synthetic biology

back to index

125 results

Against the Machine: On the Unmaking of Humanity

by Paul Kingsnorth  · 23 Sep 2025  · 388pp  · 110,920 words

by their attitude to new technologies, which they almost uniformly see as positive. Civilisation, nature and people can be ‘saved’ only by enthusiastically embracing biotechnology, synthetic biology, nuclear power, geoengineering and anything else with the prefix ‘new’ that annoys Greenpeace. The traditional green focus on ‘limits’ is dismissed as naive. We are

now increasingly sold to us as a means of ‘saving the planet’. The Fourth Industrial Revolution explores everything from the creation of artificial life through synthetic biology (spoiler: it’s already happened), digital finance, gene editing, the morality of robotics, the ‘new world order’ of the ‘second machine age’, and the future

As Gods: A Moral History of the Genetic Age

by Matthew Cobb  · 15 Nov 2022  · 772pp  · 150,109 words

is clearly the case with ‘gene editing’ which seems simple and rather domestic). Some terms refer to a much broader field – for example, ‘biotechnology’ or ‘synthetic biology’, both of which incorporate genetic engineering as a base technology but tend to have different ambitions and outlooks. What all these approaches have in common

, or coincided with, the appearance of genetic engineering are deliberately not covered in any detail here – IVF, stem cell biology, embryo research, biotechnology, mammalian cloning, synthetic biology, genomics, DNA sequencing, transhumanism and many others. Some experts will undoubtedly find that their favourite technique, their favourite experiment or their favourite researcher has been

and the National Academy of Sciences’ own internal processes, the article was published.69 The final element of this febrile mix was the advent of synthetic biology, a kind of souped-up genetic engineering, which often involves manipulating many genes and biochemical steps to achieve the desired end.70

Synthetic biology views biological processes as circuits, which can be created at will in microbes and refined by successive cycles of design → build → test → design → build → test

another team created an even more complex biochemical oscillator.72 By synthesising and distributing modular biological components such as genes for enzymes and so on, synthetic biology initially promised to democratise the scientific process by enabling hackers and hobbyists to join the game, contributing to and refining those circuits. This vision was

virtually anybody could genetically engineer microbes using this modular approach, highlighting the advantages of ‘open-source biology’ to go along with open-source computing, the synthetic biology advocates attracted the attention of the security services. Democratising the genetic manipulation of organisms inevitably raised the spectre of terrorists creating bioweapons in a basement

sequences – would put them into the hands of hobbyists, who might accidentally misuse them, or terrorists, for whom misuse would be the sole intention.75 Synthetic biology advocates such as George Church took the potential dangers of the new approach very seriously and there were calls for DNA synthesisers to be internationally

NSABB, the Australian mousepox experiment, the polio virus study and others would all have escaped regulation.78 Although in 2012 the World Economic Forum declared synthetic biology as a key twenty-first-century technology, second only to informatics, the hype eventually subsided. This was partly because it was replaced by a new

much of the biology turned out to be far more complicated than suggested by some of the more enthusiastic evangelists. The science fiction promises that synthetic biology would lead to the development of smart therapies ‘where the therapeutic agent can perform computational and logic operations and make complex decisions’ turned out to

be just that – science fiction.79 Leading researchers in the field gradually became more measured in their claims about synthetic biology’s supposed revolutionary potential and ease of application, although these are still regularly repeated.80 Many scientists – me included – are not entirely convinced that

synthetic biology even exists as a specific discipline, beyond a modularly minded version of genetic engineering. However, when I stated this on Twitter at the beginning of

2022, Fyodor Urnov replied that ‘in my field, genomic therapies, synthetic biology is very much a thing. It refers to design and deployment in the clinic of entirely engineered molecular circuits. This requires a distinct mindset and

. Researchers have also been altering the very structure of the DNA molecule. As long ago as 1990, Steven Benner – one of the founding figures of synthetic biology – created two new complementary bases that could slot into the double helix, extending the genetic code from sixty-four possible combinations to 216.86 Since

both medicine and material science.89 Our imaginations may soon become the limiting factor. As these extraordinary developments demonstrate, despite suggestions that the democratisation of synthetic biology would lead to a start-up revolution, a great deal of skill, knowledge, equipment and teamwork is required to do anything really interesting. After an

initial period of enthusiasm, the hacker side of synthetic biology faded and their online communities dwindled.90 Similarly, security fears about terrorists acquiring biological weapons declined as tragic events around the world demonstrated that the

terrorists’ murderous purpose could be served quite simply by vehicles, kitchen knives and home-made explosives. Although synthetic biology is still often used as a catch-all term to describe dual-use research of concern, far more tangible threats to international biosecurity emerged exactly

(ELSI – in Europe the final noun was ‘aspects’, so ‘ELSA’), including how genomic data might affect racial, ethnic and socioeconomic questions.13 The excitement around synthetic biology in the first decade of the new century led to a new framework for exploring the implications of science, known as responsible research and innovation

tumours in mammalian cells, so once the focus of interest for cancer researchers. Subsequently used as a vector to introduce recombinant DNA into mammalian cells. Synthetic biology. A form of genetic engineering that involves redesigning organisms (usually microbes) according to engineering principles, in order to meet human needs. Views organisms as devices

The Guardian, 4 December 2017. DARPA’s budget allocations are opaque; a year earlier the $100 million figure was quoted as covering DARPA’s whole synthetic biology budget – see Garthwaite (2016). 60 Common Call for a Global Moratorium on Genetically-Engineered Gene Drives. https://www.synbiowatch.org/gene-drives/gene-drives-moratorium

Health 2:74. 69 Wein, L. and Liu, Y. (2005), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102:9984–9. 70 Davies, J. (2018), Synthetic Biology: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford, Oxford University Press). 71 Drexler, K. (1981), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 78:5275–8. 72 Gardner

403:335–8. 73 Carlson, R. (2010), Biology is Technology: The Promise, Peril, and New Business of Engineering Life (London, Harvard University Press). 74 Davies, Synthetic Biology, p. 118. 75 Carlson, R. (2003), Biosecurity and Bioterrorism: Biodefence Strategy, Practice, and Science 1:203–14. 76 Tucker, J. (2010), Issues in Science and

, E., et al. (2006), Molecular Systems Biology 2006:0028. 80 Marris, C., et al. (2014), BioSocieties 9:393–420. For recent revivals of enthusiasm for synthetic biology, see for example: New York Times, 23 November 2021; New Yorker, 7 March 2022; Webb, A. and Hessel, A. (2022), The Genesis Machine: Our Quest

to Rewrite Life in the Age of Synthetic Biology (New York, Public Affairs). 81 For measured explorations of synthetic biology’s promises and significance (or not), see these two excellent collections: Boldt, J. (ed.) (2016), Synthetic Biology: Metaphors, Worldviews, Ethics, and Law (Wiesbaden, Springer); Schmidt, M., et al. (eds) (2010

), Synthetic Biology: The Technoscience and its Societal Consequences (London, Springer). 82 Acevedo-Rocha, C. (2016), in K. Hagen, et al. (eds) Ambivalences of Creating Life

: Societal and Philosophical Dimensions of Synthetic Biology (Cham, Springer), pp. 9–44, p. 24. 83 Gibson, D., et al. (2010), Science 329:52–6. 84 Hutchison, C., et al. (2016), Science 351

hacker communities, had not been updated since 2018. 91 See, for example, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2018), Biodefense in the Age of Synthetic Biology (Washington, DC, The National Academies Press). 92 Garrett, L. (2013), Foreign Affairs 92:28–46. 93 Imai, M., et al. (2012), Nature 486:420–8

(London, MIT Press). 4 One of the first popular expositions of this idea can be found in Church, G. and Regis, E. (2012), Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves (New York, Basic Books). 5 Zimov, S. (2005), Science 308:796–8. 6 Lynch, V., et al. (2015), Cell Reports

9:548. 15 Redford, K., et al. (eds) (2019), Genetic Frontiers for Conservation: An Assessment of Synthetic Biology and Biodiversity Conservation (Gland, Switzerland, IUCN); Redford, K. and Adams, W. (2021), Strange Natures: Conservation in the Era of Synthetic Biology (Yale, Yale University Press), pp. 172–4. 16 McCauley, D., et al. (2017), Functional Ecology

Whole Earth Discipline: An Ecopragmatist Manifesto

by Stewart Brand  · 15 Mar 2009  · 422pp  · 113,525 words

year, and agricultural biotech by 10 percent a year. Out of nowhere has come a whole new field called synthetic biology. Wikipedia describes it in application terms:Engineers view biology as a technology. Synthetic Biology includes the broad redefinition and expansion of biotechnology, with the ultimate goals of being able to design and build

to join the “synbio” party, ban it, or keep ignoring it. In 2007 Jim Thomas, from the anti-GE group ETC, wrote a survey of synthetic biology titled “Extreme Genetic Engineering.” It is well researched, fair, inclusive, and only moderately alarmist. It does conclude: “In keeping with the Precautionary Principle, ETC Group

they meet up with the homies who’ve been keeping it real for a billion years or so. One benefit of the anticipated importance of synthetic biology is a growing profusion of eclectic organizations and meetings designed to include all potential stakeholders and players right from the start—bioethicists, environmental activists, biosecurity

