veil of ignorance

back to index

description: album by Raised Fist

77 results

The Unknowers: How Strategic Ignorance Rules the World

by Linsey McGoey  · 14 Sep 2019

And yet the importance of this insight hasn’t really pierced political theory. Philosophers will point to American political philosopher John Rawls’ notion of a ‘veil of ignorance’ (I introduce the concept in the next chapter) as evidence that the unknown can be a fruitful academic tool for understanding why some people have

used the word ‘ignorance’ to understand the utility of unknowing, including Rawls’ concept of the ‘veil of ignorance’ and political scientist Anthony Downs’ notion of ‘rational ignorance,’ both of which were developed in the mid-20th century. The veil of ignorance is a thought experiment Rawls developed to consider whether most people would prefer more egalitarian

societies if they had the choice. When arguing from behind a Rawlsian ‘veil of ignorance’ people are asked to consider if they would condone practices like slavery if it is impossible for them to ever know whether they or their

about rational ignorance that she discovered long before me. Political scientists do this all the time: Downs’ principle of ignorance or Rawls’ principle of the veil of ignorance. It’s usually the names of men. But I think there is a historical rationale, a scholarly rationale, and quite unexpectedly, a somewhat serendipitous poetic

, 222–3, 304 race realism, 48 racial exploitation, 304 racism, 45, 48, 84–7, 319 Rampell, Catherine, 171, 217 rational ignorance, 46–7 Rawls, John, ‘veil of ignorance’, 8–9, 46 Reagan, Ronald, 68 reckless ignorance, 54–6, 235, 304 regulation: Adam Smith legacy, 20–1, 121, 126–7, 136–7, 140–1

Department of Justice, 102, 238, 252, 261 Unser, Bobby, 242–3 unwitting ignorance, 42, 122–3 useful unknowns, 51–6, 257, 277 utilitarianism, 8, 155 ‘veil of ignorance’, 8–9, 46 Viner, Jacob, 300, 302–3 Vinson and Elkins, 235 Vioxx, 258–62 von Eschenbach, Andrew, 273 voter ignorance: Brexit, 82–3, 89

Anarchy State and Utopia

by Robert Nozick  · 15 Mar 1974  · 524pp  · 146,798 words

class position or social status, or his natural assets and abilities, his strength, intelligence, and so forth. The principles of justice are chosen behind a veil of ignorance. This ensures that no one is advantaged or disadvantaged in the choice of principles by the outcome of natural chance or the contingency of social

historical principle, it seems, could be agreed to in the first instance by the participants in Rawls’ original position. For people meeting together behind a veil of ignorance to decide who gets what, knowing nothing about any special entitlements people may have, will treat anything to be distributed as manna from heaven. bd

not lead them to select the entitlement principle. The nature of the decision problem facing persons deciding upon principles in an original position behind a veil of ignorance limits them to end-state principles of distribution. The self-interested person evaluates any non-end-state principle on the basis of how it works

to accept Rawls’ theory and his construal of the problem as one of which principles would be chosen by rational self-interested individuals behind a veil of ignorance, unless we were sure that no adequate historical-entitlement theory was to be gotten. Since Rawls’ construction doesn’t yield a historical or entitlement conception

is difficult to formulate the requisite criterion of depth. Lest this appear lame, let us add that as Rawls states the root idea underlying the veil of ignorance, that feature which is the most prominent in excluding agreement to an entitlement conception, it is to prevent someone from tailoring principles to his own

advantage, from designing principles to favor his particular condition. But not only does the veil of ignorance do this; it ensures that no shadow of entitlement considerations will enter the rational calculations of ignorant, nonmoral individuals constrained to decide in a situation

reflecting some formal conditions of morality. bf Perhaps, in a Rawls-like construction, some condition weaker than the veil of ignorance could serve to exclude the special tailoring of principles, or perhaps some other “structural-looking” feature of the choice situation could be formulated to mirror

at a process P for generating principles of justice. This process P involves people in the original position agreeing to principles of justice behind a veil of ignorance. According to Rawls, any principles emerging from this process P will be the principles of justice. But this process P for generating principles of justice

one way we should mention whereby even more egalitarian principles might be gotten from Rawls’ original position. Rawls imagines rational self-interested persons behind a veil of ignorance choosing principles to govern their institutions. He further imagines, in the third part of his book, that when raised in a society which embodies these

endowments. In this way the fact that natural endowments are arbitrary from a moral point of view would help to impose and to justify the veil of ignorance. But how does it do this; why should knowledge of natural endowments be excluded from the original position? Presumably the underlying principle would be that

ones. bf Someone might think entitlement principles count as specially tailored in a morally objectionable way, and so he might reject my claim that the veil of ignorance accomplishes more than its stated purpose. Since to specially tailor principles is to tailor them unfairly for one’s own advantage, and since the question

of the entitlement principle is precisely the issue, it is dif ficult to decide which begs the question: my criticism of the strength of the veil of ignorance, or the defense against this criticism which I imagine in this note. bg The difference principle thus creates two conflicts of interest: between those at

