 1,072pp  · 237,186 words

Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress

by Steven Pinker  · 13 Feb 2018  · 1,034pp  · 241,773 words

Empire of Pain: The Secret History of the Sackler Dynasty

by Patrick Radden Keefe  · 12 Apr 2021  · 712pp  · 212,334 words

Age of Discovery: Navigating the Risks and Rewards of Our New Renaissance

by Ian Goldin and Chris Kutarna  · 23 May 2016  · 437pp  · 113,173 words

The Long Boom: A Vision for the Coming Age of Prosperity

by Peter Schwartz, Peter Leyden and Joel Hyatt  · 18 Oct 2000  · 353pp  · 355 words

The End of Doom: Environmental Renewal in the Twenty-First Century

by Ronald Bailey  · 20 Jul 2015  · 417pp  · 109,367 words

The Coming Plague: Newly Emerging Diseases in a World Out of Balance

by Laurie Garrett  · 31 Oct 1994  · 1,293pp  · 357,735 words

The Master and His Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World

by Iain McGilchrist  · 8 Oct 2012

Rome

by Lonely Planet

I Am a Strange Loop

by Douglas R. Hofstadter  · 21 Feb 2011  · 626pp  · 181,434 words

Remix

by John Courtenay Grimwood  · 15 Nov 2001

Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future

by Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson  · 26 Jun 2017  · 472pp  · 117,093 words

This Is Your Country on Drugs: The Secret History of Getting High in America

by Ryan Grim  · 7 Jul 2009  · 334pp  · 93,162 words

How the Mind Works

by Steven Pinker  · 1 Jan 1997  · 913pp  · 265,787 words

From eternity to here: the quest for the ultimate theory of time

by Sean M. Carroll  · 15 Jan 2010  · 634pp  · 185,116 words

For the Win

by Cory Doctorow  · 11 May 2010  · 624pp  · 180,416 words

Leonardo Da Vinci

by Walter Isaacson  · 16 Oct 2017  · 799pp  · 187,221 words

Future Crimes: Everything Is Connected, Everyone Is Vulnerable and What We Can Do About It

by Marc Goodman  · 24 Feb 2015  · 677pp  · 206,548 words

Them And Us: Politics, Greed And Inequality - Why We Need A Fair Society

by Will Hutton  · 30 Sep 2010  · 543pp  · 147,357 words

Engineering Security

by Peter Gutmann

Hope Dies Last: Visionary People Across the World, Fighting to Find Us a Future

by Alan Weisman  · 21 Apr 2025  · 599pp  · 149,014 words

The Chip: How Two Americans Invented the Microchip and Launched a Revolution

by T. R. Reid  · 18 Dec 2007  · 293pp  · 91,110 words

Enemies and Neighbours: Arabs and Jews in Palestine and Israel, 1917-2017

by Ian Black  · 2 Nov 2017  · 674pp  · 201,633 words

The Dream Machine: J.C.R. Licklider and the Revolution That Made Computing Personal

by M. Mitchell Waldrop  · 14 Apr 2001

The Doomsday Calculation: How an Equation That Predicts the Future Is Transforming Everything We Know About Life and the Universe

by William Poundstone  · 3 Jun 2019  · 283pp  · 81,376 words

In Our Own Image: Savior or Destroyer? The History and Future of Artificial Intelligence

by George Zarkadakis  · 7 Mar 2016  · 405pp  · 117,219 words

Think Like a Rocket Scientist: Simple Strategies You Can Use to Make Giant Leaps in Work and Life

by Ozan Varol  · 13 Apr 2020  · 389pp  · 112,319 words

Tribe of Mentors: Short Life Advice From the Best in the World

by Timothy Ferriss  · 14 Jun 2017  · 579pp  · 183,063 words

Toast

by Stross, Charles  · 1 Jan 2002

Half Empty

by David Rakoff  · 20 Sep 2010  · 181pp  · 62,775 words

The Driver in the Driverless Car: How Our Technology Choices Will Create the Future

by Vivek Wadhwa and Alex Salkever  · 2 Apr 2017  · 181pp  · 52,147 words

Split-Second Persuasion: The Ancient Art and New Science of Changing Minds

by Kevin Dutton  · 3 Feb 2011  · 338pp  · 100,477 words

A Fiery Peace in a Cold War: Bernard Schriever and the Ultimate Weapon

by Neil Sheehan  · 21 Sep 2009  · 589pp  · 197,971 words

The Rise of the Network Society

by Manuel Castells  · 31 Aug 1996  · 843pp  · 223,858 words

Overdiagnosed: Making People Sick in the Pursuit of Health

by H. Gilbert Welch, Lisa M. Schwartz and Steven Woloshin  · 18 Jan 2011  · 302pp  · 92,546 words

