reinforcement learning from human feedback

back to index

description: variant of reinforcement learning

generative artificial intelligence

8 results

On the Edge: The Art of Risking Everything

by Nate Silver  · 12 Aug 2024  · 848pp  · 227,015 words

-old trope. But this is still misinformation, however harmless in this instance. So LLMs undergo another stage in their training: what’s called RLHF, or reinforcement learning from human feedback. Basically, it works like this: the AI labs hire cheap labor—often from Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, where you can employ human AI trainers from

. Regulatory capture: The tendency for entrenched companies to benefit when new regulation is crafted ostensibly in the public interest, such as because of successful lobbying. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF): A late stage of training a large language model in which human evaluators give it thumbs-up or thumbs-down based on subjective criteria

ecosystem of like-minded, highly analytical, and competitive people that includes everything from poker to Wall Street to AI. The demonym is Riverian. RLHF: See: Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. Robust: In philosophy or statistical inference, reliable across many conditions or changes in parameters. A highly desirable property. ROI: See: Return on Investment. Rug pull

, 135, 143–44, 157, 513n, 514n poker and, 13 River-Village conflict and, 31 Silicon Valley, 269–70, 272 regulatory capture, 31, 269, 270, 495 reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), 440–41, 442, 495 Reinkemeier, Tobias, 102–3 replication crisis, 179, 497 Repugnant Conclusion, 364–65, 403, 495 resilience, 116–17 results-oriented thinking

, 30, 267–68, 271, 505–6n regulatory capture and, 31, 269 risk aversion and, 493 Silicon Valley and, 26, 267–75, 290, 295, 505n RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback), 440–41, 442, 495 Robins, Jason, 184, 186 robustness, 495 Rock, Arthur, 257, 296 rock paper scissors, 47, 58 Roffman, Marvin, 151 Rogers, Kenny, 229

The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century's Greatest Dilemma

by Mustafa Suleyman  · 4 Sep 2023  · 444pp  · 117,770 words

has been incredible, undeniable. It’s easy to overlook quite how far and fast we’ve come. A key driver behind this progress is called reinforcement learning from human feedback. To fix their bias-prone LLMs, researchers set up cunningly constructed multi-turn conversations with the model, prompting it to say obnoxious, harmful, or offensive

Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI

by Karen Hao  · 19 May 2025  · 660pp  · 179,531 words

technique in a blog post as a way to get AI models to follow difficult-to-specify directions. The researchers on the team called it “reinforcement learning from human feedback.” Amodei wanted to move beyond the toy environment, and Radford’s work with GPT-1 made language models seem like a good option. But GPT

content-moderation filter, a revelation first reported by Time magazine correspondent Billy Perrigo. It would also employ over a thousand other contractors globally to perform reinforcement learning from human feedback, or RLHF, the technique it had developed to teach an AI agent backflips, on its language models, including prompting the models repeatedly and scoring the

GPT-2 with roughly twice the number of parameters, a group of researchers had begun advancing the AI safety work that Amodei had wanted: testing reinforcement learning from human feedback as a way to guide the model toward generating cheerful and positive content and away from anything offensive. But late one night, a researcher made

quickly as possible. The live version on the API didn’t have any kind of content-moderation filtering, nor had its outputs been refined with reinforcement learning from human feedback. In meetings, the two camps sought to find a middle ground. Instead, they talked around each other in endless circles. At one point, Welinder, who

and quality of training data, in part by tapping into user data and shifting the model toward the best parts of the data distribution with reinforcement learning from human feedback. Beneath a section titled “How to accomplish it,” the road map elaborated further. As an initial step, OpenAI would bring various deep learning models up

ChatGPT. The company said it also used more than one thousand other contractors in the US and around the world to refine its models with reinforcement learning from human feedback, the AI safety technique that it had developed. To source those workers, it leaned heavily on the same platform that became the staple of the

the things that put OpenAI on the map and would bring it increasing commercial success had begun as AI safety projects: scaling laws, code generation, reinforcement learning from human feedback, the combination of these three into incredibly compelling large language and then multimodal models. Many Doomers would feel their work was being co-opted and

powerful and context sensitive, it was producing garbage responses.” But Brockman pushed forward, pulling together the resources to improve the model with human contractors conducting reinforcement learning from human feedback. With each week, the results looked better and better, until the performance truly began to wow people internally. GPT-4 now had built-in multimodal

new idea began to percolate between him and Altman: a team laser focused on developing new alignment methods for superintelligence, in anticipation of methods like reinforcement learning from human feedback no longer being sufficient once systems could, in their view, outsmart humans. Altman called it the Alignment Manhattan Project. At first, the two discussed spinning

VP of Research of the post-training team, which oversaw the preparation of OpenAI’s models for prime time, such as by aligning them with reinforcement learning from human feedback. The three sat side by side around a small round table to demo 4o, including its ability to be a real-time voice-to-voice

