negative emissions

back to index

description: removal of atmospheric carbon dioxide

26 results

Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress

by Steven Pinker  · 13 Feb 2018  · 1,034pp  · 241,773 words

measured century: An illustrated guide to trends in America, 1900–2000. Washington: AEI Press. CarbonBrief. 2016. Explainer: 10 ways “negative emissions” could slow climate change. https://www.carbonbrief.org/explainer-10-ways-negative-emissions-could-slow-climate-change. Carey, J. 1993. The intellectuals and the masses: Pride and prejudice among the literary intelligentsia, 1880

Prosperity Without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow

by Tim Jackson  · 8 Dec 2016  · 573pp  · 115,489 words

rate of emissions, this budget would be exhausted within a decade. Beyond that point, meeting the target we would have to rely on largely unspecified negative emission technologies; technologies that remove carbon permanently from the earth’s atmosphere.45 The message from all this is a profoundly uncomfortable one. Global average temperatures

, in order to have a decent chance of restricting global temperature rise to less than 1.5°C. On a closer examination, the rate of ‘negative emissions’ required to stay within the carbon budget is daunting. Through the late 2020s and early 2030s we would need to be taking carbon out of

the atmosphere at a rate of around 25 GtCO2 a year. The potential to achieve this level of negative emissions on that timescale is highly speculative at the very least.33 One option would be to go for an even deeper reduction target. Let’s

. A deeper cut definitely makes life easier in the long run, with a lower requirement for negative emissions in the second half of the century. But it doesn’t do much to contain the need for negative emissions in the short term, which still peak at around 25 GtCO2 in the late 2020s. A

reduction. Let’s say we aimed to hit our reduction target in 2035 rather than in 2050. This would about halve the peak demand for negative emissions. But it would clearly also involve us in a frantic rush to introduce low carbon technologies at an even faster pace. In fact the carbon

negative emission technologies, see for example Smith et al. (2016). Carbon dioxide emissions for 2015 were (estimated at) 35.7 Gt CO2 (Lequéré et al. 2015: 374).

debt see debt, public-sector nationalisation 191; financial crisis 38, 188 natural selection 132–3 see also struggle for existence nature, rights of 6–7 negative emissions 98–9 negative feedback loops 16–17 Netherlands 58, 62, 206, 207 neuroscientific perspectives: flourishing 68, 69; human behaviour 134 New Climate Economy report Better

The Climate Book: The Facts and the Solutions

by Greta Thunberg  · 14 Feb 2023  · 651pp  · 162,060 words

governments showcase their ‘climate action’ – is a microcosm of three decades of failure: of rapidly rising emissions, of climate denial, of expedient technical optimism, of ‘negative emissions’ and, today, of ‘net zero, but not in my term of office’. Where is the concern for vulnerable communities already suffering climate impacts, for species

. It is this relentless backsliding that has given rise to increasingly elaborate forms of ‘mitigation denial’, whereby we rely on ever more speculative forms of ‘negative emissions’. These range from future carbon-sucking technologies and simplistic ‘nature-based-solutions’ through to paying poor countries to further cut their emissions on our behalf

electricity (or convert it into biofuels) and pump the carbon dioxide pollution underground to keep it out of the atmosphere. Of all the drawdown or negative emissions technologies, BECCS is the only one that provides energy rather than requiring it (and, done carefully, can provide it close to carbon free). Like all

fundamentally reorganize their societies in the coming years. Even if, somehow, we miraculously managed to channel all our powers into building the fantasy amounts of negative emissions technologies that our climate plans are completely dependent on. Even if our burning of biomass for BECCS did not create further ecological breakdown. Even if

burden, the world now faces a far more harrowing task – zeroing out emissions within just a few decades, perhaps even sooner in the absence of negative emissions and carbon removal on a ‘planetary scale’. What seemed advisable in 1988 now qualifies almost as climate denial; what counted as ambitious in 2008 is

include the aspect of global equity, the consumption of imported goods, global shipping and aviation and biogenic emissions, and they must not depend on future negative emissions technologies that do not already exist at scale – and perhaps never will. / Rewild nature This is one of the most effective tools we have at

; historical emissions, 21, 163–4, 206, 207, 257, 304, 308–9, 358, 383, 389, 398; Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) foundation, emissions since, 20; negative emissions, 204, 206, 237, 303, 383, 430; net zero emissions, 21, 54, 58, 204, 211–13, 239, 261, 263, 263, 304, 309, 400, 407; offsetting, 186

Mobility: A New Urban Design and Transport Planning Philosophy for a Sustainable Future

by John Whitelegg  · 1 Sep 2015  · 224pp  · 69,494 words

–2010. This payment could be made by re-allocating the fair shares for the period 2011–2050. Thus, Annex I countries would have responsibility for negative emissions of 441 GtCO2 (122 GtCO2 minus 564 GtCO2), while non-Annex 1 countries would have responsibility within a budget of 1,372 GtCO2 (778 GtCO2

it is not possible for Annex I countries to implement their responsibility fully, keeping in mind the difficulty of achieving such a high level of negative emissions by 2050, these countries could arrange for non-Annex I countries to take on some of the responsibility through a scheme that involves payment of