Inequality and the 1%

by Danny Dorling  · 6 Oct 2014  · 317pp  · 71,776 words

Duped: Double Lives, False Identities, and the Con Man I Almost Married

by Abby Ellin  · 15 Jan 2019  · 340pp  · 91,745 words

Bricks & Mortals: Ten Great Buildings and the People They Made

by Tom Wilkinson  · 21 Jul 2014  · 341pp  · 89,986 words

The Big Ratchet: How Humanity Thrives in the Face of Natural Crisis

by Ruth Defries  · 8 Sep 2014  · 342pp  · 88,736 words

The New Harvest: Agricultural Innovation in Africa

by Calestous Juma  · 27 May 2017

Them and Us: How Immigrants and Locals Can Thrive Together

by Philippe Legrain  · 14 Oct 2020  · 521pp  · 110,286 words

Science Fictions: How Fraud, Bias, Negligence, and Hype Undermine the Search for Truth

by Stuart Ritchie  · 20 Jul 2020

Nothing Personal: My Secret Life in the Dating App Inferno

by Nancy Jo Sales  · 17 May 2021  · 445pp  · 135,648 words

Spike: The Virus vs The People - The Inside Story

by Jeremy Farrar and Anjana Ahuja  · 15 Jan 2021  · 245pp  · 71,886 words

Inventor of the Future: The Visionary Life of Buckminster Fuller

by Alec Nevala-Lee  · 1 Aug 2022  · 864pp  · 222,565 words

Samuelson Friedman: The Battle Over the Free Market

by Nicholas Wapshott  · 2 Aug 2021  · 453pp  · 122,586 words

Milk!

by Mark Kurlansky  · 450pp  · 114,766 words

Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic

by David Quammen  · 30 Sep 2012  · 669pp  · 195,743 words

Player One

by Douglas Coupland  · 30 Jun 2011

Physics of the Future: How Science Will Shape Human Destiny and Our Daily Lives by the Year 2100

by Michio Kaku  · 15 Mar 2011  · 523pp  · 148,929 words

The Impulse Society: America in the Age of Instant Gratification

by Paul Roberts  · 1 Sep 2014  · 324pp  · 92,805 words

Radical Abundance: How a Revolution in Nanotechnology Will Change Civilization

by K. Eric Drexler  · 6 May 2013  · 445pp  · 105,255 words

The Lights in the Tunnel

by Martin Ford  · 28 May 2011  · 261pp  · 10,785 words

Science in the Soul: Selected Writings of a Passionate Rationalist

by Richard Dawkins  · 15 Mar 2017  · 420pp  · 130,714 words

The Food Revolution: How Your Diet Can Help Save Your Life and Our World

by John Robbins  · 14 Sep 2010  · 468pp  · 150,206 words

The Diet Myth: The Real Science Behind What We Eat

by Tim Spector  · 13 May 2015  · 382pp  · 115,172 words

2312

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 22 May 2012  · 561pp  · 167,631 words

Branded Beauty

by Mark Tungate  · 11 Feb 2012  · 290pp  · 87,084 words

The Misbehavior of Markets: A Fractal View of Financial Turbulence

by Benoit Mandelbrot and Richard L. Hudson  · 7 Mar 2006  · 364pp  · 101,286 words

Sleepyhead: Narcolepsy, Neuroscience and the Search for a Good Night

by Henry Nicholls  · 1 Mar 2018  · 367pp  · 102,188 words

Culture and Prosperity: The Truth About Markets - Why Some Nations Are Rich but Most Remain Poor