NOTE REFERENCE IN TEXT “Your goal is to provide”: RLHF documents. GO TO NOTE REFERENCE IN TEXT during a talk at UC Berkeley: “John Schulman—Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Progress and Challenges,” posted April 19, 2023, by UC Berkeley EECS, YouTube, 1 hr., 3 min., 31 sec., youtu.be/hhiLw5Q_UFg. GO TO NOTE

Regalado, Antonio, 186, 187 regulations (regulatory policy), 25, 27, 84, 86, 134, 136, 265, 272, 301, 303–4, 306–7, 311–12, 357, 358, 384 reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), 123, 137, 146, 155, 176, 213–23, 245, 248, 315, 381, 387 Remotasks, 203–4, 218–23, 416 Renaldi, Adi, 186 renewable energy, 77

The Optimist: Sam Altman, OpenAI, and the Race to Invent the Future

by Keach Hagey  · 19 May 2025  · 439pp  · 125,379 words

’s tendency to spew out lies or other antisocial statements, researchers taught it how humans would actually like it to behave using a process called reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). Humans would rate how well a response fit their expectations, and that feedback would help create a filter that would civilize the model. The

These Strange New Minds: How AI Learned to Talk and What It Means

by Christopher Summerfield  · 11 Mar 2025  · 412pp  · 122,298 words

in a manner that is aligned with developers’ values. Two popular varieties of human-in-the-loop fine-tuning are supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), and they are typically used in tandem. The combined power of these methods was first revealed to the AI community in a 2022 paper

form of filter bubble for the user. Recent papers by the AI research company Anthropic have studied the tendency for LLMs fine-tuned with RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback) to be sycophantic. The researchers co-opted the term ‘sycophancy’ to describe the model’s propensity to bend its speech to suit the supposed preferences

(learning to learn), 158–61 one-shot learning, 253–4 prediction and, 154–62 reinforcement learning (RL), 188, 190, 192, 251, 258, 267, 305, 322 reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), 188, 189–91, 192, 251, 257, 267 trial-and-error learning, 158–61, 268 Leibniz, Gottfried, 19–21, 24–5, 28, 29, 30, 47

Amateurs!: How We Built Internet Culture and Why It Matters

by Joanna Walsh  · 22 Sep 2025  · 255pp  · 80,203 words

because they don’t distinguish between the likes given by a bot and a human. AI used to be trained using what OpenAI calls RLHF – reinforcement learning from human feedback – and this work 206was paid, but aesthetic evaluation is increasingly sourced via apps that persuade users that interacting with an AI for free is play

carbon footprint, 122 energy consumption, 124 environmental racism, 122 GPT large language model, 113 GPT NLP (natural language processing) models, 104 and humour, 101 RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback), 205–6 self-learning, 123, 206 spammers and, 214 stupidity of, 124 training, 113, 114–16, 118–19, 122, 205–6 AI art, aestheticness, 127

art, 35–6 retrofuturism, 57 revivalism, 76 rewards, 29 Ricoeur, Paul, 34 Riefenstahl, Leni, 177 Rights Alliance, 115 Riley, Denise, 134 risk, 18–20 RLHF (reinforcement learning from human feedback), 205–6260 romanticisation, 157 Romanticism, 103 Ronell, Avital, 136 Rosler, Martha, 147 Ruskin, John, 61–2, 69 Russell, Legacy, 97 Saito, Yuriko, 128 salaried work

Co-Intelligence: Living and Working With AI

by Ethan Mollick  · 2 Apr 2024  · 189pp  · 58,076 words

to fit the preferences of the human, providing additional learning that reinforces good answers and reduces bad answers, which is why the process is called Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). After an AI has gone through this initial phase of reinforcement learning, they can continue to be fine-tuned and adjusted. This type of

seen, gathering training data has its own problems. The most common approach to reducing bias is for humans to correct the AIs, as in the Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) process, which is part of the fine-tuning of LLMs that we discussed in the previous chapter. This process allows human raters to penalize

This Is for Everyone: The Captivating Memoir From the Inventor of the World Wide Web

by Tim Berners-Lee  · 8 Sep 2025  · 347pp  · 100,038 words

speech, or on deliberate disinformation, will reproduce those same flaws in its results. To prevent the nastiest outputs, LLMs like ChatGPT are fine-tuned using ‘reinforcement learning from human feedback’, an AI technique that incorporates editorial judgement from humans. Of course, this immediately leads to the objection that the output of the model is being

need for inclusivity ref1 neural networks ref1, ref2, ref3, ref4 OpenAI ref1, ref2, ref3, ref4, ref5 paradigm shift ref1 RAGs (Retrieval-Augmented Generation systems) ref1 reinforcement learning from human feedback ref1 search engines ref1 semantic web ref1 simplified text ref1 singularity ref1 speed of development ref1 superintelligence ref1 trust ref1 see also ChatGPT Asimov, Isaac