Living With the Himalayan Masters

by Swami Rama  · 1 Jan 1978

firmly on the physical.” This awareness is developed through two methods. The first is the integration of meditation with action. Through meditation one tears the veil of ignorance; he thus realizes his true self, which is the very self of all. Through selfless and loving actions one relates creatively with others. The second

that sound which is called anahata nada (inner sound). This flows through the vocal cords and is called music. Kabir says, “O sadhu, lift the veil of ignorance and you’ll be one with the Beloved. Light the lamp of love in the inner chamber of your being and you will meet the

absolute Reality everything is in vain. Ordinary men regard certain aspects of life as mysterious or mystical, but such mysteries are easily solved when the veil of ignorance is removed. The technique of dying is not known to the modern scientists, but in yoga science such techniques are described and imparted to those

The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values

by Sam Harris  · 5 Oct 2010  · 412pp  · 115,266 words

called this novel starting point “the original position,” from which each person must judge the fairness of every law and social arrangement from behind a “veil of ignorance.” In other words, we can design any society we like as long as we do not presume to know, in advance, whether we will be

really an alternative to thinking about the actual consequences of our behavior? How would we feel if, after structuring our ideal society from behind a veil of ignorance, we were told by an omniscient being that we had made a few choices that, though eminently fair, would lead to the unnecessary misery of

The Problem of Political Authority: An Examination of the Right to Coerce and the Duty to Obey

by Michael Huemer  · 29 Oct 2012  · 577pp  · 149,554 words

and indeed of any other personal information about themselves, including their race, sex, religion, social class, and so on.16 This condition, known as the ‘veil of ignorance’, prevents the parties from tailoring the chosen political principles to their own advantage; being ignorant of what one’s position in society will be, one

, the disagreement between anarchists and statists about the necessity of government.27 There is no reason for thinking that this disagreement would evaporate behind the veil of ignorance, because Rawls has given no reason for thinking that those who in fact hold either of these views do so only because they are relying

The Cult of Smart: How Our Broken Education System Perpetuates Social Injustice

by Fredrik Deboer  · 3 Aug 2020  · 236pp  · 77,546 words

the facts where they lead, a better world is possible—most of all for those at the bottom of the performance spectrum. SEVEN Before the Veil of Ignorance To build a vision for a better future, it’s necessary to unpack a lot of our current philosophical baggage. Because beneath the placid surface

in terms of their ability to secure the good life. Few ideas have had as much resonance in that debate as the concept of the veil of ignorance. The idea, developed by the eminent liberal philosopher John Rawls, asks us to imagine that we are ignorant of all of our individual demographics and

the alternative was abject misery. But the average person would probably want to play safer percentages. It’s easy to see the appeal of the veil of ignorance concept for progressives. By putting us in a state of identity-lessness, we can better recognize the evils of racism, sexism, and homophobia. No one

natural assets as an impediment to achieving social equality would militate against our basic concepts of just deserts. But as influential as Rawls and his veil of ignorance have been, the idea that inherent talent can be an impediment along with racism, sexism, and the depravations of social class never really took. The

social sorting and economic reward that doles out riches and poverty based in large measure on that which we cannot control? Think again of the veil of ignorance. Who would endorse meritocracy if “merit” depends so heavily on chance? What our system has created is a new kind of aristocracy, one hardly less

chapter. Not Whether We Are Equal, But How We Are Equal From a moral point of view, the modern science of genetics essentially makes the veil of ignorance real: the “veil” is our lack of consciousness before our birth. None of us can choose who our biological parents are, and (to date) no