by John Kay  · 24 May 2004  · 436pp  · 76 words

Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life

by Daniel C. Dennett  · 15 Jan 1995  · 846pp  · 232,630 words

Drugs 2.0: The Web Revolution That's Changing How the World Gets High

by Mike Power  · 1 May 2013  · 378pp  · 94,468 words

The Language Instinct: How the Mind Creates Language

by Steven Pinker  · 1 Jan 1994  · 661pp  · 187,613 words

Whiplash: How to Survive Our Faster Future

by Joi Ito and Jeff Howe  · 6 Dec 2016  · 254pp  · 76,064 words

Augmented: Life in the Smart Lane

by Brett King  · 5 May 2016  · 385pp  · 111,113 words

The Creativity Code: How AI Is Learning to Write, Paint and Think

by Marcus Du Sautoy  · 7 Mar 2019  · 337pp  · 103,522 words

The Red Queen: Sex and the Evolution of Human Nature

by Matt Ridley  · 14 Aug 1993  · 474pp  · 136,787 words

Plutocrats: The Rise of the New Global Super-Rich and the Fall of Everyone Else

by Chrystia Freeland  · 11 Oct 2012  · 481pp  · 120,693 words

Fancy Bear Goes Phishing: The Dark History of the Information Age, in Five Extraordinary Hacks

by Scott J. Shapiro  · 523pp  · 154,042 words

Memoirs of an Addicted Brain: A Neuroscientist Examines His Former Life on Drugs

by Marc Lewis Phd  · 5 Mar 2013  · 332pp  · 101,772 words

Foolproof: Why Safety Can Be Dangerous and How Danger Makes Us Safe

by Greg Ip  · 12 Oct 2015  · 309pp  · 95,495 words

Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars

by Lee Billings  · 2 Oct 2013  · 326pp  · 97,089 words

One Bullet Away: The Making of a Marine Officer by Fick, Nathaniel C.(October 3, 2005) Hardcover

by Nathaniel C. Fick  · 14 Apr 2006

The Selfish Gene

by Richard Dawkins  · 1 Jan 1976  · 365pp  · 117,713 words

Behave: The Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst

by Robert M. Sapolsky  · 1 May 2017  · 1,261pp  · 294,715 words

Misspent Youth

by Peter F. Hamilton  · 1 Jan 2002  · 391pp  · 106,394 words

The Ghost Map: A Street, an Epidemic and the Hidden Power of Urban Networks.

by Steven Johnson  · 18 Oct 2006  · 304pp  · 88,773 words

Alchemy: The Dark Art and Curious Science of Creating Magic in Brands, Business, and Life

by Rory Sutherland  · 6 May 2019  · 401pp  · 93,256 words

Work: A History of How We Spend Our Time

by James Suzman  · 2 Sep 2020  · 909pp  · 130,170 words

Samsung Rising: The Inside Story of the South Korean Giant That Set Out to Beat Apple and Conquer Tech

by Geoffrey Cain  · 15 Mar 2020  · 540pp  · 119,731 words

Blood Music

by Greg Bear  · 19 May 2014

The Sixth Extinction: An Unnatural History

by Elizabeth Kolbert  · 11 Feb 2014  · 308pp  · 94,447 words

The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality

by Kathryn Paige Harden  · 20 Sep 2021  · 375pp  · 102,166 words

Uncontrolled Spread: Why COVID-19 Crushed Us and How We Can Defeat the Next Pandemic

by Scott Gottlieb  · 20 Sep 2021

This Is How You Lose the Time War

by Amal El-Mohtar and Max Gladstone  · 15 Jul 2019  · 132pp  · 37,391 words

The Rise of Yeast: How the Sugar Fungus Shaped Civilisation

by Nicholas P. Money  · 22 Feb 2018

The Master Algorithm: How the Quest for the Ultimate Learning Machine Will Remake Our World

by Pedro Domingos  · 21 Sep 2015  · 396pp  · 117,149 words

Black Box Thinking: Why Most People Never Learn From Their Mistakes--But Some Do

by Matthew Syed  · 3 Nov 2015  · 410pp  · 114,005 words

We're Going to Need More Wine: Stories That Are Funny, Complicated, and True

by Gabrielle Union  · 16 Oct 2017  · 235pp  · 74,200 words

Thinking About It Only Makes It Worse: And Other Lessons From Modern Life

by David Mitchell  · 4 Nov 2014  · 354pp  · 99,690 words

Tales of a Female Nomad: Living at Large in the World

by Rita Golden Gelman  · 21 May 2001  · 386pp  · 121,400 words

Infinity in the Palm of Your Hand: Fifty Wonders That Reveal an Extraordinary Universe

