description: a phrase describing the paradox where technological advancements seem ubiquitous but do not appear to be reflected in improved productivity metrics.
31 results
by Robert J. Gordon · 12 Jan 2016 · 1,104pp · 302,176 words
-known analogy between the evolution of electric machinery and of the electronic computer.14 In 1987, Robert Solow quipped, “We can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.”15 David responded, in effect: “Just wait”—suggesting that the previous example of the electric dynamo and other electric machinery implied that a long gestation
…
productivity growth in the 1980s. Reacting to the failure of these innovations to boost productivity growth, Robert Solow quipped, “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.”18 Slow TFP growth in this period indicates that the benefits of the first round of computer applications partially masked an even more severe slowdown
…
on a Kindle or surfing the web on a smartphone. This brings us back to Solow’s quip—that we can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics. The final answer to Solow’s computer paradox is that computers are not everywhere. We don’t eat computers or wear them or drive to
by Daron Acemoglu and Simon Johnson · 15 May 2023 · 619pp · 177,548 words
the fruits of the digital revolution are much harder to see. In 1987, Nobel Prize winner Robert Solow wrote: “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics,” pointing out the small gains from investments in digital technologies. Those more optimistic about computers told Solow that he had to be patient; productivity growth
by Alan Greenspan · 14 Jun 2007
article in 1989 that addressed the puzzle of why, in the famous words of Nobel laureate economist and then-MIT professor Robert Solow, computers were "everywhere but in the productivity statistics." It was David's article that heightened my interest in long-term productivity trends. He pointed out that it often took decades for a new
by Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson · 26 Jun 2017 · 472pp · 117,093 words
, who later that year would win a Nobel prize for his work on the sources of economic growth, wrote, “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.” By the mid-1990s, that was no longer true; productivity started to grow much faster, and a large amount of research (some of it conducted
by Joseph E. Stiglitz · 15 Mar 2015 · 409pp · 125,611 words
personal computers. In 1987, the economist Robert Solow—awarded the Nobel Prize for his pioneering work on growth—lamented, “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.” There are several possible explanations for this. Perhaps GDP does not really capture the improvements in living standards that computer-age innovation is engendering. Or
by Ajay Agrawal, Joshua Gans and Avi Goldfarb · 16 Apr 2018 · 345pp · 75,660 words
, they experimented. But the fruits of those experiments took time to materialize. Robert Solow, a Nobel laureate economist, lamented, “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.”1 From this challenge came an interesting business movement called “reengineering.” In 1993, Michael Hammer and James Champy, in their book Reengineering the Corporation, argued
by Matt Ridley · 17 May 2010 · 462pp · 150,129 words
at first puzzled many economists. They wanted to credit computers, but as the economist Robert Solow had quipped in 1987, ‘you can see the computer everywhere but in the productivity statistics’, and those of us who experienced how easy it was to waste time using a computer in those days agreed. A study by McKinsey concluded
by Annie Lowrey · 10 Jul 2018 · 242pp · 73,728 words
to become ubiquitous in businesses and homes. As the economist Robert Solow—hence the Solow residual—quipped in 1987, “You can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.” In most cases, productivity did speed up once innovators invented complementary technologies and businesses had a long while to adjust—suggesting that the innovation gains
by Carl Benedikt Frey · 17 Jun 2019 · 626pp · 167,836 words
right in thinking so. When computerization finally took off, unforeseen glitches emerged. In 1987, when Robert Solow puzzled that “we can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics,” an article in the Wall Street Journal reported: “Companies are automating in smaller doses now, a strategy that allows bugs to be worked out before
by Edward Chancellor · 15 Aug 2022 · 829pp · 187,394 words
with machines’.18 Gordon’s concerns recall a famous comment made by MIT economist Bob Solow in 1987, that ‘you can see the computer age everywhere but in the productivity statistics.’ The Nobel laureate Solow spoke too soon. Not long afterwards US productivity growth picked up, assisted presumably by advances in information technology. As Gordon’s
by Diane Coyle · 11 Oct 2021 · 305pp · 75,697 words
by Rutger Bregman · 13 Sep 2014 · 235pp · 62,862 words
by Diane Coyle · 29 Oct 1998 · 49,604 words
by Philipp Carlsson-Szlezak and Paul Swartz · 8 Jul 2024 · 259pp · 89,637 words
by Steve Lohr · 10 Mar 2015 · 239pp · 70,206 words
by Nate Silver · 31 Aug 2012 · 829pp · 186,976 words
by Edward Luce · 20 Apr 2017 · 223pp · 58,732 words
by Calum Chace · 28 Jul 2015 · 144pp · 43,356 words
by Robert Wachter · 7 Apr 2015 · 309pp · 114,984 words
by Linda Yueh · 15 Mar 2018 · 374pp · 113,126 words
by Linda Yueh · 4 Jun 2018 · 453pp · 117,893 words
by Daniel Markovits · 14 Sep 2019 · 976pp · 235,576 words
by Jim Holt · 14 May 2018 · 436pp · 127,642 words
by Jonathan Haskel and Stian Westlake · 7 Nov 2017 · 346pp · 89,180 words
by David Wallace-Wells · 19 Feb 2019 · 343pp · 101,563 words
by Ryan Avent · 20 Sep 2016 · 323pp · 90,868 words
by Roger Bootle · 4 Sep 2019 · 374pp · 111,284 words
by Chris Hayes · 28 Jan 2025 · 359pp · 100,761 words
by Satya Nadella, Greg Shaw and Jill Tracie Nichols · 25 Sep 2017 · 391pp · 71,600 words
by Costas Lapavitsas · 14 Aug 2013 · 554pp · 158,687 words
by Mariana Mazzucato · 1 Jan 2011 · 382pp · 92,138 words