, and investors, along with the bioscientists and bioengineers. Great names the organizations have, too—SYNBIOSAFE (in Europe), SynBERC (Synthetic Biology Engineering Research Center), International Consortium for Polynucleotide Synthesis, and the Industry Association of Synthetic Biology. The extensive public discussion called for by the ETC group is in fact happening. In 2008, for example, Drew

Endy invited ETC’s Jim Thomas to publicly debate with him about synthetic biology, and I got to stage the event in San Francisco. “I want to develop tools that make biology easy to engineer,” said Endy. “Powerful technology

in an unjust world is likely to exacerbate the injustice,” said Thomas. At about the same time, a New York Times reporter visiting the Synthetic Biology Working Group at MIT noticed on their to-do list: “Grow a house.” Now is the time to ask: What are the most environmentally useful

things that synthetic biology could do for human food production? Do we make ever finer adjustments to existing agriculture, create new crop plants, start over with algal vats, reinvent

Long-term Thinking I run for Long Now in San Francisco. We had one such debate on the Greening of nuclear power and another on synthetic biology. Whichever debater goes first holds forth for fifteen minutes and then is interviewed for ten minutes by the second debater, who has to conclude by

the methods described here can be generalized, design, synthesis, assembly, and transplantation of synthetic chromosomes will no longer be a barrier to the progress of synthetic biology.” Decades ago I suspect that environmentalists would have risen up in outrage and alarm against technology like Venter’s, but I have found them surprisingly

noncommittal about synthetic biology, even while they continue to complain about transgenic crops. While the uproar about nuclear power persists (though it is fading into a more primary focus

farming and pest control and plant toxicity and precautionary principle and precision of recombinant DNA research and religion and second generation of stories related to synthetic biology and violence and Genetic Glass Ceilings (Gressel) genetic inertia genetic use restriction technology (GURT) gene transfer genome, human geoengineering asteroid deflection and biochar and carbon

Content of the Atmosphere” (Conservation Foundation) Inconvenient Truth, An Independent India genetic engineering and Green Revolution and nuclear power and slums and Industry Association of Synthetic Biology informal economy infrastructure insect resistance insulin integral fast reactors integrated pest management intelligent design Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA

subaks submergence tolerance subscription farms subsistence farming sugar beets Sullivan, Nicholas Sunstein, Cass SunUp papayas Swaminathan, Monkombu Sambasivan Sweden sweet potatoes Switzerland SynBERC SYNBIOSAFE Syngenta synthetic biology Synthetic Biology Working Group Synthetic Genomics Taverne, Dick taxonomy Tending the Wild (Anderson) “Ten Ways We Get the Odds Wrong,” “terminator” gene terraces terra preta soil Tetlock

The Coming Wave: Technology, Power, and the Twenty-First Century's Greatest Dilemma

by Mustafa Suleyman  · 4 Sep 2023  · 444pp  · 117,770 words

of high tech’s true insiders, addresses the most important paradox of our time: we have to contain uncontainable technologies. As he explains, generative AI, synthetic biology, robotics, and other innovations are improving and spreading quickly. They bring great benefits, but also real and growing risks. Suleyman is wise enough to know

author “The Coming Wave offers a much-needed dose of specificity, realism, and clarity about the potential unanticipated and yet disastrous consequences of artificial intelligence, synthetic biology, and other advanced technologies. This important book is a vivid and persuasive road map for how human beings might guide technological innovations rather than be

“The Coming Wave is a realistic, deeply informed, and highly accessible map of the unprecedented governance and national security challenges posed by artificial intelligence and synthetic biology. Suleyman’s remarkable and in some senses frightening book shows what must be done to contain these seemingly uncontainable technologies.” —Jack Goldsmith, Learned Hand Professor

simple answers: technology has gifted us with exponential improvements in well-being, but it’s accelerating faster than institutions can adapt. Advances in AI and synthetic biology have unlocked capabilities undreamed of by science fiction, and the resulting proliferation of power threatens everything we’ve built. To stay afloat, we must steer

complex tasks but is still a long way from being fully general. THE COMING WAVE: An emerging cluster of related technologies centered on AI and synthetic biology whose transformative applications will both empower humankind and present unprecedented risks. CONTAINMENT: The ability to monitor, curtail, control, and potentially even close down technologies.

reject narratives they see as overly negative. A variant of optimism bias, it colors much of the debate around the future, especially in technology circles. SYNTHETIC BIOLOGY: The ability to design and engineer new organisms or redesign existing biological systems. TECHNOLOGY: The application of scientific knowledge (in the broadest possible sense) to

two universal foundations: a wave of nothing less than intelligence and life. The coming wave is defined by two core technologies: artificial intelligence (AI) and synthetic biology. Together they will usher in a new dawn for humanity, creating wealth and surplus unlike anything ever seen. And yet their rapid proliferation also threatens

breakthroughs, creating not just new businesses but new industries and quality of life improvements in almost every imaginable area. And yet alongside these benefits, AI, synthetic biology, and other advanced forms of technology produce tail risks on a deeply concerning scale. They could present an existential threat to nation-states—risks so

wave of technology is built primarily on two general-purpose technologies capable of operating at the grandest and most granular levels alike: artificial intelligence and synthetic biology. For the first time core components of our technological ecosystem directly address two foundational properties of our world: intelligence and life. In other words,

our own intelligence. Realms previously closed to technology are opening. AI is enabling us to replicate speech and language, vision and reasoning. Foundational breakthroughs in synthetic biology have enabled us to sequence, modify, and now print DNA. Our new powers to control bits and genes feed back into the material, allowing extraordinary

wafers, which enabled the computation of trillions of operations per second, which in turn enabled us to decipher the code of life. While AI and synthetic biology are the coming wave’s central general-purpose technologies, a bundle of technologies with unusually powerful ramifications surrounds them, encompassing quantum computing, robotics, nanotechnology,

the pattern of history, of technology, of an endless process of productive recombination and proliferation, will continue, but also radically deepen. BEYOND THE BUZZWORDS AI, synthetic biology, robotics, and quantum computing can sound like a parade of overhyped buzzwords. Skeptics abound. All of these terms have been batted around popular tech discourse

and you have a platform of profoundly transformational scope. In the words of the Stanford bioengineer Drew Endy, “Biology is the ultimate distributed manufacturing platform.” Synthetic biology’s true promise, then, is that it will “enable people to more directly and freely make whatever they need wherever they are.” In the 1960s

down “1,000-fold within ten years.” Biology, meet exponential improvements. BIOLOGICAL CREATIVITY UNLEASHED Countless experiments are underway in the strange and emerging landscape of synthetic biology: viruses that produce batteries, proteins that purify dirty water, organs grown in vats, algae that draw down carbon from the atmosphere, plants that consume toxic

and biotech. Another company, LanzaTech, harnesses genetically modified bacteria to convert waste CO2 from steel mill production into widely used industrial chemicals. This kind of synthetic biology is helping to build a more sustainable “circular” economy. Next-generation DNA printers will produce DNA with an increasing degree of precision. If improvements can

on AI for their realization. Think, then, of two waves crashing together, not a wave but a superwave. Indeed, from one vantage artificial intelligence and synthetic biology are almost interchangeable. All intelligence to date has come from life. Call them synthetic intelligence and artificial life and they still mean the same thing

imagine, but researchers are already in the early days of making it happen. As the central general-purpose technologies of the coming wave, AI and synthetic biology are already entangled, a spiraling feedback loop boosting each other. While the pandemic gave biotech a massive awareness boost, the full impact—possibilities and risks

alike—of synthetic biology has barely begun to sink into the popular imagination. Welcome to the age of biomachines and biocomputers, where strands of DNA perform calculations and artificial

complex functions into cells like bacteria that can produce a certain protein. Software frameworks, like one called Cello, are almost like open-source languages for synthetic biology design. This could mesh with fast-moving improvements in laboratory robotics and automation and faster biological techniques like the enzymatic synthesis we saw in chapter

5, expanding synthetic biology’s range and making it more accessible. Biological evolution is becoming subject to the same cycles as software. Just as today’s models produce detailed

early days, and truly general systems are still some way off, but at some point these capabilities will expand to many thousands of activities. Consider synthetic biology, too, through the omni-use prism. Engineering life is a completely general technique whose potential uses are near limitless; it might create material for construction

source software. Some of the world’s biggest companies—Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft—regularly contribute huge amounts of IP for free. In areas like AI and synthetic biology, where the lines between scientific research and technological development are especially blurred, all of this makes the culture default to open. At DeepMind we learned

model of containment, strategically critical, relied upon by billions, modern technology itself is a prime actor, a monumental force nation-states struggle to manage. AI, synthetic biology, and the rest are being introduced to dysfunctional societies already rocked back and forth on technological waves of immense power. This is not a world

or engineering constraints on its invention, development, and deployment? Silicon chips require specialized and highly concentrated materials, machines, and knowledge. The talent available for a synthetic biology start-up is, in global terms, still quite small. Both help containment in the near term. Where additional friction keeps things in the tangible world

chapter I discussed the frictions between the United States and China. Despite their differences there are still obvious places for collaboration between these vying powers. Synthetic biology is a better starting point than AI here, thanks to lower existing competition and the obvious mutually assured destruction of novel biothreats. The SecureDNA project

is a good example, laying out a path for governing synthetic biology similarly to how chemical weapons have been curtailed. If China and the United States could create, say, a shared bio-risk observatory, encompassing everything