, Kathryn Paige Harden, Richard E. Nisbett, “Charles Murray Is Once Again Peddling Junk Science About Race and IQ,” Vox, May 18, 2017. SEVEN: BEFORE THE VEIL OF IGNORANCE 1. John Rawls, A Theory of Justice, revised edition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009), 118. 2. Carl N. Degler, In Search of Human Nature

opportunity and Medicare for All on negative and positive liberty and social inequality and social mobility and student loan debt forgiveness and universal childcare and veil of ignorance ProPublica pseudoscience and behavioral genetics eugenics phrenology pseudoscientific racism public schools, blame placed on Purdue University “race realism” race science racial achievement gaps racism Act

Racism (ANSWER) and aspirations to winning and behavioral genetics durability of and equality of opportunity pseudoscientific racism and “race realism” scientific racism structural racism and veil of ignorance Rand Education Rawls, John Reeves, Richard reform. See education reform movement reforms, realistic elimination of charter schools loosening standards lowering legal dropout age reduced focus

schools and labor force participation rate and universal basic income universal basic income (UBI) universal childcare University of Rhode Island (URI) untalented students untalented teachers veil of ignorance definition of and equality of opportunity and meritocracy vocational education voting rights wage gaps Waiting for Superman (documentary) war Afghanistan war anti-war movements Iraq

Great Lie Four: Schools, Where the Talent Gap Has Teeth Five: Does School Quality Matter? Not Really Six: The Whims of Nature Seven: Before the Veil of Ignorance Eight: Realistic Reforms Nine: A World to Win Epilogue Acknowledgments Notes Index About the Author Copyright First published in the United States by All Points

Libertarian Idea

by Jan Narveson  · 15 Dec 1988  · 371pp  · 36,271 words

the Rawlsian version the “social contract” is an idealization. It “takes place” in very remarkable circumstances: the contractors are behind, as he puts it, a “veil of ignorance”, 132 which prevents them from knowing anything about themselves in particular. They know only generalities about people but have no idea which person they themselves

behind-the-veil person look uncomfortably like Plato‟s philosopher king, say? And if not, why not? Actually, there are two ways of understanding the “veil of ignorance” idea: what we might call the “theoretically dispensable” and the “theoretically indispensable” versions. In the former understanding, the veil idea is only a metaphor for

same result. The question is, though: in what sense of „impartial‟ may impartiality be “imposed”? For people are not impartial. But the “people” behind the veil of ignorance are—they can‟t help but be, for they have no selves to be partial to! In the dispensable version of the veil, it is

them myself is, after all, obviously “partial”, right? And justice is impartial, right? So . . . 133 Clearly, we must reject this latter, strong interpretation of a “veil of ignorance” device. And since the temptation to interpret it that way is virtually irresistible, we shall avoid it by dispensing with it altogether. We will, in

Kai Nielsen and Roger Shiner, eds.. New Essays on Contract Theory, Canadian Journal of Philosophy Supplementary Vol. 3 (1977): 137-152, esp. sec. iv, “The Veil of Ignorance,” pp. 148ff. 4. Rawls has an interesting list: see A Theory of Justice, ch. 23, “The Formal Constraints of the Concept of Right.” 5. See

as the interpersonal authoritative rule for governing their interactions. But why would they do so? If we could introduce a constraint such as Rawls‟s Veil of Ignorance, of course, then we would indeed be on the rails to utilitarianism, 9 but this use of the veil is, as I have pointed out

the chicken of happiness, rather than vice versa.10 Finally, let us agree on another point. Whenever we are in realworld situations closely resembling a “veil of ignorance” in some respects, then a utilitarian solution is likely to be a good one. Suppose that some system must be devised for catering to the

Darwin's Dangerous Idea: Evolution and the Meanings of Life

by Daniel C. Dennett  · 15 Jan 1995  · 846pp  · 232,630 words

in Rawls' scenario, designed to ensure that undue selfishness among the participants in this exercise in reflection cancels itself out, is what he calls the "veil of ignorance." Everyone gets to vote on a favored design of society, but when you decide which society you would be happy to live in and give

a surgeon or a street-sweeper or a soldier; you don't get to find out until after you have voted. Choosing from behind the veil of ignorance ensures that people will give due consideration to the likely effects, the costs and benefits, for all the citizenry, including those worst off. Rawls' theory

normal cooperation in the strongly shared fate of somatic-line cells is analogous to the cooperation Bawls tried to engineer behind the veil of ignorance. He calls this, aptly, the "Darwinian Veil of Ignorance." Your sex cells (sperm or ova) are formed by a process unlike that of normal cell division or mitosis. Your sex cells

gained by selfish competition among their "fellow" genes. That, at any rate, is the usual arrangement. There are special occasions, however, on which the Darwinian Veil of Ignorance is briefly lifted. We have already noted them; they are the cases of "meiotic drive" or "genomic imprinting" (Haig and Grafen 1991, Haig 1992) we

day of the split. The similarity to the genetic rules of meiosis could hardly be more complete. [Wilson and Sober 1994, p. 604.] The Darwinian Veil of Ignorance in action! But it is not enough, all by itself, to ensure group solidarity, since human beings, even those who have lived their entire lives