The End of Doom: Environmental Renewal in the Twenty-First Century

by Ronald Bailey  · 20 Jul 2015  · 417pp  · 109,367 words

they grow and then use them as fuel to produce energy. When the plants are burned, the carbon emissions are captured and buried, resulting in negative emissions. Another proposal is direct air capture, a possibility offered by Columbia University researcher Klaus Lackner; this involves using a specific resin that absorbs atmospheric carbon

What We Owe the Future: A Million-Year View

by William MacAskill  · 31 Aug 2022  · 451pp  · 125,201 words

point sources such as power plants and then burying it underground. Carbon can also be captured from the ambient air in a process known as “negative emissions.” Carbon capture would remove a large fraction of the environmental costs of fossil fuels (though the terrible air pollution costs would remain). Consequently, carbon capture

, Nursultan, 85 Nazi Germany forced labour, 65 goal of global domination, 92 Hitler’s sadistic behaviour, 219 ideological lock-in, 97–98 moral evolution, 70 negative emissions process, 141 negative-wellbeing lives, 193–194. See also below-neutral wellbeing neglectedness, 230–231 neurons, weighting the capacity for wellbeing by, 210–211 neutrality

Nomad Century: How Climate Migration Will Reshape Our World

by Gaia Vince  · 22 Aug 2022  · 302pp  · 92,206 words

the carbon we’ve already emitted, through restorative planting and making sure the carbon that is removed is locked away. Forests do this so-called ‘negative emissions activity’ until they are chopped down or burned; sea grasses are excellent at locking carbon down into the seabed. Another strategy is to take vegetation

, mulched or used for other purposes. Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage – usually called ‘BECCS’ – is extremely popular with governments and corporations hoping for cheap negative-emissions technologies to offset their emissions. BECCS involves growing plants for fuel, burning them in power stations and capturing the carbon dioxide produced, which can then

underlying problems resulting from too much carbon in the atmosphere, such as ocean acidification, but it would buy us more time to decarbonize and achieve negative emissions. Crucially, keeping the Earth cooler for longer would help the poorest people to adapt and alleviate poverty, which is vital morally and to restore ecosystems

oceans see also diet and nutrition; farming; livestock farming food security Ford, Henry forests: advance north of in Nordic nations; deforestation; impact of climate emergency; ‘negative emissions activity’; replanting of; Siberian taiga forest fossil fuels; carbon capture and storage (CCS); as embedded in human systems France Fraser, Sean freedom of movement French

War; need to change immigration narrative; patriotism of welcomed migrants; predicated on mythology of homogeneity; and supranational identity; transition to pan-species identity Nauru Neanderthals negative emissions technologies Netherlands; Delta Programme; Energiesprong house insulation Neukölln (Berlin) New Orleans New Story (nonprofit) New York City; ‘Big U’ seawall project; NYCID programme New Zealand

regions; genetic tools to help species adapt; as global, labour-intensive task; natural restoration after human abandonment; nature guardianship in tropical regions; need for speed; negative emissions technologies; ocean fertilization; paying communities to protect ecosystems; regenerative agriculture; replanting of vegetation; solar radiation reduction tools, see also geoengineering retail services rice; SRI cultivation

Less Is More: How Degrowth Will Save the World

by Jason Hickel  · 12 Aug 2020  · 286pp  · 87,168 words

, and Elon Musk has shown that it’s possible to mass-produce storage batteries at a rapid clip. For others, it’s a matter of ‘negative-emissions technologies’ that will pull carbon out of the atmosphere. Still others bank on the hope of enormous geo-engineering schemes: everything from blocking out the

energy, capture the carbon emissions at the chimneys and store it all underground where it can never escape. Voila: a global energy system that produces ‘negative emissions’. This technology is known as BECCS: bio-energy with carbon capture and storage. When Obersteiner published his paper there was no evidence that the scheme

a dangerous distraction’ from the imperative of reducing emissions.4 And they’re not alone. The following year, another forty scientists argued that reliance on negative-emissions technologies like BECCS is ‘extremely risky’.5 Professor Kevin Anderson of Manchester University, one of the world’s leading climate scientists, has been a particularly

that brings together the national science academies of all the states of the European Union, published a report condemning the reliance on BECCS and other negative emissions technologies. In the scientific community, it’s difficult to get a stronger conclusion than this. The report urges that we stop speculating on tech fantasies

report outlining what it will take for us to keep global warming under 1.5°C if we accept that we cannot reasonably rely on negative emissions technologies. The report landed like a bombshell in the world’s media. It was difficult to find an outlet that didn’t carry the headline

declining material and energy throughput. This is the only scenario for staying under 1.5°C or 2°C that does not rely on speculative negative-emissions technologies. The underlying paper is Arnulf Grubler et al., ‘A low energy demand scenario for meeting the 1.5 C target and sustainable development goals

dioxide capture and storage: issues and prospects,’ Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 2014, pp. 243–270. 4 Sabine Fuss et al., ‘Betting on negative emissions,’ Nature Climate Change 4(10), 2014, pp. 850–853. 5 Pete Smith et al., ‘Biophysical and economic limits to negative CO2 emissions,’ Nature Climate Change