Bringing Silicon to Life,” Science, Nov. 25, 2016, www.science.org/​doi/​10.1126/​science.aah6219. GO TO NOTE REFERENCE IN TEXT This kind of synthetic biology is helping James Urquhart, “Reprogrammed Bacterium Turns Carbon Dioxide into Chemicals on Industrial Scale,” Chemistry World, March 2, 2022, www.chemistryworld.com/​news/​reprogrammed-bacterium

.com/​articles/​d41586-022-00924-8. GO TO NOTE REFERENCE IN TEXT Computational tools help automate Anna Nowogrodzki, “The Automatic-Design Tools That Are Changing Synthetic Biology,” Nature, Dec. 10, 2018, www.nature.com/​articles/​d41586-018-07662-w. GO TO NOTE REFERENCE IN TEXT Quantum technologies, many millions Vidar, “Google’

44 scaling hypothesis, 67–68, 74 self-critical culture and, 270 sentience claims, 72, 75 skepticism about, 72, 179 surveillance and, 193–94, 195, 196 synthetic biology and, 89–90, 109 technological unemployment and, 177–81 Turing test, 75 See also coming wave; deep learning; machine learning arXiv, 129 Asilomar principles, 269

Benz, Carl, 24, 285 Berg, Paul, 269–70 BGI Group, 122 bias, 69–70, 239–40 Bioforge, 86 Biological Weapons Convention, 241, 263 biotech. See synthetic biology Black Death, 205 Bletchley Park, 32 books, 30 Boyer, Herbert W., 80 Breakout, 51–52, 113 Brin, Sergey, 53 British East India Company, 186, 

War containment and, 37 international cooperation and, 263, 264 nuclear weapons and, 42 Sputnik and, 119–20, 126 coming wave AI on, 3–4 AI-synthetic biology interactivity and, 88–91 autonomy and, 105, 113–15 avoidance of, 12–14 benefits of, 10, 11, 16, 283 defined, vii, 7 ego as driver

, 172 deep learning autonomy and, 113 computer vision and, 58–60 limitations of, 73 potential of, 61–62 protein structure and, 89–90 supervised, 65 synthetic biology and, 90–91 See also machine learning DeepMind AGI as goal of, 8, 51 arms race rhetoric and, 124 choke points and, 251 containment and

, 82–83 autonomy and, 114 containment and, 46, 265, 269–70 genome sequencing, 80–81, 114 origins of, 80 See also gene editing; synthetic biology genetics, 55 See also synthetic biology Genghis Khan, 205 genome sequencing, 80–81 geopolitics AlphaGo and, 117–19, 120 arms race rhetoric and, 124–25, 126–27 China and

65 bias in, 69–70, 239–40 capabilities of, 64–65 deepfakes and, 170 efficiency of, 68 open source and, 69 scale of, 65–66 synthetic biology and, 91 laser weapons, 263 law enforcement, 97–98 Lebanon, 196–97 LeCun, Yann, 130 Lee Sedol, 53–54, 117 Legg, Shane, 8 legislation, 260

, 73 medical applications, 110 military applications and, 103–5 potential of, 61–62 protein structure and, 89–90 robotics and, 95 supervised deep learning, 65 synthetic biology and, 90–91 See also deep learning Macron, Emmanuel, 125 Malthus, Thomas, 136 Manhattan Project, 41, 124, 126, 141, 270 Maoism, 192 Mao Zedong, 194

Ring, 227 RNA editing, 82 Robinson, James, 276, 278 robotics, 93–97 Chinese development of, 122 military applications, 165–66 profit motive and, 134–35 synthetic biology and, 109 Rogers, Everett, 56–57 Rotblat, Joseph, 270 Russell, Stuart, 115, 244 Russian flu epidemic, 173–74 Russian invasion of Ukraine, 44, 103–4

-sovereign world and, 193–96, 206 regulation and, 228 resistance to, 277–78 Sutskever, Ilya, 59 swarming robots, 95–96 Switch Transformer, 68 Sycamore, 122 synthetic biology AI and, 89–90, 109 audits and, 247–48 catastrophe scenarios and, 208–9 computers and, 87–88 current applications, 84–85 decentralization and, 200

The Transhumanist Reader

by Max More and Natasha Vita-More  · 4 Mar 2013  · 798pp  · 240,182 words

Avatar Censuses Secondary and Posthumous Avatars Conclusion 10 Alternative Biologies Biology as Technology The Rise of Machines Complexity The Science of Complexity Synthetic Biology – Complex Embodied Technology Top-Down Synthetic Biology Bottom-Up Synthetic Biology Protocells Artificial Biology From Proposition to Reality Future Venice Artificial Biology and Human Enhancement Part III Human Enhancement: The Cognitive Sphere

that govern biological and cellular functions, from principles that are already well characterized in large and well-mapped non-biological systems such as the Internet. Synthetic Biology – Complex Embodied Technology Living systems are complex and operate according to the world of systems thinking as opposed to Cartesian reality. They possess fundamental properties

in their environment. They are also able to deal with unpredictability, the converse of this being that living technologies may also behave in unpredictable ways. Synthetic biology embodies the principles of complex systems using real-world technologies that can connect with ecology as flexible chemical networks. It is a new kind of

advantage of developing complex systems is that they participate in a problem-solving process to meet ongoing challenges rather than searching for a preconceived outcome. Synthetic biology can be created using direct top-down interventions where existing systems are modified through instrumentation or using bottom-up approaches that engage with chemical self

-assembly. Top-Down Synthetic Biology Synthetic biology is often equated with the genetic modification of biological systems as a top-down design practice. Genes are found in a membrane-bound region in

gene sequences can be mixed and matched to suit the intended application. Venter’s remarkable achievements have heralded a new era in the potential of synthetic biology to rewrite the code of nature and ultimately create new genetic species. In practice, genetic engineering is not as precise as the theory suggests, as

genetically modified organisms are also heavily regulated owing to concerns about their unknown impact on natural systems, should they contaminate a local environment. Bottom-Up Synthetic Biology The astonishing feats of molecular biology in the second half of the twentieth century have downstaged scientific advances in a broader field of investigation that

appearance. Just like the Traube Cell, Leduc’s system also seemed to be governed by the movement of water molecules. Leduc also coined the term “synthetic biology” in 1911 and proposed that this field of study would provide insights into the origins of life and cell organization. Over the twentieth century, research

environmental waste toxins like cyanide and converting them into harmless thiocyanide that can be absorbed into the natural ecological system. Protocell technologies may also support synthetic biology in achieving some of its environmental goals, such as assisting extremophile bacteria to perform under extreme conditions by providing a slow-release system of inorganic

carbon dioxide from the water into an insoluble form using local minerals. Drawing by GMJ. Protocell technology working in combination with top-down forms of synthetic biology could offer a new kind of approach to shape these natural processes to improve environmental conditions (Hanczyc and Ikegami 2009) and positively impact on human

health. So a project to sustainably reclaim the city of Venice was proposed by using protocell technology and synthetic biology to grow an artificial limestone reef underneath it and stop the city sinking into the soft mud on which its foundations are built, in a

Using Nanotechnology, Biotechnology, Information Technology, and Cognitive Science with Living Technology.” Artificial Life (MIT Press) 16, pp. 1–15. Armstrong, Rachel and Spiller, Neill (2011) “Synthetic Biology: Living Quarters.” Nature 467 (October 21, 2010), pp. 916–918. Hanczyc Martin and Ikegami, Takashi (2009) “Protocells as Smart Agents for Architectural Design.” Technoetic Arts

/30, pp. 9386–9391. Leduc, Stéphane (1907) Les Bases physiques de la vie. Paris. Schmidt, Marcus, Mahmutoglu, Ismail, Porcar, Manuel, Armstrong, Rachel, et al. (2010) Synthetic Biology Applications in Environmental Biotechnology: Assessing Potential Economic, Environmental and Ethical Ramifications. TARPOL Project Report. Traube, Moritz (1867) Archiv für Anatomie Physiologie und wissenschaftliche Medicin, pp

, Michael Schilling, Alfons self-organization Sententia, Wrye Shapiro, Michael Silver, Lee simulation singularity Stelarc Sterling, Bruce Stock, Gregory substrate independent minds superhuman superintelligence superlongevity symbiogenesis synthetic biology techno-organic Technological Singularity, see singularity technoprogressive Teilhard de Chardin, Pierre telematic therapeutic, see therapy therapy Tipler, Frank tradeoffs transcend transcendence transcendent transgender transgenderism, see