Big Data and the Welfare State: How the Information Revolution Threatens Social Solidarity

by Torben Iversen and Philipp Rehm  · 18 May 2022

public system of social insurance. With the ICT revolution, however, information has increasingly divided public opinion on many social insurance issues. Using Rawls’s (1971) “veil of ignorance” metaphor, the data revolution has raised the veil and allowed people to see more clearly whether they are likely to lose or gain from public

very simple way of expressing this general insight is that class conflict increases with information. Behind the veil of ignorance, everyone can agree that a robust level of public insurance is a good thing; without the veil of ignorance, there is disagreement about the level of public insurance (and potentially also its public nature). Even if

very simple way of expressing this general insight is that class conflict increases with information. Behind the veil of ignorance, everyone can agree that a robust level of public insurance is a good thing; without the veil of ignorance, there is disagreement about the level of public insurance (and potentially also its public nature). Even if

very simple way of expressing this general insight is that class conflict increases with information. Behind the veil of ignorance, everyone can agree that a robust level of public insurance is a good thing; without the veil of ignorance, there is disagreement about the level of public insurance (and potentially also its public nature). Even if

benefits. Of course, the assumption of average risk is not realistic, but it highlights a key insight in Rawls’s theory of justice: behind the veil of ignorance, most will go along with some equalization of income. Finally, because insurance is welfare-enhancing and because many employers depended on workers making risky investments

mandatory risk pooling did not come about for efficiency reasons – as economists tend to imply – but instead for reasons of distributive politics. Under the proverbial “veil of ignorance” (Rawls 1971) – in times of uncertainty or in low-information environments – a majority of risk-averse citizens have an economic interest in publicly provided social

The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality

by Kathryn Paige Harden  · 20 Sep 2021  · 375pp  · 102,166 words

class in political philosophy. The most famous version of this thought experiment was proposed by the philosopher John Rawls, who imagined something called “the veil of ignorance.” Behind the veil of ignorance,31 no one knows his place in society, his class position or social status; nor does he know his fortune in the distribution of

life, or even the special features of his psychology such as his aversion to risk or liability to optimism or pessimism. The point of the veil of ignorance is to imagine a hypothetical situation in which everyone is on an equal footing and so can come to a fair agreement about the principles

gets to do what and who gets to have what? Rawls argued that two principles would emerge from the fair agreement of people behind the veil of ignorance: Each person has an equal right to a fully adequate scheme of equal basic liberties which is compatible with a similar scheme of liberties for

school, are the consequence of a series of lucky breaks for which you can take no credit. Now, take the Rawlsian thought experiment about the veil of ignorance seriously, and consider: What sort of society would you want if you didn’t know what the outcome of the genetic lottery was going to

those least advantaged, 251–255; using genetic information for equity, not exclusion, 242–246; using genetic information to improve opportunity, not classify people, 235–242; veil of ignorance and, 251–255 anti-eugenic project, 20 antiracism, 89–93, 232 Appelbaum, Paul, 197 attachment, 97 autism spectrum disorders (ASDs), 27–28, 63, 228–229

, 62, 202, 203, 234 twin studies, 117–121, 200–202 UK Biobank, 128, 181 Unger, Roberto Mangabeira, 20 unskilled versus skilled workers, 5–6, 209 veil of ignorance, 251–252 Visscher, Peter, 114–115 Wall Street Journal, 38, 205 Warner, John, 175 War on Cops, The, 205 Warren, Elizabeth, 205–206 Washington, Harriet

Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism, and Progress

by Steven Pinker  · 13 Feb 2018  · 1,034pp  · 241,773 words

Evil Geniuses: The Unmaking of America: A Recent History

by Kurt Andersen  · 14 Sep 2020  · 486pp  · 150,849 words

The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts

by Richard Susskind and Daniel Susskind  · 24 Aug 2015  · 742pp  · 137,937 words

Basic Income: A Radical Proposal for a Free Society and a Sane Economy

by Philippe van Parijs and Yannick Vanderborght  · 20 Mar 2017

The Armchair Economist: Economics and Everyday Life

by Steven E. Landsburg  · 1 May 2012

The Broken Ladder

by Keith Payne  · 8 May 2017

The Glass Half-Empty: Debunking the Myth of Progress in the Twenty-First Century

by Rodrigo Aguilera  · 10 Mar 2020  · 356pp  · 106,161 words

A Pelican Introduction: Basic Income

by Guy Standing  · 3 May 2017  · 307pp  · 82,680 words

Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies

by Nick Bostrom  · 3 Jun 2014  · 574pp  · 164,509 words

Making Globalization Work

by Joseph E. Stiglitz  · 16 Sep 2006

How the Mind Works

by Steven Pinker  · 1 Jan 1997  · 913pp  · 265,787 words

Why Liberalism Failed

by Patrick J. Deneen  · 9 Jan 2018  · 215pp  · 61,435 words

Engineering Security

by Peter Gutmann

Dark Laboratory: On Columbus, the Caribbean, and the Origins of the Climate Crisis

by Tao Leigh. Goffe  · 14 Mar 2025  · 441pp  · 122,013 words

Rationality: What It Is, Why It Seems Scarce, Why It Matters

by Steven Pinker  · 14 Oct 2021  · 533pp  · 125,495 words

The Aristocracy of Talent: How Meritocracy Made the Modern World

by Adrian Wooldridge  · 2 Jun 2021  · 693pp  · 169,849 words

The Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity

by Toby Ord  · 24 Mar 2020  · 513pp  · 152,381 words

Algorithms to Live By: The Computer Science of Human Decisions

by Brian Christian and Tom Griffiths  · 4 Apr 2016  · 523pp  · 143,139 words

How to Be Right: In a World Gone Wrong

by James O'Brien  · 2 Nov 2018  · 173pp  · 52,725 words

The Darwin Economy: Liberty, Competition, and the Common Good

by Robert H. Frank  · 3 Sep 2011

Super Thinking: The Big Book of Mental Models

by Gabriel Weinberg and Lauren McCann  · 17 Jun 2019

Hard Times: The Divisive Toll of the Economic Slump

by Tom Clark and Anthony Heath  · 23 Jun 2014  · 401pp  · 112,784 words

Culture and Prosperity: The Truth About Markets - Why Some Nations Are Rich but Most Remain Poor

by John Kay  · 24 May 2004  · 436pp  · 76 words

Visions of Inequality: From the French Revolution to the End of the Cold War

by Branko Milanovic  · 9 Oct 2023

The Joy of Tax

by Richard Murphy  · 30 Sep 2015  · 233pp  · 71,775 words

Left Behind

by Paul Collier  · 6 Aug 2024  · 299pp  · 92,766 words

Free Money for All: A Basic Income Guarantee Solution for the Twenty-First Century

by Mark Walker  · 29 Nov 2015

System Error: Where Big Tech Went Wrong and How We Can Reboot

by Rob Reich, Mehran Sahami and Jeremy M. Weinstein  · 6 Sep 2021

Head, Hand, Heart: Why Intelligence Is Over-Rewarded, Manual Workers Matter, and Caregivers Deserve More Respect

by David Goodhart  · 7 Sep 2020  · 463pp  · 115,103 words

Two Nations, Indivisible: A History of Inequality in America: A History of Inequality in America

by Jamie Bronstein  · 29 Oct 2016  · 332pp  · 89,668 words

From Gutenberg to Google: electronic representations of literary texts

by Peter L. Shillingsburg  · 15 Jan 2006  · 224pp  · 12,941 words

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion

by Jonathan Haidt  · 13 Mar 2012  · 539pp  · 139,378 words

Giving the Devil His Due: Reflections of a Scientific Humanist

by Michael Shermer  · 8 Apr 2020  · 677pp  · 121,255 words

The Great Mental Models: General Thinking Concepts

by Shane Parrish  · 22 Nov 2019  · 147pp  · 39,910 words

The Economists' Hour: How the False Prophets of Free Markets Fractured Our Society