by Marcus Chown  · 22 Apr 2019  · 171pp  · 51,276 words

Mind in Motion: How Action Shapes Thought

by Barbara Tversky  · 20 May 2019  · 426pp  · 117,027 words

A Mind at Play: How Claude Shannon Invented the Information Age

by Jimmy Soni and Rob Goodman  · 17 Jul 2017  · 415pp  · 114,840 words

Braiding Sweetgrass

by Robin Wall Kimmerer

Everything's Trash, but It's Okay

by Phoebe Robinson  · 15 Oct 2018  · 257pp  · 90,857 words

Asymmetry

by Lisa Halliday  · 6 Feb 2018  · 287pp  · 77,181 words

The New Rules of War: Victory in the Age of Durable Disorder

by Sean McFate  · 22 Jan 2019  · 330pp  · 83,319 words

Present Shock: When Everything Happens Now

by Douglas Rushkoff  · 21 Mar 2013  · 323pp  · 95,939 words

A Dominant Character

by Samanth Subramanian  · 27 Apr 2020

Pegasus: How a Spy in Your Pocket Threatens the End of Privacy, Dignity, and Democracy

by Laurent Richard and Sandrine Rigaud  · 17 Jan 2023  · 350pp  · 115,802 words

The Idea of Israel: A History of Power and Knowledge

by Ilan Pappe  · 30 Apr 2012  · 387pp  · 120,092 words

The Quantum Curators and the Fabergé Egg: A Fast Paced Portal Adventure

by Eva St. John  · 23 May 2020  · 229pp  · 67,752 words

Safe Food: The Politics of Food Safety

by Marion Nestle  · 1 Jan 2010  · 736pp  · 147,021 words

Forty Signs of Rain

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 29 May 2004  · 362pp  · 104,308 words

On the Future: Prospects for Humanity

by Martin J. Rees  · 14 Oct 2018  · 193pp  · 51,445 words

Kings of Crypto: One Startup's Quest to Take Cryptocurrency Out of Silicon Valley and Onto Wall Street

by Jeff John Roberts  · 15 Dec 2020  · 226pp  · 65,516 words

Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience

by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi  · 1 Jul 2008  · 453pp  · 132,400 words

The Man From the Future: The Visionary Life of John Von Neumann

by Ananyo Bhattacharya  · 6 Oct 2021  · 476pp  · 121,460 words

Fallen Idols: Twelve Statues That Made History

by Alex von Tunzelmann  · 7 Jul 2021  · 337pp  · 87,236 words

The Premonition: A Pandemic Story

by Michael Lewis  · 3 May 2021  · 285pp  · 98,832 words

How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet (Information Policy)

by Benjamin Peters  · 2 Jun 2016  · 518pp  · 107,836 words

To Be a Machine: Adventures Among Cyborgs, Utopians, Hackers, and the Futurists Solving the Modest Problem of Death

by Mark O'Connell  · 28 Feb 2017  · 252pp  · 79,452 words

Beggars in Spain

by Nancy Kress  · 23 Nov 2004

The Fractalist

by Benoit Mandelbrot  · 30 Oct 2012

The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes' Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant From Two Centuries of Controversy

by Sharon Bertsch McGrayne  · 16 May 2011  · 561pp  · 120,899 words

The Strange Order of Things: The Biological Roots of Culture

by Antonio Damasio  · 6 Feb 2018  · 289pp  · 87,292 words

Icehenge

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 29 May 1994  · 334pp  · 103,508 words

The God Delusion

by Richard Dawkins  · 12 Sep 2006  · 478pp  · 142,608 words

The Open Revolution: New Rules for a New World

by Rufus Pollock  · 29 May 2018  · 105pp  · 34,444 words

Ask Me About My Uterus: A Quest to Make Doctors Believe in Women's Pain

by Abby Norman  · 6 Mar 2018  · 323pp  · 107,963 words

Information: A Very Short Introduction

by Luciano Floridi  · 25 Feb 2010  · 137pp  · 36,231 words

Puzzling People: The Labyrinth of the Psychopath

by Thomas Sheridan  · 1 Mar 2011  · 223pp  · 72,425 words

Dark Laboratory: On Columbus, the Caribbean, and the Origins of the Climate Crisis

by Tao Leigh. Goffe  · 14 Mar 2025  · 441pp  · 122,013 words

Fluke: Chance, Chaos, and Why Everything We Do Matters

by Brian Klaas  · 23 Jan 2024  · 250pp  · 96,870 words

The Misfit Economy: Lessons in Creativity From Pirates, Hackers, Gangsters and Other Informal Entrepreneurs