Life at the Speed of Light: From the Double Helix to the Dawn of Digital Life

by J. Craig Venter  · 16 Oct 2013  · 285pp  · 78,180 words

-century, made by a range of extraordinarily gifted individuals in laboratories throughout the world. I will provide an overview of these developments in molecular and synthetic biology, in part to pay tribute to this epic enterprise, in part to acknowledge the contributions made by key leading scientists. My aim is not to

offer a comprehensive history of synthetic biology but to shed a little light on the power of that extraordinarily cooperative venture we call science. DNA, as digitized information, is not only accumulating

dawn of an era of biological design. Humankind is about to enter a new phase of evolution. 2 Chemical Synthesis as Proof This type of synthetic biology, a grand challenge to create artificial life, also challenges our definition-theory of life. If life is nothing more than a self-sustaining chemical system

the inherited blood condition beta-thalassemia. Genetic engineering has today evolved to be more commonly known as synthetic biology. The distinction between molecular biology and synthetic biology is blurred, and in most uses there is no actual distinction. “Synthetic biology” just sounds sexier, and in the same way, “systems biology” has replaced physiology, and some good

of code,6 and over the decades engineers have developed smart debugging programs to aid in finding faults. Vladimir Noskov, a staff scientist in the Synthetic Biology & Bioenergy Group at the JCVI, Maryland, was our resident yeast guru. Noskov had graduated from St. Petersburg State University, Russia, and then went on to

suggested that the synthesis of living cells become a national goal for America.15 Over the past few years we have seen the rise of synthetic biology, an emerging phase of research in molecular biology. The field represents a marked shift away from the reductionist experimentation that, over the decades, has been

life, learning which components are crucial, which are not, and teasing apart how they work together. This will be a boon for the field of synthetic biology by expanding the range of biological constituents, software subroutines, and circuits that we can develop. 10 Life by Design A new variety raised by man

ability to grow and reproduce.11 The future of biological research will be based to a great extent on the combination of computer science and synthetic biology. We can get a fascinating view of this future from a series of contests that culminate in a remarkable event that takes place each year

with a delay, or counters, where an event triggers the production of a protein, which in turn activates another protein generator. In this way, the synthetic-biology student can construct a hierarchy, starting with parts and moving to devices and then systems. As a result of their work, we now have cellular

resveratrol, a chemical found in wine that is thought by some to have health benefits. The competition is very aware of the societal aspects of synthetic biology and the need to have non-scientists understand and accept their attempts to tinker with the machinery of life. The competitors are deeply involved, as

can recognize a particular sequence. With just six fingers, you can target any particular gene. This important piece of biological machinery has been adapted for synthetic biology by Boston University biomedical engineers Ahmad S. Khalil and James J. Collins. They have created novel zinc-finger designs that are intended to bind with

addition of new functions to proteins and making cells resistant to viral infections. But most important of all, a systematic exploration of the potential of synthetic biology will deepen our understanding of fundamental biology. With such capabilities, we can expand our knowledge of biology thousands of times faster than is possible today

, the National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity (NSABB), the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, and the Department of Homeland Security. Reports on synthetic biology have been issued by many bodies, such as the U.S. Department of Energy and the NSABB. Public consultations have been sponsored, as well, not

together at the OECD/U.S. National Academies/UK Royal Society Symposium, in July 2009, and considered the opportunities, threats, and wider questions posed by synthetic biology, such as what it means to be human. From any perspective, the discussions concerning precisely what it means to create synthetic life have been long

equally to our efforts to alter the basic machinery of life by substituting “synthetic life form” for “robot.” Emerging technologies, whether in robotics or in synthetic biology, can be a double-edged sword. Today there is much debate about “dual-use” technologies—as, for instance, in a study published in 2012 by

to discuss the conundrum that powerful technology cuts both ways. But it is important not to lose sight of the opportunities that this research presents. Synthetic biology can help address key challenges facing the planet and its population, such as food security, sustainable energy, and health. Over time, research in

synthetic biology may lead to new products that will produce clean energy and help quell pollution; help us grow crops on more marginal land; and provide more

programmed cells to self-assemble at the sites of disease to repair damage. Clearly, this apparently limitless potential raises many unsettling questions, not least because synthetic biology frees the design of life from the shackles of evolution and opens up new vistas for life. It is crucial that we invest in underpinning

technologies, science, education, and policy in order to ensure the safe and efficient development of synthetic biology. Opportunities for public debate and discussion on this topic must be sponsored, and the lay public must engage with the relevant issues. I hope that

nothing we have encountered before. The political, societal, and scientific backdrop is continually evolving and has shifted a great deal since the days of Asilomar. Synthetic biology also relies on the skills of scientists who have little experience in biology, such as mathematicians and electrical engineers. As shown by the efforts of

working synthetic genome, when the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues released a report in December 201040 entitled New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies. This document opened with a letter from President Barack Obama that emphasized how vital it was that, as a society, we consider

and responsibility, democratic deliberation, and justice and fairness. If those principles were diligently used to illuminate and guide public-policy choices as we advanced with synthetic biology, the commission concluded, we could be confident that the technology could be developed in a responsible and ethical manner. Among its recommendations to the president

, the commission said that the government should undertake a coordinated evaluation of public funding for synthetic-biology research, including studies on techniques for risk assessment and risk reduction and on ethical and social issues, so as to reveal noticeable gaps, if one

self-regulation, it also urged it to be vigilant about the possibilities of do-it-yourself synthetic biology being carried out in what it called “noninstitutional settings.” One problem facing anyone who casts a critical eye over synthetic biology is that the field is evolving so quickly. For that reason, assessments of the technology

reference virus, co-infection in eggs with standard backbone viruses, and isolation and purification of the vaccine seeds. By taking advantage of major advancements in synthetic biology and cell-based manufacturing, and by introducing the exciting concept of digital-to-biological conversion, we and Novartis have produced better quality vaccines in fewer

more rapid future pandemic responses but a more reliable supply of pandemic influenza vaccines. While vaccines are the best means of prevention against pandemics, and synthetic biology has helped us to make them more effective, we are now facing another major threat from infection, as one of humankind’s most important weapons

. “Ethical considerations in synthesizing a minimal genome.” Science 286, no. 5447 (December 10, 1999): pp. 2087–90. 20. George Church and Ed Regis. Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves (New York: Basic Books, 2012), p. 9. 21. Cho, et. al, “Ethical Considerations in Synthesizing a Minimal Genome.” 22. Kenneth

Mail, June 3, 2010. www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1279988/Artificial-life-created-Craig-Venter—wipe-humanity.html. 8. New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies. Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, Washington D.C., December 2010. www.bioethics.gov. 9. “Vatican greets development of first

(2001): pp. 751–55. 31. Geoff Baldwin, Travis Bayer, Robert Dickinson, Tom Ellis, Paul S. Freemont, Richard I. Kitney, Karen Polizzi, and Guy-Bart Stan. Synthetic Biology: A Primer (London: Imperial College Press, 2012), p. 142. 32. Mansi Srivastava, Oleg Simakov, Jarrod Chapman, Bryony Fahey, Marie E. A. Gauthier, Therese Mitros, Gemma

. Fero, Harley H. McAdams, and Lucy Shapiro. “The essential genome of a bacterium.” Molecular Systems Biology 7 (2011): article number 528. 12. Baldwin, et. al, Synthetic Biology. 13. T. S. Gardner, C. R. Cantor, and J. J. Collins. “Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli.” Nature 403, no. 6767 (January

Jeff Hasty. “A synchronized quorum of genetic clocks.” Nature 463 (January 21, 2010): pp. 326–30. 16. See www.clothocad.org. 17. Baldwin, et. al, Synthetic Biology, p. 121. 18. Karmella A. Haynes, Marian L. Broderick, Adam D. Brown, Trevor L. Butner, James O. Dickson, W. Lance Harden, Lane H. Heard, Eric

(2008). doi:10.1186/1754-1611-2-8. 19. Parasight, Imperial College London. http://2010.igem.org/Team:Imperial_College_London. 20. Baldwin, et. al, Synthetic Biology, p. 121. 21. Laura Adam, Michael Kozar, Gaelle Letort, Olivier Mirat, Arunima Srivastava, Tyler Stewart, Mandy L Wilson, and Jean Peccoud. “Strengths and limitations of

–14. 27. Ahmad S. Khalil, Timothy K. Lu, Caleb J. Bashor, Cherie L. Ramirez, Nora C. Pyenson, J. Keith Joung, and James J. Collins. “A synthetic biology framework for programming eukaryotic transcription functions.” Cell 150, no. 3 (August 3, 2012): pp. 647–58. 28. Ibid. 29. Synthetic Genomics: Options for Governance accessible

online at www.synbiosafe.eu/uploads///pdf/Synthetic%20Genomics%20Options%20for%20Governance.pdf. 30. See “Playing democs games to explore synthetic biology,” Edinethics, at www.edinethics.co.uk/synbio/synbio%20democs%20report.pdf; and Nuffield Council on Bioethics at www.nuffieldbioethics.org/emerging-biotechnologies. 31. “Bridging science