by Binyamin Appelbaum  · 4 Sep 2019  · 614pp  · 174,226 words

The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature

by Steven Pinker  · 1 Jan 2002  · 901pp  · 234,905 words

Respectable: The Experience of Class

by Lynsey Hanley  · 20 Apr 2016  · 230pp  · 79,229 words

Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion

by Paul Bloom  · 281pp  · 79,464 words

The Coddling of the American Mind: How Good Intentions and Bad Ideas Are Setting Up a Generation for Failure

by Greg Lukianoff and Jonathan Haidt  · 14 Jun 2018  · 531pp  · 125,069 words

The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class

by Guy Standing  · 27 Feb 2011  · 209pp  · 89,619 words

Reset

by Ronald J. Deibert  · 14 Aug 2020

Empire of AI: Dreams and Nightmares in Sam Altman's OpenAI

by Karen Hao  · 19 May 2025  · 660pp  · 179,531 words

Thinking in Bets

by Annie Duke  · 6 Feb 2018  · 288pp  · 81,253 words

Them And Us: Politics, Greed And Inequality - Why We Need A Fair Society

by Will Hutton  · 30 Sep 2010  · 543pp  · 147,357 words

Willful: How We Choose What We Do

by Richard Robb  · 12 Nov 2019  · 202pp  · 58,823 words

Power, for All: How It Really Works and Why It's Everyone's Business

by Julie Battilana and Tiziana Casciaro  · 30 Aug 2021  · 345pp  · 92,063 words

Universal Basic Income and the Reshaping of Democracy: Towards a Citizens’ Stipend in a New Political Order

by Burkhard Wehner  · 10 Jan 2019

Financing Basic Income: Addressing the Cost Objection

by Richard Pereira  · 5 Jul 2017  · 177pp  · 38,221 words

Cogs and Monsters: What Economics Is, and What It Should Be

by Diane Coyle  · 11 Oct 2021  · 305pp  · 75,697 words

China into Africa: trade, aid, and influence

by Robert I. Rotberg  · 15 Nov 2008  · 651pp  · 135,818 words

How to Fix the Future: Staying Human in the Digital Age

by Andrew Keen  · 1 Mar 2018  · 308pp  · 85,880 words

Zero to One: Notes on Startups, or How to Build the Future

by Peter Thiel and Blake Masters  · 15 Sep 2014  · 185pp  · 43,609 words

Capitalism in America: A History

by Adrian Wooldridge and Alan Greenspan  · 15 Oct 2018  · 585pp  · 151,239 words

WTF?: What's the Future and Why It's Up to Us

by Tim O'Reilly  · 9 Oct 2017  · 561pp  · 157,589 words

Model Thinker: What You Need to Know to Make Data Work for You

by Scott E. Page  · 27 Nov 2018  · 543pp  · 153,550 words

Progress: Ten Reasons to Look Forward to the Future

by Johan Norberg  · 31 Aug 2016  · 262pp  · 66,800 words

Seven Crashes: The Economic Crises That Shaped Globalization

by Harold James  · 15 Jan 2023  · 469pp  · 137,880 words

The Wake-Up Call: Why the Pandemic Has Exposed the Weakness of the West, and How to Fix It

by John Micklethwait and Adrian Wooldridge  · 1 Sep 2020  · 134pp  · 41,085 words

Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution

by Francis Fukuyama  · 1 Jan 2002  · 350pp  · 96,803 words

Global Inequality: A New Approach for the Age of Globalization

by Branko Milanovic  · 10 Apr 2016  · 312pp  · 91,835 words

Political Order and Political Decay: From the Industrial Revolution to the Globalization of Democracy

by Francis Fukuyama  · 29 Sep 2014  · 828pp  · 232,188 words

Battling Eight Giants: Basic Income Now

by Guy Standing  · 19 Mar 2020

I, Warbot: The Dawn of Artificially Intelligent Conflict

by Kenneth Payne  · 16 Jun 2021  · 339pp  · 92,785 words

Limitarianism: The Case Against Extreme Wealth

by Ingrid Robeyns  · 16 Jan 2024  · 327pp  · 110,234 words

The Code Breaker: Jennifer Doudna, Gene Editing, and the Future of the Human Race

by Walter Isaacson  · 9 Mar 2021  · 700pp  · 160,604 words

Dream Hoarders: How the American Upper Middle Class Is Leaving Everyone Else in the Dust, Why That Is a Problem, and What to Do About It

by Richard V. Reeves  · 22 May 2017  · 198pp  · 52,089 words

Information: A Very Short Introduction

by Luciano Floridi  · 25 Feb 2010  · 137pp  · 36,231 words