by Alexa Clay and Kyra Maya Phillips  · 23 Jun 2015  · 210pp  · 56,667 words

Under a White Sky: The Nature of the Future

by Elizabeth Kolbert  · 15 Mar 2021  · 221pp  · 59,755 words

The Magic of Reality: How We Know What's Really True

by Richard Dawkins  · 3 Oct 2011  · 208pp  · 67,288 words

Virtual Competition

by Ariel Ezrachi and Maurice E. Stucke  · 30 Nov 2016

Invisible Influence: The Hidden Forces that Shape Behavior

by Jonah Berger  · 13 Jun 2016  · 261pp  · 72,277 words

Immortality: The Quest to Live Forever and How It Drives Civilization

by Stephen Cave  · 2 Apr 2012  · 299pp  · 98,943 words

QI: The Third Book of General Ignorance (Qi: Book of General Ignorance)

by John Lloyd and John Mitchinson  · 28 Sep 2015  · 432pp  · 85,707 words

Dirty Genes: A Breakthrough Program to Treat the Root Cause of Illness and Optimize Your Health

by Ben Lynch Nd.  · 30 Jan 2018  · 438pp  · 103,983 words

Massive: The Missing Particle That Sparked the Greatest Hunt in Science

by Ian Sample  · 1 Jan 2010  · 310pp  · 89,838 words

Blueprint: The Evolutionary Origins of a Good Society

by Nicholas A. Christakis  · 26 Mar 2019

Been There, Done That: A Rousing History of Sex

by Rachel Feltman  · 14 May 2022  · 306pp  · 88,545 words

A Hunter-Gatherer's Guide to the 21st Century: Evolution and the Challenges of Modern Life

by Heather Heying and Bret Weinstein  · 14 Sep 2021  · 384pp  · 105,110 words

When the Air Hits Your Brain: Tales From Neurosurgery

by Frank Vertosick  · 1 Jan 1996  · 250pp  · 75,586 words

The Great Economists Ten Economists whose thinking changed the way we live-FT Publishing International (2014)

by Phil Thornton  · 7 May 2014

Building and Dwelling: Ethics for the City

by Richard Sennett  · 9 Apr 2018

CRISPR People: The Science and Ethics of Editing Humans

by Henry T. Greely  · 22 Jan 2021

Drugs Without the Hot Air

by David Nutt  · 30 May 2012  · 605pp  · 110,673 words

From Gutenberg to Google: electronic representations of literary texts

by Peter L. Shillingsburg  · 15 Jan 2006  · 224pp  · 12,941 words

Composing a Further Life: The Age of Active Wisdom

by Mary Catherine Bateson  · 13 Sep 2010  · 287pp  · 99,131 words

Essentialism: The Disciplined Pursuit of Less

by Greg McKeown  · 14 Apr 2014  · 202pp  · 62,199 words

The Mind Is Flat: The Illusion of Mental Depth and the Improvised Mind

by Nick Chater  · 28 Mar 2018  · 263pp  · 81,527 words

Explore Everything

by Bradley Garrett  · 7 Oct 2013  · 273pp  · 76,786 words

The God Equation: The Quest for a Theory of Everything

by Michio Kaku  · 5 Apr 2021  · 157pp  · 47,161 words

Conflicted: How Productive Disagreements Lead to Better Outcomes

by Ian Leslie  · 23 Feb 2021  · 280pp  · 82,393 words

Navel Gazing: True Tales of Bodies, Mostly Mine (But Also My Mom's, Which I Know Sounds Weird)

by Michael Ian Black  · 5 Jan 2016  · 171pp  · 57,379 words

The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable

by Amitav Ghosh  · 16 Jan 2018

A Thousand Brains: A New Theory of Intelligence

by Jeff Hawkins  · 15 Nov 2021  · 253pp  · 84,238 words

Power Systems: Conversations on Global Democratic Uprisings and the New Challenges to U.S. Empire

by Noam Chomsky and David Barsamian  · 1 Nov 2012

Einstein's Dice and Schrödinger's Cat: How Two Great Minds Battled Quantum Randomness to Create a Unified Theory of Physics

by Paul Halpern  · 13 Apr 2015  · 282pp  · 89,436 words

To Explain the World: The Discovery of Modern Science

by Steven Weinberg  · 17 Feb 2015  · 532pp  · 133,143 words

Mind Wide Open: Your Brain and the Neuroscience of Everyday Life

by Steven Johnson  · 2 Jan 1999  · 294pp  · 86,601 words