Research in an Age of Terrorism: Confronting the ‘Dual Use’ Dilemma (Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press, 2004). 37. Wohlsen, Biopunk. 38. Baldwin, et. al, Synthetic Biology, p. 139. 39. There are many formulations. See Kenneth R. Foster, Paolo Vecchia, and Michael H. Repacholi. “Science and the precautionary principle.” Science 288, no

. 5468 (2000): pp. 979–81. 40. www.bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/news/PCSBI-Synthetic-Biology-Report-12.16.10.pdf. 41. Isaac Asimov. “Introduction.” In The Rest of the Robots (New York: Doubleday, 1964). Chapter 11 1. Arthur Conan Doyle

, 157–9 natural, 155 See also climate change; temperature environmentalists, 128 epigenetics, 18 ethics, 151–9 five guiding principles, 156 New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies, 156 Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, 156 review board for synthetic life, 79, 151 and science, 80–2 Evans

: In the Light of New Knowledge (Le Dantec), 11 Nature’s Robots, 37 Neanderthal genome, 87 New Atlantis (Bacon), 10 New Directions: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies, 156–8 The New York Times, 128 Newton, Isaac, epigraph, 179 Nirenberg, Marshall Warren, 30–1, 49, 61, 135, 165 nitrogen as

The End of Doom: Environmental Renewal in the Twenty-First Century

by Ronald Bailey  · 20 Jul 2015  · 417pp  · 109,367 words

2012, a coalition of 111 environmental and social activist groups called for a moratorium on the development of synthetic biology. The activists are worried about researchers into synthetic biology who aim to create a toolbox of standardized intracellular parts that can be used to create novel organisms that do things like clean up toxic

specifically cites the Wingspread Consensus Statement as its authoritative version of the precautionary principle. The declarants state, “Applying the Precautionary Principle to the field of synthetic biology first necessitates a moratorium on the release and commercial use of synthetic organisms, cells, or genomes.” Once the moratorium is in place, the groups want

the implications of this technology, including but not limited to devising a comprehensive means of assessing the human health, environmental, and socio-economic impacts of synthetic biology.” It’s not just risks to health and environment that are to be weighed, but also social and economic risks that are to be assessed

’s Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues issued a comprehensive report in 2010, noting that “synthetic biology does not necessarily raise radically new concerns or risks.” The commission explicitly rejected applying the precautionary principle to synthetic biology and instead recommended “an ongoing system of prudent vigilance that carefully monitors, identifies, and mitigates potential

and realized harms over time.” The commission concluded that with respect to the benefits and harms of synthetic biology, the current regulatory system is robust enough to protect people and the environment. Nanotechnology is also being targeted by proponents of the precautionary principle. Nanotechnology

Science to Break Yield Barriers.” Background paper to the CGIAR 2009 Science Forum workshop: “Beyond the Yield Curve: Exerting the Power of Genetics, Genomics and Synthetic Biology,” “2009, 17. www.scienceforum2009.nl/Portals/11/BGWS4.pdf. that past population growth: Julio A. Gonzalo, Félix-Fernando Muñoz, David J. Santos, “Using a Rate

inclusive assessments”: Eric Hoffman et al. The Principles for the Oversight of Synthetic Biology. Friends of the Earth, March 2012. “rooted in the precautionary principle”: Eric Hoffman, “Global Coalition Calls for Oversight of Synthetic Biology.” Friends of the Earth, March 13, 2012. “synthetic biology does not”: Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues, New Directions

: The Ethics of Synthetic Biology and Emerging Technologies. December 1, 2010, 124. “a more comprehensive application”: Georgia Miller, “Who

. rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1639/20130087.full.html. algae that can suck carbon dioxide: D. Ryan Georgianna and Stephen P. Mayfield, “Exploiting Diversity and Synthetic Biology for the Production of Algal Biofuels.” Nature 488 (August 16, 2012): 329–335. labs.biology.ucsd.edu/schroeder/bggn227/2014%20Lectures/Mayfield/Algae%20biofuels%20review

male nanotechnology for obesity and pathological science and penile deformation pesticides and pharmaceuticals and politicization of precautionary principle positioned for reproductive problems saccharin and sperm synthetic biology for Heinberg, Richard herbicides Heritage Foundation Hickey, Joseph HIV/AIDS Holdren, John homeopathy Hooker, Joseph Hopfenberg, Russell hormones, in meat and dairy. See also endocrine

cutting energy food production Sugiyama, Taishi sulfur dioxide Sunstein, Cass superpests superweeds sustainable development. See also climate change mitigation Swanson, Richard Sweeney, Edmund Synfuels Corporation synthetic biology synthetic chemicals. See also DDT; endocrine disrupting chemicals Tahil, William Tainter, Joseph technology. See biotech crops; biotechnology; innovation temperature increase climate sensitivity and projections trends

Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives

by Michael Specter  · 14 Apr 2009  · 281pp  · 79,958 words

so faithfully. “Of course this is all possible,” Drew Endy said when I asked him whether the theoretical threats posed by the new science of synthetic biology were real. “If we don’t want to exist, we can stop existing now.” Endy is a biological engineer at Stanford University who is essentially

’s most important malaria medicine, Keasling wasn’t up on infectious diseases. But he happened to be in the process of creating a new discipline, synthetic biology, which, by combining elements of engineering, chemistry, computer science, and molecular biology, seeks nothing less than to assemble the biological tools necessary to redesign the

—has promised so much, and none has come with greater risks or clearer possibilities for deliberate abuse. If they fulfill their promise, the tools of synthetic biology could transform microbes into tiny, self-contained factories—creating cheap drugs, clean fuels, and entirely new organisms to siphon carbon dioxide from the atmosphere we

will require immense commitment and technical skill. It will also demand something more basic: as we watch the seas rise and snow-covered mountaintops melt, synthetic biology provides what may be our last chance to embrace science and reject denialism. For nearly fifty years Americans have challenged the very idea of progress

, why not try to build the drug out of genetic parts? How many millions of lives would be saved if, by using the tools of synthetic biology, he could construct a cell to manufacture that particular chemical, amorphadiene? It would require Keasling and his team to dismantle several different organisms, then use

have on the market by the end of 2011. Scientific response has been largely reverential—it is, after all, the first bona fide product of synthetic biology, proof of a principle that we need not rely on the unpredictable whims of nature to address the world’s most pressing crises. But there

and East Africa?” asked Jim Thomas, an activist with ETC Group, a technology watchdog based in Canada. Thomas has argued that while the science of synthetic biology has advanced rapidly, there has been little discussion of the ethical and cultural implications involved in altering nature so fundamentally, and he is right. “Scientists

project of biology has been to break that code and learn to read it—to understand how DNA creates and perpetuates life. As an idea, synthetic biology has been around for many years. It took most of the past century to acquire the knowledge, develop the computing power, and figure out how

sure that our kids do not endanger themselves and others. The dangers of biotechnology are real and serious.” I have never met anyone engaged in synthetic biology who would disagree. Venter in particular has always stressed the field’s ethical and physical risks. His current company, Synthetic Genomics, commissioned a lengthy review

a Luddite or Prince Charles—who famously has foreseen a world reduced to “grey goo” by avaricious and out-of-control technology—to recognize that synthetic biology, if it truly succeeds, will make it possible to supplant the world created by Darwinian evolution with a world created by us. “Many a technology

has at some time or another been deemed an affront to God, but perhaps none invites the accusation as directly as synthetic biology,” the editors of Nature—who nonetheless support the technology—wrote in 2007. “Only a deity predisposed to cut-and-paste would suffer any serious challenge

design our own offspring?” Drew Endy asked the first time we met. It was a startling question—and it was meant to startle. Endy is synthetic biology’s most compelling evangelist. He is also perhaps its most disturbing, because, while he displays a childlike eagerness to start building new creatures, he insists

to ask two critical questions: what sorts of risks does that bring into play, and what sorts of opportunities?” The deeply unpleasant risks associated with synthetic biology are not hard to contemplate: who would control this technology, who would pay for it, and how much would it cost? Would we all have

that between fifteen and eighteen terawatts of energy are required to power our planet. How much of that could we manufacture with the tools of synthetic biology? “The estimates run between five and ninety terawatts,” Endy said. “And you can figure out the significance of that right away. If it turns out

next time I saw Endy, a few months later, was in his new office at Stanford. The Bay Area is rapidly becoming as central to synthetic biology as it has always been to the computer industry. Endy looked rattled. “I just drove across the Golden Gate Bridge,” he said. “The whole way

times, it’s obviously lost control of itself and become cancer. Kill it.’ That lets us think about new therapies for all kinds of diseases.” Synthetic biology is changing so rapidly that predictions seem pointless. Even that fact presents people like Endy with a new kind of problem. “Wayne Gretzky once famously

to help us prevent it or respond. We need to be talking.” It didn’t take long for me to realize that he was right. Synthetic biology will never fulfill its promise unless it is discussed and understood by the society it is designed to serve. If not, the cycle of opposition

the research to make vaccines. “But our approach was to remodel the virus,” he went on. “I have said before—and this is true of synthetic biology in general—we have to understand that it provides wonderful solutions to terrible problems. And it can also lead to the synthesis of smallpox and

poliovirus genome, elucidating genetic functions in poliovirus replication and pathogenesis, and synthesizing poliovirus de novo.” Wimmer’s polio research did spark a discussion about whether synthetic biology could be used for bioterrorism; the answer, of course, is yes. If a group of well-trained scientists want to manufacture polio—or even the

memory can be purchased for less than a hundred dollars. In 2001, Rob Carlson, then a researcher at the University of Washington and one of synthetic biology’s most consistently provocative voices, decided to examine a similar phenomenon: the speed at which the capacity to synthesize DNA was growing. What he produced

specialized site for scientific equipment). “All you need is an Internet connection and a credit card,” he said. While nobody suggests that the field of synthetic biology should proceed without regulations, history has shown that they can produce consequences nobody really wants. “Strict regulation doesn’t accomplish its goals,” Carlson told me