6(1), 2016, pp. 42–50. 6 Kevin Anderson and Glen Peters, ‘The trouble with negative emissions,’ Science 354(6309), 2016, pp. 182–183. 7 Vera Heck, ‘Biomass-based negative emissions difficult to reconcile with planetary boundaries,’ Nature Climate Change 8(2), 2018, pp. 151–155. 8 Pete Smith et

negative CO2 emissions,’ Nature Climate Change 6(1), 2016, pp. 42–50. 9 ‘Six problems with BECCS,’ FERN briefing, 2018. 10 Henry Shue, ‘Climate dreaming: negative emissions, risk transfer, and irreversibility,’ Journal of Human Rights and the Environment 8(2), 2017, pp. 203–216. 11 Hickman, ‘The history of BECCS. 12 Daisy

Making Globalization Work

by Joseph E. Stiglitz  · 16 Sep 2006

assistance to developing countries is around $60 billion.) In addition, as we have noted, the forests “clean” carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere. The annual “negative emissions” of the rainforest countries are estimated (using the $30 a ton figure) at some $100 billion a year.20 While Kyoto recognized the role that

” services are hard to estimate, partially because analogous services are provided by the forests of the advanced industrial countries, including the United States, and these “negative emissions” have not been included in the carbon accounting for them. 21.There are a number of technical details in the implementation of avoided deforestation schemes

The Great Disruption: Why the Climate Crisis Will Bring on the End of Shopping and the Birth of a New World

by Paul Gilding  · 28 Mar 2011  · 337pp  · 103,273 words

toward global climate control—the effort to create a stable global climate and a sustainable global economy. Achieving this will require a long period of negative emissions (i.e., removing CO2 from the atmosphere) to move the climate back toward the preindustrial “normal.” For instance, some refreezing of the arctic ice cap

The Planet Remade: How Geoengineering Could Change the World

by Oliver Morton  · 26 Sep 2015  · 469pp  · 142,230 words

Escape From Model Land: How Mathematical Models Can Lead Us Astray and What We Can Do About It

by Erica Thompson  · 6 Dec 2022  · 250pp  · 79,360 words

Slowdown: The End of the Great Acceleration―and Why It’s Good for the Planet, the Economy, and Our Lives

by Danny Dorling and Kirsten McClure  · 18 May 2020  · 459pp  · 138,689 words

The Uninhabitable Earth: Life After Warming

by David Wallace-Wells  · 19 Feb 2019  · 343pp  · 101,563 words

The Divide: A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and Its Solutions

by Jason Hickel  · 3 May 2017  · 332pp  · 106,197 words

How to Spend a Trillion Dollars

by Rowan Hooper  · 15 Jan 2020  · 285pp  · 86,858 words

How to Avoid a Climate Disaster: The Solutions We Have and the Breakthroughs We Need

by Bill Gates  · 16 Feb 2021  · 314pp  · 75,678 words

Under a White Sky: The Nature of the Future

by Elizabeth Kolbert  · 15 Mar 2021  · 221pp  · 59,755 words

There Is No Planet B: A Handbook for the Make or Break Years

by Mike Berners-Lee  · 27 Feb 2019

This Is Not a Drill: An Extinction Rebellion Handbook

by Extinction Rebellion  · 12 Jun 2019  · 138pp  · 40,525 words

Boom: Bubbles and the End of Stagnation

by Byrne Hobart and Tobias Huber  · 29 Oct 2024  · 292pp  · 106,826 words

How to Blow Up a Pipeline

by Andreas Malm  · 4 Jan 2021  · 156pp  · 49,653 words

Open: The Story of Human Progress

by Johan Norberg  · 14 Sep 2020  · 505pp  · 138,917 words

Ways of Being: Beyond Human Intelligence

by James Bridle  · 6 Apr 2022  · 502pp  · 132,062 words

The Water Will Come: Rising Seas, Sinking Cities, and the Remaking of the Civilized World

by Jeff Goodell  · 23 Oct 2017  · 292pp  · 92,588 words

What We Need to Do Now: A Green Deal to Ensure a Habitable Earth

by Chris Goodall  · 30 Jan 2020  · 154pp  · 48,340 words