,” Carlson said. “Crystal meth use is still rising, and all this despite restrictions.” That doesn’t mean strict control would ensure the same fate for synthetic biology. But it would be hard to see why it wouldn’t. The most promising technologies always present the biggest dangers. That’s scary, but turning

the people least likely to use it wisely, because fear and denialism are capable of producing no other result. This is a chance to embrace synthetic biology, and to end denialism. To succeed we will have to stop conflating ideas and actions. There is no government conspiracy to kill American children with

citizens of countries that spend a fraction as much on health care. That can only change if alternatives are based on scientifically verifiable fact. For synthetic biology to succeed we will also need an education system that encourages skepticism (and once again encourages the study of science). In 2008, students in Singapore

, as Drew Endy put it, is surfing the exponential. It is not enough simply to tell people to go back to school and learn about synthetic biology, or for that matter, about how vaccines or vitamins or genomics work. Optimism only prevails when people are engaged and excited. Why should we bother

the exponential” comes from Drew Endy of Stanford University. The best study on the topic is New Life, Old Bottles: Regulating First-Generation Products of Synthetic Biology by Michael Rodemeyer, a former director of the Pew Charitable Trust’s Initiative on Food and Biotechnology. This report, issued in March 2009 under the

auspices of the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, can be obtained from the Synthetic Biology Project (http://www.synbioproject.org/library/publications/archive/synbio2/). The ETC Group (Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration) has taken the lead in calling

of which can be found on the group’s homepage (http://www.etcgroup.org/en/issues/synthetic_biology.html). The most important and comprehensive of them, Extreme Genetic Engineering, is here (http://www.etcgroup.org/en/issues/synthetic_biology.html). Scientists are often accused of ignoring the ethical implications of their work. It is

worth nothing, then, that Craig Venter—the genomic world’s brashest brand name—embarked on a yearlong study of the ethical and scientific issues in synthetic biology before stepping into the lab. Synthetic Genomics: Options of Governance, by Michele S. Garfinkel, Drew Endy, Gerald L. Epstein, and Robert M. Friedman, is available

the technical reports that were commissioned for the study can be found at http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/39658. The scientific roots of synthetic biology are explored in Philip J. Pauly’s book Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology (Oxford University Press, 1987). It’s expensive

: Will Civilisation Survive the Twenty-first Century? London: Arrow Books, 2004. Regis, Ed. What Is Life? Investigating the Nature of Life in the Age of Synthetic Biology. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2008. Ronald, Pamela C., and Raoul W. Adamchak. Tomorrow’s Table: Organic Farming, Genetics, and the Future of Food

, Kari stem cell research sterilization, forced stinging nettle root Straus, Stephen streptokinase Sun Microsystems Super Bowl (TV) sustainability Svendsen, Lars, A Philosophy of Fear Syngenta synthetic biology creating new life forms in difficulty of regulation of and DNA, see DNA, synthetic and ethics fears of manipulating genes in medical application of new

The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty

by Benjamin H. Bratton  · 19 Feb 2016  · 903pp  · 235,753 words

as self-evident when revealed but that today we can scarcely anticipate.28 In parallel, the various technologies and concepts gathered under the rubric of synthetic biology can engage this absolutized commons as an open-ended toolkit for biological refashioning (if it is actually held in common) and in doing so bring

, geophysics, oceanography, glaciology), earth sciences (e.g., focusing on the atmosphere, lithospere, biosphere, hydrosphere), as well as the various programs of biotechnology (e.g., bioinformatics, synthetic biology, cell therapy), of nanotechnology (e.g., materials, machines, medicines), of economics (e.g., modeling price, output cycles, disincentivized externalities), of neuroscience (e.g., behavioral, cognitive

An Optimist's Tour of the Future

by Mark Stevenson  · 4 Dec 2010  · 379pp  · 108,129 words

seem to say, ‘Well, isn’t this world interesting?’ He works for the enjoyment of discovering new things. ‘I have very expensive hobbies,’ he confesses. ‘Synthetic biology and personal genomics.’ I can tell you a lot more about George you probably don’t want to know. He has high cholesterol as a

these cookbooks that we’re now learning how to edit: the ‘genetic modification’ that occupies so many headlines. The twin sibling of personal genomics is ‘synthetic biology’ – the tools, techniques and knowledge that today allow us to recode cells and, in the future, will enable us to fabricate entirely new ones to

. As the CEO and chairman of Synthetic Genomics he has stated (with only a smidgen of irony) that he has the ‘modest goal’ of using synthetic biology to create new fuels and ‘replace the whole petrochemical industry.’ In May 2010, the newspapers announced he had ‘created artificial life.’ Venter himself was more

, each daughter cell inheriting the synthetic DNA sequence. The newspaper flurry of ‘Dr God’ headlines both overstated and overshadowed an important and symbolic milestone in synthetic biology. George Church told me, ‘I’m a big believer in lots of milestones and celebrations along the way. I think we should celebrate it as

some good stuff too?’ George laughs. ‘Yeah. Irradiating your body is not good for it. But you can imagine that with a little bit more synthetic biology, you could get these new cells to home in on where they’re needed, and first kill whoever is there, but only kill them on

coming to Harvard I’d squeezed in a short trip to the University of Southern Denmark to meet Mark Bedau, not only a founder of synthetic biology pioneers ProtoLife*, but also a philosopher and an advocate for ‘scientific social responsibility.’ ‘There are dangers, there are risks and you have to face them

a joint study between the J. Craig Venter Institute, MIT and The Centre for Strategic and International Studies along with a ‘Who’s Who’ of synthetic biology. The study outlined seventeen options for governance. ‘Can it be done?’ I ask. ‘Sure. Right now, there are bottlenecks which would be easy to license

Health Organisation and the UN (the latter considering how the existing Biological Weapons Convention can be enhanced to encompass synthetic biology). The commercial syn-bio industry too has several overlapping initiatives – the International Association Synthetic Biology, the International Gene Synthesis Consortium and the Consortium for Polynucleotide Synthesis. In particular, members of these consortia are

four billion biosecurity frameworks to choose from by tomorrow. As ever, the science is moving faster than we are. So, we’ll have an accident. Synthetic biology will have its Three Mile Island, its Windscale, its Chernobyl. And somewhere, some ideology-driven buffoon will succeed in a deadly bio-attack giving us

synthetic biology’s 9/11. I suspect we’ll have done most of the things we can think of to prevent it, but it’ll happen anyway.

, or putting extreme weapon-making power into the hands of idiots – I’m transported back to Harvard with George Church talking about the power of synthetic biology and the need for a scientist-led movement for oversight and licensing. Nanotechnology is a younger science and is only just waking up to the

the benefits, but avoids the pitfalls. Regulation tends to get off the ground after we’ve had a few accidents and outrages; and nanotechnology, like synthetic biology, will have its fair share. The ‘good’ news is that those first accidents will be as much a reflection of the technology’s advancement as

(either by homing in on its signal or using LEDs to reveal the glint of hidden camera lenses). I suspect therefore that nanotechnology will follow synthetic biology’s example. As the science becomes more ‘real,’ regulation will evolve, and some people will die because we didn’t work out all the risks

. Not because of his winning smile and confident drawl but because I’ve seen what George Church is doing at Harvard in the field of synthetic biology. If Church can engineer living cells that make fuel, it’s not hard to imagine that experts in synthetic chemistry like Alan Heeger can continue

Juan, is about the worst thing you can do. Mark Bedau, editor of MIT’s Artificial Life and a philosopher with a particular interest in synthetic biology, told me, ‘Change will happen and we can either try to influence it in a constructive way, or we can try to stop it from

air. I remember how that CO2 can be used as a raw material to create liquid fuels that could replace gasoline, harnessing the power of synthetic biology. Maybe such fuels will one day power spacecraft like those I saw in Mojave? I think of Vicki Buck and her algae fixation and the

Dr Emmanuel Skordalakes, Assistant Professor of Gene Expression and Regulation at the Wistar Institute (and co-incidentally my landlord) for reviewing the chapters relating to synthetic biology and genetics, as well as funding a new kitchen. I must also mention the brilliant writers Robert Kunzig, Bob Henson and Chris Goodall for looking

–8 nonzero-sum game 149–51 telegraph 145–7 and violent deaths 149 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 171, 172, 179, 180 International Association Synthetic Biology 68 International Gene Synthesis Consortium 68 Internet 147, 151–64, 268, 302 invariants 99 Iran 157 Isasi, Rosario 27 IVF 106 J Jackson, Ron 64

–9 Stoppard, Tom 281 Strong, Graham 237–8 StubbyGlove 228 Suel, Gurol 273 Suh, Yousin 53 Sun Tzu 40–1, 51–2 surveillance 127, 129 synthetic biology 55–8, 70 bacteria 56–8 bioterrorism 63–6, 68 control 66–70 genome engineering 60–3 viral gene therapy 58–60 Synthetic Genomics 56

Woolly: The True Story of the Quest to Revive History's Most Iconic Extinct Creature

by Ben Mezrich  · 3 Jul 2017

100 Plus: How the Coming Age of Longevity Will Change Everything, From Careers and Relationships to Family And

by Sonia Arrison  · 22 Aug 2011  · 381pp  · 78,467 words

Future Crimes: Everything Is Connected, Everyone Is Vulnerable and What We Can Do About It

by Marc Goodman  · 24 Feb 2015  · 677pp  · 206,548 words

Life on the Edge: The Coming of Age of Quantum Biology

by Johnjoe McFadden and Jim Al-Khalili  · 14 Oct 2014  · 476pp  · 120,892 words

Bold: How to Go Big, Create Wealth and Impact the World

by Peter H. Diamandis and Steven Kotler  · 3 Feb 2015  · 368pp  · 96,825 words

Editing Humanity: The CRISPR Revolution and the New Era of Genome Editing

by Kevin Davies  · 5 Oct 2020  · 741pp  · 164,057 words

Hope Dies Last: Visionary People Across the World, Fighting to Find Us a Future

by Alan Weisman  · 21 Apr 2025  · 599pp  · 149,014 words

The God Species: Saving the Planet in the Age of Humans

by Mark Lynas  · 3 Oct 2011  · 369pp  · 98,776 words

Life's Greatest Secret: The Race to Crack the Genetic Code

by Matthew Cobb  · 6 Jul 2015  · 608pp  · 150,324 words

Soonish: Ten Emerging Technologies That'll Improve And/or Ruin Everything

by Kelly Weinersmith and Zach Weinersmith  · 16 Oct 2017  · 398pp  · 105,032 words

Decoding the World: A Roadmap for the Questioner

by Po Bronson  · 14 Jul 2020  · 320pp  · 95,629 words

The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race

by Walter Isaacson  · 9 Mar 2021  · 700pp  · 160,604 words

Whiplash: How to Survive Our Faster Future

by Joi Ito and Jeff Howe  · 6 Dec 2016  · 254pp  · 76,064 words

What to Think About Machines That Think: Today's Leading Thinkers on the Age of Machine Intelligence

by John Brockman  · 5 Oct 2015  · 481pp  · 125,946 words

Tomorrowland: Our Journey From Science Fiction to Science Fact

by Steven Kotler  · 11 May 2015  · 294pp  · 80,084 words

Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies

by Nick Bostrom  · 3 Jun 2014  · 574pp  · 164,509 words

The Driver in the Driverless Car: How Our Technology Choices Will Create the Future

by Vivek Wadhwa and Alex Salkever  · 2 Apr 2017  · 181pp  · 52,147 words

Life as We Made It: How 50,000 Years of Human Innovation Refined--And Redefined--Nature

by Beth Shapiro  · 15 Dec 2021  · 338pp  · 105,112 words

Uncontrolled Spread: Why COVID-19 Crushed Us and How We Can Defeat the Next Pandemic

by Scott Gottlieb  · 20 Sep 2021

Global Catastrophic Risks

by Nick Bostrom and Milan M. Cirkovic  · 2 Jul 2008

The Techno-Human Condition

by Braden R. Allenby and Daniel R. Sarewitz  · 15 Feb 2011

Innovation and Its Enemies

by Calestous Juma  · 20 Mar 2017

We Are Electric: Inside the 200-Year Hunt for Our Body's Bioelectric Code, and What the Future Holds

by Sally Adee  · 27 Feb 2023  · 329pp  · 101,233 words

How to Spend a Trillion Dollars

by Rowan Hooper  · 15 Jan 2020  · 285pp  · 86,858 words

Future War: Preparing for the New Global Battlefield

by Robert H. Latiff  · 25 Sep 2017  · 158pp  · 46,353 words

What We Owe the Future: A Million-Year View

by William MacAskill  · 31 Aug 2022  · 451pp  · 125,201 words

Green Swans: The Coming Boom in Regenerative Capitalism

by John Elkington  · 6 Apr 2020  · 384pp  · 93,754 words

The Runaway Species: How Human Creativity Remakes the World

by David Eagleman and Anthony Brandt  · 30 Sep 2017  · 345pp  · 84,847 words

Adventures in the Anthropocene: A Journey to the Heart of the Planet We Made

by Gaia Vince  · 19 Oct 2014  · 505pp  · 147,916 words

Human Frontiers: The Future of Big Ideas in an Age of Small Thinking

by Michael Bhaskar  · 2 Nov 2021

Fully Automated Luxury Communism

by Aaron Bastani  · 10 Jun 2019  · 280pp  · 74,559 words

Fool Me Twice: Fighting the Assault on Science in America

by Shawn Lawrence Otto  · 10 Oct 2011  · 692pp  · 127,032 words

Growth: From Microorganisms to Megacities

by Vaclav Smil  · 23 Sep 2019

Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress

by Steven Pinker  · 13 Feb 2018  · 1,034pp  · 241,773 words

The Golden Thread: How Fabric Changed History

by Kassia St Clair  · 3 Oct 2018  · 480pp  · 112,463 words

Spies, Lies, and Algorithms: The History and Future of American Intelligence

by Amy B. Zegart  · 6 Nov 2021

Collaborative Society

by Dariusz Jemielniak and Aleksandra Przegalinska  · 18 Feb 2020  · 187pp  · 50,083 words

MacroWikinomics: Rebooting Business and the World

by Don Tapscott and Anthony D. Williams  · 28 Sep 2010  · 552pp  · 168,518 words

Stealing Fire: How Silicon Valley, the Navy SEALs, and Maverick Scientists Are Revolutionizing the Way We Live and Work

by Steven Kotler and Jamie Wheal  · 21 Feb 2017  · 407pp  · 90,238 words

We-Think: Mass Innovation, Not Mass Production

by Charles Leadbeater  · 9 Dec 2010  · 313pp  · 84,312 words

Is the Internet Changing the Way You Think?: The Net's Impact on Our Minds and Future

by John Brockman  · 18 Jan 2011  · 379pp  · 109,612 words

Inventing the Future: Postcapitalism and a World Without Work

by Nick Srnicek and Alex Williams  · 1 Oct 2015  · 357pp  · 95,986 words

The Human Age: The World Shaped by Us

by Diane Ackerman  · 9 Sep 2014  · 380pp  · 104,841 words

Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming

by Anthony Dunne and Fiona Raby  · 22 Nov 2013  · 165pp  · 45,397 words

AI 2041: Ten Visions for Our Future

by Kai-Fu Lee and Qiufan Chen  · 13 Sep 2021

The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity

by Toby Ord  · 24 Mar 2020  · 513pp  · 152,381 words

Geek Sublime: The Beauty of Code, the Code of Beauty

by Vikram Chandra  · 7 Nov 2013  · 239pp  · 64,812 words

The Demon in the Machine: How Hidden Webs of Information Are Finally Solving the Mystery of Life

by Paul Davies  · 31 Jan 2019  · 253pp  · 83,473 words

Antifragile: Things That Gain From Disorder

by Nassim Nicholas Taleb  · 27 Nov 2012  · 651pp  · 180,162 words

50 Future Ideas You Really Need to Know

by Richard Watson  · 5 Nov 2013  · 219pp  · 63,495 words

You Are Not a Gadget

by Jaron Lanier  · 12 Jan 2010  · 224pp  · 64,156 words

The Patient Will See You Now: The Future of Medicine Is in Your Hands

by Eric Topol  · 6 Jan 2015  · 588pp  · 131,025 words

Selfie: How We Became So Self-Obsessed and What It's Doing to Us

by Will Storr  · 14 Jun 2017  · 431pp  · 129,071 words

CRISPR People: The Science and Ethics of Editing Humans

by Henry T. Greely  · 22 Jan 2021

Darwin Among the Machines

by George Dyson  · 28 Mar 2012  · 463pp  · 118,936 words

12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next

by Jeanette Winterson  · 15 Mar 2021  · 256pp  · 73,068 words

The Singularity Is Nearer: When We Merge with AI

by Ray Kurzweil  · 25 Jun 2024

Architects of Intelligence

by Martin Ford  · 16 Nov 2018  · 586pp  · 186,548 words

Exponential Organizations: Why New Organizations Are Ten Times Better, Faster, and Cheaper Than Yours (And What to Do About It)

by Salim Ismail and Yuri van Geest  · 17 Oct 2014  · 292pp  · 85,151 words

The Fourth Industrial Revolution

by Klaus Schwab  · 11 Jan 2016  · 179pp  · 43,441 words

This Will Make You Smarter: 150 New Scientific Concepts to Improve Your Thinking

by John Brockman  · 14 Feb 2012  · 416pp  · 106,582 words

Exponential: How Accelerating Technology Is Leaving Us Behind and What to Do About It

by Azeem Azhar  · 6 Sep 2021  · 447pp  · 111,991 words

In Our Own Image: Savior or Destroyer? The History and Future of Artificial Intelligence

by George Zarkadakis  · 7 Mar 2016  · 405pp  · 117,219 words

Machine, Platform, Crowd: Harnessing Our Digital Future

by Andrew McAfee and Erik Brynjolfsson  · 26 Jun 2017  · 472pp  · 117,093 words

vN: The First Machine Dynasty (The Machine Dynasty Book 1)

by Madeline Ashby  · 28 Jul 2012  · 343pp  · 93,544 words

Age of Discovery: Navigating the Risks and Rewards of Our New Renaissance

by Ian Goldin and Chris Kutarna  · 23 May 2016  · 437pp  · 113,173 words

Complexity: A Guided Tour

by Melanie Mitchell  · 31 Mar 2009  · 524pp  · 120,182 words

Thank You for Being Late: An Optimist's Guide to Thriving in the Age of Accelerations

by Thomas L. Friedman  · 22 Nov 2016  · 602pp  · 177,874 words

Robots Will Steal Your Job, But That's OK: How to Survive the Economic Collapse and Be Happy

by Pistono, Federico  · 14 Oct 2012  · 245pp  · 64,288 words

The New Harvest: Agricultural Innovation in Africa

by Calestous Juma  · 27 May 2017

Overcomplicated: Technology at the Limits of Comprehension

by Samuel Arbesman  · 18 Jul 2016  · 222pp  · 53,317 words

The Patterning Instinct: A Cultural History of Humanity's Search for Meaning

by Jeremy Lent  · 22 May 2017  · 789pp  · 207,744 words

Possible Minds: Twenty-Five Ways of Looking at AI

by John Brockman  · 19 Feb 2019  · 339pp  · 94,769 words

Unit X: How the Pentagon and Silicon Valley Are Transforming the Future of War

by Raj M. Shah and Christopher Kirchhoff  · 8 Jul 2024  · 272pp  · 103,638 words

The Future of the Brain: Essays by the World's Leading Neuroscientists

by Gary Marcus and Jeremy Freeman  · 1 Nov 2014  · 336pp  · 93,672 words

Valley of Genius: The Uncensored History of Silicon Valley (As Told by the Hackers, Founders, and Freaks Who Made It Boom)

by Adam Fisher  · 9 Jul 2018  · 611pp  · 188,732 words

Physics of the Future: How Science Will Shape Human Destiny and Our Daily Lives by the Year 2100

by Michio Kaku  · 15 Mar 2011  · 523pp  · 148,929 words

The Great Leveler: Violence and the History of Inequality From the Stone Age to the Twenty-First Century

by Walter Scheidel  · 17 Jan 2017  · 775pp  · 208,604 words

Future Files: A Brief History of the Next 50 Years

by Richard Watson  · 1 Jan 2008

Augmented: Life in the Smart Lane

by Brett King  · 5 May 2016  · 385pp  · 111,113 words

What If We Get It Right?: Visions of Climate Futures

by Ayana Elizabeth Johnson  · 17 Sep 2024  · 588pp  · 160,825 words

2312

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 22 May 2012  · 561pp  · 167,631 words

Spin

by Robert Charles Wilson  · 2 Jan 2005  · 541pp  · 146,445 words

Windfall: The Booming Business of Global Warming

by Mckenzie Funk  · 22 Jan 2014  · 337pp  · 101,281 words

Supremacy: AI, ChatGPT, and the Race That Will Change the World

by Parmy Olson  · 284pp  · 96,087 words

Who Owns the Future?

by Jaron Lanier  · 6 May 2013  · 510pp  · 120,048 words

Moral Ambition: Stop Wasting Your Talent and Start Making a Difference

by Bregman, Rutger  · 9 Mar 2025  · 181pp  · 72,663 words

Massive: The Missing Particle That Sparked the Greatest Hunt in Science

by Ian Sample  · 1 Jan 2010  · 310pp  · 89,838 words

The AI Economy: Work, Wealth and Welfare in the Robot Age

by Roger Bootle  · 4 Sep 2019  · 374pp  · 111,284 words

No Ordinary Disruption: The Four Global Forces Breaking All the Trends

by Richard Dobbs and James Manyika  · 12 May 2015  · 389pp  · 87,758 words

The Dark Net

by Jamie Bartlett  · 20 Aug 2014  · 267pp  · 82,580 words

A New History of the Future in 100 Objects: A Fiction

by Adrian Hon  · 5 Oct 2020  · 340pp  · 101,675 words

The Best Business Writing 2013

by Dean Starkman  · 1 Jan 2013  · 514pp  · 152,903 words

Loonshots: How to Nurture the Crazy Ideas That Win Wars, Cure Diseases, and Transform Industries

by Safi Bahcall  · 19 Mar 2019  · 393pp  · 115,217 words

The Future Is Asian

by Parag Khanna  · 5 Feb 2019  · 496pp  · 131,938 words

When the Heavens Went on Sale: The Misfits and Geniuses Racing to Put Space Within Reach

by Ashlee Vance  · 8 May 2023  · 558pp  · 175,965 words

Five Billion Years of Solitude: The Search for Life Among the Stars

by Lee Billings  · 2 Oct 2013  · 326pp  · 97,089 words

From eternity to here: the quest for the ultimate theory of time

by Sean M. Carroll  · 15 Jan 2010  · 634pp  · 185,116 words

Growth: A Reckoning

by Daniel Susskind  · 16 Apr 2024  · 358pp  · 109,930 words

The Ministry for the Future: A Novel

by Kim Stanley Robinson  · 5 Oct 2020  · 583pp  · 182,990 words

Termites of the State: Why Complexity Leads to Inequality

by Vito Tanzi  · 28 Dec 2017

Supertall: How the World's Tallest Buildings Are Reshaping Our Cities and Our Lives

by Stefan Al  · 11 Apr 2022  · 300pp  · 81,293 words

WTF?: What's the Future and Why It's Up to Us

by Tim O'Reilly  · 9 Oct 2017  · 561pp  · 157,589 words

In Covid's Wake: How Our Politics Failed Us

by Stephen Macedo and Frances Lee  · 10 Mar 2025  · 393pp  · 146,371 words

You Can't Make This Stuff Up: The Complete Guide to Writing Creative Nonfiction--From Memoir to Literary Journalism and Everything in Between

by Lee Gutkind  · 13 Aug 2012  · 347pp  · 90,234 words

The Immigrant Exodus: Why America Is Losing the Global Race to Capture Entrepreneurial Talent

by Vivek Wadhwa  · 1 Oct 2012  · 103pp  · 24,033 words

Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy That Works for Progress, People and Planet

by Klaus Schwab and Peter Vanham  · 27 Jan 2021  · 460pp  · 107,454 words

Destined for War: America, China, and Thucydides's Trap

by Graham Allison  · 29 May 2017  · 518pp  · 128,324 words

Blockchain: Blueprint for a New Economy

by Melanie Swan  · 22 Jan 2014  · 271pp  · 52,814 words

Stakeholder Capitalism: A Global Economy That Works for Progress, People and Planet

by Klaus Schwab  · 7 Jan 2021  · 460pp  · 107,454 words

The Autonomous Revolution: Reclaiming the Future We’ve Sold to Machines

by William Davidow and Michael Malone  · 18 Feb 2020  · 304pp  · 80,143 words

The Great Wave: The Era of Radical Disruption and the Rise of the Outsider

by Michiko Kakutani  · 20 Feb 2024  · 262pp  · 69,328 words

Blitzscaling: The Lightning-Fast Path to Building Massively Valuable Companies

by Reid Hoffman and Chris Yeh  · 14 Apr 2018  · 286pp  · 87,401 words

Build: An Unorthodox Guide to Making Things Worth Making

by Tony Fadell  · 2 May 2022  · 411pp  · 119,022 words

Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity

by Lawrence Lessig  · 15 Nov 2004  · 297pp  · 103,910 words